Guest guest Posted July 20, 2006 Report Share Posted July 20, 2006 Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " <skywords wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " <skywords@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " <skywords@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , OConnor Patricia <gdtige@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- skywhilds <skywords@> a écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , OConnor > > > > > > Patricia <gdtige@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- dan330033 <dan330033@> a écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , OConnor > > > > > > > > Patricia <gdtige@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey Anna -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There isn't any " after enlightenment " -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > except as an idea to make people feel > > > > > > > > special > > > > > > > > > > about themselves. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Dan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > well danny boy, two things: yes, you are > > > > > > > > right > > > > > > > > > > and yes, you are > > > > > > > > > > > wrong. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > so be it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ;-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Right and wrong isn't what this is about > > > > > > Ana. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nor is there any specialness available. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Clearly, dropping self-constructed illusions > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > deceptions isn't > > > > > > > > > > going to be attractive. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There's nothing in it for " me. " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No wonderful feelings, no spiritual > > > > > > experiences, > > > > > > > > no > > > > > > > > > > great insights. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Just releasing, in and of itself. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Dan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if there wasn`t wonder in releasing, would > > > > > > there > > > > > > > > be a > > > > > > > > > let go of Dan??? > > > > > > > > > Or maybe wonder isn`t the right word, but > > > > > > since > > > > > > > > there > > > > > > > > > are no right words.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Patricia > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from my perspective, the release is automatic, > > > > > > > > simply when it is time. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > when " holding " is, literally, impossible. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as long as " holding " seems possible to continue, > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > attempt continues. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I can't release, in order to get a result, like > > > > > > > > wonder, love, or awe. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That is because " I " am what is released, and > > > > > > there > > > > > > > > is nothing in it > > > > > > > > for " me. " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Dan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > good, i like that. > > > > > > > Still, is it taboo to talk about a process > > > > > > involving > > > > > > > time, > > > > > > > about a situation (self-created) that is so > > > > > > unbearable > > > > > > > that one let go? > > > > > > > About a death that has a begining and yet no end? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Patricia > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >I only want to know how you yourself are feeling. > > > > > > Please do not > > > > > > talk to me about no-self, nor about abstract > > > > > > situations. So that I > > > > > > may feel your love and offer mine in return. > > > > > > > > > > > > I am no longer interested in the semantics of being > > > > > > an island. If you > > > > > > suffer, open the door to love in love. If you do > > > > > > not suffer, why > > > > > > list, why anything? > > > > > > > > > > > > Listing, being, is suffering, anyone who denies this > > > > > > is suffering too > > > > > > much to admit it. > > > > > > > > > > > > Love is beautiful suffering in hope of healing > > > > > > transformation though > > > > > > another, is it not? > > > > > > > > > > > > No one is beyond hope, beauty, transformation, the > > > > > > longing for another > > > > > > to love and be loved. > > > > > > > > > > > > ~*~ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Love isn`t someone or for someone. It is. > > > > > Nobody is going to give you what is. > > > > > And you can`t dispense love to another since you don`t > > > > > own it. > > > > > is that too abstract? > > > > > > > > > > Patricia > > > > > > > > > > > > > Don't mean to be too contentious, but, yes. > > > > > > > > Because you wouldn't have posted if you'd not had a need for > > > > recognition (which is love). Nor would you have posted directly > > to my > > > > post, if love were merely autonomous, generic. > > > > > > > > You might protest that " love just happens, no need, just > > burgeoning. " > > > > But I know there's anticipation. And that's all I'm talking > > bout: > > > > > > > > Expectation, appreciation, disappointment, patience, impatience, > > these > > > > are all specific to each person, place, situation. > > > > > > > > What you're saying is as abstract as, " no one need make a > > distinction > > > > between fog and smog, it's all air, anyway. " > > > > > > > > ~*~ > > > > Sky > > > > (not bob in any but an abstract, > > > > " we're all human offering love, " sense) > > > > > > > > > > > > > P.S.: All I'm saying is that love is always more, not less, > > > discriminating. And this makes ALL the difference. > > > > > > Even when it reaches the point of " not caring, " it only does so > > > because it already cares so much more, most thoroughly. It cares > > > beyond caring. Only then can it be said to be absolute (not > > > abstract). I wonder if I'm making any sense. I hope so. > > > > > > ah!.......now I get it........yes you're making perfect sense. > > > > love beyond loving, > > > > .........almost bob(working on absolute bob) ;-)) > > > I Salute You > And I absolutely absolve > You. > > (You didn't know you were an ab salute problem to be > Ab solved, did you? > > Have you been working your abs, lately?) > > Now do you understand? > > approximately > ~*~ > Sky > (not bob) at this point, if bob was a drinking man, he would grab his bottle of Absolut vodka and get approximately as drunk as he could and tell his wife that he was exercising his abs in the most efficient manner conceivable.....no sweat. .......bob ( I think) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.