Guest guest Posted July 21, 2006 Report Share Posted July 21, 2006 --- pliantheart <pliantheart a écrit : > toombaru: > " All questions evaporated in the clarity of > unknowing. " > > I *love* that! > > What a wonderfully ironic phrase: the clarity of > unknowing. > > And its counterpart is: the muddle of knowing > > Questions run on tracks: verbal tracks. > And seeing the fundamental emptiness of the question > is > to somehow get off the limited " space " of the verbal > tracks. > It is like a mini out-of-body experience... but a > mini > out-of-question experience... where the question can > be > seen as just this " stuff " that has no particular > meaning, > and that is seeing the emptiness of it. > > The point is that one has to get out of the limited > " verbal > space " and that is never accomplished by thought, > which > only runs on the " tracks " . > > One way to consider it, perhaps, is that there must > be a > shift from the " meaning " of the question to the > " beingness " > of the question. > > Bill Yes yes yes! it is about being into the heart of immensity, there is no more trying to solve our smallness, One suddenly see how small fits right within immense, Flowing out into immensity, Seeing how immensity and that breathing are one. Then being immensity and smallness all at once. And yet so very distinct. How can we put word to immediacy, completness, How can we make sense with only small at our disposal? Sorry, i know that what i say is so very abstract.. One can only let it happen! Patricia > > > > > > > _________________________ Découvrez un nouveau moyen de poser toutes vos questions quelque soit le sujet ! Questions/Réponses pour partager vos connaissances, vos opinions et vos expériences. http://fr.answers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 21, 2006 Report Share Posted July 21, 2006 Nisargadatta , OConnor Patricia <gdtige wrote: > > > --- pliantheart <pliantheart a écrit : > > > toombaru: > > " All questions evaporated in the clarity of > > unknowing. " > > > > I *love* that! > > > > What a wonderfully ironic phrase: the clarity of > > unknowing. > > > > And its counterpart is: the muddle of knowing > > > > Questions run on tracks: verbal tracks. > > And seeing the fundamental emptiness of the question > > is > > to somehow get off the limited " space " of the verbal > > tracks. > > It is like a mini out-of-body experience... but a > > mini > > out-of-question experience... where the question can > > be > > seen as just this " stuff " that has no particular > > meaning, > > and that is seeing the emptiness of it. > > > > The point is that one has to get out of the limited > > " verbal > > space " and that is never accomplished by thought, > > which > > only runs on the " tracks " . > > > > One way to consider it, perhaps, is that there must > > be a > > shift from the " meaning " of the question to the > > " beingness " > > of the question. > > > > Bill > > Yes yes yes! > > it is about being into the heart of immensity, > there is no more trying to solve our smallness, > One suddenly see how small fits right within immense, > Flowing out into immensity, > Seeing how immensity and that breathing are one. > Then being immensity and smallness all at once. > And yet so very distinct. > > How can we put word to immediacy, completness, > How can we make sense with only small at our disposal? > > Sorry, i know that what i say is so very abstract.. > One can only let it happen! > > Patricia Hey, abstractness happens! Don't let them make you think twice while they chant their rhymes and pick their lice. So much better to just roll the dice and let what said be said. Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 21, 2006 Report Share Posted July 21, 2006 Nisargadatta , OConnor Patricia <gdtige wrote: > > > --- pliantheart <pliantheart a écrit : > > > toombaru: > > " All questions evaporated in the clarity of > > unknowing. " > > > > I *love* that! > > > > What a wonderfully ironic phrase: the clarity of > > unknowing. > > > > And its counterpart is: the muddle of knowing > > > > Questions run on tracks: verbal tracks. > > And seeing the fundamental emptiness of the question > > is > > to somehow get off the limited " space " of the verbal > > tracks. > > It is like a mini out-of-body experience... but a > > mini > > out-of-question experience... where the question can > > be > > seen as just this " stuff " that has no particular > > meaning, > > and that is seeing the emptiness of it. > > > > The point is that one has to get out of the limited > > " verbal > > space " and that is never accomplished by thought, > > which > > only runs on the " tracks " . > > > > One way to consider it, perhaps, is that there must > > be a > > shift from the " meaning " of the question to the > > " beingness " > > of the question. > > > > Bill > > Yes yes yes! > > it is about being into the heart of immensity, > there is no more trying to solve our smallness, > One suddenly see how small fits right within immense, > Flowing out into immensity, > Seeing how immensity and that breathing are one. > Then being immensity and smallness all at once. > And yet so very distinct. > > How can we put word to immediacy, completness, > How can we make sense with only small at our disposal? > > Sorry, i know that what i say is so very abstract.. > One can only let it happen! > > Patricia Small is dimensionality. Immense is dimensionality. Know at once this which has no dimensionality. Of this, nothing has been conveyed. -- Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2006 Report Share Posted July 22, 2006 Nisargadatta , OConnor Patricia <gdtige wrote: > > > --- pliantheart <pliantheart a écrit : > > > toombaru: > > " All questions evaporated in the clarity of > > unknowing. " > > > > I *love* that! > > > > What a wonderfully ironic phrase: the clarity of > > unknowing. > > > > And its counterpart is: the muddle of knowing > > > > Questions run on tracks: verbal tracks. > > And seeing the fundamental emptiness of the question > > is > > to somehow get off the limited " space " of the verbal > > tracks. > > It is like a mini out-of-body experience... but a > > mini > > out-of-question experience... where the question can > > be > > seen as just this " stuff " that has no particular > > meaning, > > and that is seeing the emptiness of it. > > > > The point is that one has to get out of the limited > > " verbal > > space " and that is never accomplished by thought, > > which > > only runs on the " tracks " . > > > > One way to consider it, perhaps, is that there must > > be a > > shift from the " meaning " of the question to the > > " beingness " > > of the question. > > > > Bill > > Yes yes yes! > > it is about being into the heart of immensity, > there is no more trying to solve our smallness, > One suddenly see how small fits right within immense, > Flowing out into immensity, > Seeing how immensity and that breathing are one. > Then being immensity and smallness all at once. > And yet so very distinct. > > How can we put word to immediacy, completness, > How can we make sense with only small at our disposal? > > Sorry, i know that what i say is so very abstract.. > One can only let it happen! > > Patricia > dearest Patricia, I would say " One " IS the happening. ;-0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ___________________ ______ > Découvrez un nouveau moyen de poser toutes vos questions quelque soit le sujet ! > Questions/Réponses pour partager vos connaissances, vos opinions et vos expériences. > http://fr.answers. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.