Guest guest Posted July 22, 2006 Report Share Posted July 22, 2006 --- dan330033 <dan330033 a écrit : > Nisargadatta , OConnor > Patricia <gdtige wrote: > > > > > > --- pliantheart <pliantheart a écrit : > > > > > toombaru: > > > " All questions evaporated in the clarity of > > > unknowing. " > > > > > > I *love* that! > > > > > > What a wonderfully ironic phrase: the clarity of > > > unknowing. > > > > > > And its counterpart is: the muddle of knowing > > > > > > Questions run on tracks: verbal tracks. > > > And seeing the fundamental emptiness of the > question > > > is > > > to somehow get off the limited " space " of the > verbal > > > tracks. > > > It is like a mini out-of-body experience... but > a > > > mini > > > out-of-question experience... where the question > can > > > be > > > seen as just this " stuff " that has no particular > > > meaning, > > > and that is seeing the emptiness of it. > > > > > > The point is that one has to get out of the > limited > > > " verbal > > > space " and that is never accomplished by > thought, > > > which > > > only runs on the " tracks " . > > > > > > One way to consider it, perhaps, is that there > must > > > be a > > > shift from the " meaning " of the question to the > > > " beingness " > > > of the question. > > > > > > Bill > > > > Yes yes yes! > > > > it is about being into the heart of immensity, > > there is no more trying to solve our smallness, > > One suddenly see how small fits right within > immense, > > Flowing out into immensity, > > Seeing how immensity and that breathing are one. > > Then being immensity and smallness all at once. > > And yet so very distinct. > > > > How can we put word to immediacy, completness, > > How can we make sense with only small at our > disposal? > > > > Sorry, i know that what i say is so very > abstract.. > > One can only let it happen! > > > > Patricia > > Small is dimensionality. > > Immense is dimensionality. > > Know at once this which has no dimensionality. > > Of this, nothing has been conveyed. > > -- Dan my words have failed again, How to call non dimensionality if i can`t say immense. I could have said : it is like being immensity: yet it isn`t about being nor about dimension. It is about lack of being and dimension. And small? funny, small is there, but not as in size, more as a witness, a presence, a ..i don`t now what. Very vague, trying to describe something that has been here since early age, always lacking the right word, because i can`t even make sense of it myself. Patricia > > > > > _________________________ Découvrez un nouveau moyen de poser toutes vos questions quelque soit le sujet ! Questions/Réponses pour partager vos connaissances, vos opinions et vos expériences. http://fr.answers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.