Guest guest Posted July 22, 2006 Report Share Posted July 22, 2006 <snip> > > my words have failed again, > How to call non dimensionality if i can`t say immense. > I could have said : it is like being immensity: > yet it isn`t about being nor about dimension. > It is about lack of being and dimension. > And small? funny, small is there, but not as in size, > more as a witness, a presence, a ..i don`t now what. > Very vague, trying to describe something that has been > here since early age, always lacking the right word, > because i can`t even make sense of it myself. > > Patricia that which absolutely defies description absolutely defies description. or... as Wittgenstein said... whereof we cannot speak, thereof we must remain silent. Bill Note: these words came to mind re your text: " the collapse of 'dimensionalizing' itself back back to the very primal " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.