Guest guest Posted July 24, 2006 Report Share Posted July 24, 2006 --- dan330033 <dan330033 a écrit : > Nisargadatta , pliantheart > <pliantheart wrote: > > > do you call *really paying attention* a " process " ? > > I don't > > > > I didn't talk about processes at all. > > I spoke of " recommendations " . > > Neo-Advaita is anti-recommendations, > > and the basis of my criticism. > > > > Bill > > If you are pro-something, there will be the anti to > oppose. > > If you are anti-something, there will be the pro to > oppose. > > Life goes on. > > This moment as is, there is no division into > something to do, > something not to do. > > There is no division into a process to engage, and a > process not to > engage. > > If you are following a recommendation to do > something or not to do > something -- you have already assumed that you exist > as someone who > continues from one moment to another, apart from the > moments that come > and go as experiences. You are attempting to carry > something with you > (the " recommendation " ) and trying to implement the > recommendation so > as to get some desired result which you want (e.g., > " knowing who I > really am, at last!). > > How will you truly know/be as is -- when you are > invested in a > mistaken self-existence as a being apart which can > carry a > recommendation, implement it, and gain a benefit in > some future moment > of assumed self-existence? > > Of course, this kind of inquiry isn't for > " everyone. " It is for " only > one. " > > And that one is now/here. > > If someone offers " you are not this state, you are > not this emotion, > you are not this thought -- observe " are they really > leading into a > process to be carried through? Or are they > not-leading, pointing to > what can't be said in words, to who you are when not > a single thing is > assumed? It is the latter, it seems to me. Where > " you are none of > this " and " you are all of this " meet, unspeakably > so. > > It can't be implemented, because it is one's own > being, this moment. > > How to know the undivided being one is, this > instant? > > Any advice to do or not to do, any program of > teaching, can only be > carried over in another moment, in the future, at > some point that > " you " will supposedly carry it through in. > > How rare, to know/be this moment indivisible, > without involving any > added in processes or teachings, or doings or > nondoings, or someone > who will carry something over to another moment. > > -- Dan exist (ex-is) : the attempt to be. > > > > > _________________________ Découvrez un nouveau moyen de poser toutes vos questions quelque soit le sujet ! Questions/Réponses pour partager vos connaissances, vos opinions et vos expériences. http://fr.answers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.