Guest guest Posted July 28, 2006 Report Share Posted July 28, 2006 Nisargadatta , OConnor Patricia <gdtige wrote: > > Make love, not war. > -Hell, do both > GET MARRIED! > > ......your wordss seem to me to have a kind of exquisite delicacy and a fragile sense of dignity which contrasts dramatically against a kind of reckless abandon........ that delicacy sems beautiful..... that recklessness seems tragi-comic..... would warmth navigate such seemingly boiling/icy waters, unscathed, untouched, pristine, serene pure trusting itself all one ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 28, 2006 Report Share Posted July 28, 2006 Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " <skywords wrote: > > Nisargadatta , OConnor Patricia <gdtige@> wrote: > > > > Make love, not war. > > -Hell, do both > > GET MARRIED! > > > > > .....your wordss seem to me to have a kind of exquisite delicacy and a > fragile sense of dignity which contrasts dramatically against a kind > of reckless abandon........ > > that delicacy sems beautiful..... > that recklessness seems tragi-comic..... > > would warmth navigate such seemingly boiling/icy waters, unscathed, > untouched, pristine, > > serene > > pure > > trusting > > itself > > all > > one > > ? > there is nothing wrong...and there is nothing right...there is mind...but whats so interesting with the mind...really ? ....iietsa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 28, 2006 Report Share Posted July 28, 2006 there is nothing wrong...and there is nothing right...there is mind...but whats so interesting with the mind...really ? ....iietsa >>> what knows there is mind? Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 28, 2006 Report Share Posted July 28, 2006 Nisargadatta , pliantheart <pliantheart wrote: > > there is nothing wrong...and there is nothing right...there is > mind...but whats so interesting with the mind...really ? > ...iietsa > >>> > what knows there is mind? > > Bill > it is not that there is a " what " that knows the mind... all knowledge is mind...and when this is seen totaly... the mind is in the seeing... ....iietsa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 28, 2006 Report Share Posted July 28, 2006 --- iietsa <iietsa wrote: > Nisargadatta , pliantheart <pliantheart > wrote: > > > > there is nothing wrong...and there is nothing right...there is > > mind...but whats so interesting with the mind...really ? > > ...iietsa > > >>> > > what knows there is mind? > > > > Bill > > > it is not that there is a " what " that knows the mind... > all knowledge is mind...and when this is seen totaly... > the mind is in the seeing... > ...iietsa so you are saying that there is seeing and that there is mind; that seeing and mind are distinct. Is that right? you define mind as " all knowledge " , but what about processing, functioning. Is that included in mind by your definition? Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 28, 2006 Report Share Posted July 28, 2006 Nisargadatta , pliantheart <pliantheart wrote: > > > > --- iietsa <iietsa wrote: > > > Nisargadatta , pliantheart <pliantheart@> > > wrote: > > > > > > there is nothing wrong...and there is nothing right...there is > > > mind...but whats so interesting with the mind...really ? > > > ...iietsa > > > >>> > > > what knows there is mind? > > > > > > Bill > > > > > it is not that there is a " what " that knows the mind... > > all knowledge is mind...and when this is seen totaly... > > the mind is in the seeing... > > ...iietsa > > so you are saying that there is seeing and that there > is mind; that seeing and mind are distinct. Is that right? > > you define mind as " all knowledge " , but what about > processing, functioning. Is that included in mind > by your definition? > > Bill > distinctions are in the mind made by the mind... the seeing is the natural constant timeless openness... it is not a thing...so it can not be something distinct... what exactly is processing, functioning ? ....iietsa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 28, 2006 Report Share Posted July 28, 2006 Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa wrote: > > Nisargadatta , pliantheart <pliantheart@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- iietsa <iietsa@> wrote: > > > > > Nisargadatta , pliantheart <pliantheart@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > there is nothing wrong...and there is nothing right...there is > > > > mind...but whats so interesting with the mind...really ? > > > > ...iietsa > > > > >>> > > > > what knows there is mind? > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > it is not that there is a " what " that knows the mind... > > > all knowledge is mind...and when this is seen totaly... > > > the mind is in the seeing... > > > ...iietsa > > > > so you are saying that there is seeing and that there > > is mind; that seeing and mind are distinct. Is that right? > > > > you define mind as " all knowledge " , but what about > > processing, functioning. Is that included in mind > > by your definition? > > > > Bill > > > distinctions are in the mind made by the mind... > the seeing is the natural constant timeless openness... > it is not a thing...so it can not be something distinct... > what exactly is processing, functioning ? > ...iietsa > an example of processing could be worrying, with relentless thought streams of frightful scenarios and a looking for a " way out " ... Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 28, 2006 Report Share Posted July 28, 2006 Nisargadatta , " pliantheart " <pliantheart wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , pliantheart <pliantheart@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- iietsa <iietsa@> wrote: > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , pliantheart <pliantheart@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > there is nothing wrong...and there is nothing right...there is > > > > > mind...but whats so interesting with the mind...really ? > > > > > ...iietsa > > > > > >>> > > > > > what knows there is mind? > > > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > > > it is not that there is a " what " that knows the mind... > > > > all knowledge is mind...and when this is seen totaly... > > > > the mind is in the seeing... > > > > ...iietsa > > > > > > so you are saying that there is seeing and that there > > > is mind; that seeing and mind are distinct. Is that right? > > > > > > you define mind as " all knowledge " , but what about > > > processing, functioning. Is that included in mind > > > by your definition? > > > > > > Bill > > > > > distinctions are in the mind made by the mind... > > the seeing is the natural constant timeless openness... > > it is not a thing...so it can not be something distinct... > > what exactly is processing, functioning ? > > ...iietsa > > > > an example of processing could be worrying, with > relentless thought streams of frightful scenarios > and a looking for a " way out " ... > > > Bill > war: making: minding: trying: processing love: not doing anything: not making anything: peace ~*~ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 28, 2006 Report Share Posted July 28, 2006 Nisargadatta , " pliantheart " <pliantheart wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , pliantheart <pliantheart@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- iietsa <iietsa@> wrote: > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , pliantheart <pliantheart@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > there is nothing wrong...and there is nothing right...there is > > > > > mind...but whats so interesting with the mind...really ? > > > > > ...iietsa > > > > > >>> > > > > > what knows there is mind? > > > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > > > it is not that there is a " what " that knows the mind... > > > > all knowledge is mind...and when this is seen totaly... > > > > the mind is in the seeing... > > > > ...iietsa > > > > > > so you are saying that there is seeing and that there > > > is mind; that seeing and mind are distinct. Is that right? > > > > > > you define mind as " all knowledge " , but what about > > > processing, functioning. Is that included in mind > > > by your definition? > > > > > > Bill > > > > > distinctions are in the mind made by the mind... > > the seeing is the natural constant timeless openness... > > it is not a thing...so it can not be something distinct... > > what exactly is processing, functioning ? > > ...iietsa > > > > an example of processing could be worrying, with > relentless thought streams of frightful scenarios > and a looking for a " way out " ... > > > Bill > looking for a way out...is taking yourself to be what you are not... if worrying is the processing...just let it be in openness... without doing something about it... the one who wants to get out of worrying is not you... ....just let it be in openness... ....iietsa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.