Guest guest Posted July 30, 2006 Report Share Posted July 30, 2006 ....the unreachable is unreachable... ....all efforts to reach that is only because one is blind... ....and one is blind as long as one is trying to reach for that... ....now there is a thousand ways to go around telling that there is no such a thing as blindness...and this is part of the blindness... ....and there is a thousand ways to go around telling that there is such a thing as blindness...and this is part of the blindness... (as above) when this is seen...all efforts come to an end...without anybody doing anything...the circus might still be there...but you are no longer involved with the tears of the clown... ....iietsa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2006 Report Share Posted July 30, 2006 hi there, Fine, it makes sense everything you said, still, why ending your clarification at " what is not " = the clown's tears? Why not going a bit further where usually words can't reach unless you activate that particular consciousness effortlessly? I would love to hear more of that….many greeting, Tomas. Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa wrote: > > ...the unreachable is unreachable... > > ...all efforts to reach that is only because one is blind... > ...and one is blind as long as one is trying to reach for that... > > ...now there is a thousand ways to go around telling that there is no > such a thing as blindness...and this is part of the blindness... > ...and there is a thousand ways to go around telling that there is > such a thing as blindness...and this is part of the blindness... > (as above) > when this is seen...all efforts come to an end...without anybody doing > anything...the circus might still be there...but you are no longer > involved with the tears of the clown... > ...iietsa > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2006 Report Share Posted July 30, 2006 Nisargadatta , tomás <ossomorelli wrote: > > hi there, > Fine, it makes sense everything you said, still, why ending your > clarification at " what is not " = the clown's tears? Why not going a > bit further where usually words can't reach unless you activate that > particular consciousness effortlessly? I would love to hear more of > that….many greeting, Tomas. hey tomas... what would you like to hear more of ??? ....iietsa > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@> wrote: > > > > ...the unreachable is unreachable... > > > > ...all efforts to reach that is only because one is blind... > > ...and one is blind as long as one is trying to reach for that... > > > > ...now there is a thousand ways to go around telling that there is > no > > such a thing as blindness...and this is part of the blindness... > > ...and there is a thousand ways to go around telling that there is > > such a thing as blindness...and this is part of the blindness... > > (as above) > > when this is seen...all efforts come to an end...without anybody > doing > > anything...the circus might still be there...but you are no longer > > involved with the tears of the clown... > > ...iietsa > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.