BEING THE MIRROR ? was Dakshinamurthy Stotra & Buddhist view from ramana

[Guest guest]

In the same way, when we " are the mirror " we have the quality to

reflect infinite objects. When we have infinite potentiality,

we conceive every object as a reflection of our real nature.

>>>>>>>>>>

 

My view on this...

 

to behold an object is to behold falsely.

 

to behold truly is to behold infinite

objectlessness...

 

in infinite objectlessness all sparkles pristine.

 

such is the endingness of division, separation,

specification.

 

such is the end of this-that.

 

such is the end of anything-here.

 

Bill

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " pliantheart " <pliantheart

wrote:

>

>

> In the same way, when we " are the mirror " we have the quality to

> reflect infinite objects. When we have infinite potentiality,

> we conceive every object as a reflection of our real nature.

> >>>>>>>>>>

>

> My view on this...

>

> to behold an object is to behold falsely.

>

> to behold truly is to behold infinite

> objectlessness...

>

> in infinite objectlessness all sparkles pristine.

>

> such is the endingness of division, separation,

> specification.

>

> such is the end of this-that.

>

> such is the end of anything-here.

>

> Bill

>

 

 

and how, then, would you answer Toombaru's question?

 

 

....

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " <skywords wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " pliantheart " <pliantheart@>

> wrote:

> >

> >

> > In the same way, when we " are the mirror " we have the quality to

> > reflect infinite objects. When we have infinite potentiality,

> > we conceive every object as a reflection of our real nature.

> > >>>>>>>>>>

> >

> > My view on this...

> >

> > to behold an object is to behold falsely.

> >

> > to behold truly is to behold infinite

> > objectlessness...

> >

> > in infinite objectlessness all sparkles pristine.

> >

> > such is the endingness of division, separation,

> > specification.

> >

> > such is the end of this-that.

> >

> > such is the end of anything-here.

> >

> > Bill

> >

>

>

> and how, then, would you answer Toombaru's question?

>

>

> ...

>

 

did toombaru ask a question?

 

and how can there be any questions in

infinite objectlessness?

 

Ans. Only by making them rhetorical!

 

Bill

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " <skywords

wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " pliantheart " <pliantheart@>

> wrote:

> >

> >

> > In the same way, when we " are the mirror " we have the quality to

> > reflect infinite objects. When we have infinite potentiality,

> > we conceive every object as a reflection of our real nature.

> > >>>>>>>>>>

> >

> > My view on this...

> >

> > to behold an object is to behold falsely.

> >

> > to behold truly is to behold infinite

> > objectlessness...

> >

> > in infinite objectlessness all sparkles pristine.

> >

> > such is the endingness of division, separation,

> > specification.

> >

> > such is the end of this-that.

> >

> > such is the end of anything-here.

> >

> > Bill

> >

>

>

> and how, then, would you answer Toombaru's question?

>

>

> ...

>

 

what question? ;-) there never was any question, only the

questioner.