Era.

[Guest guest]

[...]

 

>>> > ac is also a member of; is:

> > <gururatings>

> > >

> > > Join Sky, see Arvinds' photo maybe he is your' soulmate.. who

kows ¿

> > >

> > > Era

 

 

>> weren't you suggesting that my

>> interest in AC was more than just what

>> I said it was? Weren't you being

>> intrusive and taunting?

 

 

Dear Sky:

 

If you don't already know Era then, my

advice to you is to stay totally away

from her.

 

Archives of every list that I have

seen her participate contain ample

proof of the disruption, disharmony and

barrage of negativity and insults that she has

brought wherever she went. Those lists

include GR, which she quoted and this

very list on which she has posted.

 

I have seen her arrival on a list

followed immediately by the start of personal

fights and abundance of posts dealing

in personal abuses, insults, attacks and defenses.

 

I have seen 'average' standard of list getting greatly

lowered because of personal attacks,

fights, insults and jibes that she has

started, helped start or that she helped encourage.

 

I have seen her being banned from many

lists by many moderators because of her

disrupting tendencies and because of

the general 'lowering' of quality that

she has brought to the group. Lists

that have banned her have included NDS

and GR, the list she was talking about.

 

 

The very same member that Era so fondly quoted

in her effort to prove how bad ac is

[and possibly to start a *battle of insults*

involving many people... including those

who do not even post on this list];

has criticized her very heavily on many*

occasions!

 

Reading the material at the

end of this mail might tell you what that

very same member [whom Era found

'worthy to quote'] thinks many battles

started by Era does to a list.

 

 

As far as I remember, I have seen her

engage in only following activities on

lists:

 

- Insulting somebody.

- Bitching about somebody.

- Attacking somebody.

- Bringing fights from one list to

another.

 

 

- Defending herself when someone

questions her about her consciousness

lowering tendencies.

- Attacking the person who questions

her tactics.

 

 

and,

 

- Praising someone especially when she

thinks it can help her start a fight.

 

 

- Apologizing for what she has done.

- Quoting some text from some site.

 

 

- Continuing the same behavior again.

 

She apologized to me no less than 4

times both publicly and in private

conversations for her behavior that

even she thought was wrong - yet, she

continued behaving the same way again.

After seeing this few times; I decided

to just ignore her.

 

I saw that dealing with her was

starting a battle of 'who can get

lower', who can shout more insanities, who

can make false accusations, crude

remarks, slurs and who can insult whom

more. I saw that it was good for

neither me nor the list.

 

I decided she was the problem that

moderators like Hur, Pete, Jerry, Eric,

Sarlo had to deal with and many of them

actually have many times

warned/banned/restricted her for the

hugely negative effect that she brings

to the lists.

 

I don't know what her real problem is

but, my guess is hat perhaps she is

deeply addicted to personal fights,

insults, discord and general

negativity. , in it was best not to

engage myself wit her.

 

Since her latest arrival I have seen

her make several remarks to me but, I

have ignored them so far.

 

I am little surprised to see that she

has brought some potentially

inflammatory texts from another list,

in yet another attempt to start fights

and 'battle of insults' in which she

has many times reveled in and for which

she has been warned by many members

many times and for which she has been

warned and banned my many moderators as

well. Frankly I think this is a

tendency that is highly negative any

" spiritual " list and it is something

that should be strongly discouraged.

 

I can easily understand If Hur was to

warn her or ban her for effort to start

an unnecessary personal fight and for

making crude remarks against you

without proper reason.

 

For you, my advice will be to stay

away from her!

 

It is headache of Hur and other

moderators like him to control and

manage or ban a member with long

history of causing list disruptions,

personal insults and attacks. For

members like you and me - it might be

best to resist her efforts to get

others into mud-wresting with her!

 

 

 

 

With warm regards,

ac.

 

 

 

 

----------

 

*

 

GuruRatings/message/87300

 

....

 

 

In the matter of the 'fragile egos' of

'era' and 'devi', wherein those parties

incompetently spar for dominance in this

venue, thereby lowering themselves

incrementally below each-other, ad-infinitum,

thereby 'wasting space' on this list, while

each inadvertently proves the points of the

other;

 

let it be known, that those 'fragile egos'

do reach out for 'support' from other

readers, thereby eliciting involvement in

the inevitable downward spiral of self-

evaluation; and that such involvement, as

shown by the example of 'Flemming', above,

becomes merely an extension of the

aforementioned 'contest', thus 'wasting'

more space, until such time as the inevitable

'reductio ad absurdium' in which every posting

is merely an echo of the absurd 'contest of

losers', as per the intractable ego-conflict

of 'era' vs 'devi'.

 

- Entertainment value: zero

 

- Redeeming social value: Zero

 

- Bandwidth Wastage: 100%

 

- Redundancy Factor: 100%

 

- Viable chances for solution: Zero

 

- Ridiculosity: 100%

 

- Placement on Dumb-Ass scale of 1-10: 10

 

- Status of 'era' or 'devi' as group mascots: Zero

 

- Rating of 'Postings most likely to induce hurling': 100%

 

- Likelyhood of evoking ghost of Kavorkian: 100%

 

- Best examples of sleep-posting: Yes

 

- Chronicity of ancient Indo-European ethnic conflict: Maximum

 

- Medical category: Essence of Migrain

 

 

==GP==