Guest guest Posted August 19, 2006 Report Share Posted August 19, 2006 Sk: is that what you yourself do? > > > P: I notice you're more interesting in me > than in the subject. That is a sign you haven't > examined the verbal scaffolding properly, > but to satisfy your idle curiosity, yes I did, > and do. Sky: Pete, are you aware that you just responded to my attack with your own attack? Thus, I don't believe you've really done the following: " If instead of wasting energy in attacking the > > > attacker, they will look at the verbal scaffolding > > > producing the hurt " P: If you consider an attack pointing out to you that you are only interested in discussing me and not the verbal structure which makes you see attacks everywhere, then there is no point in talking to you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 19, 2006 Report Share Posted August 19, 2006 Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie5 wrote: > > Sk: is that what you yourself do? > > > > > P: I notice you're more interesting in me > > than in the subject. That is a sign you haven't > > examined the verbal scaffolding properly, > > but to satisfy your idle curiosity, yes I did, > > and do. > > > Sky: > > Pete, are you aware that you just responded to my attack with your own > attack? Thus, I don't believe you've really done the following: > > " If instead of wasting energy in attacking the > > > > attacker, they will look at the verbal scaffolding > > > > producing the hurt " > > P: If you consider an attack pointing out to you that you > are only interested in discussing me and not the verbal > structure which makes you see attacks everywhere, then > there is no point in talking to you. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 19, 2006 Report Share Posted August 19, 2006 Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa wrote: > > Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie5@> wrote: > > > > Sk: is that what you yourself do? > > > > > > > P: I notice you're more interesting in me > > > than in the subject. That is a sign you haven't > > > examined the verbal scaffolding properly, > > > but to satisfy your idle curiosity, yes I did, > > > and do. > > > > > > Sky: > > > > Pete, are you aware that you just responded to my attack with > your own > > attack? Thus, I don't believe you've really done the following: > > > > " If instead of wasting energy in attacking the > > > > > attacker, they will look at the verbal scaffolding > > > > > producing the hurt " > > > > P: If you consider an attack pointing out to you that you > > are only interested in discussing me and not the verbal > > structure which makes you see attacks everywhere, then > > there is no point in talking to you. > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.