Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Mirage

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Stephan: I do not know what the absolute is. Really, I am simply

speaking

from the standpoint of what I experience. It is happening as it

happens. There is no way that I can direct this stream. It includes

everything without exception. Others, dreams, emotions, sensations...

It is the only reality that I have. Also division into parts is

happening, classification, judgment. But those as well are coming and

going. Some last longer, others pass by quickly. No need to carve it

into stones. Now I am the slave of my hunger. Now I am the listener of

a birds song. Air is inhaled. It is all memory. It is simple, ordinary

and normal... it feels a little silly to write about it.

 

 

 

Anna: I would say this Pete, here on the internet, as we type in the

words

that convey our feeling-thoughts, we can touch one another in

countless ways in the way the immediacy of light-waves move at the

speed of our fingers that reach the ears who hear and eyes to see

that which is beyond the moving hand that writes words on a the wall

(screen).

 

The only thing we can't do is to feel the flesh, the first

separation between 'you' and 'I'.

 

P: Notice how Stephan accepts sensations without

mirage creation, while Anna loves mirage building.

The sensation produced by words is not enough

for her, those sensations must come from other

interacting personal mirages that she builds from

the sensations which words on the screen cause in her.

She projects those sensations as " the other she knows. "

As long as she loves her fantasy world, she will be its

willing victim, prisoner and martyr. ;)

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie5 wrote:

>

>

>

>

> Stephan: I do not know what the absolute is. Really, I am simply

> speaking

> from the standpoint of what I experience. It is happening as it

> happens. There is no way that I can direct this stream. It

includes

> everything without exception. Others, dreams, emotions,

sensations...

> It is the only reality that I have. Also division into parts is

> happening, classification, judgment. But those as well are

coming and

> going. Some last longer, others pass by quickly. No need to

carve it

> into stones. Now I am the slave of my hunger. Now I am the

listener of

> a birds song. Air is inhaled. It is all memory. It is simple,

ordinary

> and normal... it feels a little silly to write about it.

>

>

>

> Anna: I would say this Pete, here on the internet, as we type in

the

> words

> that convey our feeling-thoughts, we can touch one another in

> countless ways in the way the immediacy of light-waves move at

the

> speed of our fingers that reach the ears who hear and eyes to see

> that which is beyond the moving hand that writes words on a the

wall

> (screen).

>

> The only thing we can't do is to feel the flesh, the first

> separation between 'you' and 'I'.

>

> P: Notice how Stephan accepts sensations without

> mirage creation, while Anna loves mirage building.

> The sensation produced by words is not enough

> for her, those sensations must come from other

> interacting personal mirages that she builds from

> the sensations which words on the screen cause in her.

> She projects those sensations as " the other she knows. "

> As long as she loves her fantasy world, she will be its

> willing victim, prisoner and martyr. ;)

 

 

 

Anna in Rod Serling voice:

 

Here we have a man of undetermined years, quite possibly a professor

of some otherwordly renown ;-0 about to step out into

another dimension of life calling itself anna and Stephan. Stay

tuned and watch and listen as Pete opens one door after another

alternating and projectiing into the realities and dillusions of his

own mind...

 

:-)

 

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , " anabebe57 " <kailashana wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie5@> wrote:

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Stephan: I do not know what the absolute is. Really, I am simply

> > speaking

> > from the standpoint of what I experience. It is happening as it

> > happens. There is no way that I can direct this stream. It

> includes

> > everything without exception. Others, dreams, emotions,

> sensations...

> > It is the only reality that I have. Also division into parts is

> > happening, classification, judgment. But those as well are

> coming and

> > going. Some last longer, others pass by quickly. No need to

> carve it

> > into stones. Now I am the slave of my hunger. Now I am the

> listener of

> > a birds song. Air is inhaled. It is all memory. It is simple,

> ordinary

> > and normal... it feels a little silly to write about it.

> >

> >

> >

> > Anna: I would say this Pete, here on the internet, as we type in

> the

> > words

> > that convey our feeling-thoughts, we can touch one another in

> > countless ways in the way the immediacy of light-waves move at

> the

> > speed of our fingers that reach the ears who hear and eyes to see

> > that which is beyond the moving hand that writes words on a the

> wall

> > (screen).

> >

> > The only thing we can't do is to feel the flesh, the first

> > separation between 'you' and 'I'.

> >

> > P: Notice how Stephan accepts sensations without

> > mirage creation, while Anna loves mirage building.

> > The sensation produced by words is not enough

> > for her, those sensations must come from other

> > interacting personal mirages that she builds from

> > the sensations which words on the screen cause in her.

> > She projects those sensations as " the other she knows. "

> > As long as she loves her fantasy world, she will be its

> > willing victim, prisoner and martyr. ;)

>

>

>

> Anna in Rod Serling voice:

>

> Here we have a man of undetermined years, quite possibly a professor

> of some otherwordly renown ;-0 about to step out into

> another dimension of life calling itself anna and Stephan. Stay

> tuned and watch and listen as Pete opens one door after another

> alternating and projectiing into the realities and dillusions of his

> own mind...

>

> :-)

>

 

 

 

 

Anna,

 

I speak to you with something rare, sincerity. Wouldn't it be better

to refrain from repopulating, repopularizing, repatriating this site,

with yet another pissing contest? Yes, you and Pete could go on

forever with it, I'm sure. I'd prefer for you to stick to your ...

 

Oh, never mind. What's the use? You don't seem to like sincere and

transparent dialog, either. Still, on this particular issue, between

you and Pete, we do drink from the same well, you and I.

 

It's too bad you don't seem to like to be frank without some delicious

little irony to spice things up. Problem with that is that you

sacrifice a level of clarity. There can be passionate dispassion,

candor without grandeur, intimacy without imposition, or can't there?

 

Can you respond without rhetoric, directly? Few here can, so I won't

blame you.

 

sky

~*~

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " <skywords

wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " anabebe57 " <kailashana@>

wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie5@> wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Stephan: I do not know what the absolute is. Really, I am

simply

> > > speaking

> > > from the standpoint of what I experience. It is happening as

it

> > > happens. There is no way that I can direct this stream. It

> > includes

> > > everything without exception. Others, dreams, emotions,

> > sensations...

> > > It is the only reality that I have. Also division into parts

is

> > > happening, classification, judgment. But those as well are

> > coming and

> > > going. Some last longer, others pass by quickly. No need to

> > carve it

> > > into stones. Now I am the slave of my hunger. Now I am the

> > listener of

> > > a birds song. Air is inhaled. It is all memory. It is

simple,

> > ordinary

> > > and normal... it feels a little silly to write about it.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Anna: I would say this Pete, here on the internet, as we type

in

> > the

> > > words

> > > that convey our feeling-thoughts, we can touch one another in

> > > countless ways in the way the immediacy of light-waves move

at

> > the

> > > speed of our fingers that reach the ears who hear and eyes

to see

> > > that which is beyond the moving hand that writes words on a

the

> > wall

> > > (screen).

> > >

> > > The only thing we can't do is to feel the flesh, the first

> > > separation between 'you' and 'I'.

> > >

> > > P: Notice how Stephan accepts sensations without

> > > mirage creation, while Anna loves mirage building.

> > > The sensation produced by words is not enough

> > > for her, those sensations must come from other

> > > interacting personal mirages that she builds from

> > > the sensations which words on the screen cause in her.

> > > She projects those sensations as " the other she knows. "

> > > As long as she loves her fantasy world, she will be its

> > > willing victim, prisoner and martyr. ;)

> >

> >

> >

> > Anna in Rod Serling voice:

> >

> > Here we have a man of undetermined years, quite possibly a

professor

> > of some otherwordly renown ;-0 about to step out into

> > another dimension of life calling itself anna and Stephan. Stay

> > tuned and watch and listen as Pete opens one door after another

> > alternating and projectiing into the realities and dillusions of

his

> > own mind...

> >

> > :-)

> >

>

>

>

>

> Anna,

>

> I speak to you with something rare, sincerity. Wouldn't it be

better

> to refrain from repopulating, repopularizing, repatriating this

site,

> with yet another pissing contest? Yes, you and Pete could go on

> forever with it, I'm sure. I'd prefer for you to stick to your ...

>

> Oh, never mind. What's the use? You don't seem to like sincere

and

> transparent dialog, either. Still, on this particular issue,

between

> you and Pete, we do drink from the same well, you and I.

>

> It's too bad you don't seem to like to be frank without some

delicious

> little irony to spice things up. Problem with that is that you

> sacrifice a level of clarity. There can be passionate dispassion,

> candor without grandeur, intimacy without imposition, or can't

there?

>

> Can you respond without rhetoric, directly? Few here can, so I

won't

> blame you.

>

> sky

> ~*~

>

 

 

Hmmm. How ironic, are you 'getting' it?

 

 

Yours,

Anna

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , " anabebe57 " <kailashana wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " <skywords@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " anabebe57 " <kailashana@>

> wrote:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie5@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Stephan: I do not know what the absolute is. Really, I am

> simply

> > > > speaking

> > > > from the standpoint of what I experience. It is happening as

> it

> > > > happens. There is no way that I can direct this stream. It

> > > includes

> > > > everything without exception. Others, dreams, emotions,

> > > sensations...

> > > > It is the only reality that I have. Also division into parts

> is

> > > > happening, classification, judgment. But those as well are

> > > coming and

> > > > going. Some last longer, others pass by quickly. No need to

> > > carve it

> > > > into stones. Now I am the slave of my hunger. Now I am the

> > > listener of

> > > > a birds song. Air is inhaled. It is all memory. It is

> simple,

> > > ordinary

> > > > and normal... it feels a little silly to write about it.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Anna: I would say this Pete, here on the internet, as we type

> in

> > > the

> > > > words

> > > > that convey our feeling-thoughts, we can touch one another in

> > > > countless ways in the way the immediacy of light-waves move

> at

> > > the

> > > > speed of our fingers that reach the ears who hear and eyes

> to see

> > > > that which is beyond the moving hand that writes words on a

> the

> > > wall

> > > > (screen).

> > > >

> > > > The only thing we can't do is to feel the flesh, the first

> > > > separation between 'you' and 'I'.

> > > >

> > > > P: Notice how Stephan accepts sensations without

> > > > mirage creation, while Anna loves mirage building.

> > > > The sensation produced by words is not enough

> > > > for her, those sensations must come from other

> > > > interacting personal mirages that she builds from

> > > > the sensations which words on the screen cause in her.

> > > > She projects those sensations as " the other she knows. "

> > > > As long as she loves her fantasy world, she will be its

> > > > willing victim, prisoner and martyr. ;)

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Anna in Rod Serling voice:

> > >

> > > Here we have a man of undetermined years, quite possibly a

> professor

> > > of some otherwordly renown ;-0 about to step out into

> > > another dimension of life calling itself anna and Stephan. Stay

> > > tuned and watch and listen as Pete opens one door after another

> > > alternating and projectiing into the realities and dillusions of

> his

> > > own mind...

> > >

> > > :-)

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Anna,

> >

> > I speak to you with something rare, sincerity. Wouldn't it be

> better

> > to refrain from repopulating, repopularizing, repatriating this

> site,

> > with yet another pissing contest? Yes, you and Pete could go on

> > forever with it, I'm sure. I'd prefer for you to stick to your ...

> >

> > Oh, never mind. What's the use? You don't seem to like sincere

> and

> > transparent dialog, either. Still, on this particular issue,

> between

> > you and Pete, we do drink from the same well, you and I.

> >

> > It's too bad you don't seem to like to be frank without some

> delicious

> > little irony to spice things up. Problem with that is that you

> > sacrifice a level of clarity. There can be passionate dispassion,

> > candor without grandeur, intimacy without imposition, or can't

> there?

> >

> > Can you respond without rhetoric, directly? Few here can, so I

> won't

> > blame you.

> >

> > sky

> > ~*~

> >

>

>

> Hmmm. How ironic, are you 'getting' it?

>

>

> Yours,

> Anna

>

 

 

No. Sometimes I take a break. I prefer to abstain from having to

ceaselessly prove how clever I am. Isn't this equally 'ironic,' are

you getting it?

 

Forget it.

 

 

 

....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...