Guest guest Posted September 16, 2006 Report Share Posted September 16, 2006 reading I Am That, I see that the bulk of Nisargadatta's advice is to dwell in/ponder/stay with the " i am " thought, but he also says to ask the question " who am i? " I suspect they both mean the same thing. Just be aware of being aware and wondering how. is that a correct interpretation? am I also correct in thinking there's essentially no difference between Nisargadtta's " i am " and Ramana Maharishi's " who am i? " thanks alex Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 16, 2006 Report Share Posted September 16, 2006 reading I Am That, I see that the bulk of Nisargadatta' s advice is to dwell in/ponder/stay with the " i am " thought, but he also says to ask the question " who am i? " I suspect they both mean the same thing. Just be aware of being aware and wondering how. is that a correct interpretation? am I also correct in thinking there's essentially no difference between Nisargadtta' s " i am " and Ramana Maharishi's " who am i? " thanks alex Correct Alex, there is no difference between Nisargadtta' s " i am " and Ramana Maharishi's " who am i " . Lulu Stay in the know. Pulse on the new .com. Check it out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 17, 2006 Report Share Posted September 17, 2006 Nisargadatta , Lulu Dong <lulu.dong wrote: > > reading I Am That, I see that the bulk of Nisargadatta' s advice is to > dwell in/ponder/stay with the " i am " thought, but he also says to ask > the question " who am i? " > > I suspect they both mean the same thing. Just be aware of being aware > and wondering how. is that a correct interpretation? > > am I also correct in thinking there's essentially no difference > between Nisargadtta' s " i am " and Ramana Maharishi's " who am i? " > > thanks > alex > > > Correct Alex, there is no difference between Nisargadtta' s " i am " and Ramana Maharishi's " who am i " . > > Lulu LOL. " I Am " meets " Who Am I? " . Nonduality!!!!! Love, Anna > > > > > > Stay in the know. Pulse on the new .com. Check it out. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 19, 2006 Report Share Posted September 19, 2006 Nisargadatta , " alexknowles090 " <alexknowles090 wrote: > > reading I Am That, I see that the bulk of Nisargadatta's advice is to > dwell in/ponder/stay with the " i am " thought, but he also says to ask > the question " who am i? " > > I suspect they both mean the same thing. Just be aware of being aware > and wondering how. is that a correct interpretation? > > am I also correct in thinking there's essentially no difference > between Nisargadtta's " i am " and Ramana Maharishi's " who am i? " > > thanks > alex > Ultimately..........any prescription given to the illusory self as a solution to its conceptual dilemma........ is medicine for a disease that does not exist. Both Ramana and Nisargadatta were very aware if this. It is suggested that in the attempt to find itself......the only result can be the finding of nothing (simply because the self does not exist)......and as this apperception dawns.........a new quiesence opens.......the back of dream is broken.......and everything old is new again. toombaru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.