Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Consciousness is pain.

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

On Sep 25, 2006, at 6:26 PM, Nisargadatta wrote:

 

> Maharaj: Very good. In the later stages this consciousness is

> > itself the pain.

 

P: Buddha said that craving for existence was suffering,

and craving for nonexistence is also suffering. Maharaj,

above, is going even further, and saying: consciousness

itself is suffering. To accept suffering seems the only way

out... until death do us part.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie5 wrote:

>

>

> On Sep 25, 2006, at 6:26 PM, Nisargadatta wrote:

>

> > Maharaj: Very good. In the later stages this consciousness is

> > > itself the pain.

>

> P: Buddha said that craving for existence was suffering,

> and craving for nonexistence is also suffering. Maharaj,

> above, is going even further, and saying: consciousness

> itself is suffering. To accept suffering seems the only way

> out... until death do us part.

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie5@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > On Sep 25, 2006, at 6:26 PM, Nisargadatta wrote:

> >

> > > Maharaj: Very good. In the later stages this consciousness is

> > > > itself the pain.

> >

> > P: Buddha said that craving for existence was suffering,

> > and craving for nonexistence is also suffering. Maharaj,

> > above, is going even further, and saying: consciousness

> > itself is suffering. To accept suffering seems the only way

> > out... until death do us part.

> >

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain

wrote:

>

>

> > >

> >

> > who understands?

> >

> > (no one)

> >

> > dc

> >

That.........is the understanding.

>

>

>

> toombaru

 

 

no one, ever, understood anything.......in awareness (understanding)

of That

 

(....to follow little the imaginary words about....understanding of

Nothing for real)

 

:)

 

Marc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunatelly, it seems to me, that Vedantic mentality, is only a

mentality... feeding on concepts with their endless permutations and

possibilities for exotically impressive ping-pong games, for the

competing philosophical minds.

 

The _austere_ 'spirit' of a Niz or certainly a J. Krishnamurti -

though it might look like it might disturb one's mine-games and fun

(which it certainly pulverizes), if felt/heard with deep

honesty/interest, might awaken the seeing of the necessity of

'throwing away' that entertainment strategy, and stick to real

inquiry...

Good idea, no?

 

Regards,

Jb

 

 

Nisargadatta , " dannyc_1eyeluv "

<dannyc_1eyeluv wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@>

wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie5@> wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > > On Sep 25, 2006, at 6:26 PM, Nisargadatta wrote:

> > >

> > > > Maharaj: Very good. In the later stages this consciousness is

> > > > > itself the pain.

> > >

> > > P: Buddha said that craving for existence was suffering,

> > > and craving for nonexistence is also suffering. Maharaj,

> > > above, is going even further, and saying: consciousness

> > > itself is suffering. To accept suffering seems the only way

> > > out... until death do us part.

> > >

> > >

> > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain

wrote:

>

>

> > >

> >

> > who understands?

> >

> > (no one)

> >

> > dc

> >

That.........is the understanding.

>

>

>

> toombaru

 

 

Aaaah!... MORE

profound

zen koans. :o)

Jb

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 "

<dennis_travis33 wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@>

> wrote:

> >

> >

> > > >

> > >

> > > who understands?

> > >

> > > (no one)

> > >

> > > dc

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > That.........is the understanding.

> >

> >

> >

> > toombaru

>

>

> no one, ever, understood anything.......in awareness

(understanding)

> of That

>

> (....to follow little the imaginary words about....understanding of

> Nothing for real)

>

> :)

>

> Marc

 

But Marc, How have you come to

understand that? I would like to understand.

 

You know... a dialog-inquiry is between friends who travel together

and loook, look... and point to what they see... they do not indulge

in cute conceptual and non-sensical cryptic exchanges...

like stating " no one ever understood! " with the authority of one who

truly understands.

 

Would you not say, that the melody played thru some of these messages

here, could psossibly originate from a record, scratched and defect,

and that being jolted into switching to the CD version, might be - in

the name of good communication - a worth while momentary discomfort?

Jb

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , " new7892001 " <JB789 wrote:

>

> Unfortunatelly, it seems to me, that Vedantic mentality, is only a

> mentality... feeding on concepts with their endless permutations and

> possibilities for exotically impressive ping-pong games, for the

> competing philosophical minds.

>

> The _austere_ 'spirit' of a Niz or certainly a J. Krishnamurti -

> though it might look like it might disturb one's mine-games and fun

> (which it certainly pulverizes), if felt/heard with deep

> honesty/interest, might awaken the seeing of the necessity of

> 'throwing away' that entertainment strategy, and stick to real

> inquiry...

> Good idea, no?

>

> Regards,

> Jb

>

 

 

 

 

For whom?

 

 

toombaru

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , " new7892001 " <JB789 wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 "

> <dennis_travis33@> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > > who understands?

> > > >

> > > > (no one)

> > > >

> > > > dc

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > That.........is the understanding.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > toombaru

> >

> >

> > no one, ever, understood anything.......in awareness

> (understanding)

> > of That

> >

> > (....to follow little the imaginary words about....understanding

of

> > Nothing for real)

> >

> > :)

> >

> > Marc

>

> But Marc, How have you come to

> understand that? I would like to understand.

>

> You know... a dialog-inquiry is between friends who travel together

> and loook, look... and point to what they see... they do not

indulge

> in cute conceptual and non-sensical cryptic exchanges...

> like stating " no one ever understood! " with the authority of one

who

> truly understands.

>

> Would you not say, that the melody played thru some of these

messages

> here, could psossibly originate from a record, scratched and

defect,

> and that being jolted into switching to the CD version, might be -

in

> the name of good communication - a worth while momentary discomfort?

> Jb

 

 

....feeling a momentary discomfort?....

 

what is the definition of a " momentary discomfort " ....?...

 

who decide about the definitions....and why?

 

aren't definitions a product of " momentary discomfort " ...?

 

 

" who " knows....and " who " cares....?

 

wish a nice day

 

Marc

 

 

 

 

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...