Guest guest Posted November 5, 2006 Report Share Posted November 5, 2006 Hi Anna, Staying in the I'mness, to go beyond beingness & switch off the consiouness leads you to nothingness ...but the flurry of mind impressions of past/presemt & unknow scattered all over like rain drops. Is that the way to reality or yet another mind game? Rajesh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 5, 2006 Report Share Posted November 5, 2006 Nisargadatta , " pardesr " <pardesr wrote: > > Hi Anna, > > Staying in the I'mness, to go beyond beingness & switch off the > consiouness leads you to nothingness ...but the flurry of mind > impressions of past/presemt & unknow scattered all over like rain > drops. > > Is that the way to reality or yet another mind game? > > Rajesh > understanding is a perfect snowflake m e l t i n g Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 6, 2006 Report Share Posted November 6, 2006 But Maharaj says - If you understand you are still not there because that state cannot be understood with this limited body, mind and consiousness. It is beyond that... --- anabebe57 <kailashana wrote: > Nisargadatta , " pardesr " > <pardesr wrote: > > > > Hi Anna, > > > > Staying in the I'mness, to go beyond beingness & > switch off the > > consiouness leads you to nothingness ...but the > flurry of mind > > impressions of past/presemt & unknow scattered all > over like rain > > drops. > > > > Is that the way to reality or yet another mind > game? > > > > Rajesh > > > > > > understanding > > is > > a perfect snowflake > > m > e > l > t > i > n > g > > > > > > > ______________________________\ ____ We have the perfect Group for you. Check out the handy changes to () Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 6, 2006 Report Share Posted November 6, 2006 Nisargadatta , Rajesh Pardeshi <pardesr wrote: > > But Maharaj says - > > If you understand you are still not there because that > state cannot be understood with this limited body, > mind and consiousness. It is beyond that... > > What if.........there is no 'there'. What if........the understanding.....as experienced through the human mechanism.....is as close as one can get? What if human consciousness is the cutting edge of What-Is? toombaru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 6, 2006 Report Share Posted November 6, 2006 Nisargadatta , Rajesh Pardeshi <pardesr wrote: > > But Maharaj says - > > If you understand you are still not there because that > state cannot be understood with this limited body, > mind and consiousness. It is beyond that... yes... one is " there " ....since ever....always the only one who can't understand That...is the Mind therefore the Mind invent endless excuses....and create endless concepts.....and theories......and fabulous things..... in order to reflect all this nice dreamed (false) knowledge....by real ignorance this so called " knowledge " of an ignorant entity is reflected in the " mirror " ....of whatever kind and " melting " ....again....and again Marc > > > > --- anabebe57 <kailashana wrote: > > > Nisargadatta , " pardesr " > > <pardesr@> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Anna, > > > > > > Staying in the I'mness, to go beyond beingness & > > switch off the > > > consiouness leads you to nothingness ...but the > > flurry of mind > > > impressions of past/presemt & unknow scattered all > > over like rain > > > drops. > > > > > > Is that the way to reality or yet another mind > > game? > > > > > > Rajesh > > > > > > > > > > > understanding > > > > is > > > > a perfect snowflake > > > > m > > e > > l > > t > > i > > n > > g > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________________ ______________ > We have the perfect Group for you. Check out the handy changes to > () > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 6, 2006 Report Share Posted November 6, 2006 Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " <dennis_travis33 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , Rajesh Pardeshi <pardesr@> > wrote: > > > > But Maharaj says - > > > > If you understand you are still not there because that > > state cannot be understood with this limited body, > > mind and consiousness. It is beyond that... > > > yes... > one is " there " ....since ever....always > > the only one who can't understand That...is the Mind > > therefore the Mind invent endless excuses....and create endless > concepts.....and theories......and fabulous things..... > in order to reflect all this nice dreamed (false) knowledge....by > real ignorance > > this so called " knowledge " of an ignorant entity is reflected in > the " mirror " ....of whatever kind > > and " melting " ....again....and again > > Marc > Hey Marc, Can you explain to me what is the difference between mundane arrogance and spiritual arrogance ? Werner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 6, 2006 Report Share Posted November 6, 2006 Nisargadatta , " Werner Woehr " <wwoehr wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > <dennis_travis33@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , Rajesh Pardeshi <pardesr@> > > wrote: > > > > > > But Maharaj says - > > > > > > If you understand you are still not there because that > > > state cannot be understood with this limited body, > > > mind and consiousness. It is beyond that... > > > > > > yes... > > one is " there " ....since ever....always > > > > the only one who can't understand That...is the Mind > > > > therefore the Mind invent endless excuses....and create endless > > concepts.....and theories......and fabulous things..... > > in order to reflect all this nice dreamed (false) knowledge....by > > real ignorance > > > > this so called " knowledge " of an ignorant entity is reflected in > > the " mirror " ....of whatever kind > > > > and " melting " ....again....and again > > > > Marc > > > > > Hey Marc, > > Can you explain to me what is the difference between mundane > arrogance and spiritual arrogance ? > > Werner " Don't trust Perception " JK > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 6, 2006 Report Share Posted November 6, 2006 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > Nisargadatta , Rajesh Pardeshi <pardesr@> wrote: > > > > But Maharaj says - > > > > If you understand you are still not there because that > > state cannot be understood with this limited body, > > mind and consiousness. It is beyond that... > > > > > > > > What if.........there is no 'there'. > > What if........the understanding.....as experienced through the human > mechanism.....is as close as one can get? > > What if human consciousness is the cutting edge of What-Is? > > > toombaru > What if there are no questions? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 6, 2006 Report Share Posted November 6, 2006 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > Nisargadatta , Rajesh Pardeshi <pardesr@> wrote: > > > > But Maharaj says - > > > > If you understand you are still not there because that > > state cannot be understood with this limited body, > > mind and consiousness. It is beyond that... > > > > > > > > What if.........there is no 'there'. > > What if........the understanding.....as experienced through the no human > mechanism.....is as close as one can get? > > What if human consciousness is the cutting edge of What-Is? > > > toombaru > human consciousness...just (m0re) stuff. Neither more, nor less, nor even 'equal' importance or meaning than anything or nothing else... No 'there', = no 'here', no all over', no 'everywhere', no 'nowhere' = no edges.. cutting or otherwise. 'Is' and 'Is not' (is/are) capricious, whimsical, arbitrary and are less Real than the most vapid vapor in bio church vector-time.Understanding and non- understanding are mutually arising and annihilating. You cannot understand because there is nothing to understand when 'you' ARE...... 'you' are not there and never have been...and there is no 'there'. What if you try and NOT 'experience' this...It goes down and the beat goes on....and always will. .b Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 6, 2006 Report Share Posted November 6, 2006 Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , Rajesh Pardeshi <pardesr@> > wrote: > > > > > > But Maharaj says - > > > > > > If you understand you are still not there because that > > > state cannot be understood with this limited body, > > > mind and consiousness. It is beyond that... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What if.........there is no 'there'. > > > > What if........the understanding.....as experienced through the no > human > > mechanism.....is as close as one can get? > > > > What if human consciousness is the cutting edge of What-Is? > > > > > > toombaru > > > > human consciousness...just (m0re) stuff. Neither more, nor less, nor > even 'equal' importance or meaning than anything or nothing else... > No 'there', = no 'here', no all over', no 'everywhere', no 'nowhere' > = no edges.. cutting or otherwise. 'Is' and 'Is not' (is/are) > capricious, whimsical, arbitrary and are less Real than the most > vapid vapor in bio church vector-time.Understanding and non- > understanding are mutually arising and annihilating. You cannot > understand because there is nothing to understand when 'you' > ARE...... 'you' are not there and never have been...and there is > no 'there'. What if you try and NOT 'experience' this...It goes down > and the beat goes on....and always will. > > .b now....here....there..... wherever however Bob, you could try to transform your nice words in a wonderful and also as fantastic as fabulous...Poem... for the kids in here.....who LOVE to play around with words having no meaning... except the expression of melting knowledge/ignorance Marc > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 6, 2006 Report Share Posted November 6, 2006 Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , Rajesh Pardeshi <pardesr@> > wrote: > > > > > > But Maharaj says - > > > > > > If you understand you are still not there because that > > > state cannot be understood with this limited body, > > > mind and consiousness. It is beyond that... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What if.........there is no 'there'. > > > > What if........the understanding.....as experienced through the no > human > > mechanism.....is as close as one can get? > > > > What if human consciousness is the cutting edge of What-Is? > > > > > > toombaru > > > > human consciousness...just (m0re) stuff. Neither more, nor less, nor > even 'equal' importance or meaning than anything or nothing else... > No 'there', = no 'here', no all over', no 'everywhere', no 'nowhere' > = no edges.. cutting or otherwise. 'Is' and 'Is not' (is/are) > capricious, whimsical, arbitrary and are less Real than the most > vapid vapor in bio church vector-time.Understanding and non- > understanding are mutually arising and annihilating. You cannot > understand because there is nothing to understand when 'you' > ARE...... 'you' are not there and never have been...and there is > no 'there'. What if you try and NOT 'experience' this...It goes down > and the beat goes on....and always will. > > .b > What if I Am the 'experience' of nothing, of everything, of what Is and what Isn't... here.....now.....always.....all ways..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.