Guest guest Posted December 7, 2006 Report Share Posted December 7, 2006 Thought is duality. toombaru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 7, 2006 Report Share Posted December 7, 2006 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > > > Thought is duality. > > > > > > toombaru > thought is one of many faces...of duality Marc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 7, 2006 Report Share Posted December 7, 2006 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > > > Thought is duality. > > > > > > toombaru > Thought is a hot potato you can't swallow or spit out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 7, 2006 Report Share Posted December 7, 2006 Nisargadatta , " Johan " <yohansky wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > Thought is duality. > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > Thought is a hot potato you can't swallow or spit out. > That's because I am IS a thought.;-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 8, 2006 Report Share Posted December 8, 2006 " You thought that you were you, but you are not you, you are He. " Muhyiddin Ibn Arabi. Sufi Saint, (circa, 1300---- T. Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " <tuvalu66 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > Thought is duality. > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > thought is one of many faces...of duality > > Marc > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 8, 2006 Report Share Posted December 8, 2006 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > > > Thought is duality. > > > > > > toombaru > neither thought nor duality 'are'...not as one nor as two. that which is not, IS indeed that which is the same as all other non-existents. birth and death are in the same catagory. as heretical as statements on heretics always prove to be, this statement is too judgemental for the non-judgmental reality to adhere to. that reality simply doesn't care about statements....or thoughts or 'understanding' or duality or 'reality' itself. Mel Gibson or Michael Richards may be able to explain this better. .b Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 8, 2006 Report Share Posted December 8, 2006 Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Thought is duality. > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > neither thought nor duality 'are'...not as one nor as two. that which > is not, IS indeed that which is the same as all other non-existents. > birth and death are in the same catagory. as heretical as statements > on heretics always prove to be, this statement is too judgemental for > the non-judgmental reality to adhere to. that reality simply doesn't > care about statements....or thoughts or 'understanding' or duality or > 'reality' itself. Mel Gibson or Michael Richards may be able to > explain this better. > > .b > You speak of 'reality' as if it were something other then a thought. toombaru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 8, 2006 Report Share Posted December 8, 2006 Nisargadatta , " one1nottwo2 " <one1nottwo2 wrote: > > " You thought that you were you, > but you are not you, > you are He. " > > Muhyiddin Ibn Arabi. Sufi Saint, (circa, 1300---- > > T. > yes...sure....who else... Marc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 8, 2006 Report Share Posted December 8, 2006 Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Thought is duality. > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > neither thought nor duality 'are'...not as one nor as two. that which > is not, IS indeed that which is the same as all other non-existents. > birth and death are in the same catagory. as heretical as statements > on heretics always prove to be, this statement is too judgemental for > the non-judgmental reality to adhere to. that reality simply doesn't > care about statements....or thoughts or 'understanding' or duality or > 'reality' itself. Mel Gibson or Michael Richards may be able to > explain this better. > > .b Reality don't care about nothing....for real " In reality...whatever " ....is related to a thought based on the unreal few thoughts... but who cares....for real.... nobody/nothing Marc Ps: thoughts are always related to fabuloes non-sense....people in here....Feel in Love with.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 8, 2006 Report Share Posted December 8, 2006 Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " <tuvalu66 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " > <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Thought is duality. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > neither thought nor duality 'are'...not as one nor as two. that > which > > is not, IS indeed that which is the same as all other non- existents. > > birth and death are in the same catagory. as heretical as statements > > on heretics always prove to be, this statement is too judgemental > for > > the non-judgmental reality to adhere to. that reality simply doesn't > > care about statements....or thoughts or 'understanding' or duality > or > > 'reality' itself. Mel Gibson or Michael Richards may be able to > > explain this better. > > > > .b > > > Reality don't care about nothing....for real > > " In reality...whatever " ....is related to a thought based on the unreal > > > few thoughts... > > but who cares....for real.... > > nobody/nothing > > > Marc > > > Ps: thoughts are always related to fabuloes non-sense....people in > here....Feel in Love with.... > Thoughts are things. Think on these things.* Krishnamurti. Love, Anna *and when're finished thinking about them, fall in love with all your thinking thoughts;-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 8, 2006 Report Share Posted December 8, 2006 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Thought is duality. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > neither thought nor duality 'are'...not as one nor as two. that which > > is not, IS indeed that which is the same as all other non-existents. > > birth and death are in the same catagory. as heretical as statements > > on heretics always prove to be, this statement is too judgemental for > > the non-judgmental reality to adhere to. that reality simply doesn't > > care about statements....or thoughts or 'understanding' or duality or > > 'reality' itself. Mel Gibson or Michael Richards may be able to > > explain this better. > > > > .b > > You speak of 'reality' as if it were something other then a thought. > > > toombaru > 'it' is a tricky little monkey this 'it'. not thought nor any entity that 'thinks'...but 'it' thinks not. very curious. there is no one 'thinking' nor speaking. there is nothing. there is nothing 'other'. 'reality' is not for real. what do you think? for real? .b Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 8, 2006 Report Share Posted December 8, 2006 Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thought is duality. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > neither thought nor duality 'are'...not as one nor as two. that which > > > is not, IS indeed that which is the same as all other non-existents. > > > birth and death are in the same catagory. as heretical as statements > > > on heretics always prove to be, this statement is too judgemental for > > > the non-judgmental reality to adhere to. that reality simply doesn't > > > care about statements....or thoughts or 'understanding' or duality or > > > 'reality' itself. Mel Gibson or Michael Richards may be able to > > > explain this better. > > > > > > .b > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You speak of 'reality' as if it were something other then a thought. > > > > > > toombaru > > > 'it' is a tricky little monkey this 'it'. not thought nor any entity > that 'thinks'...but 'it' thinks not. very curious. there is no one > 'thinking' nor speaking. there is nothing. there is nothing 'other'. > 'reality' is not for real. what do you think? for real? > > .b > What if.........there were no such thing as 'reality'? Could you live with that? toombaru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 8, 2006 Report Share Posted December 8, 2006 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thought is duality. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > neither thought nor duality 'are'...not as one nor as two. that > which > > > > is not, IS indeed that which is the same as all other non-existents. > > > > birth and death are in the same catagory. as heretical as statements > > > > on heretics always prove to be, this statement is too > judgemental for > > > > the non-judgmental reality to adhere to. that reality simply doesn't > > > > care about statements....or thoughts or 'understanding' or > duality or > > > > 'reality' itself. Mel Gibson or Michael Richards may be able to > > > > explain this better. > > > > > > > > .b > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You speak of 'reality' as if it were something other then a thought. > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > 'it' is a tricky little monkey this 'it'. not thought nor any entity > > that 'thinks'...but 'it' thinks not. very curious. there is no one > > 'thinking' nor speaking. there is nothing. there is nothing 'other'. > > 'reality' is not for real. what do you think? for real? > > > > .b > > > > > > What if.........there were no such thing as 'reality'? > > Could you live with that? > > > toombaru > " Reality " is the ever emerging newness. toombaru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 8, 2006 Report Share Posted December 8, 2006 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thought is duality. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > neither thought nor duality 'are'...not as one nor as two. that > > which > > > > > is not, IS indeed that which is the same as all other > non-existents. > > > > > birth and death are in the same catagory. as heretical as > statements > > > > > on heretics always prove to be, this statement is too > > judgemental for > > > > > the non-judgmental reality to adhere to. that reality simply > doesn't > > > > > care about statements....or thoughts or 'understanding' or > > duality or > > > > > 'reality' itself. Mel Gibson or Michael Richards may be able to > > > > > explain this better. > > > > > > > > > > .b > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You speak of 'reality' as if it were something other then a thought. > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > 'it' is a tricky little monkey this 'it'. not thought nor any entity > > > that 'thinks'...but 'it' thinks not. very curious. there is no one > > > 'thinking' nor speaking. there is nothing. there is nothing 'other'. > > > 'reality' is not for real. what do you think? for real? > > > > > > .b > > > > > > > > > > > What if.........there were no such thing as 'reality'? > > > > Could you live with that? > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > " Reality " is the ever emerging newness. > > > > toombaru > change your thinking...change the world.... and still nothing changes;-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 8, 2006 Report Share Posted December 8, 2006 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thought is duality. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > neither thought nor duality 'are'...not as one nor as two. that > which > > > > is not, IS indeed that which is the same as all other non-existents. > > > > birth and death are in the same catagory. as heretical as statements > > > > on heretics always prove to be, this statement is too > judgemental for > > > > the non-judgmental reality to adhere to. that reality simply doesn't > > > > care about statements....or thoughts or 'understanding' or > duality or > > > > 'reality' itself. Mel Gibson or Michael Richards may be able to > > > > explain this better. > > > > > > > > .b > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You speak of 'reality' as if it were something other then a thought. > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > 'it' is a tricky little monkey this 'it'. not thought nor any entity > > that 'thinks'...but 'it' thinks not. very curious. there is no one > > 'thinking' nor speaking. there is nothing. there is nothing 'other'. > > 'reality' is not for real. what do you think? for real? > > > > .b > > > > > > What if.........there were no such thing as 'reality'? > > Could you live with that? > > > toombaru > no ifs, ands, or buts....I live, yet not 'I', but 'Christ' liveth me(inside and outside and all about and through). and this is correct...there is no such thing. all 'things' and 'egos' and 'estates' and 'domains' and 'realms'...are NOT. but it sure is a persistent belief that there is 'someone' who 'has something' to talk about eh?.....maybe even to post. ha ha! that which is 'not real' has a hell of a sense of humor for a nobo-daddy. .b Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 8, 2006 Report Share Posted December 8, 2006 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thought is duality. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > neither thought nor duality 'are'...not as one nor as two. that > > which > > > > > is not, IS indeed that which is the same as all other > non-existents. > > > > > birth and death are in the same catagory. as heretical as > statements > > > > > on heretics always prove to be, this statement is too > > judgemental for > > > > > the non-judgmental reality to adhere to. that reality simply > doesn't > > > > > care about statements....or thoughts or 'understanding' or > > duality or > > > > > 'reality' itself. Mel Gibson or Michael Richards may be able to > > > > > explain this better. > > > > > > > > > > .b > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You speak of 'reality' as if it were something other then a thought. > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > 'it' is a tricky little monkey this 'it'. not thought nor any entity > > > that 'thinks'...but 'it' thinks not. very curious. there is no one > > > 'thinking' nor speaking. there is nothing. there is nothing 'other'. > > > 'reality' is not for real. what do you think? for real? > > > > > > .b > > > > > > > > > > > What if.........there were no such thing as 'reality'? > > > > Could you live with that? > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > " Reality " is the ever emerging newness. > > > > toombaru > what is 'oldness'? is 'it' too ever emerging? it would seem that in any sense, from a 'world' of polar opposites within which we here speak ('you' and 'I' just being one of uncountable 'polar opposites' that insist on 'comparison' and 'communication'..it would seem that within any such 'world', there must be an 'oldness' as opposed to a 'newness', elst all logic and living within said system should fail and become that which it 'really' is...'nothing'. and nothing 'new' nor nothing 'old' obtains nor is relevant. a term in a proposition that is related to the referent of the proposition or what is called a 'relatum' is just a term in a proposition relating ultimately and only to 'itself' which neither 'knows' nor 'understands' why. " Reality " is the biggest myth we create, and 'has been', and 'is', and 'will be', until the " Gotterdammerung " , or " Twilight of the Gods " ...and THAT is 'evernow'....but 'it's nothing and no thing. The Babbling Bible of Babel tells us so. .b Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 9, 2006 Report Share Posted December 9, 2006 Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " > <Roberibus111@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thought is duality. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > neither thought nor duality 'are'...not as one nor as two. that > > > which > > > > > > is not, IS indeed that which is the same as all other > > non-existents. > > > > > > birth and death are in the same catagory. as heretical as > > statements > > > > > > on heretics always prove to be, this statement is too > > > judgemental for > > > > > > the non-judgmental reality to adhere to. that reality simply > > doesn't > > > > > > care about statements....or thoughts or 'understanding' or > > > duality or > > > > > > 'reality' itself. Mel Gibson or Michael Richards may be able to > > > > > > explain this better. > > > > > > > > > > > > .b > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You speak of 'reality' as if it were something other then a > thought. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > 'it' is a tricky little monkey this 'it'. not thought nor any entity > > > > that 'thinks'...but 'it' thinks not. very curious. there is no one > > > > 'thinking' nor speaking. there is nothing. there is nothing 'other'. > > > > 'reality' is not for real. what do you think? for real? > > > > > > > > .b > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What if.........there were no such thing as 'reality'? > > > > > > Could you live with that? > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > " Reality " is the ever emerging newness. > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > what is 'oldness'? is 'it' too ever emerging? it would seem that in > any sense, from a 'world' of polar opposites within which we here > speak ('you' and 'I' just being one of uncountable 'polar opposites' > that insist on 'comparison' and 'communication'..it would seem that > within any such 'world', there must be an 'oldness' as opposed to a > 'newness', elst all logic and living within said system should fail > and become that which it 'really' is...'nothing'. and nothing 'new' > nor nothing 'old' obtains nor is relevant. a term in a proposition > that is related to the referent of the proposition or what is called a > 'relatum' is just a term in a proposition relating ultimately and only > to 'itself' which neither 'knows' nor 'understands' why. " Reality " is > the biggest myth we create, and 'has been', and 'is', and 'will be', > until the " Gotterdammerung " , or " Twilight of the Gods " ...and THAT is > 'evernow'....but 'it's nothing and no thing. The Babbling Bible of > Babel tells us so. > > . b > THOUGHTS OF MYSELF My eyes fill up with words seep slowly into my awakening pores I stretch into syllables luxuriate into letters I am a power unto myself a generator for God vibrations forming myself into the flesh of morning. I barely fit into my surroundings. I describe myself, essences pour. 12/3/05 love, Anna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.