Guest guest Posted December 16, 2006 Report Share Posted December 16, 2006 just as one may never set foot in the same river once let alone twice, one never 'meets' the same person twice..one never 'meets' another person at all..never. all is change and change itself is changing. why would one believe that: the image before one, or the voice one hears, or that words read, are of one whom is known? all that is ever known is what is believed by the perceptual and cognising unit, and not what is. the person you meet in the next second, next day, next week, month, year or lifetime is NOT the same person that you had met before. the situation is NOT the same situation. the purposes and reasons and places and things etc. are all different. what goes on is of itself a piece and does not pertain to, nor is it related to some past event or personages. there is that which remains all unaffected throughout this whirlwind. that which abides for always and forever without end or beginning is most certainly not the ephemeral and wisping twists of people and affairs of men. once re-identified with Substance..there is seen that there never were separate thoughts, people, events, world. It's a Wonderful Life as George Bailey comes to find out. What a trip! What a Game.There is no escaping the Truth..and intimacy at that moment is seen as a poor shadow of Being, albeit a necessary enabling device for the vaporous ego to hold onto, in it's fear of a separation that can never obtain. one cannot become separated from ONE. Hark the Herald Angels Sing.....Joy to the World...the king, and savior, and understanding, are and always have been with you and you with them. it is certainty personified. .b Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 16, 2006 Report Share Posted December 16, 2006 Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > just as one may never set foot in the same river once let alone twice, > one never 'meets' the same person twice..one never 'meets' another > person at all..never. all is change and change itself is changing. why > would one believe that: the image before one, or the voice one hears, > or that words read, are of one whom is known? all that is ever known > is what is believed by the perceptual and cognising unit, and not what > is. the person you meet in the next second, next day, next week, > month, year or lifetime is NOT the same person that you had met > before. the situation is NOT the same situation. the purposes and > reasons and places and things etc. are all different. what goes on is > of itself a piece and does not pertain to, nor is it related to some > past event or personages. there is that which remains all unaffected > throughout this whirlwind. that which abides for always and forever > without end or beginning is most certainly not the ephemeral and > wisping twists of people and affairs of men. once re-identified with > Substance..there is seen that there never were separate thoughts, > people, events, world. It's a Wonderful Life as George Bailey comes to > find out. What a trip! What a Game.There is no escaping the Truth..and > intimacy at that moment is seen as a poor shadow of Being, albeit a > necessary enabling device for the vaporous ego to hold onto, in it's > fear of a separation that can never obtain. one cannot become > separated from ONE. Hark the Herald Angels Sing.....Joy to the > World...the king, and savior, and understanding, are and always have > been with you and you with them. it is certainty personified. > > .b > .............or appears to be......... t. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 16, 2006 Report Share Posted December 16, 2006 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > wrote: > > > > just as one may never set foot in the same river once let alone twice, > > one never 'meets' the same person twice..one never 'meets' another > > person at all..never. all is change and change itself is changing. why > > would one believe that: the image before one, or the voice one hears, > > or that words read, are of one whom is known? all that is ever known > > is what is believed by the perceptual and cognising unit, and not what > > is. the person you meet in the next second, next day, next week, > > month, year or lifetime is NOT the same person that you had met > > before. the situation is NOT the same situation. the purposes and > > reasons and places and things etc. are all different. what goes on is > > of itself a piece and does not pertain to, nor is it related to some > > past event or personages. there is that which remains all unaffected > > throughout this whirlwind. that which abides for always and forever > > without end or beginning is most certainly not the ephemeral and > > wisping twists of people and affairs of men. once re-identified with > > Substance..there is seen that there never were separate thoughts, > > people, events, world. It's a Wonderful Life as George Bailey comes to > > find out. What a trip! What a Game.There is no escaping the Truth..and > > intimacy at that moment is seen as a poor shadow of Being, albeit a > > necessary enabling device for the vaporous ego to hold onto, in it's > > fear of a separation that can never obtain. one cannot become > > separated from ONE. Hark the Herald Angels Sing.....Joy to the > > World...the king, and savior, and understanding, are and always have > > been with you and you with them. it is certainty personified. > > > > .b > > > > > > ............or appears to be......... > > > t. > or not...'isn't' if no one's looking.'is' if one is not! .b Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.