Guest guest Posted January 2, 2007 Report Share Posted January 2, 2007 when it's about 'me', it's always woe is 'me'. 'me' is synonymous with woe. if 'me' is ever gotten over, so is the woe. but 'me' is a poor little thing and is always struggling to be understood, even though it doesn't understand itself. woe is this little me. nobody understands. when 'woe little me' finally does understand that there truly is no one that cares or will EVER understand or care to understand..it will truly understand. and it won't be around to wonder what has been understood. besides, there truly is no one to tell...just like shouting to the careless wind that sad song of being misunderstood....but it's funny! unlamentations: 01:01 ..b Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 2007 Report Share Posted January 2, 2007 Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > when it's about 'me', it's always woe is 'me'. 'me' is synonymous with > woe. if 'me' is ever gotten over, so is the woe. but 'me' is a poor > little thing and is always struggling to be understood, even though it > doesn't understand itself. woe is this little me. nobody understands. > when 'woe little me' finally does understand that there truly is no > one that cares or will EVER understand or care to understand..it will > truly understand. and it won't be around to wonder what has been > understood. besides, there truly is no one to tell...just like > shouting to the careless wind that sad song of being > misunderstood....but it's funny! > > unlamentations: 01:01 > > .b yes....it's funny..... lol Marc > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 2007 Report Share Posted January 2, 2007 Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " <tuvalu66 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > wrote: > > > > when it's about 'me', it's always woe is 'me'. 'me' is synonymous with > > woe. if 'me' is ever gotten over, so is the woe. but 'me' is a poor > > little thing and is always struggling to be understood, even though it > > doesn't understand itself. woe is this little me. nobody understands. > > when 'woe little me' finally does understand that there truly is no > > one that cares or will EVER understand or care to understand..it will > > truly understand. and it won't be around to wonder what has been > > understood. besides, there truly is no one to tell...just like > > shouting to the careless wind that sad song of being > > misunderstood....but it's funny! > > > > unlamentations: 01:01 > > > > .b > > > yes....it's funny..... > > lol > > Marc > > > .....funny to....'me' (you-me = sado-maso, in case we didn't already know) 'it' is all there is to watch this sado-masochistic story 'it' is the new story (devouring the old story) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 2007 Report Share Posted January 2, 2007 Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " <skywords wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " <tuvalu66@> > wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > wrote: > > > > > > when it's about 'me', it's always woe is 'me'. 'me' is synonymous with > > > woe. if 'me' is ever gotten over, so is the woe. but 'me' is a poor > > > little thing and is always struggling to be understood, even though it > > > doesn't understand itself. woe is this little me. nobody understands. > > > when 'woe little me' finally does understand that there truly is no > > > one that cares or will EVER understand or care to understand..it will > > > truly understand. and it won't be around to wonder what has been > > > understood. besides, there truly is no one to tell...just like > > > shouting to the careless wind that sad song of being > > > misunderstood....but it's funny! > > > > > > unlamentations: 01:01 > > > > > > .b > > > > > > yes....it's funny..... > > > > lol > > > > Marc > > > > > > > > > > ....funny to....'me' yep. that very same phoney. > (you-me = sado-maso, in case we didn't already know) > > > > > > 'it' is all there is > > > > > to > > watch this sado-masochistic > > story > > > > > 'it' is > > the new story > > > > > (devouring > > the old > > story) there is no story for no man. ..b Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 2007 Report Share Posted January 2, 2007 Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " <skywords@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " <tuvalu66@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > when it's about 'me', it's always woe is 'me'. 'me' is > synonymous with > > > > woe. if 'me' is ever gotten over, so is the woe. but 'me' is a poor > > > > little thing and is always struggling to be understood, even > though it > > > > doesn't understand itself. woe is this little me. nobody > understands. > > > > when 'woe little me' finally does understand that there truly is no > > > > one that cares or will EVER understand or care to understand..it > will > > > > truly understand. and it won't be around to wonder what has been > > > > understood. besides, there truly is no one to tell...just like > > > > shouting to the careless wind that sad song of being > > > > misunderstood....but it's funny! > > > > > > > > unlamentations: 01:01 > > > > > > > > .b > > > > > > > > > yes....it's funny..... > > > > > > lol > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ....funny to....'me' > > > > yep. that very same phoney. > > > > > > > (you-me = sado-maso, in case we didn't already know) > > > > > > > > > > > > 'it' is all there is > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > watch this sado-masochistic > > > > story > > > > > > > > > > 'it' is > > > > the new story > > > > > > > > > > (devouring > > > > the old > > > > story) > > > > there is no story for no man. > > .b > ) how would anyone know? ) (that's some story ~~ and some sticking to it) eye is the measure of all things: eye is that eye is Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 2007 Report Share Posted January 2, 2007 Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " <skywords wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " <skywords@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " <tuvalu66@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > when it's about 'me', it's always woe is 'me'. 'me' is > > synonymous with > > > > > woe. if 'me' is ever gotten over, so is the woe. but 'me' is a > poor > > > > > little thing and is always struggling to be understood, even > > though it > > > > > doesn't understand itself. woe is this little me. nobody > > understands. > > > > > when 'woe little me' finally does understand that there truly > is no > > > > > one that cares or will EVER understand or care to understand..it > > will > > > > > truly understand. and it won't be around to wonder what has been > > > > > understood. besides, there truly is no one to tell...just like > > > > > shouting to the careless wind that sad song of being > > > > > misunderstood....but it's funny! > > > > > > > > > > unlamentations: 01:01 > > > > > > > > > > .b > > > > > > > > > > > > yes....it's funny..... > > > > > > > > lol > > > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ....funny to....'me' > > > > > > > > yep. that very same phoney. > > > > > > > > > > > > > (you-me = sado-maso, in case we didn't already know) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'it' is all there is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > watch this sado-masochistic > > > > > > story > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'it' is > > > > > > the new story > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (devouring > > > > > > the old > > > > > > story) > > > > > > > > there is no story for no man. > > > > .b > > > > > > > ) > > > > > how would anyone know? 'they' don't. > ) > > > > > (that's some story ~~ no content no story > and some sticking to it) nothing to stick to and no one stuck. > eye is the measure of all things: and then there is the immeasurable. > eye is that eye is with not one 'thing' to 'see'. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 2007 Report Share Posted January 2, 2007 Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " <skywords@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " <skywords@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " <tuvalu66@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " > <Roberibus111@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > when it's about 'me', it's always woe is 'me'. 'me' is > > > synonymous with > > > > > > woe. if 'me' is ever gotten over, so is the woe. but 'me' is a > > poor > > > > > > little thing and is always struggling to be understood, even > > > though it > > > > > > doesn't understand itself. woe is this little me. nobody > > > understands. > > > > > > when 'woe little me' finally does understand that there truly > > is no > > > > > > one that cares or will EVER understand or care to understand..it > > > will > > > > > > truly understand. and it won't be around to wonder what has been > > > > > > understood. besides, there truly is no one to tell...just like > > > > > > shouting to the careless wind that sad song of being > > > > > > misunderstood....but it's funny! > > > > > > > > > > > > unlamentations: 01:01 > > > > > > > > > > > > .b > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > yes....it's funny..... > > > > > > > > > > lol > > > > > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ....funny to....'me' > > > > > > > > > > > > yep. that very same phoney. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (you-me = sado-maso, in case we didn't already know) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'it' is all there is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > watch this sado-masochistic > > > > > > > > story > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'it' is > > > > > > > > the new story > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (devouring > > > > > > > > the old > > > > > > > > story) > > > > > > > > > > > > there is no story for no man. > > > > > > .b > > > > > > > > > > > > > ) > > > > > > > > > > how would anyone know? > > > > 'they' don't. > > > > > ) > > > > > > > > > > (that's some story ~~ > > > no content no story > > > > > > and some sticking to it) > > > nothing to stick to and no one stuck. > > > > > > eye is the measure of all things: > > > > and then there is the immeasurable. > > > > eye is that eye is > > > with not one 'thing' to 'see'. > possible responses: " of course, that's just another story " or " that's what I experience as the white light, but I'm sure there's another angle... let's hear it. how about just: unqualified ~nothing~ ? " or " let's see, how not to respond... a lesson some of us (me obviously included) simply haven't yet mastered. " and " or is it that I simply have 'nothing' better to do? " or " you know what would be fun? privately send e-mails predicting others' responces then show them, postmarked, after the actual responces: see how well we know the rivers of Nis then we could map them since it's gotten rather dry as of late. On the other hand, better dry than burning or ....? " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 2007 Report Share Posted January 2, 2007 Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " <skywords wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " <skywords@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " <skywords@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " <tuvalu66@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " > > <Roberibus111@> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > when it's about 'me', it's always woe is 'me'. 'me' is > > > > synonymous with > > > > > > > woe. if 'me' is ever gotten over, so is the woe. but 'me' is a > > > poor > > > > > > > little thing and is always struggling to be understood, even > > > > though it > > > > > > > doesn't understand itself. woe is this little me. nobody > > > > understands. > > > > > > > when 'woe little me' finally does understand that there truly > > > is no > > > > > > > one that cares or will EVER understand or care to > understand..it > > > > will > > > > > > > truly understand. and it won't be around to wonder what > has been > > > > > > > understood. besides, there truly is no one to tell...just like > > > > > > > shouting to the careless wind that sad song of being > > > > > > > misunderstood....but it's funny! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > unlamentations: 01:01 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > yes....it's funny..... > > > > > > > > > > > > lol > > > > > > > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ....funny to....'me' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > yep. that very same phoney. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (you-me = sado-maso, in case we didn't already know) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'it' is all there is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > watch this sado-masochistic > > > > > > > > > > story > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'it' is > > > > > > > > > > the new story > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (devouring > > > > > > > > > > the old > > > > > > > > > > story) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there is no story for no man. > > > > > > > > .b > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > how would anyone know? > > > > > > > > 'they' don't. > > > > > > > > > ) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (that's some story ~~ > > > > > > no content no story > > > > > > > > > > > and some sticking to it) > > > > > > nothing to stick to and no one stuck. > > > > > > > > > > > eye is the measure of all things: > > > > > > > > and then there is the immeasurable. > > > > > > > eye is that eye is > > > > > > with not one 'thing' to 'see'. > > > > possible responses: > > > " of course, that's just another story " > > > > or > > > > " that's what I experience as the white light, > > but I'm sure there's another angle... > > > let's hear it. > > > how about just: > > > unqualified > > > ~nothing~ > > > ? " > > > > or > > > > " let's see, > > how not to respond... > > > > > a lesson > > > some of us > > > (me obviously included) > > > simply haven't > > > yet mastered. " > > > > and > > > " or is it that > > > I simply have > > > 'nothing' > > > better to do? " > > > > or > > > > " you know what would be fun? > > > privately send e-mails > > predicting others' responces > > > > > then show them, postmarked, after the actual responces: > > see how well we know the rivers of Nis > > > then we could map them > > > since it's gotten rather dry > > > as of late. On the other hand, > > > better dry than burning or ....? " it's so much simpler. ..b Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 2007 Report Share Posted January 2, 2007 Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " <skywords@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " <skywords@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " <skywords@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > <tuvalu66@> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " > > > <Roberibus111@> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > when it's about 'me', it's always woe is 'me'. 'me' is > > > > > synonymous with > > > > > > > > woe. if 'me' is ever gotten over, so is the woe. but > 'me' is a > > > > poor > > > > > > > > little thing and is always struggling to be understood, even > > > > > though it > > > > > > > > doesn't understand itself. woe is this little me. nobody > > > > > understands. > > > > > > > > when 'woe little me' finally does understand that there > truly > > > > is no > > > > > > > > one that cares or will EVER understand or care to > > understand..it > > > > > will > > > > > > > > truly understand. and it won't be around to wonder what > > has been > > > > > > > > understood. besides, there truly is no one to > tell...just like > > > > > > > > shouting to the careless wind that sad song of being > > > > > > > > misunderstood....but it's funny! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > unlamentations: 01:01 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > yes....it's funny..... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > lol > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ....funny to....'me' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > yep. that very same phoney. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (you-me = sado-maso, in case we didn't already know) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'it' is all there is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > watch this sado-masochistic > > > > > > > > > > > > story > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'it' is > > > > > > > > > > > > the new story > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (devouring > > > > > > > > > > > > the old > > > > > > > > > > > > story) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there is no story for no man. > > > > > > > > > > .b > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > how would anyone know? > > > > > > > > > > > > 'they' don't. > > > > > > > > > > > > > ) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (that's some story ~~ > > > > > > > > > no content no story > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and some sticking to it) > > > > > > > > > nothing to stick to and no one stuck. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > eye is the measure of all things: > > > > > > > > > > > > and then there is the immeasurable. > > > > > > > > > > eye is that eye is > > > > > > > > > with not one 'thing' to 'see'. > > > > > > > possible responses: > > > > > > " of course, that's just another story " > > > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > " that's what I experience as the white light, > > > > but I'm sure there's another angle... > > > > > > let's hear it. > > > > > > how about just: > > > > > > unqualified > > > > > > ~nothing~ > > > > > > ? " > > > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > " let's see, > > > > how not to respond... > > > > > > > > > > a lesson > > > > > > some of us > > > > > > (me obviously included) > > > > > > simply haven't > > > > > > yet mastered. " > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > " or is it that > > > > > > I simply have > > > > > > 'nothing' > > > > > > better to do? " > > > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > " you know what would be fun? > > > > > > privately send e-mails > > > > predicting others' responces > > > > > > > > > > then show them, postmarked, after the actual responces: > > > > see how well we know the rivers of Nis > > > > > > then we could map them > > > > > > since it's gotten rather dry > > > > > > as of late. On the other hand, > > > > > > better dry than burning or ....? " > > > > > it's so much simpler. > > .b > never seen you do it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 2007 Report Share Posted January 2, 2007 Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " <skywords wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " <skywords@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " <skywords@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " > <Roberibus111@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " <skywords@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > > <tuvalu66@> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " > > > > <Roberibus111@> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > when it's about 'me', it's always woe is 'me'. 'me' is > > > > > > synonymous with > > > > > > > > > woe. if 'me' is ever gotten over, so is the woe. but > > 'me' is a > > > > > poor > > > > > > > > > little thing and is always struggling to be > understood, even > > > > > > though it > > > > > > > > > doesn't understand itself. woe is this little me. nobody > > > > > > understands. > > > > > > > > > when 'woe little me' finally does understand that there > > truly > > > > > is no > > > > > > > > > one that cares or will EVER understand or care to > > > understand..it > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > truly understand. and it won't be around to wonder what > > > has been > > > > > > > > > understood. besides, there truly is no one to > > tell...just like > > > > > > > > > shouting to the careless wind that sad song of being > > > > > > > > > misunderstood....but it's funny! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > unlamentations: 01:01 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > yes....it's funny..... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > lol > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ....funny to....'me' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > yep. that very same phoney. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (you-me = sado-maso, in case we didn't already know) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'it' is all there is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > watch this sado-masochistic > > > > > > > > > > > > > > story > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'it' is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the new story > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (devouring > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the old > > > > > > > > > > > > > > story) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there is no story for no man. > > > > > > > > > > > > .b > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > how would anyone know? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'they' don't. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (that's some story ~~ > > > > > > > > > > > > no content no story > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and some sticking to it) > > > > > > > > > > > > nothing to stick to and no one stuck. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > eye is the measure of all things: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and then there is the immeasurable. > > > > > > > > > > > > > eye is that eye is > > > > > > > > > > > > with not one 'thing' to 'see'. > > > > > > > > > > possible responses: > > > > > > > > > " of course, that's just another story " > > > > > > > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > > > > > " that's what I experience as the white light, > > > > > > but I'm sure there's another angle... > > > > > > > > > let's hear it. > > > > > > > > > how about just: > > > > > > > > > unqualified > > > > > > > > > ~nothing~ > > > > > > > > > ? " > > > > > > > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > > > > > " let's see, > > > > > > how not to respond... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a lesson > > > > > > > > > some of us > > > > > > > > > (me obviously included) > > > > > > > > > simply haven't > > > > > > > > > yet mastered. " > > > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > " or is it that > > > > > > > > > I simply have > > > > > > > > > 'nothing' > > > > > > > > > better to do? " > > > > > > > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > > > > > " you know what would be fun? > > > > > > > > > privately send e-mails > > > > > > predicting others' responces > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > then show them, postmarked, after the actual responces: > > > > > > see how well we know the rivers of Nis > > > > > > > > > then we could map them > > > > > > > > > since it's gotten rather dry > > > > > > > > > as of late. On the other hand, > > > > > > > > > better dry than burning or ....? " > > > > > > > > > > it's so much simpler. > > > > .b > never seen you do it > 'you' never will. ..b Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 2007 Report Share Posted January 2, 2007 Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " <skywords@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " <skywords@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " <skywords@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " > > <Roberibus111@> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " > <skywords@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > > > <tuvalu66@> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " > > > > > <Roberibus111@> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > when it's about 'me', it's always woe is 'me'. 'me' is > > > > > > > synonymous with > > > > > > > > > > woe. if 'me' is ever gotten over, so is the woe. but > > > 'me' is a > > > > > > poor > > > > > > > > > > little thing and is always struggling to be > > understood, even > > > > > > > though it > > > > > > > > > > doesn't understand itself. woe is this little me. nobody > > > > > > > understands. > > > > > > > > > > when 'woe little me' finally does understand that there > > > truly > > > > > > is no > > > > > > > > > > one that cares or will EVER understand or care to > > > > understand..it > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > > truly understand. and it won't be around to wonder what > > > > has been > > > > > > > > > > understood. besides, there truly is no one to > > > tell...just like > > > > > > > > > > shouting to the careless wind that sad song of being > > > > > > > > > > misunderstood....but it's funny! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > unlamentations: 01:01 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > yes....it's funny..... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > lol > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ....funny to....'me' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > yep. that very same phoney. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (you-me = sado-maso, in case we didn't already know) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'it' is all there is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > watch this sado-masochistic > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > story > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'it' is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the new story > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (devouring > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the old > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > story) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there is no story for no man. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > how would anyone know? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'they' don't. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (that's some story ~~ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > no content no story > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and some sticking to it) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > nothing to stick to and no one stuck. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > eye is the measure of all things: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and then there is the immeasurable. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > eye is that eye is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with not one 'thing' to 'see'. > > > > > > > > > > > > > possible responses: > > > > > > > > > > > > " of course, that's just another story " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " that's what I experience as the white light, > > > > > > > > but I'm sure there's another angle... > > > > > > > > > > > > let's hear it. > > > > > > > > > > > > how about just: > > > > > > > > > > > > unqualified > > > > > > > > > > > > ~nothing~ > > > > > > > > > > > > ? " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " let's see, > > > > > > > > how not to respond... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a lesson > > > > > > > > > > > > some of us > > > > > > > > > > > > (me obviously included) > > > > > > > > > > > > simply haven't > > > > > > > > > > > > yet mastered. " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > " or is it that > > > > > > > > > > > > I simply have > > > > > > > > > > > > 'nothing' > > > > > > > > > > > > better to do? " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " you know what would be fun? > > > > > > > > > > > > privately send e-mails > > > > > > > > predicting others' responces > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > then show them, postmarked, after the actual responces: > > > > > > > > see how well we know the rivers of Nis > > > > > > > > > > > > then we could map them > > > > > > > > > > > > since it's gotten rather dry > > > > > > > > > > > > as of late. On the other hand, > > > > > > > > > > > > better dry than burning or ....? " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it's so much simpler. > > > > > > .b > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > never seen you do it > > > > > > 'you' never will. > > .b > nor will you. But my point is that your posts are always so dominated by your competitiveness, that it's utterly impossible for you to refrain from having the last word. This is your complex, or simplex, if you prefer. I find it tiresome and dreadfully predictable. And yet you seem to be entertaining yourself, at least. But I can't see how others could avoid getting tired of it's doggedness. What's more, I feel pretty confident that I know how you'll respond to this, as well. It's gotten boring. You'll claim, among other things, not to care. But I don't trust you. And I'm sure you'll claim not to care about that, either. I know that I'm competitive, and probably tiresome, as well. But I doubt that you've reached the point where you can predict my responses, or anyone else's, for that matter. You're too reactive for that kind of introspection. What's my real point? Let's just say, none. Carry on, as you have. Remain completely inaffected, as is your game. Now that I've said what I had to say, I have no problem with it. Beautiful. Really! ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 3, 2007 Report Share Posted January 3, 2007 Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " <skywords wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " <skywords@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " <skywords@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " > <Roberibus111@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " <skywords@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " > > > <Roberibus111@> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " > > <skywords@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > > > > <tuvalu66@> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " > > > > > > <Roberibus111@> > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > when it's about 'me', it's always woe is 'me'. 'me' is > > > > > > > > synonymous with > > > > > > > > > > > woe. if 'me' is ever gotten over, so is the woe. but > > > > 'me' is a > > > > > > > poor > > > > > > > > > > > little thing and is always struggling to be > > > understood, even > > > > > > > > though it > > > > > > > > > > > doesn't understand itself. woe is this little me. > nobody > > > > > > > > understands. > > > > > > > > > > > when 'woe little me' finally does understand that > there > > > > truly > > > > > > > is no > > > > > > > > > > > one that cares or will EVER understand or care to > > > > > understand..it > > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > > > truly understand. and it won't be around to wonder > what > > > > > has been > > > > > > > > > > > understood. besides, there truly is no one to > > > > tell...just like > > > > > > > > > > > shouting to the careless wind that sad song of being > > > > > > > > > > > misunderstood....but it's funny! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > unlamentations: 01:01 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > yes....it's funny..... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > lol > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ....funny to....'me' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > yep. that very same phoney. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (you-me = sado-maso, in case we didn't already know) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'it' is all there is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > watch this sado-masochistic > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > story > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'it' is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the new story > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (devouring > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the old > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > story) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there is no story for no man. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > how would anyone know? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'they' don't. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (that's some story ~~ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > no content no story > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and some sticking to it) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > nothing to stick to and no one stuck. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > eye is the measure of all things: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and then there is the immeasurable. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > eye is that eye is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with not one 'thing' to 'see'. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > possible responses: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " of course, that's just another story " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " that's what I experience as the white light, > > > > > > > > > > but I'm sure there's another angle... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > let's hear it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > how about just: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > unqualified > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~nothing~ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ? " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " let's see, > > > > > > > > > > how not to respond... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a lesson > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > some of us > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (me obviously included) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > simply haven't > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > yet mastered. " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " or is it that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I simply have > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'nothing' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > better to do? " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " you know what would be fun? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > privately send e-mails > > > > > > > > > > predicting others' responces > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > then show them, postmarked, after the actual responces: > > > > > > > > > > see how well we know the rivers of Nis > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > then we could map them > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > since it's gotten rather dry > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as of late. On the other hand, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > better dry than burning or ....? " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it's so much simpler. > > > > > > > > .b > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > never seen you do it > > > > > > > > > > > 'you' never will. > > > > .b > > > > > > nor will you. But my point is that your posts are always so dominated > by your competitiveness, ho ho ho!...are you holding up a mirror? that it's utterly impossible for you to refrain from having the last word. This is your complex, or simplex, > if you prefer. makes you jealous doesn't it skyguy. pretty generally you are full of stuff and nonsense and here you go again. I find it tiresome and dreadfully predictable. you pretty much are, no make that definitely are, a bore yourself. And > yet you seem to be entertaining yourself, at least. But I can't see > how others could avoid getting tired of it's doggedness. you always want to talk for others. who do you think you are with all of this pseudo intellectual psyco babble? and 'others' don't like you speaking for them. that should be a lesson learned in early childhood and not at this late day in the days of your life. What's more, > I feel pretty confident that I know how you'll respond to this, as > well. you may feel confident, but no you don't how i'll respond or squat else about me.you will convince yourself otherwise and continue to live in your imagination, though that doesn't cover much area so you wont get any more lost than you already are. It's gotten boring. You'll claim, among other things, not to > care. But I don't trust you. And I'm sure you'll claim not to care > about that, either. i'm not here to entertain your neurosis nor your penchant for poetic trivialities or exitement. fact is true...i'm not here. and i don't care and true fact is, neither do you. you cloud your reasoning with the belief that you care about others while all the time only caring and concerning and concentrating solely on your perceived ideas of what's 'correct' or 'proper' or 'graceful' or 'loving' and all of that is crap...for you and every other imaginary center of awareness. self love and concern is the only thing the animal knows...it so loves itself..it's phoney little self. and you become obsequious with those whom you try to saddle up to and befriend and lay all your crap and analysis about yourself and themselves onto them about relationships with others and your pet psychological silliness....make it all their responsibility to make you happy, or fulfilled, or loved or whatever. and it's just childish. > I know that I'm competitive, and probably tiresome, as well. absolutely. But I doubt that you've reached the point where you can predict my responses, or anyone else's, for that matter. You're too reactive for > that kind of introspection. you truly are a deluded fellow. now your telling me what i can a cannot anticipate(or 'predict' mr. sawami). introspection of the kind you seem to be familiar with is for patsies and fools who think it achieves something beyond self indulgent narcissism. you will never reach beyond your immature emotions and reactions to understand this obvious situation as it pertains to that shadow of self. > What's my real point? Let's just say, none. this is conspicuously true. > Carry on, as you have. Remain completely inaffected, as is your game. i don't need your permission nor command to carry on or leave off. i will do as i do and i won't even know what that is till it happens. i don't plan and then set the self up for certain failure so that in turn i can than show all the 'others' how i was 'right', i did all the 'right' things and i'm a good guy and i should have gotten what i wanted, but i was jilted or misunderstood or......shit if it's working it's working, if not, not. it's all nobody else's business or concern or blame. and fact is they really don't care about all that 'make me a loved person'.. whether you were right or wrong or unthinking or uncaring or loving or 'in tune' or co-dependent or .....you get the picture, that stuff is all bullshit. > Now that I've said what I had to say, I have no problem with it. there are no such things as problems. i am problem free myself. > Beautiful. > > > Really! > > > ) > good for 'you'. glad you can handle it. ..b Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.