Pestis Solidi..2-3-4

[Guest guest]

When act of touching happens the unity of matter will start; the

coexistence of physics, one

concave, the other convex (considering the complexity of their

behavioural pattern).

Concavity is the nature of machine; an incompleteness of dimension;

always extendable by

means of vomiting or devouring a capacity totally differentiated from

its physic. Human, the

key, gas, liquid, air are parts of convex of context. Human is a part

of the contextual

composition; the bad chemistry between dead position and liveware. A

moment later the

separation begins that ends up to objectivity of one: the movement of

concave, the release of

convex.

-- Reply (Pestis Solidus) by R. Negarestani --

R. Negarestani: PESTIS SOLIDUS: The suggested automobile-human system

didymous [1] harmonia (not harmony or symphonia but a complex of

initiums through a

mesh which also implies the function of this configuration) undergoes

an esoteric process

of surface modification in a similar way which Platonic solidity and

Pythagorean

cosmogony attain. Through and by this esoteric production (arresting

the compositions in

the form of strata, contentum, organizational involvement, filiation,

environs, subjugation

and even independence while running them con-figured: economized/ing

ethics) which is

never completely done or undone, finished or started, the modified

surface is specialized

and stratified; customizing its own elliptic (but immensely

consolidatory) and in the same

vein assimilative political economy out of politics of ground, the

sphere of solidity [2]; a

metron [3] is molded at the moment of TOUCH, your suggested one [4],

(an asexual,

coital, senseless, necrophilic touch? Or a frantic fingering?) through

the concave / convex

coexistent regime — endowing (endouer) a modus vivendi; this

Pythagorean metron which

at the same time is too conservo-humanist and in the same track is

transcendental and

solid [5], runs with surface modification [6], registers and

circulates (in line with solidus in

circulation or the machinery of pseudo-flux) both a criterium and a

dominance

coincidentally; as 'metron' according to Sextus Empiricus expresses

criterium and as seen by

Heraclitus and Sophocles certifies dominance, a domination over

something. Not only this

institutionalized metron is applied through this coexistent regime you

suggested, but also

applies its power formation through the other surfaces, depositing the

solid investments in

the form of quasi-syntactical depositions or accumulations of solid,

or more accurately, all

kinds of surface specialization, from your suggested concave / convex

surfaces to affordance

[7] (J. J. Gibson) to the polar regimes of solid and void; context,

...., platonic solids and

territories ... and in a despotic attitude, the regimes — terra firma,

the Obelisk (See

Georges Bataille, Obelisk), etc. Such a kinetic metron or the

(re-)animator of power and

solidity awakes in your automobile-human system harmonia both as an

engine and a hood:

it is an engine assembled by ingenuus (inborn: solidus-based) and

igneous parts to mark off

 

Pestis Solidus 3

horizons (horos: boundary), picking up volumes of inertia, forging

vessels in the form of

navigium (an enlightening apparatus or the apparatus of

enlightenment?) and emitting

undulations of heat to thermodynamically translate the surplus value

of the complex

(automobile-human system) into your suggested 'LIVEWARE' which is not

only initiated

through human system but also the heavy occidental compound of your

automobilehuman

system coexistent regime (concave, convex; etc?) as a

thermo-economic(al) system

or more, an entity of survival economy ... live-ware as a phantom

entity forging the

necrocracy of Oedipus and his avatars. This liveware is triggered off

and originated not by

and through organism but also the entire multifaceted machineries of

solidus in circulation,

ground and its survival economy i.e. Genesis: an autonomous siege

engine with bloodless

attitude. And now as a hood, this metron does not really have any

protective structure out

of a hardened material; and it does not offer a full covering trait

like a full sewn up jacket;

yet it is not completely unfastened as well; the hood gives an access

to engine, to the heart

of metron (itself) as a horismologic motor of power, measures,

cognitive maps, dwelling /

accommodating spaces, judgments, etc.; as a hood, it opens thousands

of stitches for

engine to breathe, talk, breed, eat, vomit, copulate and exchange;

rendering and

transmitting the dominance of the metron processing enginery to the

other modified

surfaces to appropriate (and being appropriated) the further

accumulations of solid,

surfaces and metrons through the sphere of solidity; economically,

animating ground to no

end. Solid is slippery. All solid machineries have hood, not

protective or defensive ones (as

it is usually suspected) but hood as an opening tunnel by which

solidity or the solidus

engine communicate, exchange and configure, distributing metron as the

work-ground of

power, stratifying ground(s) to no end. Metron is the dimensionality

of Power; it forges the

'work-ground'. What the hood does, is more like hood-face supplemental

attachment

rather than hood-engine affinities. Returning to the old usage of hood

in Medieval culture

and Catholicism, it cloaks the body and gives a space (more at

capacity) to the face, then,

it augments the face, translating the entire dynamism of metron and

its solid / dimensional

machinery from the slippery site of the face (and not the coagulated,

molar or rigid parts)

in the form of architectonic energy of liveware [8]: " installation of

the new semiotic of

signification and subjectification on that holey surface " (Deleuze and

Guattari, A

Thousand Plateaus). Hood augments the Face; it transports the

faciality machine of solid /

void out of its horizon, dispersing its concentrative energy through

the most slippery ways

and not monolithic / molar ones, launching the economy of ground from

the atypical

harmonia of the face. This is the bio-politics of solidity (such as

your suggested harmonia)

and face, the white wall / black hole (Deleuze). It is through the

face that the miasma of

the configuring metron (articulations of dimensionality, ground and

solidus) is unfolded by

hood (the supplement of metron) into the boundless discourse of

solidity, becoming a

messenger of the out-place and dynamic sphere of solidus (it is an

oversimplified view to

 

Pestis Solidus 4

consider solidus in circulation or solidity, immobile, fixed and

completely rooted ... it is

another deceiving maneuver of solidus in circulation and its

pseudo-fluxes). Here, the metron

of this coexistent regime transforms into the other metrons of

solidity, the other ones, the

other ones and the other ones erratically throughout the most stealth

mode of solid

industry which does not care much about coagulation techniques,

obelisks, monolithic and

rigid solids but horizons, drives, formations, references, boundaries,

authenticity,

institutions, livewares, metrons, non-occupational volumes, spatial

reasoning, pseudo-flux

and trans-ecological dominance. Amid these maneuvers what goes

esoteric are the ways

that 'heat emission', 'surface modification' and 'horizons' are

reticulated through the

surfaces, animating the extensions of metron all around into this

coexistent regime in the

form of consolidated (configural) bodies ( " Human, the key, gas, ... " ).

Now we encounter

such questions: 'How does this surface modification turn into a body

of depositions or

accumulations of solids?' or 'How does the metron work and propagate

through the

anatomia of this body (or vice versa) and how does it work as a body;

how does this body

run, get interlaced and mantled under the economy of pseudo-flux and

solidus in

circulation?', 'How does these surface modifications and metrons

enmesh the sphere of

survival economy?', 'How is the body of solidus in circulation formed,

then, releasing solidity

as its surplus value?' or 'the Whys around this panorama, why-motives,

and this and not-this

diametrical discourse [9] of solid engineering mechanisms' ... all

these questions bear the

genetic dominance of representational thought or nihilism based cogito

or regulating grund

(Appropriator) as Lyotard outlines in Libidinal Economy; they

inter-connect with the

regulating (and institutionalizing) harmonia of this and not-this as a

quasi-logical solidusbased

core. It is from the diametric and configural discourse of this and

not-this — which

does not only include this twofold (a this and a not-this) as a polar

coordination but also

their exclusions, environment and the circle on which this two (2 × 0)

pulsional principles

(Lyotard) make a diametric discourse with the support of the other

regulating intensities

or in the other word, further points or 'the other of this and

not-this' which modifies and

tunes the circle and diametric (Polar discourses are parts of

diametric discourses.)

discourses of this and not-this, their affordance — that the

formations of your suggested

automobile-human system harmonia evolves; and not a particular

formation but formation

as Genesis, Con+formatio, Gestaltungen (even non-evolutionary) that is

the curse of

solidus (Genesis is constituted of the mega-cycles of solidus in

circulation whose surplus

value is solidity.) and its con-solidating machineries (from

Aristotelian rotation of

elements to pseudo-flux); on an innocent (and partially inoffensive)

panorama, the

consolidating formation decodes the coexistent regime of

concave-convex (your suggested

one) through an observational empiricism; and through the cyclorama of

its duplicity, it

(over)codes this preexisting regime to the most stealth, diluted,

deceiving and

maneuvering harmonia of solidus-in-circulation, pseudo-flux and solidity.

 

 

..b bobji baba

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 "

<Roberibus111 wrote:

>

> When act of touching happens the unity of matter will start; the

> coexistence of physics, one

> concave, the other convex (considering the complexity of their

> behavioural pattern).

> Concavity is the nature of machine; an incompleteness of dimension;

> always extendable by

> means of vomiting or devouring a capacity totally differentiated

from

> its physic. Human, the

> key, gas, liquid, air are parts of convex of context. Human is a

part

> of the contextual

> composition; the bad chemistry between dead position and liveware. A

> moment later the

> separation begins that ends up to objectivity of one: the movement

of

> concave, the release of

> convex.

> -- Reply (Pestis Solidus) by R. Negarestani --

> R. Negarestani: PESTIS SOLIDUS: The suggested automobile-human

system

> didymous [1] harmonia (not harmony or symphonia but a complex of

> initiums through a

> mesh which also implies the function of this configuration)

undergoes

> an esoteric process

> of surface modification in a similar way which Platonic solidity and

> Pythagorean

> cosmogony attain. Through and by this esoteric production (arresting

> the compositions in

> the form of strata, contentum, organizational involvement,

filiation,

> environs, subjugation

> and even independence while running them con-figured: economized/ing

> ethics) which is

> never completely done or undone, finished or started, the modified

> surface is specialized

> and stratified; customizing its own elliptic (but immensely

> consolidatory) and in the same

> vein assimilative political economy out of politics of ground, the

> sphere of solidity [2]; a

> metron [3] is molded at the moment of TOUCH, your suggested one [4],

> (an asexual,

> coital, senseless, necrophilic touch? Or a frantic fingering?)

through

> the concave / convex

> coexistent regime — endowing (endouer) a modus vivendi; this

> Pythagorean metron which

> at the same time is too conservo-humanist and in the same track is

> transcendental and

> solid [5], runs with surface modification [6], registers and

> circulates (in line with solidus in

> circulation or the machinery of pseudo-flux) both a criterium and a

> dominance

> coincidentally; as 'metron' according to Sextus Empiricus expresses

> criterium and as seen by

> Heraclitus and Sophocles certifies dominance, a domination over

> something. Not only this

> institutionalized metron is applied through this coexistent regime

you

> suggested, but also

> applies its power formation through the other surfaces, depositing

the

> solid investments in

> the form of quasi-syntactical depositions or accumulations of solid,

> or more accurately, all

> kinds of surface specialization, from your suggested concave /

convex

> surfaces to affordance

> [7] (J. J. Gibson) to the polar regimes of solid and void; context,

> ..., platonic solids and

> territories ... and in a despotic attitude, the regimes — terra

firma,

> the Obelisk (See

> Georges Bataille, Obelisk), etc. Such a kinetic metron or the

> (re-)animator of power and

> solidity awakes in your automobile-human system harmonia both as an

> engine and a hood:

> it is an engine assembled by ingenuus (inborn: solidus-based) and

> igneous parts to mark off

>

> Pestis Solidus 3

> horizons (horos: boundary), picking up volumes of inertia, forging

> vessels in the form of

> navigium (an enlightening apparatus or the apparatus of

> enlightenment?) and emitting

> undulations of heat to thermodynamically translate the surplus value

> of the complex

> (automobile-human system) into your suggested 'LIVEWARE' which is

not

> only initiated

> through human system but also the heavy occidental compound of your

> automobilehuman

> system coexistent regime (concave, convex; etc?) as a

> thermo-economic(al) system

> or more, an entity of survival economy ... live-ware as a phantom

> entity forging the

> necrocracy of Oedipus and his avatars. This liveware is triggered

off

> and originated not by

> and through organism but also the entire multifaceted machineries of

> solidus in circulation,

> ground and its survival economy i.e. Genesis: an autonomous siege

> engine with bloodless

> attitude. And now as a hood, this metron does not really have any

> protective structure out

> of a hardened material; and it does not offer a full covering trait

> like a full sewn up jacket;

> yet it is not completely unfastened as well; the hood gives an

access

> to engine, to the heart

> of metron (itself) as a horismologic motor of power, measures,

> cognitive maps, dwelling /

> accommodating spaces, judgments, etc.; as a hood, it opens thousands

> of stitches for

> engine to breathe, talk, breed, eat, vomit, copulate and exchange;

> rendering and

> transmitting the dominance of the metron processing enginery to the

> other modified

> surfaces to appropriate (and being appropriated) the further

> accumulations of solid,

> surfaces and metrons through the sphere of solidity; economically,

> animating ground to no

> end. Solid is slippery. All solid machineries have hood, not

> protective or defensive ones (as

> it is usually suspected) but hood as an opening tunnel by which

> solidity or the solidus

> engine communicate, exchange and configure, distributing metron as

the

> work-ground of

> power, stratifying ground(s) to no end. Metron is the dimensionality

> of Power; it forges the

> 'work-ground'. What the hood does, is more like hood-face

supplemental

> attachment

> rather than hood-engine affinities. Returning to the old usage of

hood

> in Medieval culture

> and Catholicism, it cloaks the body and gives a space (more at

> capacity) to the face, then,

> it augments the face, translating the entire dynamism of metron and

> its solid / dimensional

> machinery from the slippery site of the face (and not the

coagulated,

> molar or rigid parts)

> in the form of architectonic energy of liveware [8]: " installation

of

> the new semiotic of

> signification and subjectification on that holey surface " (Deleuze

and

> Guattari, A

> Thousand Plateaus). Hood augments the Face; it transports the

> faciality machine of solid /

> void out of its horizon, dispersing its concentrative energy through

> the most slippery ways

> and not monolithic / molar ones, launching the economy of ground

from

> the atypical

> harmonia of the face. This is the bio-politics of solidity (such as

> your suggested harmonia)

> and face, the white wall / black hole (Deleuze). It is through the

> face that the miasma of

> the configuring metron (articulations of dimensionality, ground and

> solidus) is unfolded by

> hood (the supplement of metron) into the boundless discourse of

> solidity, becoming a

> messenger of the out-place and dynamic sphere of solidus (it is an

> oversimplified view to

>

> Pestis Solidus 4

> consider solidus in circulation or solidity, immobile, fixed and

> completely rooted ... it is

> another deceiving maneuver of solidus in circulation and its

> pseudo-fluxes). Here, the metron

> of this coexistent regime transforms into the other metrons of

> solidity, the other ones, the

> other ones and the other ones erratically throughout the most

stealth

> mode of solid

> industry which does not care much about coagulation techniques,

> obelisks, monolithic and

> rigid solids but horizons, drives, formations, references,

boundaries,

> authenticity,

> institutions, livewares, metrons, non-occupational volumes, spatial

> reasoning, pseudo-flux

> and trans-ecological dominance. Amid these maneuvers what goes

> esoteric are the ways

> that 'heat emission', 'surface modification' and 'horizons' are

> reticulated through the

> surfaces, animating the extensions of metron all around into this

> coexistent regime in the

> form of consolidated (configural) bodies ( " Human, the key,

gas, ... " ).

> Now we encounter

> such questions: 'How does this surface modification turn into a body

> of depositions or

> accumulations of solids?' or 'How does the metron work and propagate

> through the

> anatomia of this body (or vice versa) and how does it work as a

body;

> how does this body

> run, get interlaced and mantled under the economy of pseudo-flux and

> solidus in

> circulation?', 'How does these surface modifications and metrons

> enmesh the sphere of

> survival economy?', 'How is the body of solidus in circulation

formed,

> then, releasing solidity

> as its surplus value?' or 'the Whys around this panorama, why-

motives,

> and this and not-this

> diametrical discourse [9] of solid engineering mechanisms' ... all

> these questions bear the

> genetic dominance of representational thought or nihilism based

cogito

> or regulating grund

> (Appropriator) as Lyotard outlines in Libidinal Economy; they

> inter-connect with the

> regulating (and institutionalizing) harmonia of this and not-this

as a

> quasi-logical solidusbased

> core. It is from the diametric and configural discourse of this and

> not-this — which

> does not only include this twofold (a this and a not-this) as a

polar

> coordination but also

> their exclusions, environment and the circle on which this two (2 ×

0)

> pulsional principles

> (Lyotard) make a diametric discourse with the support of the other

> regulating intensities

> or in the other word, further points or 'the other of this and

> not-this' which modifies and

> tunes the circle and diametric (Polar discourses are parts of

> diametric discourses.)

> discourses of this and not-this, their affordance — that the

> formations of your suggested

> automobile-human system harmonia evolves; and not a particular

> formation but formation

> as Genesis, Con+formatio, Gestaltungen (even non-evolutionary) that

is

> the curse of

> solidus (Genesis is constituted of the mega-cycles of solidus in

> circulation whose surplus

> value is solidity.) and its con-solidating machineries (from

> Aristotelian rotation of

> elements to pseudo-flux); on an innocent (and partially inoffensive)

> panorama, the

> consolidating formation decodes the coexistent regime of

> concave-convex (your suggested

> one) through an observational empiricism; and through the cyclorama

of

> its duplicity, it

> (over)codes this preexisting regime to the most stealth, diluted,

> deceiving and

> maneuvering harmonia of solidus-in-circulation, pseudo-flux and

solidity.

>

>

> .b bobji baba

 

 

exactly!...yes

 

lol

>

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " <tuvalu66

wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 "

> <Roberibus111@> wrote:

> >

> > When act of touching happens the unity of matter will start; the

> > coexistence of physics, one

> > concave, the other convex (considering the complexity of their

> > behavioural pattern).

> > Concavity is the nature of machine; an incompleteness of dimension;

> > always extendable by

> > means of vomiting or devouring a capacity totally differentiated

> from

> > its physic. Human, the

> > key, gas, liquid, air are parts of convex of context. Human is a

> part

> > of the contextual

> > composition; the bad chemistry between dead position and liveware. A

> > moment later the

> > separation begins that ends up to objectivity of one: the movement

> of

> > concave, the release of

> > convex.

> > -- Reply (Pestis Solidus) by R. Negarestani --

> > R. Negarestani: PESTIS SOLIDUS: The suggested automobile-human

> system

> > didymous [1] harmonia (not harmony or symphonia but a complex of

> > initiums through a

> > mesh which also implies the function of this configuration)

> undergoes

> > an esoteric process

> > of surface modification in a similar way which Platonic solidity and

> > Pythagorean

> > cosmogony attain. Through and by this esoteric production (arresting

> > the compositions in

> > the form of strata, contentum, organizational involvement,

> filiation,

> > environs, subjugation

> > and even independence while running them con-figured: economized/ing

> > ethics) which is

> > never completely done or undone, finished or started, the modified

> > surface is specialized

> > and stratified; customizing its own elliptic (but immensely

> > consolidatory) and in the same

> > vein assimilative political economy out of politics of ground, the

> > sphere of solidity [2]; a

> > metron [3] is molded at the moment of TOUCH, your suggested one [4],

> > (an asexual,

> > coital, senseless, necrophilic touch? Or a frantic fingering?)

> through

> > the concave / convex

> > coexistent regime — endowing (endouer) a modus vivendi; this

> > Pythagorean metron which

> > at the same time is too conservo-humanist and in the same track is

> > transcendental and

> > solid [5], runs with surface modification [6], registers and

> > circulates (in line with solidus in

> > circulation or the machinery of pseudo-flux) both a criterium and a

> > dominance

> > coincidentally; as 'metron' according to Sextus Empiricus expresses

> > criterium and as seen by

> > Heraclitus and Sophocles certifies dominance, a domination over

> > something. Not only this

> > institutionalized metron is applied through this coexistent regime

> you

> > suggested, but also

> > applies its power formation through the other surfaces, depositing

> the

> > solid investments in

> > the form of quasi-syntactical depositions or accumulations of solid,

> > or more accurately, all

> > kinds of surface specialization, from your suggested concave /

> convex

> > surfaces to affordance

> > [7] (J. J. Gibson) to the polar regimes of solid and void; context,

> > ..., platonic solids and

> > territories ... and in a despotic attitude, the regimes — terra

> firma,

> > the Obelisk (See

> > Georges Bataille, Obelisk), etc. Such a kinetic metron or the

> > (re-)animator of power and

> > solidity awakes in your automobile-human system harmonia both as an

> > engine and a hood:

> > it is an engine assembled by ingenuus (inborn: solidus-based) and

> > igneous parts to mark off

> >

> > Pestis Solidus 3

> > horizons (horos: boundary), picking up volumes of inertia, forging

> > vessels in the form of

> > navigium (an enlightening apparatus or the apparatus of

> > enlightenment?) and emitting

> > undulations of heat to thermodynamically translate the surplus value

> > of the complex

> > (automobile-human system) into your suggested 'LIVEWARE' which is

> not

> > only initiated

> > through human system but also the heavy occidental compound of your

> > automobilehuman

> > system coexistent regime (concave, convex; etc?) as a

> > thermo-economic(al) system

> > or more, an entity of survival economy ... live-ware as a phantom

> > entity forging the

> > necrocracy of Oedipus and his avatars. This liveware is triggered

> off

> > and originated not by

> > and through organism but also the entire multifaceted machineries of

> > solidus in circulation,

> > ground and its survival economy i.e. Genesis: an autonomous siege

> > engine with bloodless

> > attitude. And now as a hood, this metron does not really have any

> > protective structure out

> > of a hardened material; and it does not offer a full covering trait

> > like a full sewn up jacket;

> > yet it is not completely unfastened as well; the hood gives an

> access

> > to engine, to the heart

> > of metron (itself) as a horismologic motor of power, measures,

> > cognitive maps, dwelling /

> > accommodating spaces, judgments, etc.; as a hood, it opens thousands

> > of stitches for

> > engine to breathe, talk, breed, eat, vomit, copulate and exchange;

> > rendering and

> > transmitting the dominance of the metron processing enginery to the

> > other modified

> > surfaces to appropriate (and being appropriated) the further

> > accumulations of solid,

> > surfaces and metrons through the sphere of solidity; economically,

> > animating ground to no

> > end. Solid is slippery. All solid machineries have hood, not

> > protective or defensive ones (as

> > it is usually suspected) but hood as an opening tunnel by which

> > solidity or the solidus

> > engine communicate, exchange and configure, distributing metron as

> the

> > work-ground of

> > power, stratifying ground(s) to no end. Metron is the dimensionality

> > of Power; it forges the

> > 'work-ground'. What the hood does, is more like hood-face

> supplemental

> > attachment

> > rather than hood-engine affinities. Returning to the old usage of

> hood

> > in Medieval culture

> > and Catholicism, it cloaks the body and gives a space (more at

> > capacity) to the face, then,

> > it augments the face, translating the entire dynamism of metron and

> > its solid / dimensional

> > machinery from the slippery site of the face (and not the

> coagulated,

> > molar or rigid parts)

> > in the form of architectonic energy of liveware [8]: " installation

> of

> > the new semiotic of

> > signification and subjectification on that holey surface " (Deleuze

> and

> > Guattari, A

> > Thousand Plateaus). Hood augments the Face; it transports the

> > faciality machine of solid /

> > void out of its horizon, dispersing its concentrative energy through

> > the most slippery ways

> > and not monolithic / molar ones, launching the economy of ground

> from

> > the atypical

> > harmonia of the face. This is the bio-politics of solidity (such as

> > your suggested harmonia)

> > and face, the white wall / black hole (Deleuze). It is through the

> > face that the miasma of

> > the configuring metron (articulations of dimensionality, ground and

> > solidus) is unfolded by

> > hood (the supplement of metron) into the boundless discourse of

> > solidity, becoming a

> > messenger of the out-place and dynamic sphere of solidus (it is an

> > oversimplified view to

> >

> > Pestis Solidus 4

> > consider solidus in circulation or solidity, immobile, fixed and

> > completely rooted ... it is

> > another deceiving maneuver of solidus in circulation and its

> > pseudo-fluxes). Here, the metron

> > of this coexistent regime transforms into the other metrons of

> > solidity, the other ones, the

> > other ones and the other ones erratically throughout the most

> stealth

> > mode of solid

> > industry which does not care much about coagulation techniques,

> > obelisks, monolithic and

> > rigid solids but horizons, drives, formations, references,

> boundaries,

> > authenticity,

> > institutions, livewares, metrons, non-occupational volumes, spatial

> > reasoning, pseudo-flux

> > and trans-ecological dominance. Amid these maneuvers what goes

> > esoteric are the ways

> > that 'heat emission', 'surface modification' and 'horizons' are

> > reticulated through the

> > surfaces, animating the extensions of metron all around into this

> > coexistent regime in the

> > form of consolidated (configural) bodies ( " Human, the key,

> gas, ... " ).

> > Now we encounter

> > such questions: 'How does this surface modification turn into a body

> > of depositions or

> > accumulations of solids?' or 'How does the metron work and propagate

> > through the

> > anatomia of this body (or vice versa) and how does it work as a

> body;

> > how does this body

> > run, get interlaced and mantled under the economy of pseudo-flux and

> > solidus in

> > circulation?', 'How does these surface modifications and metrons

> > enmesh the sphere of

> > survival economy?', 'How is the body of solidus in circulation

> formed,

> > then, releasing solidity

> > as its surplus value?' or 'the Whys around this panorama, why-

> motives,

> > and this and not-this

> > diametrical discourse [9] of solid engineering mechanisms' ... all

> > these questions bear the

> > genetic dominance of representational thought or nihilism based

> cogito

> > or regulating grund

> > (Appropriator) as Lyotard outlines in Libidinal Economy; they

> > inter-connect with the

> > regulating (and institutionalizing) harmonia of this and not-this

> as a

> > quasi-logical solidusbased

> > core. It is from the diametric and configural discourse of this and

> > not-this — which

> > does not only include this twofold (a this and a not-this) as a

> polar

> > coordination but also

> > their exclusions, environment and the circle on which this two (2 ×

> 0)

> > pulsional principles

> > (Lyotard) make a diametric discourse with the support of the other

> > regulating intensities

> > or in the other word, further points or 'the other of this and

> > not-this' which modifies and

> > tunes the circle and diametric (Polar discourses are parts of

> > diametric discourses.)

> > discourses of this and not-this, their affordance — that the

> > formations of your suggested

> > automobile-human system harmonia evolves; and not a particular

> > formation but formation

> > as Genesis, Con+formatio, Gestaltungen (even non-evolutionary) that

> is

> > the curse of

> > solidus (Genesis is constituted of the mega-cycles of solidus in

> > circulation whose surplus

> > value is solidity.) and its con-solidating machineries (from

> > Aristotelian rotation of

> > elements to pseudo-flux); on an innocent (and partially inoffensive)

> > panorama, the

> > consolidating formation decodes the coexistent regime of

> > concave-convex (your suggested

> > one) through an observational empiricism; and through the cyclorama

> of

> > its duplicity, it

> > (over)codes this preexisting regime to the most stealth, diluted,

> > deceiving and

> > maneuvering harmonia of solidus-in-circulation, pseudo-flux and

> solidity.

> >

> >

> > .b bobji baba

>

>

> exactly!...yes

>

> lol

 

 

 

:-)

 

.b bobji b.

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 "

<Roberibus111 wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " <tuvalu66@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 "

> > <Roberibus111@> wrote:

> > >

> > > When act of touching happens the unity of matter will start; the

> > > coexistence of physics, one

> > > concave, the other convex (considering the complexity of their

> > > behavioural pattern).

> > > Concavity is the nature of machine; an incompleteness of

dimension;

> > > always extendable by

> > > means of vomiting or devouring a capacity totally

differentiated

> > from

> > > its physic. Human, the

> > > key, gas, liquid, air are parts of convex of context. Human is

a

> > part

> > > of the contextual

> > > composition; the bad chemistry between dead position and

liveware. A

> > > moment later the

> > > separation begins that ends up to objectivity of one: the

movement

> > of

> > > concave, the release of

> > > convex.

> > > -- Reply (Pestis Solidus) by R. Negarestani --

> > > R. Negarestani: PESTIS SOLIDUS: The suggested automobile-human

> > system

> > > didymous [1] harmonia (not harmony or symphonia but a complex of

> > > initiums through a

> > > mesh which also implies the function of this configuration)

> > undergoes

> > > an esoteric process

> > > of surface modification in a similar way which Platonic

solidity and

> > > Pythagorean

> > > cosmogony attain. Through and by this esoteric production

(arresting

> > > the compositions in

> > > the form of strata, contentum, organizational involvement,

> > filiation,

> > > environs, subjugation

> > > and even independence while running them con-figured:

economized/ing

> > > ethics) which is

> > > never completely done or undone, finished or started, the

modified

> > > surface is specialized

> > > and stratified; customizing its own elliptic (but immensely

> > > consolidatory) and in the same

> > > vein assimilative political economy out of politics of ground,

the

> > > sphere of solidity [2]; a

> > > metron [3] is molded at the moment of TOUCH, your suggested one

[4],

> > > (an asexual,

> > > coital, senseless, necrophilic touch? Or a frantic fingering?)

> > through

> > > the concave / convex

> > > coexistent regime — endowing (endouer) a modus vivendi; this

> > > Pythagorean metron which

> > > at the same time is too conservo-humanist and in the same track

is

> > > transcendental and

> > > solid [5], runs with surface modification [6], registers and

> > > circulates (in line with solidus in

> > > circulation or the machinery of pseudo-flux) both a criterium

and a

> > > dominance

> > > coincidentally; as 'metron' according to Sextus Empiricus

expresses

> > > criterium and as seen by

> > > Heraclitus and Sophocles certifies dominance, a domination over

> > > something. Not only this

> > > institutionalized metron is applied through this coexistent

regime

> > you

> > > suggested, but also

> > > applies its power formation through the other surfaces,

depositing

> > the

> > > solid investments in

> > > the form of quasi-syntactical depositions or accumulations of

solid,

> > > or more accurately, all

> > > kinds of surface specialization, from your suggested concave /

> > convex

> > > surfaces to affordance

> > > [7] (J. J. Gibson) to the polar regimes of solid and void;

context,

> > > ..., platonic solids and

> > > territories ... and in a despotic attitude, the regimes — terra

> > firma,

> > > the Obelisk (See

> > > Georges Bataille, Obelisk), etc. Such a kinetic metron or the

> > > (re-)animator of power and

> > > solidity awakes in your automobile-human system harmonia both

as an

> > > engine and a hood:

> > > it is an engine assembled by ingenuus (inborn: solidus-based)

and

> > > igneous parts to mark off

> > >

> > > Pestis Solidus 3

> > > horizons (horos: boundary), picking up volumes of inertia,

forging

> > > vessels in the form of

> > > navigium (an enlightening apparatus or the apparatus of

> > > enlightenment?) and emitting

> > > undulations of heat to thermodynamically translate the surplus

value

> > > of the complex

> > > (automobile-human system) into your suggested 'LIVEWARE' which

is

> > not

> > > only initiated

> > > through human system but also the heavy occidental compound of

your

> > > automobilehuman

> > > system coexistent regime (concave, convex; etc?) as a

> > > thermo-economic(al) system

> > > or more, an entity of survival economy ... live-ware as a

phantom

> > > entity forging the

> > > necrocracy of Oedipus and his avatars. This liveware is

triggered

> > off

> > > and originated not by

> > > and through organism but also the entire multifaceted

machineries of

> > > solidus in circulation,

> > > ground and its survival economy i.e. Genesis: an autonomous

siege

> > > engine with bloodless

> > > attitude. And now as a hood, this metron does not really have

any

> > > protective structure out

> > > of a hardened material; and it does not offer a full covering

trait

> > > like a full sewn up jacket;

> > > yet it is not completely unfastened as well; the hood gives an

> > access

> > > to engine, to the heart

> > > of metron (itself) as a horismologic motor of power, measures,

> > > cognitive maps, dwelling /

> > > accommodating spaces, judgments, etc.; as a hood, it opens

thousands

> > > of stitches for

> > > engine to breathe, talk, breed, eat, vomit, copulate and

exchange;

> > > rendering and

> > > transmitting the dominance of the metron processing enginery to

the

> > > other modified

> > > surfaces to appropriate (and being appropriated) the further

> > > accumulations of solid,

> > > surfaces and metrons through the sphere of solidity;

economically,

> > > animating ground to no

> > > end. Solid is slippery. All solid machineries have hood, not

> > > protective or defensive ones (as

> > > it is usually suspected) but hood as an opening tunnel by which

> > > solidity or the solidus

> > > engine communicate, exchange and configure, distributing metron

as

> > the

> > > work-ground of

> > > power, stratifying ground(s) to no end. Metron is the

dimensionality

> > > of Power; it forges the

> > > 'work-ground'. What the hood does, is more like hood-face

> > supplemental

> > > attachment

> > > rather than hood-engine affinities. Returning to the old usage

of

> > hood

> > > in Medieval culture

> > > and Catholicism, it cloaks the body and gives a space (more at

> > > capacity) to the face, then,

> > > it augments the face, translating the entire dynamism of metron

and

> > > its solid / dimensional

> > > machinery from the slippery site of the face (and not the

> > coagulated,

> > > molar or rigid parts)

> > > in the form of architectonic energy of liveware

[8]: " installation

> > of

> > > the new semiotic of

> > > signification and subjectification on that holey surface "

(Deleuze

> > and

> > > Guattari, A

> > > Thousand Plateaus). Hood augments the Face; it transports the

> > > faciality machine of solid /

> > > void out of its horizon, dispersing its concentrative energy

through

> > > the most slippery ways

> > > and not monolithic / molar ones, launching the economy of

ground

> > from

> > > the atypical

> > > harmonia of the face. This is the bio-politics of solidity

(such as

> > > your suggested harmonia)

> > > and face, the white wall / black hole (Deleuze). It is through

the

> > > face that the miasma of

> > > the configuring metron (articulations of dimensionality, ground

and

> > > solidus) is unfolded by

> > > hood (the supplement of metron) into the boundless discourse of

> > > solidity, becoming a

> > > messenger of the out-place and dynamic sphere of solidus (it is

an

> > > oversimplified view to

> > >

> > > Pestis Solidus 4

> > > consider solidus in circulation or solidity, immobile, fixed and

> > > completely rooted ... it is

> > > another deceiving maneuver of solidus in circulation and its

> > > pseudo-fluxes). Here, the metron

> > > of this coexistent regime transforms into the other metrons of

> > > solidity, the other ones, the

> > > other ones and the other ones erratically throughout the most

> > stealth

> > > mode of solid

> > > industry which does not care much about coagulation techniques,

> > > obelisks, monolithic and

> > > rigid solids but horizons, drives, formations, references,

> > boundaries,

> > > authenticity,

> > > institutions, livewares, metrons, non-occupational volumes,

spatial

> > > reasoning, pseudo-flux

> > > and trans-ecological dominance. Amid these maneuvers what goes

> > > esoteric are the ways

> > > that 'heat emission', 'surface modification' and 'horizons' are

> > > reticulated through the

> > > surfaces, animating the extensions of metron all around into

this

> > > coexistent regime in the

> > > form of consolidated (configural) bodies ( " Human, the key,

> > gas, ... " ).

> > > Now we encounter

> > > such questions: 'How does this surface modification turn into a

body

> > > of depositions or

> > > accumulations of solids?' or 'How does the metron work and

propagate

> > > through the

> > > anatomia of this body (or vice versa) and how does it work as a

> > body;

> > > how does this body

> > > run, get interlaced and mantled under the economy of pseudo-

flux and

> > > solidus in

> > > circulation?', 'How does these surface modifications and metrons

> > > enmesh the sphere of

> > > survival economy?', 'How is the body of solidus in circulation

> > formed,

> > > then, releasing solidity

> > > as its surplus value?' or 'the Whys around this panorama, why-

> > motives,

> > > and this and not-this

> > > diametrical discourse [9] of solid engineering mechanisms' ...

all

> > > these questions bear the

> > > genetic dominance of representational thought or nihilism based

> > cogito

> > > or regulating grund

> > > (Appropriator) as Lyotard outlines in Libidinal Economy; they

> > > inter-connect with the

> > > regulating (and institutionalizing) harmonia of this and not-

this

> > as a

> > > quasi-logical solidusbased

> > > core. It is from the diametric and configural discourse of this

and

> > > not-this — which

> > > does not only include this twofold (a this and a not-this) as a

> > polar

> > > coordination but also

> > > their exclusions, environment and the circle on which this two

(2 ×

> > 0)

> > > pulsional principles

> > > (Lyotard) make a diametric discourse with the support of the

other

> > > regulating intensities

> > > or in the other word, further points or 'the other of this and

> > > not-this' which modifies and

> > > tunes the circle and diametric (Polar discourses are parts of

> > > diametric discourses.)

> > > discourses of this and not-this, their affordance — that the

> > > formations of your suggested

> > > automobile-human system harmonia evolves; and not a particular

> > > formation but formation

> > > as Genesis, Con+formatio, Gestaltungen (even non-evolutionary)

that

> > is

> > > the curse of

> > > solidus (Genesis is constituted of the mega-cycles of solidus in

> > > circulation whose surplus

> > > value is solidity.) and its con-solidating machineries (from

> > > Aristotelian rotation of

> > > elements to pseudo-flux); on an innocent (and partially

inoffensive)

> > > panorama, the

> > > consolidating formation decodes the coexistent regime of

> > > concave-convex (your suggested

> > > one) through an observational empiricism; and through the

cyclorama

> > of

> > > its duplicity, it

> > > (over)codes this preexisting regime to the most stealth,

diluted,

> > > deceiving and

> > > maneuvering harmonia of solidus-in-circulation, pseudo-flux and

> > solidity.

> > >

> > >

> > > .b bobji baba

> >

> >

> > exactly!...yes

> >

> > lol

>

>

>

> :-)

>

> .b bobji b.

>

 

 

....there was a time I would have read it and thought about it, rolled

it off my tongue until I understood it...

 

I did once... to reshape my mind...

 

ROFLMarseO.

 

now that makes perfect sense!!