Guest guest Posted March 23, 2007 Report Share Posted March 23, 2007 Nobly, the great priest deposits his daily stool in bleak winter fields -Buson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 23, 2007 Report Share Posted March 23, 2007 Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " <pedsie6 wrote: > > Nobly, the great priest > deposits his daily stool > in bleak winter fields > -Buson ignobly the lowborn quotes priest on master. the fields is windswept snow. the intruder is an obsessive cross-poster with scatological fixations. missing the point completely, he finds joy in the old boy's feces. HO ho! ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 23, 2007 Report Share Posted March 23, 2007 Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " <pedsie6@> wrote: > > > > Nobly, the great priest > > deposits his daily stool > > in bleak winter fields > > -Buson > > > ignobly the lowborn > > quotes priest on master. > > the fields is windswept snow. > > the intruder is an > > obsessive cross-poster > > with scatological fixations. > > missing the point completely, > > he finds joy in the old boy's faces > > HO ho! > > > .b b.b. > note above typo correction;-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 23, 2007 Report Share Posted March 23, 2007 Nisargadatta , " anabebe57 " <kailashana wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " > <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " <pedsie6@> wrote: > > > > > > Nobly, the great priest > > > deposits his daily stool > > > in bleak winter fields > > > -Buson > > > > > > ignobly the lowborn > > > > quotes priest on master. > > > > the fields is windswept snow. > > > > the intruder is an > > > > obsessive cross-poster > > > > with scatological fixations. > > > > missing the point completely, > > > > he finds joy in the old boy's faces > > > > HO ho! > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > note above typo correction;-) no. i was referring to shit. i was not referring to faces or nervus facialis. and the old boy only had ONE FACE..his original. the correction should have been with the singular 'is' with the plural 'fields. but that's just grammar. i had my reasons for writing it this way. i'll leave that to anyone to figure out why. the correct answer will merit the correct guesser ten points and a good long time in nirvana. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.