Guest guest Posted May 18, 2007 Report Share Posted May 18, 2007 The thoughts that are decoding the modulations are themselves modulations--so here is where the metaphor breaks down. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 18, 2007 Report Share Posted May 18, 2007 Nisargadatta , " tom " <jeusisbuen wrote: > > The thoughts that are decoding the modulations are themselves > modulations--so here is where the metaphor breaks down. > yes thoughts are themselves modulations... but don't need a decoder. Where the metaphor breaks down is that the modulations are not a signal from point A to point B. They just are, and it is the " seeing of them " that is the creation of them(!). Their " appearance " in consciousness and their " beingness " in consciousness are the same! They aren't actually *there* except as inventions. And it is interesting to note that in the statement: > Their " appearance " in consciousness and their " beingness " in > consciousness are the same. epistemology and ontology come together... Thanks again. Fun and interesting stuff Tom! Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.