Guest guest Posted May 19, 2007 Report Share Posted May 19, 2007 A visitor asked about the three methods mentioned in Ramana Gita - Chapter II. Maharshi pointed out that breath-retention is an aid to control of mind, i.e., suppression or annihilation of thoughts. One person may practise breath-control, inhalation, exhalation and retention or retention only. Still another type of practising meditator, on controlling the mind, controls the breath and its retention automatically results. Watching the inhalation and exhalation is also breath-control. These methods are only apparently three-fold. They are in fact really one, because they lead to the same goal. They are however differently adopted according to the stage of the aspirant and his antecedent predisposition or tendencies. Really there are only two methods: enquiry and devotion. One leads to the other. Disciple: Seeking the 'I' there is nothing to be seen. M.: Because you are accustomed to identify yourself with the body and sight with the eyes, therefore, you say you do not see anything. What is there to be seen? Who is to see? How to see? There is only one consciousness which, manifesting as 'I-thought', identifies itself with the body, projects itself through the eyes and sees the objects around. The individual is limited in the waking state and expects to see something different. The evidence of his senses will be the seal of authority. But he will not admit that the seer, the seen and the sight are all manifestations of the same consciousness - namely, 'I-I'. Contemplation helps one to overcome the illusion that the Self must be visual. In truth, there is nothing visual. How do you feel the 'I' now? Do you hold a mirror before you to know your own being? The awareness is the 'I'. Realise it and that is the truth. D.: On enquiry into the origin of thoughts there is a perception of 'I'. But it does not satisfy me. M.: Quite right. The perception of 'I' is associated with a form, maybe the body. There should be nothing associated with the pure Self. The Self is the unassociated, pure Reality, in whose light, the body, the ego, etc. shine. On stilling all thoughts the pure consciousness remains over. Just on waking from sleep and before becoming aware of the world there is that pure 'I-I'. Hold to it without sleeping or without allowing thoughts to possess you. If that is held firm it does not matter even though the world is seen. The seer remains unaffected by the phenomena. Talks with Sri Ramana Maharshi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2007 Report Share Posted May 19, 2007 Nisargadatta , " Grant " <g-ssummerville wrote: > > A visitor asked about the three methods mentioned in Ramana Gita - Chapter II. > > Maharshi pointed out that breath-retention is an aid to control of mind, i.e., suppression or annihilation of thoughts. One person may practise breath-control, inhalation, exhalation and retention or retention only. Still another type of practising meditator, on controlling the mind, controls the breath and its retention automatically results. Watching the inhalation and exhalation is also breath-control. These methods are only apparently three-fold. They are in fact really one, because they lead to the same goal. They are however differently adopted according to the stage of the aspirant and his antecedent predisposition or tendencies. Really there are only two methods: enquiry and devotion. One leads to the other. > > Disciple: Seeking the 'I' there is nothing to be seen. > > M.: Because you are accustomed to identify yourself with the body and sight with the eyes, therefore, you say you do not see anything. What is there to be seen? Who is to see? How to see? There is only one consciousness which, manifesting as 'I-thought', identifies itself with the body, projects itself through the eyes and sees the objects around. The individual is limited in the waking state and expects to see something different. The evidence of his senses will be the seal of authority. But he will not admit that the seer, the seen and the sight are all manifestations of the same consciousness - namely, 'I-I'. Contemplation helps one to overcome the illusion that the Self must be visual. In truth, there is nothing visual. How do you feel the 'I' now? Do you hold a mirror before you to know your own being? The awareness is the 'I'. Realise it and that is the truth. > > D.: On enquiry into the origin of thoughts there is a perception of 'I'. But it does not satisfy me. > > M.: Quite right. The perception of 'I' is associated with a form, maybe the body. There should be nothing associated with the pure Self. The Self is the unassociated, pure Reality, in whose light, the body, the ego, etc. shine. On stilling all thoughts the pure consciousness remains over. Just on waking from sleep and before becoming aware of the world there is that pure 'I-I'. Hold to it without sleeping or without allowing thoughts to possess you. If that is held firm it does not matter even though the world is seen. The seer remains unaffected by the phenomena. the reader is unaffected by this phenomenon. ramana followers seem to be very affected though. bless their little souls. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2007 Report Share Posted May 19, 2007 " ...control of mind, i.e., suppression or annihilation of thoughts.... " I am one ego, here to tell other egos, that it is the height of stupidity to think they can suppress or annihilate their thoughts. The mind cannot be controlled for more than a temporary amount of time before it begins to operate on automatic like it is designed to do. By the end of all things human, it will cease to operate; it will die. Yes, the death of ego is real. Very real, indeed. Hehehe.... Silver Nisargadatta , " Grant " <g-ssummerville wrote: > > A visitor asked about the three methods mentioned in Ramana Gita - Chapter II. > > Maharshi pointed out that breath-retention is an aid to control of mind, i.e., suppression or annihilation of thoughts. One person may practise breath-control, inhalation, exhalation and retention or retention only. Still another type of practising meditator, on controlling the mind, controls the breath and its retention automatically results. Watching the inhalation and exhalation is also breath-control. These methods are only apparently three-fold. They are in fact really one, because they lead to the same goal. They are however differently adopted according to the stage of the aspirant and his antecedent predisposition or tendencies. Really there are only two methods: enquiry and devotion. One leads to the other. > > Disciple: Seeking the 'I' there is nothing to be seen. > > M.: Because you are accustomed to identify yourself with the body and sight with the eyes, therefore, you say you do not see anything. What is there to be seen? Who is to see? How to see? There is only one consciousness which, manifesting as 'I-thought', identifies itself with the body, projects itself through the eyes and sees the objects around. The individual is limited in the waking state and expects to see something different. The evidence of his senses will be the seal of authority. But he will not admit that the seer, the seen and the sight are all manifestations of the same consciousness - namely, 'I-I'. Contemplation helps one to overcome the illusion that the Self must be visual. In truth, there is nothing visual. How do you feel the 'I' now? Do you hold a mirror before you to know your own being? The awareness is the 'I'. Realise it and that is the truth. > > D.: On enquiry into the origin of thoughts there is a perception of 'I'. But it does not satisfy me. > > M.: Quite right. The perception of 'I' is associated with a form, maybe the body. There should be nothing associated with the pure Self. The Self is the unassociated, pure Reality, in whose light, the body, the ego, etc. shine. On stilling all thoughts the pure consciousness remains over. Just on waking from sleep and before becoming aware of the world there is that pure 'I-I'. Hold to it without sleeping or without allowing thoughts to possess you. If that is held firm it does not matter even though the world is seen. The seer remains unaffected by the phenomena. > > Talks with Sri Ramana Maharshi > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2007 Report Share Posted May 19, 2007 Nisargadatta , " Silver " <silver wrote: > > " ...control of mind, i.e., suppression or annihilation of > thoughts.... " > > I am one ego, here to tell other egos, that it is the height of > stupidity to think they can suppress or annihilate their thoughts. > The mind cannot be controlled for more than a temporary amount of > time before it begins to operate on automatic like it is designed to > do. By the end of all things human, it will cease to operate; it will > die. Yes, the death of ego is real. Very real, indeed. Hehehe.... > > Silver > > > > Nisargadatta , " Grant " <g-ssummerville@> > wrote: > > > > A visitor asked about the three methods mentioned in Ramana Gita - > Chapter II. > > > > Maharshi pointed out that breath-retention is an aid to control of > mind, i.e., suppression or annihilation of thoughts. One person may > practise breath-control, inhalation, exhalation and retention or > retention only. Still another type of practising meditator, on > controlling the mind, controls the breath and its retention > automatically results. Watching the inhalation and exhalation is also > breath-control. These methods are only apparently three-fold. They > are in fact really one, because they lead to the same goal. They are > however differently adopted according to the stage of the aspirant > and his antecedent predisposition or tendencies. Really there are > only two methods: enquiry and devotion. One leads to the other. > > > > Disciple: Seeking the 'I' there is nothing to be seen. > > > > M.: Because you are accustomed to identify yourself with the body > and sight with the eyes, therefore, you say you do not see anything. > What is there to be seen? Who is to see? How to see? There is only > one consciousness which, manifesting as 'I-thought', identifies > itself with the body, projects itself through the eyes and sees the > objects around. The individual is limited in the waking state and > expects to see something different. The evidence of his senses will > be the seal of authority. But he will not admit that the seer, the > seen and the sight are all manifestations of the same consciousness - > namely, 'I-I'. Contemplation helps one to overcome the illusion that > the Self must be visual. In truth, there is nothing visual. How do > you feel the 'I' now? Do you hold a mirror before you to know your > own being? The awareness is the 'I'. Realise it and that is the truth. > > > > D.: On enquiry into the origin of thoughts there is a perception > of 'I'. But it does not satisfy me. > > > > M.: Quite right. The perception of 'I' is associated with a form, > maybe the body. There should be nothing associated with the pure > Self. The Self is the unassociated, pure Reality, in whose light, the > body, the ego, etc. shine. On stilling all thoughts the pure > consciousness remains over. Just on waking from sleep and before > becoming aware of the world there is that pure 'I-I'. Hold to it > without sleeping or without allowing thoughts to possess you. If that > is held firm it does not matter even though the world is seen. The > seer remains unaffected by the phenomena. > > > > Talks with Sri Ramana Maharshi > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 20, 2007 Report Share Posted May 20, 2007 Yes, old, blah and boring! :-) Silver Nisargadatta , " tom " <jeusisbuen wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Silver " <silver@> wrote: > > > > " ...control of mind, i.e., suppression or annihilation of > > thoughts.... " > > > > I am one ego, here to tell other egos, that it is the height of > > stupidity to think they can suppress or annihilate their thoughts. > > The mind cannot be controlled for more than a temporary amount of > > time before it begins to operate on automatic like it is designed > to > > do. By the end of all things human, it will cease to operate; it > will > > die. Yes, the death of ego is real. Very real, indeed. Hehehe.... > > > > Silver > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Grant " <g-ssummerville@> > > wrote: > > > > > > A visitor asked about the three methods mentioned in Ramana > Gita - > > Chapter II. > > > > > > Maharshi pointed out that breath-retention is an aid to control > of > > mind, i.e., suppression or annihilation of thoughts. One person > may > > practise breath-control, inhalation, exhalation and retention or > > retention only. Still another type of practising meditator, on > > controlling the mind, controls the breath and its retention > > automatically results. Watching the inhalation and exhalation is > also > > breath-control. These methods are only apparently three-fold. They > > are in fact really one, because they lead to the same goal. They > are > > however differently adopted according to the stage of the aspirant > > and his antecedent predisposition or tendencies. Really there are > > only two methods: enquiry and devotion. One leads to the other. > > > > > > Disciple: Seeking the 'I' there is nothing to be seen. > > > > > > M.: Because you are accustomed to identify yourself with the > body > > and sight with the eyes, therefore, you say you do not see > anything. > > What is there to be seen? Who is to see? How to see? There is only > > one consciousness which, manifesting as 'I-thought', identifies > > itself with the body, projects itself through the eyes and sees > the > > objects around. The individual is limited in the waking state and > > expects to see something different. The evidence of his senses > will > > be the seal of authority. But he will not admit that the seer, the > > seen and the sight are all manifestations of the same > consciousness - > > namely, 'I-I'. Contemplation helps one to overcome the illusion > that > > the Self must be visual. In truth, there is nothing visual. How do > > you feel the 'I' now? Do you hold a mirror before you to know your > > own being? The awareness is the 'I'. Realise it and that is the > truth. > > > > > > D.: On enquiry into the origin of thoughts there is a perception > > of 'I'. But it does not satisfy me. > > > > > > M.: Quite right. The perception of 'I' is associated with a > form, > > maybe the body. There should be nothing associated with the pure > > Self. The Self is the unassociated, pure Reality, in whose light, > the > > body, the ego, etc. shine. On stilling all thoughts the pure > > consciousness remains over. Just on waking from sleep and before > > becoming aware of the world there is that pure 'I-I'. Hold to it > > without sleeping or without allowing thoughts to possess you. If > that > > is held firm it does not matter even though the world is seen. The > > seer remains unaffected by the phenomena. > > > > > > Talks with Sri Ramana Maharshi > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.