Guest guest Posted July 4, 2007 Report Share Posted July 4, 2007 You have > > to EXPERIENCE each of them as they ARE--not as they are symbolized > > in writing. I am getting a little short-winded at this point but I > > think the idea--such as it is-- has been brought out. this is a marvelous idea. > > .b b.b. > Bill, I'm wondering if it is possible to bridge the gap between conceptual thought.....the naming of things.....and the natural reality of which Nisargadatta speaks..... .......thinking that there and be no bridge between the real and the unreal. The imagined experiencer is privy only to the conceptual overlay. Perhaps I missed the point of your post. Although from your words....I envision the possibility of an experiential tonal resonance that can make the walls come-a tumblin-down......and the need for a bridge evaporates. toombaru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 4, 2007 Report Share Posted July 4, 2007 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > You have > > > to EXPERIENCE each of them as they ARE--not as they are symbolized > > > in writing. I am getting a little short-winded at this point but I > > > think the idea--such as it is-- has been brought out. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this is a marvelous idea. > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > Bill, > > I'm wondering if it is possible to bridge the gap between conceptual > thought.....the naming of things.....and the natural reality of which > Nisargadatta speaks..... > > ......thinking that there and be no bridge between the real and the > unreal. > > > The imagined experiencer is privy only to the conceptual overlay. > > > Perhaps I missed the point of your post. > > > Although from your words....I envision the possibility of an > experiential tonal resonance that can make the walls come-a > tumblin-down......and the need for a bridge evaporates. > > > > > > toombaru > Koan Only the bare tree can surrender her last leaf. ;-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 5, 2007 Report Share Posted July 5, 2007 --- toombaru2006 <lastrain wrote: > You have > > > to EXPERIENCE each of them as they ARE--not as they are symbolized > > > in writing. I am getting a little short-winded at this point but I > > > think the idea--such as it is-- has been brought out. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this is a marvelous idea. > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > Bill, > > I'm wondering if it is possible to bridge the gap between conceptual > thought.....the naming of things.....and the natural reality of which > Nisargadatta speaks..... > > ......thinking that there and be no bridge between the real and the > unreal. > > > The imagined experiencer is privy only to the conceptual overlay. > > > Perhaps I missed the point of your post. > > > Although from your words....I envision the possibility of an > experiential tonal resonance that can make the walls come-a > tumblin-down......and the need for a bridge evaporates. yes! > > > > > > toombaru > > > > ______________________________\ ____ Need Mail bonding? Go to the Mail Q & A for great tips from Answers users. http://answers./dir/?link=list & sid=396546091 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 5, 2007 Report Share Posted July 5, 2007 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > You have > > > to EXPERIENCE each of them as they ARE--not as they are symbolized > > > in writing. I am getting a little short-winded at this point but I > > > think the idea--such as it is-- has been brought out. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this is a marvelous idea. > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > Bill, > > I'm wondering if it is possible to bridge the gap between conceptual > thought.....the naming of things.....and the natural reality of which > Nisargadatta speaks..... > > ......thinking that there and be no bridge between the real and the > unreal. > > > The imagined experiencer is privy only to the conceptual overlay. > > > Perhaps I missed the point of your post. > > > Although from your words....I envision the possibility of an > experiential tonal resonance that can make the walls come-a > tumblin-down......and the need for a bridge evaporates. > > > > > > toombaru > which is better... bridge " the gap " or deconstruct the gap? my point about attention is that the gap is in attention itself. which may be hard to see as seeing that like seeing the glasses being worn Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.