Guest guest Posted July 16, 2007 Report Share Posted July 16, 2007 " My first realization after the accident was that nature did not involve suffering at all, it was only the human mind that was out of step with natural consciousness, " explained John. " Human consciousness is unaware of the unconditional love of the universe! " John is now aware of that love but says that he spends only about 50% of his day in eternity consciousness, since concentration of any kind causes the eternal, or the 'Dazzling Dark,' to temporarily recede. He is working towards perpetual eternity consciousness, and though some gurus have claimed to have reached it, he doubts if it is possible. John experiences two types of regressions into normal consciousness: the first he calls a 'slip-out,' which happens once or twice a week; the second he calls 'screening.' When John needs to concentrate on something, the Dazzling Dark is pushed to the background, and the 'role' of John Wren-Lewis takes the attention on the forefront of his mind. He used the metaphor of a camera shutter closing briefly then re-opening so he can see the world 'correctly' (in eternity consciousness) again. Occasionally, the camera shutter gets 'stuck,' and this results in the slip-out. But he falls back into Enlightenment as soon as he remembers the Dazzling Dark, and no harm is done. The other kind of regression, screening, is a more extreme slip-out -- the shutter closes, and John cannot relocate the Dark. This has happened to him only a couple of times, and it has always been associated with severe physical or emotional pain. John describes the time when he is apart from eternity as his own 'dark night of the soul.' One thing about the prospect of Enlightenment has always bothered me: the notion of the complete loss of self and identity. I ask John about this -- is it true? Do you really cease being who you are? In his enlightened state, John says it is as though nothing has changed and yet everything has changed. He has retained his personality, needs, desires, but now is aware that the entirety of his existence is simply one of the infinite ways the universe is expressing itself moment by moment. When I asked him if it was worth it, he says definitively that " Yes, this is the best thing that's ever happened to me and it's the natural birthright of everyone and I haven't got a clue how to reach it! " In fact, he feels that most methods people practice to try to reach Enlightenment are counter-productive in that they concentrate on self-effort and think along the lines of time and causality. Although the acausality of enlightenment may sound like bad news at first, John says that it is also good news in a sense because there is no need to kill yourself with spiritual practices or worry about making irreversible mistakes on the spiritual path. In the sixteen years since his experience, he has sought out other people who have had permanent Enlightenment experiences. He has thus far found fifteen, and only two had previous spiritual backgrounds. Just as we are all different people, John told me, there is an infinite variety in the types of Enlightenment experiences that people have. John says the eternity/God/Dazzling Dark loves the variety. The best you can do in the meantime is be aware and to 'travel hopefully.' " And besides, " says John, " Death takes you straight there anyway! " Now he really had my attention. I realized more acutely than ever before that the primary motivation behind my interest in spirituality was my fear and fascination with death and the prospect of life after death. So I popped the question: " What happens to you after you die? " " I don't know. I haven't died yet! " John said with a laugh. What he really meant was that he didn't know specifics about what part of a person survived death or what exactly happens to it, but he could tell me that some sort of 'personal essence' returns to the unconditional love of the Dazzling Dark. Partly this knowledge derives from a real sense of closeness that John feels with family and friends that have passed away, a feeling that what was 'good' in them is still contained in the Dark somehow. However, John is quick to point out that it is more than just a 'sense' that there is 'life' after death -- he knows. " The Dark, " he says, " is constantly there, producing everything at every moment, from the big bang to the final whimper. When you die, the Dark in you lives on. " John likens the whole space-time universe to a theatre in which eternity is playing out the 'time game.' The only place to go when your personal 'time game' is over is offstage, and back to the Dazzling Dark. No judgment, no hellfire and brimstone, simply a return home to eternal love. " The entire concept of a fallen angel is ridiculous, " says John. " I can't imagine anyone choosing not to have Enlightenment! " The fact that there is no hell is not to say that there is no universal morality, for as Christ taught, that which is not in accord with unconditional love is still 'immoral;' however, there is no sin that goes unforgiven. As a great sigh of relief echoed through my Catholic soul, I felt a new sense of vitality and freedom. But at the same time, I felt an overwhelming aimlessness due to the fact that there no longer seemed to be a huge 'agenda' for life. So I asked John, " If you were in my shoes, twenty-one years old and unenlightened, with a world of opportunities before you, what would you do? " Characteristically, the playful John Wren-Lewis quoted Shakespeare, saying, " 'There is nothing serious in mortality.' Live mindful of the fact that life is nothing but a grand play, " he advised, " and become more settled day by day in the knowledge that death is but a return home. Remember that happiness is in the moment and its value is itself. " posted: ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 16, 2007 Report Share Posted July 16, 2007 What happens after death? " First I cut you into little pieces " , LOL. Then I delete all your experiences, all your memories, each and every of your realizations, and if you are completely clear, crystal clear, like thin air, I let you enter my brain. You'll see the reality through my eyes, and you'll know when you see reality through my eyes that you are dead. What happens after that, after you died, and lived my live? The no sphere. lulu Nisargadatta , " .b bobji baba " <Roberibus111 wrote: " My first realization after the accident was that nature did not involve suffering at all, it was only the human mind that was out of step with natural consciousness, " explained John. " Human consciousness is unaware of the unconditional love of the universe! " John is now aware of that love but says that he spends only about 50% of his day in eternity consciousness, since concentration of any kind causes the eternal, or the 'Dazzling Dark,' to temporarily recede. He is working towards perpetual eternity consciousness, and though some gurus have claimed to have reached it, he doubts if it is possible. John experiences two types of regressions into normal consciousness: the first he calls a 'slip-out,' which happens once or twice a week; the second he calls 'screening.' When John needs to concentrate on something, the Dazzling Dark is pushed to the background, and the 'role' of John Wren-Lewis takes the attention on the forefront of his mind. He used the metaphor of a camera shutter closing briefly then re-opening so he can see the world 'correctly' (in eternity consciousness) again. Occasionally, the camera shutter gets 'stuck,' and this results in the slip-out. But he falls back into Enlightenment as soon as he remembers the Dazzling Dark, and no harm is done. The other kind of regression, screening, is a more extreme slip-out -- the shutter closes, and John cannot relocate the Dark. This has happened to him only a couple of times, and it has always been associated with severe physical or emotional pain. John describes the time when he is apart from eternity as his own 'dark night of the soul.' One thing about the prospect of Enlightenment has always bothered me: the notion of the complete loss of self and identity. I ask John about this -- is it true? Do you really cease being who you are? In his enlightened state, John says it is as though nothing has changed and yet everything has changed. He has retained his personality, needs, desires, but now is aware that the entirety of his existence is simply one of the infinite ways the universe is expressing itself moment by moment. When I asked him if it was worth it, he says definitively that " Yes, this is the best thing that's ever happened to me and it's the natural birthright of everyone and I haven't got a clue how to reach it! " In fact, he feels that most methods people practice to try to reach Enlightenment are counter-productive in that they concentrate on self-effort and think along the lines of time and causality. Although the acausality of enlightenment may sound like bad news at first, John says that it is also good news in a sense because there is no need to kill yourself with spiritual practices or worry about making irreversible mistakes on the spiritual path. In the sixteen years since his experience, he has sought out other people who have had permanent Enlightenment experiences. He has thus far found fifteen, and only two had previous spiritual backgrounds. Just as we are all different people, John told me, there is an infinite variety in the types of Enlightenment experiences that people have. John says the eternity/God/Dazzling Dark loves the variety. The best you can do in the meantime is be aware and to 'travel hopefully.' " And besides, " says John, " Death takes you straight there anyway! " Now he really had my attention. I realized more acutely than ever before that the primary motivation behind my interest in spirituality was my fear and fascination with death and the prospect of life after death. So I popped the question: " What happens to you after you die? " " I don't know. I haven't died yet! " John said with a laugh. What he really meant was that he didn't know specifics about what part of a person survived death or what exactly happens to it, but he could tell me that some sort of 'personal essence' returns to the unconditional love of the Dazzling Dark. Partly this knowledge derives from a real sense of closeness that John feels with family and friends that have passed away, a feeling that what was 'good' in them is still contained in the Dark somehow. However, John is quick to point out that it is more than just a 'sense' that there is 'life' after death -- he knows. " The Dark, " he says, " is constantly there, producing everything at every moment, from the big bang to the final whimper. When you die, the Dark in you lives on. " John likens the whole space-time universe to a theatre in which eternity is playing out the 'time game.' The only place to go when your personal 'time game' is over is offstage, and back to the Dazzling Dark. No judgment, no hellfire and brimstone, simply a return home to eternal love. " The entire concept of a fallen angel is ridiculous, " says John. " I can't imagine anyone choosing not to have Enlightenment! " The fact that there is no hell is not to say that there is no universal morality, for as Christ taught, that which is not in accord with unconditional love is still 'immoral;' however, there is no sin that goes unforgiven. As a great sigh of relief echoed through my Catholic soul, I felt a new sense of vitality and freedom. But at the same time, I felt an overwhelming aimlessness due to the fact that there no longer seemed to be a huge 'agenda' for life. So I asked John, " If you were in my shoes, twenty-one years old and unenlightened, with a world of opportunities before you, what would you do? " Characteristically, the playful John Wren-Lewis quoted Shakespeare, saying, " 'There is nothing serious in mortality.' Live mindful of the fact that life is nothing but a grand play, " he advised, " and become more settled day by day in the knowledge that death is but a return home. Remember that happiness is in the moment and its value is itself. " posted: ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 16, 2007 Report Share Posted July 16, 2007 " I'm wondering when and if Bob is going to have such an experience, so that he might abandon his fixation on image and images. " Nisargadatta , " .b bobji baba " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > " My first realization after the accident was that nature did not > involve suffering at all, it was only the human mind that was out of > step with natural consciousness, " explained John. " Human consciousness > is unaware of the unconditional love of the universe! " John is now > aware of that love but says that he spends only about 50% of his day > in eternity consciousness, since concentration of any kind causes the > eternal, or the 'Dazzling Dark,' to temporarily recede. He is working > towards perpetual eternity consciousness, and though some gurus have > claimed to have reached it, he doubts if it is possible. John > experiences two types of regressions into normal consciousness: the > first he calls a 'slip-out,' which happens once or twice a week; the > second he calls 'screening.' When John needs to concentrate on > something, the Dazzling Dark is pushed to the background, and the > 'role' of John Wren-Lewis takes the attention on the forefront of his > mind. He used the metaphor of a camera shutter closing briefly then > re-opening so he can see the world 'correctly' (in eternity > consciousness) again. Occasionally, the camera shutter gets 'stuck,' > and this results in the slip-out. But he falls back into Enlightenment > as soon as he remembers the Dazzling Dark, and no harm is done. > > The other kind of regression, screening, is a more extreme slip-out -- > the shutter closes, and John cannot relocate the Dark. This has > happened to him only a couple of times, and it has always been > associated with severe physical or emotional pain. John describes the > time when he is apart from eternity as his own 'dark night of the soul.' > > One thing about the prospect of Enlightenment has always bothered me: > the notion of the complete loss of self and identity. I ask John about > this -- is it true? Do you really cease being who you are? > > In his enlightened state, John says it is as though nothing has > changed and yet everything has changed. He has retained his > personality, needs, desires, but now is aware that the entirety of his > existence is simply one of the infinite ways the universe is > expressing itself moment by moment. When I asked him if it was worth > it, he says definitively that " Yes, this is the best thing that's ever > happened to me and it's the natural birthright of everyone and I > haven't got a clue how to reach it! " In fact, he feels that most > methods people practice to try to reach Enlightenment are > counter-productive in that they concentrate on self-effort and think > along the lines of time and causality. Although the acausality of > enlightenment may sound like bad news at first, John says that it is > also good news in a sense because there is no need to kill yourself > with spiritual practices or worry about making irreversible mistakes > on the spiritual path. In the sixteen years since his experience, he > has sought out other people who have had permanent Enlightenment > experiences. He has thus far found fifteen, and only two had previous > spiritual backgrounds. Just as we are all different people, John told > me, there is an infinite variety in the types of Enlightenment > experiences that people have. John says the eternity/God/Dazzling Dark > loves the variety. The best you can do in the meantime is be aware and > to 'travel hopefully.' > > " And besides, " says John, " Death takes you straight there anyway! " > > Now he really had my attention. I realized more acutely than ever > before that the primary motivation behind my interest in spirituality > was my fear and fascination with death and the prospect of life after > death. So I popped the question: " What happens to you after you die? " > " I don't know. I haven't died yet! " John said with a laugh. What he > really meant was that he didn't know specifics about what part of a > person survived death or what exactly happens to it, but he could tell > me that some sort of 'personal essence' returns to the unconditional > love of the Dazzling Dark. Partly this knowledge derives from a real > sense of closeness that John feels with family and friends that have > passed away, a feeling that what was 'good' in them is still contained > in the Dark somehow. However, John is quick to point out that it is > more than just a 'sense' that there is 'life' after death -- he knows. > > " The Dark, " he says, " is constantly there, producing everything at > every moment, from the big bang to the final whimper. When you die, > the Dark in you lives on. " John likens the whole space-time universe > to a theatre in which eternity is playing out the 'time game.' The > only place to go when your personal 'time game' is over is offstage, > and back to the Dazzling Dark. No judgment, no hellfire and brimstone, > simply a return home to eternal love. " The entire concept of a fallen > angel is ridiculous, " says John. " I can't imagine anyone choosing not > to have Enlightenment! " The fact that there is no hell is not to say > that there is no universal morality, for as Christ taught, that which > is not in accord with unconditional love is still 'immoral;' however, > there is no sin that goes unforgiven. > > As a great sigh of relief echoed through my Catholic soul, I felt a > new sense of vitality and freedom. But at the same time, I felt an > overwhelming aimlessness due to the fact that there no longer seemed > to be a huge 'agenda' for life. So I asked John, " If you were in my > shoes, twenty-one years old and unenlightened, with a world of > opportunities before you, what would you do? " > > Characteristically, the playful John Wren-Lewis quoted Shakespeare, > saying, " 'There is nothing serious in mortality.' Live mindful of the > fact that life is nothing but a grand play, " he advised, " and become > more settled day by day in the knowledge that death is but a return > home. Remember that happiness is in the moment and its value is itself. " > > posted: > > .b b.b. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 16, 2007 Report Share Posted July 16, 2007 Nisargadatta , " .b bobji baba " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > " My first realization after the accident was that nature did not > involve suffering at all, it was only the human mind that was out of > step with natural consciousness, " explained John. " Human consciousness > is unaware of the unconditional love of the universe! " John is now > aware of that love but says that he spends only about 50% of his day > in eternity consciousness, since concentration of any kind causes the > eternal, or the 'Dazzling Dark,' to temporarily recede. He is working > towards perpetual eternity consciousness, and though some gurus have > claimed to have reached it, he doubts if it is possible. John > experiences two types of regressions into normal consciousness: the > first he calls a 'slip-out,' which happens once or twice a week; the > second he calls 'screening.' When John needs to concentrate on > something, the Dazzling Dark is pushed to the background, and the > 'role' of John Wren-Lewis takes the attention on the forefront of his > mind. He used the metaphor of a camera shutter closing briefly then > re-opening so he can see the world 'correctly' (in eternity > consciousness) again. Occasionally, the camera shutter gets 'stuck,' > and this results in the slip-out. But he falls back into Enlightenment > as soon as he remembers the Dazzling Dark, and no harm is done. > > The other kind of regression, screening, is a more extreme slip- out -- > the shutter closes, and John cannot relocate the Dark. This has > happened to him only a couple of times, and it has always been > associated with severe physical or emotional pain. John describes the > time when he is apart from eternity as his own 'dark night of the soul.' > > One thing about the prospect of Enlightenment has always bothered me: > the notion of the complete loss of self and identity. I ask John about > this -- is it true? Do you really cease being who you are? > > In his enlightened state, John says it is as though nothing has > changed and yet everything has changed. He has retained his > personality, needs, desires, but now is aware that the entirety of his > existence is simply one of the infinite ways the universe is > expressing itself moment by moment. When I asked him if it was worth > it, he says definitively that " Yes, this is the best thing that's ever > happened to me and it's the natural birthright of everyone and I > haven't got a clue how to reach it! " In fact, he feels that most > methods people practice to try to reach Enlightenment are > counter-productive in that they concentrate on self-effort and think > along the lines of time and causality. Although the acausality of > enlightenment may sound like bad news at first, John says that it is > also good news in a sense because there is no need to kill yourself > with spiritual practices or worry about making irreversible mistakes > on the spiritual path. In the sixteen years since his experience, he > has sought out other people who have had permanent Enlightenment > experiences. He has thus far found fifteen, and only two had previous > spiritual backgrounds. Just as we are all different people, John told > me, there is an infinite variety in the types of Enlightenment > experiences that people have. John says the eternity/God/Dazzling Dark > loves the variety. The best you can do in the meantime is be aware and > to 'travel hopefully.' > > " And besides, " says John, " Death takes you straight there anyway! " > > Now he really had my attention. I realized more acutely than ever > before that the primary motivation behind my interest in spirituality > was my fear and fascination with death and the prospect of life after > death. So I popped the question: " What happens to you after you die? " > " I don't know. I haven't died yet! " John said with a laugh. What he > really meant was that he didn't know specifics about what part of a > person survived death or what exactly happens to it, but he could tell > me that some sort of 'personal essence' returns to the unconditional > love of the Dazzling Dark. Partly this knowledge derives from a real > sense of closeness that John feels with family and friends that have > passed away, a feeling that what was 'good' in them is still contained > in the Dark somehow. However, John is quick to point out that it is > more than just a 'sense' that there is 'life' after death -- he knows. > > " The Dark, " he says, " is constantly there, producing everything at > every moment, from the big bang to the final whimper. When you die, > the Dark in you lives on. " John likens the whole space-time universe > to a theatre in which eternity is playing out the 'time game.' The > only place to go when your personal 'time game' is over is offstage, > and back to the Dazzling Dark. No judgment, no hellfire and brimstone, > simply a return home to eternal love. " The entire concept of a fallen > angel is ridiculous, " says John. " I can't imagine anyone choosing not > to have Enlightenment! " The fact that there is no hell is not to say > that there is no universal morality, for as Christ taught, that which > is not in accord with unconditional love is still 'immoral;' however, > there is no sin that goes unforgiven. > > As a great sigh of relief echoed through my Catholic soul, I felt a > new sense of vitality and freedom. But at the same time, I felt an > overwhelming aimlessness due to the fact that there no longer seemed > to be a huge 'agenda' for life. So I asked John, " If you were in my > shoes, twenty-one years old and unenlightened, with a world of > opportunities before you, what would you do? " > > Characteristically, the playful John Wren-Lewis quoted Shakespeare, > saying, " 'There is nothing serious in mortality.' Live mindful of the > fact that life is nothing but a grand play, " he advised, " and become > more settled day by day in the knowledge that death is but a return > home. Remember that happiness is in the moment and its value is itself. " > > posted: > > .b b.b. >Now I know my path--get an NDE. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 16, 2007 Report Share Posted July 16, 2007 Nisargadatta , " tom " <jeusisbuen wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " .b bobji baba " > <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > " My first realization after the accident was that nature did not > > involve suffering at all, it was only the human mind that was out > of > > step with natural consciousness, " explained John. " Human > consciousness > > is unaware of the unconditional love of the universe! " John is now > > aware of that love but says that he spends only about 50% of his > day > > in eternity consciousness, since concentration of any kind causes > the > > eternal, or the 'Dazzling Dark,' to temporarily recede. He is > working > > towards perpetual eternity consciousness, and though some gurus > have > > claimed to have reached it, he doubts if it is possible. John > > experiences two types of regressions into normal consciousness: the > > first he calls a 'slip-out,' which happens once or twice a week; > the > > second he calls 'screening.' When John needs to concentrate on > > something, the Dazzling Dark is pushed to the background, and the > > 'role' of John Wren-Lewis takes the attention on the forefront of > his > > mind. He used the metaphor of a camera shutter closing briefly then > > re-opening so he can see the world 'correctly' (in eternity > > consciousness) again. Occasionally, the camera shutter > gets 'stuck,' > > and this results in the slip-out. But he falls back into > Enlightenment > > as soon as he remembers the Dazzling Dark, and no harm is done. > > > > The other kind of regression, screening, is a more extreme slip- > out -- > > the shutter closes, and John cannot relocate the Dark. This has > > happened to him only a couple of times, and it has always been > > associated with severe physical or emotional pain. John describes > the > > time when he is apart from eternity as his own 'dark night of the > soul.' > > > > One thing about the prospect of Enlightenment has always bothered > me: > > the notion of the complete loss of self and identity. I ask John > about > > this -- is it true? Do you really cease being who you are? > > > > In his enlightened state, John says it is as though nothing has > > changed and yet everything has changed. He has retained his > > personality, needs, desires, but now is aware that the entirety of > his > > existence is simply one of the infinite ways the universe is > > expressing itself moment by moment. When I asked him if it was > worth > > it, he says definitively that " Yes, this is the best thing that's > ever > > happened to me and it's the natural birthright of everyone and I > > haven't got a clue how to reach it! " In fact, he feels that most > > methods people practice to try to reach Enlightenment are > > counter-productive in that they concentrate on self-effort and > think > > along the lines of time and causality. Although the acausality of > > enlightenment may sound like bad news at first, John says that it > is > > also good news in a sense because there is no need to kill yourself > > with spiritual practices or worry about making irreversible > mistakes > > on the spiritual path. In the sixteen years since his experience, > he > > has sought out other people who have had permanent Enlightenment > > experiences. He has thus far found fifteen, and only two had > previous > > spiritual backgrounds. Just as we are all different people, John > told > > me, there is an infinite variety in the types of Enlightenment > > experiences that people have. John says the eternity/God/Dazzling > Dark > > loves the variety. The best you can do in the meantime is be aware > and > > to 'travel hopefully.' > > > > " And besides, " says John, " Death takes you straight there anyway! " > > > > Now he really had my attention. I realized more acutely than ever > > before that the primary motivation behind my interest in > spirituality > > was my fear and fascination with death and the prospect of life > after > > death. So I popped the question: " What happens to you after you > die? " > > " I don't know. I haven't died yet! " John said with a laugh. What he > > really meant was that he didn't know specifics about what part of a > > person survived death or what exactly happens to it, but he could > tell > > me that some sort of 'personal essence' returns to the > unconditional > > love of the Dazzling Dark. Partly this knowledge derives from a > real > > sense of closeness that John feels with family and friends that > have > > passed away, a feeling that what was 'good' in them is still > contained > > in the Dark somehow. However, John is quick to point out that it is > > more than just a 'sense' that there is 'life' after death -- he > knows. > > > > " The Dark, " he says, " is constantly there, producing everything at > > every moment, from the big bang to the final whimper. When you die, > > the Dark in you lives on. " John likens the whole space-time > universe > > to a theatre in which eternity is playing out the 'time game.' The > > only place to go when your personal 'time game' is over is > offstage, > > and back to the Dazzling Dark. No judgment, no hellfire and > brimstone, > > simply a return home to eternal love. " The entire concept of a > fallen > > angel is ridiculous, " says John. " I can't imagine anyone choosing > not > > to have Enlightenment! " The fact that there is no hell is not to > say > > that there is no universal morality, for as Christ taught, that > which > > is not in accord with unconditional love is still 'immoral;' > however, > > there is no sin that goes unforgiven. > > > > As a great sigh of relief echoed through my Catholic soul, I felt a > > new sense of vitality and freedom. But at the same time, I felt an > > overwhelming aimlessness due to the fact that there no longer > seemed > > to be a huge 'agenda' for life. So I asked John, " If you were in my > > shoes, twenty-one years old and unenlightened, with a world of > > opportunities before you, what would you do? " > > > > Characteristically, the playful John Wren-Lewis quoted Shakespeare, > > saying, " 'There is nothing serious in mortality.' Live mindful of > the > > fact that life is nothing but a grand play, " he advised, " and > become > > more settled day by day in the knowledge that death is but a return > > home. Remember that happiness is in the moment and its value is > itself. " > > > > posted: > > > > .b b.b. > >Now I know my path--get an NDE. :-) that's easy and ever present. at the corner of the next nanosecond and time. Always Now. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 16, 2007 Report Share Posted July 16, 2007 " Yes, I've felt that exuberance, often do. Now more into just being fully in my whole body in its relationship to past, present and future, in serene love and acceptance. " Nisargadatta , " .b bobji baba " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " tom " <jeusisbuen@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " .b bobji baba " > > <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > " My first realization after the accident was that nature did not > > > involve suffering at all, it was only the human mind that was out > > of > > > step with natural consciousness, " explained John. " Human > > consciousness > > > is unaware of the unconditional love of the universe! " John is now > > > aware of that love but says that he spends only about 50% of his > > day > > > in eternity consciousness, since concentration of any kind causes > > the > > > eternal, or the 'Dazzling Dark,' to temporarily recede. He is > > working > > > towards perpetual eternity consciousness, and though some gurus > > have > > > claimed to have reached it, he doubts if it is possible. John > > > experiences two types of regressions into normal consciousness: the > > > first he calls a 'slip-out,' which happens once or twice a week; > > the > > > second he calls 'screening.' When John needs to concentrate on > > > something, the Dazzling Dark is pushed to the background, and the > > > 'role' of John Wren-Lewis takes the attention on the forefront of > > his > > > mind. He used the metaphor of a camera shutter closing briefly then > > > re-opening so he can see the world 'correctly' (in eternity > > > consciousness) again. Occasionally, the camera shutter > > gets 'stuck,' > > > and this results in the slip-out. But he falls back into > > Enlightenment > > > as soon as he remembers the Dazzling Dark, and no harm is done. > > > > > > The other kind of regression, screening, is a more extreme slip- > > out -- > > > the shutter closes, and John cannot relocate the Dark. This has > > > happened to him only a couple of times, and it has always been > > > associated with severe physical or emotional pain. John describes > > the > > > time when he is apart from eternity as his own 'dark night of the > > soul.' > > > > > > One thing about the prospect of Enlightenment has always bothered > > me: > > > the notion of the complete loss of self and identity. I ask John > > about > > > this -- is it true? Do you really cease being who you are? > > > > > > In his enlightened state, John says it is as though nothing has > > > changed and yet everything has changed. He has retained his > > > personality, needs, desires, but now is aware that the entirety of > > his > > > existence is simply one of the infinite ways the universe is > > > expressing itself moment by moment. When I asked him if it was > > worth > > > it, he says definitively that " Yes, this is the best thing that's > > ever > > > happened to me and it's the natural birthright of everyone and I > > > haven't got a clue how to reach it! " In fact, he feels that most > > > methods people practice to try to reach Enlightenment are > > > counter-productive in that they concentrate on self-effort and > > think > > > along the lines of time and causality. Although the acausality of > > > enlightenment may sound like bad news at first, John says that it > > is > > > also good news in a sense because there is no need to kill yourself > > > with spiritual practices or worry about making irreversible > > mistakes > > > on the spiritual path. In the sixteen years since his experience, > > he > > > has sought out other people who have had permanent Enlightenment > > > experiences. He has thus far found fifteen, and only two had > > previous > > > spiritual backgrounds. Just as we are all different people, John > > told > > > me, there is an infinite variety in the types of Enlightenment > > > experiences that people have. John says the eternity/God/Dazzling > > Dark > > > loves the variety. The best you can do in the meantime is be aware > > and > > > to 'travel hopefully.' > > > > > > " And besides, " says John, " Death takes you straight there anyway! " > > > > > > Now he really had my attention. I realized more acutely than ever > > > before that the primary motivation behind my interest in > > spirituality > > > was my fear and fascination with death and the prospect of life > > after > > > death. So I popped the question: " What happens to you after you > > die? " > > > " I don't know. I haven't died yet! " John said with a laugh. What he > > > really meant was that he didn't know specifics about what part of a > > > person survived death or what exactly happens to it, but he could > > tell > > > me that some sort of 'personal essence' returns to the > > unconditional > > > love of the Dazzling Dark. Partly this knowledge derives from a > > real > > > sense of closeness that John feels with family and friends that > > have > > > passed away, a feeling that what was 'good' in them is still > > contained > > > in the Dark somehow. However, John is quick to point out that it is > > > more than just a 'sense' that there is 'life' after death -- he > > knows. > > > > > > " The Dark, " he says, " is constantly there, producing everything at > > > every moment, from the big bang to the final whimper. When you die, > > > the Dark in you lives on. " John likens the whole space-time > > universe > > > to a theatre in which eternity is playing out the 'time game.' The > > > only place to go when your personal 'time game' is over is > > offstage, > > > and back to the Dazzling Dark. No judgment, no hellfire and > > brimstone, > > > simply a return home to eternal love. " The entire concept of a > > fallen > > > angel is ridiculous, " says John. " I can't imagine anyone choosing > > not > > > to have Enlightenment! " The fact that there is no hell is not to > > say > > > that there is no universal morality, for as Christ taught, that > > which > > > is not in accord with unconditional love is still 'immoral;' > > however, > > > there is no sin that goes unforgiven. > > > > > > As a great sigh of relief echoed through my Catholic soul, I felt a > > > new sense of vitality and freedom. But at the same time, I felt an > > > overwhelming aimlessness due to the fact that there no longer > > seemed > > > to be a huge 'agenda' for life. So I asked John, " If you were in my > > > shoes, twenty-one years old and unenlightened, with a world of > > > opportunities before you, what would you do? " > > > > > > Characteristically, the playful John Wren-Lewis quoted Shakespeare, > > > saying, " 'There is nothing serious in mortality.' Live mindful of > > the > > > fact that life is nothing but a grand play, " he advised, " and > > become > > > more settled day by day in the knowledge that death is but a return > > > home. Remember that happiness is in the moment and its value is > > itself. " > > > > > > posted: > > > > > > .b b.b. > > >Now I know my path--get an NDE. > > > > :-) > > that's easy and ever present. > > at the corner of the next nanosecond and time. > > Always Now. > > .b b.b. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.