Guest guest Posted August 17, 2007 Report Share Posted August 17, 2007 To count xxx3 Foreward to cyberculture... I'm observing your question, and i don't know if you and i share the same consciousness, or not, if so, I'm replying to my own post, if that is the case, I could be called insane, because I'm talking to myself, if not, I could be called sane because I talk with someone else. but they say that there is no other, so I'm talking to myself, all the time, I just can't remember having written asked or proposed that question. maybe in a dream I was inside your body, but can't remember the dream. Is this fantasy, is this realization really what we want to get across in cyberculture, that we are everyone, that everyone is insane, that everyone is talking constantly to him and herself? That we are all eyes in the same mirror? That there is just one being in front of just one mirror, and that this being is me. That I am everyone? Is this the conclusion we want to arrive? In every language and culture? Yes it is. tom <jeusisbuen wrote: The question I ask is this: Does anything that arises in conscoiusnesshave an observer outside of itself? Or does each content of consciousness act as its' own observer? Each thought, each sensation, each vibration of emotion its' own cognizer.AS someone has said: Everywhere does everything.Z Got a little couch potato? Check out fun summer activities for kids. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 17, 2007 Report Share Posted August 17, 2007 Nisargadatta , Black Eyes <loggin.again wrote: > > To count xxx3 > > Foreward to cyberculture... > > I'm observing your question, > and i don't know if you and i share the same consciousness, or not, > if so, I'm replying to my own post, > if that is the case, > I could be called insane, > because I'm talking to myself, > if not, > I could be called sane > because I talk with someone else. > but they say that there is no other, > so I'm talking to myself, > all the time, > I just can't remember having written asked or proposed that question. > maybe in a dream I was inside your body, but can't remember the dream. > > Is this fantasy, is this realization really what we want to get across in cyberculture, > that we are everyone, > that everyone is insane, > that everyone is talking constantly to him and herself? > That we are all eyes in the same mirror? > > That there is just one being in front of just one mirror, > and that this being is me. > > That I am everyone? > > Is this the conclusion we want to arrive? > > In every language and culture? > > Yes it is. > > > > maybe.... " you " are everyone.... " you " imagine to be..... and then?.... Marc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 17, 2007 Report Share Posted August 17, 2007 > Yes it is. > > Thou hast said it Z > > > tom <jeusisbuen wrote: > The question I ask is this: Does anything that arises in conscoiusness > have an observer outside of itself? Or does each content of > consciousness act as its' own observer? Each thought, each sensation, > each vibration of emotion its' own cognizer.AS someone has said: > Everywhere does everything.Z > Got a little couch potato? > Check out fun summer activities for kids. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.