Guest guest Posted September 18, 2007 Report Share Posted September 18, 2007 Sorry I don't know how to send an active link Z Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 18, 2007 Report Share Posted September 18, 2007 Nisargadatta , " tom " <jeusisbuen wrote: > > > > Sorry I don't know how to send an active link Z > That link worked fine, Tom. Thanks for it and I like it too. Werner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 18, 2007 Report Share Posted September 18, 2007 And there is not even " nothing " . There *is* nothing. Stefan Nisargadatta , " tom " <jeusisbuen wrote: > > > > Sorry I don't know how to send an active link Z > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 18, 2007 Report Share Posted September 18, 2007 Nisargadatta , " Stefan " <s.petersilge wrote: > > And there is not even " nothing " . There *is* nothing. > > Stefan > > What impressed me as I watched this was: we know nothing about the knower. Whatever we know is the known not the knower.the knower isn't there except as--to coin an original exporession--a presence. But there are those who say the knower is self-luminous.So maybe the sense of presence is the self-illumination of the knower. And maybe this sense waxes and wanes and can develop over time.It can develop but not be developed. Z Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.