Guest guest Posted October 17, 2007 Report Share Posted October 17, 2007 When your totality occurs within a conceptual reality......the " rain " will never touch your " skin " . toombaru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 17, 2007 Report Share Posted October 17, 2007 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > When your totality occurs within a conceptual reality......the " rain " > will never touch your " skin " . > > > > toombaru reading your recent words about..... " who " ever wasn't/isn't.... ..... then this " rainjacket " look like exactly your size.....indeed.... Marc > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 17, 2007 Report Share Posted October 17, 2007 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > When your totality occurs within a conceptual reality......the " rain " > will never touch your " skin " . > > > > toombaru if the 'conceptual reality' is equated with... what is 'commonly' considered the 'physical reality'.. this has already been established by the 'science' of same. there is no separation between the atomic structures.. considered as 'basic' to that 'reality. there is no 'line' set out between or created by.. any conceived demarcations. from the smallest quark's tomentum to the most 'distant' infinity.. all and every 'thing' is not separated one from another. that is just illusory and convenient 'truth'.. without and fundamental nor provable validity. so of course the 'rain' doesn't ever 'touch' your skin... the 'skin', surrounding 'airs', internal structure..and 'rain.. are all of a piece. a piece that 'is not'. a WHOLE that IS. a PEACE Eternal. why my goodness..this is not advaita you speak.. it's common, rudimentary, physics and mathematics. it's commendable that you have been reading some primers on science! ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 17, 2007 Report Share Posted October 17, 2007 Nisargadatta , " .b bobji baba " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When your totality occurs within a conceptual reality......the " rain " > > will never touch your " skin " . > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > if the 'conceptual reality' is equated with... > > what is 'commonly' considered the 'physical reality'.. > > this has already been established by the 'science' of same. > > there is no separation between the atomic structures.. > > considered as 'basic' to that 'reality. > > there is no 'line' set out between or created by.. > > any conceived demarcations. > > from the smallest quark's tomentum to the most 'distant' infinity.. > > all and every 'thing' is not separated one from another. > > that is just illusory and convenient 'truth'.. > > without and fundamental nor provable validity. > > so of course the 'rain' doesn't ever 'touch' your skin... > > the 'skin', surrounding 'airs', internal structure..and 'rain.. > > are all of a piece. > > a piece that 'is not'. > > a WHOLE that IS. > > a PEACE Eternal. > > why my goodness..this is not advaita you speak.. > > it's common, rudimentary, physics and mathematics. > > it's commendable that you have been reading some primers on science! > > > > .b b.b. of course..there is no 'difference' between science and advaita. every 'thing' that is... and is not (much the same).. is " THAT " .. without qualification or exception. what could possibly be an exception 'to' or 'from'.. " THAT " ? " THAT " is without 'qualification', 'quality'or.... 'care'. not that 'i' care. 'i' AM " THAT " . " THAT " IS INDIFFERENT. IT 'is' not..... " ISING " ....not even one little bit. isn't that enough to rot your socks off! Yikes a Mahooty! ..b bobji baba Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.