Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

whatever...is like a wave...(nothing to it)

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa wrote:

>

> a mere movement...in stillness

> a sound...in silence

> why make a fuss about a wave...

> if there is identifying with a wave...there is identifying with a wave..

> to ride whatever wave...is suffering...the surferers may say something

> else...but they depend on the wave(s)...for their happiness...

> truely you are not a mere surferer...

> let the waves be...and you will see

> ...iietsa

> http://iietsa.blogspot.com/

 

 

talking about surfers:

 

 

 

 

" Surf dude comes up with theory of everything " ....

 

Is mathematical pattern the theory of everything?

 

 

 

 

GARRETT LISI is an unlikely individual to be staking a claim for a

theory of everything. He has no university affiliation and spends most

of the year surfing in Hawaii. In winter, he heads to the mountains

near Lake Tahoe, California, to teach snowboarding. Until recently,

physics was not much more than a hobby.

 

That hasn't stopped some leading physicists sitting up and taking

notice after Lisi made his theory public on the physics pre-print

archive this week (www.arxiv.org/abs/0711.0770). By analysing the most

elegant and intricate pattern known to mathematics, Lisi has uncovered

a relationship underlying all the universe's particles and forces,

including gravity - or so he hopes. Lee Smolin at the Perimeter

Institute for Theoretical Physics (PI) in Waterloo, Ontario, Canada,

describes Lisi's work as " fabulous " . " It is one of the most compelling

unification models I've seen in many, many years, " he says.

 

That's some achievement, as physicists have been trying to find a

uniform framework for the fundamental forces and particles ever since

they developed the standard model more than 30 years ago. The standard

model successfully weaves together three of the four fundamental

forces of nature: the electromagnetic force; the strong force, which

binds quarks together in atomic nuclei; and the weak force, which

controls radioactive decay. The problem has been that gravity has so

far refused to join the party.

 

 

Most attempts to bring gravity into the picture have been based on

string theory, which proposes that particles are ultimately composed

of minuscule strings. Lisi has never been a fan of string theory and

says that it's because of pressure to step into line that he abandoned

academia after his PhD. " I've never been much of a follower, so I

walked off to search for my own theory, " he says. Last year, he won a

research grant from the charitably funded Foundational Questions

Institute to pursue his ideas.

 

He had been tinkering with " weird " equations for years and getting

nowhere, but six months ago he stumbled on a research paper analysing

E8 - a complex, eight-dimensional mathematical pattern with 248

points. He noticed that some of the equations describing its structure

matched his own. " The moment this happened my brain exploded with the

implications and the beauty of the thing, " says Lisi. " I thought:

'Holy crap, that's it!' "

 

 

What Lisi had realised was that if he could find a way to place the

various elementary particles and forces on E8's 248 points, it might

explain, for example, how the forces make particles decay, as seen in

particle accelerators.

 

Lisi is not the first person to associate particles with the points of

symmetric patterns. In the 1950s, Murray Gell-Mann and colleagues

correctly predicted the existence of the " omega-minus " particle after

mapping known particles onto the points of a symmetrical mathematical

structure called SU(3). This exposed a blank slot, where the new

particle fitted.

 

Before tackling the daunting E8, Lisi examined a smaller cousin, a

hexagonal pattern called G2, to see if it would explain how the strong

nuclear force works. According to the standard model, forces are

carried by particles: for example, the strong force is carried by

gluons. Every quark has a quantum property called its " colour charge "

- red, green or blue - which denotes how the quarks are affected by

gluons. Lisi labelled points on G2 with quarks and anti-quarks of each

colour, and with various gluons, and found that he could reproduce the

way that quarks are known to change colour when they interact with

gluons, using nothing more than high-school geometry (see Graphic).

 

Turning to the geometry of the next simplest pattern in the family,

Lisi found he was able to explain the interactions between neutrinos

and electrons by using the star-like F4. The standard model already

successfully describes the electroweak force, uniting the

electromagnetic and the weak forces. Lisi added gravity into the mix

by including two force-carrying particles called " e-phi " and " omega " ,

to the F4 diagram - creating a " gravi-electroweak " force.

 

Finally, he filled in most of the 248 points of the E8 pattern, using

various " identities " of the 40 known particles and forces. For

example, some particles can have quantum spin values that are either

up or down, and each of these identities would sit on a different

point. He filled the remaining 20 gaps with notional particles, for

example those that some physicists predict to be associated with gravity.

 

With the points on the E8 pattern occupied, he could rotate it using

computer simulations and so project it down in various ways to two

dimensions. By rotating it a certain way, he found that he could

recreate the earlier basic patterns describing the quark-gluon

relationship and his gravi-electroweak force.

 

As he rotated the shape further, he found even more intriguing

patterns. For example, in one configuration, you can see the

gravi-electroweak interaction pattern surrounded by quarks and

anti-quarks congregated into their individually " coloured " groups

(visit www.newscientist.com/article/dn12891 to watch an animation of

the pattern's rotation). What's more, these quarks cluster into

families of three, with almost identical properties but different

masses. Physicists have long puzzled over why elementary particles

appear to belong to such families, but this arises naturally from the

geometry of E8, he says.

 

So far, all the interactions predicted by the complex geometrical

relationships inside E8 match with observations in the real world. " As

far as I have been able to tell, it's a perfect match of tens of

thousands of interactions, " says Lisi. " How cool is that? "

 

Lisi is specially pleased that his model is " without strings, extra

space-time dimensions or other weird inventions that there's no

evidence for " , which bedevil string theory. The maths is simpler, too,

which he says makes it even more compelling. Compared with string

theory, " this uses baby mathematics, " he says.

 

Other physicists are impressed. " Some incredibly beautiful stuff falls

out of Lisi's theory, " says David Ritz Finkelstein at the Georgia

Institute of Technology in Atlanta. " I think that this must be more

than coincidence and he really is touching on something profound. "

 

The question of why our universe should be controlled by the E8

structure is not one that Lisi tackles. " I think the universe is pure

geometry - basically, a beautiful shape twisting around and dancing

over space-time, " says Lisi. " Since E8 is perhaps the most beautiful

structure in mathematics, it is very satisfying that nature appears to

have chosen this geometry. " Finkelstein, however, plans to investigate

whether space-time could be described as a quilt woven together from

E8 patches.

 

Sabine Hossenfelder, also at PI, argues that Lisi's idea could be

complementary to string theory, rather than a radical alternative. She

points out that string theorists already use E8 to describe a pattern

of extra-dimensional space called the Calabi-Yau manifold, which they

propose exists alongside the three dimensions that we see. " Is this a

coincidence? " she asks.

 

The crucial test of Lisi's work will come only when he has made

testable predictions. Lisi himself accepts this, saying that although

his theory is beautiful to him, " nature may disagree " . To fill E8

entirely will require more than 20 new particles not envisaged by the

standard model. Lisi is now calculating the masses that these

particles should have, in the hope that they may be spotted when the

Large Hadron Collider - being built at CERN, near Geneva in

Switzerland - starts up next year.

 

" This is an all-or-nothing kind of theory - it's either going to be

exactly right, or spectacularly wrong, " says Lisi. " I'm the first to

admit this is a long shot. But it ain't over till the LHC sings. "

 

 

 

see there?

 

there's nothing to it after all.

 

..b b.b.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 "

<Roberibus111 wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@> wrote:

> >

> > a mere movement...in stillness

> > a sound...in silence

> > why make a fuss about a wave...

> > if there is identifying with a wave...there is identifying with a

wave..

> > to ride whatever wave...is suffering...the surferers may say

something

> > else...but they depend on the wave(s)...for their happiness...

> > truely you are not a mere surferer...

> > let the waves be...and you will see

> > ...iietsa

> > http://iietsa.blogspot.com/

>

>

> talking about surfers:

>

>

>

>

> " Surf dude comes up with theory of everything " ....

>

> Is mathematical pattern the theory of everything?

>

>

>

>

> GARRETT LISI is an unlikely individual to be staking a claim for a

> theory of everything. He has no university affiliation and spends

most

> of the year surfing in Hawaii. In winter, he heads to the mountains

> near Lake Tahoe, California, to teach snowboarding. Until recently,

> physics was not much more than a hobby.

>

> That hasn't stopped some leading physicists sitting up and taking

> notice after Lisi made his theory public on the physics pre-print

> archive this week (www.arxiv.org/abs/0711.0770). By analysing the

most

> elegant and intricate pattern known to mathematics, Lisi has

uncovered

> a relationship underlying all the universe's particles and forces,

> including gravity - or so he hopes. Lee Smolin at the Perimeter

> Institute for Theoretical Physics (PI) in Waterloo, Ontario, Canada,

> describes Lisi's work as " fabulous " . " It is one of the most

compelling

> unification models I've seen in many, many years, " he says.

>

> That's some achievement, as physicists have been trying to find a

> uniform framework for the fundamental forces and particles ever

since

> they developed the standard model more than 30 years ago. The

standard

> model successfully weaves together three of the four fundamental

> forces of nature: the electromagnetic force; the strong force, which

> binds quarks together in atomic nuclei; and the weak force, which

> controls radioactive decay. The problem has been that gravity has so

> far refused to join the party.

>

>

> Most attempts to bring gravity into the picture have been based on

> string theory, which proposes that particles are ultimately composed

> of minuscule strings. Lisi has never been a fan of string theory and

> says that it's because of pressure to step into line that he

abandoned

> academia after his PhD. " I've never been much of a follower, so I

> walked off to search for my own theory, " he says. Last year, he won

a

> research grant from the charitably funded Foundational Questions

> Institute to pursue his ideas.

>

> He had been tinkering with " weird " equations for years and getting

> nowhere, but six months ago he stumbled on a research paper

analysing

> E8 - a complex, eight-dimensional mathematical pattern with 248

> points. He noticed that some of the equations describing its

structure

> matched his own. " The moment this happened my brain exploded with

the

> implications and the beauty of the thing, " says Lisi. " I thought:

> 'Holy crap, that's it!' "

>

>

> What Lisi had realised was that if he could find a way to place the

> various elementary particles and forces on E8's 248 points, it might

> explain, for example, how the forces make particles decay, as seen

in

> particle accelerators.

>

> Lisi is not the first person to associate particles with the points

of

> symmetric patterns. In the 1950s, Murray Gell-Mann and colleagues

> correctly predicted the existence of the " omega-minus " particle

after

> mapping known particles onto the points of a symmetrical

mathematical

> structure called SU(3). This exposed a blank slot, where the new

> particle fitted.

>

> Before tackling the daunting E8, Lisi examined a smaller cousin, a

> hexagonal pattern called G2, to see if it would explain how the

strong

> nuclear force works. According to the standard model, forces are

> carried by particles: for example, the strong force is carried by

> gluons. Every quark has a quantum property called its " colour

charge "

> - red, green or blue - which denotes how the quarks are affected by

> gluons. Lisi labelled points on G2 with quarks and anti-quarks of

each

> colour, and with various gluons, and found that he could reproduce

the

> way that quarks are known to change colour when they interact with

> gluons, using nothing more than high-school geometry (see Graphic).

>

> Turning to the geometry of the next simplest pattern in the family,

> Lisi found he was able to explain the interactions between neutrinos

> and electrons by using the star-like F4. The standard model already

> successfully describes the electroweak force, uniting the

> electromagnetic and the weak forces. Lisi added gravity into the mix

> by including two force-carrying particles called " e-phi "

and " omega " ,

> to the F4 diagram - creating a " gravi-electroweak " force.

>

> Finally, he filled in most of the 248 points of the E8 pattern,

using

> various " identities " of the 40 known particles and forces. For

> example, some particles can have quantum spin values that are either

> up or down, and each of these identities would sit on a different

> point. He filled the remaining 20 gaps with notional particles, for

> example those that some physicists predict to be associated with

gravity.

>

> With the points on the E8 pattern occupied, he could rotate it using

> computer simulations and so project it down in various ways to two

> dimensions. By rotating it a certain way, he found that he could

> recreate the earlier basic patterns describing the quark-gluon

> relationship and his gravi-electroweak force.

>

> As he rotated the shape further, he found even more intriguing

> patterns. For example, in one configuration, you can see the

> gravi-electroweak interaction pattern surrounded by quarks and

> anti-quarks congregated into their individually " coloured " groups

> (visit www.newscientist.com/article/dn12891 to watch an animation of

> the pattern's rotation). What's more, these quarks cluster into

> families of three, with almost identical properties but different

> masses. Physicists have long puzzled over why elementary particles

> appear to belong to such families, but this arises naturally from

the

> geometry of E8, he says.

>

> So far, all the interactions predicted by the complex geometrical

> relationships inside E8 match with observations in the real

world. " As

> far as I have been able to tell, it's a perfect match of tens of

> thousands of interactions, " says Lisi. " How cool is that? "

>

> Lisi is specially pleased that his model is " without strings, extra

> space-time dimensions or other weird inventions that there's no

> evidence for " , which bedevil string theory. The maths is simpler,

too,

> which he says makes it even more compelling. Compared with string

> theory, " this uses baby mathematics, " he says.

>

> Other physicists are impressed. " Some incredibly beautiful stuff

falls

> out of Lisi's theory, " says David Ritz Finkelstein at the Georgia

> Institute of Technology in Atlanta. " I think that this must be more

> than coincidence and he really is touching on something profound. "

>

> The question of why our universe should be controlled by the E8

> structure is not one that Lisi tackles. " I think the universe is

pure

> geometry - basically, a beautiful shape twisting around and dancing

> over space-time, " says Lisi. " Since E8 is perhaps the most beautiful

> structure in mathematics, it is very satisfying that nature appears

to

> have chosen this geometry. " Finkelstein, however, plans to

investigate

> whether space-time could be described as a quilt woven together from

> E8 patches.

>

> Sabine Hossenfelder, also at PI, argues that Lisi's idea could be

> complementary to string theory, rather than a radical alternative.

She

> points out that string theorists already use E8 to describe a

pattern

> of extra-dimensional space called the Calabi-Yau manifold, which

they

> propose exists alongside the three dimensions that we see. " Is this

a

> coincidence? " she asks.

>

> The crucial test of Lisi's work will come only when he has made

> testable predictions. Lisi himself accepts this, saying that

although

> his theory is beautiful to him, " nature may disagree " . To fill E8

> entirely will require more than 20 new particles not envisaged by

the

> standard model. Lisi is now calculating the masses that these

> particles should have, in the hope that they may be spotted when the

> Large Hadron Collider - being built at CERN, near Geneva in

> Switzerland - starts up next year.

>

> " This is an all-or-nothing kind of theory - it's either going to be

> exactly right, or spectacularly wrong, " says Lisi. " I'm the first to

> admit this is a long shot. But it ain't over till the LHC sings. "

>

>

>

> see there?

>

> there's nothing to it after all.

>

> .b b.b.

>

 

wow...

its like a whole book...

and...its all garbage...

why carry such a load...

....iietsa

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 "

> <Roberibus111@> wrote:

 

> wow...

> its like a whole book...

> and...its all garbage...

> why carry such a load...

> ...iietsa

 

 

because i knew maggots like you would find the heap and jump right in.

 

you're so desperately in need of support...

 

it takes a great being to carry that load of garbage...

 

with it's parasitic housefly and blowfly larva like yourself.

 

and baba carries this organic waste, and the feeders found therein..

 

because he pities them all.

 

no need for thanks.

 

this is baba's gift to grubs, worms, fleas and larva.

 

it's for the free ride of the ignorant that you come i know.

 

blessings little one,

 

..b b.b.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...