Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Has observing the universe hastened its end? LOL!

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

from a scientific journal:

 

 

Have we hastened the demise of the universe by looking at it? That's

the startling question posed by a pair of physicists, who suggest that

we may have accidentally nudged the universe closer to its death by

observing dark energy, which is thought to be speeding up cosmic

expansion.

 

Lawrence Krauss of Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio,

and colleague James Dent suggest that by making this observation in

1998 we may have caused the universe to revert to a state similar to

early in its history, when it was more likely to end. " Incredible as

it seems, our detection of the dark energy may have reduced the

life-expectancy of the universe, " says Krauss.

 

The researchers came to their conclusion by calculating how the energy

state of our universe might have evolved. Until recently, cosmologists

thought that the big bang 13.7 billion years ago occurred after a

bubble of weird high-energy " false vacuum " with repulsive gravity

decayed into a zero-energy " ordinary " vacuum. The energy released

during this transition could have made matter and heated it to a

ferocious temperature, which essentially created the massive explosion

of the big bang. The discovery of dark energy - and the realisation

that the universe's expansion is accelerating - reveals that the

vacuum may not have decayed to zero energy, but to another false

vacuum state. In other words, some energy was retained in this vacuum,

and this is accelerating the universe's expansion.

 

Like the decay of a radioactive atom, such shifts in energy state

happen at random. " So it is entirely possible it could decay again,

wiping the slate of our universe clean, " says Krauss. If this

transition did happen, everything in our universe would cease to exist.

 

The fact that we are still here means this can't have happened yet.

But cosmologists have long puzzled over why this should be,

particularly as the probability of the false vacuum of our universe

having survived decreases exponentially over time.

 

Building on a discovery made in the 1950s, Krauss's calculations show

that if the universe did happen to hold out past a certain threshold,

its chance of staying stable are substantially increased. In 1958,

Russian physicist L. Khalfin discovered that after an extremely long

time, the probability of a quantum system having survived stops

falling exponentially and switches to a slower rate of decline. This

means that if the false vacuum of the universe survives to the

switching point between the two rates, it will effectively become

eternal. This is because the false vacuum is known to grow

exponentially fast, and past the switching point it will be created

faster than it can be eaten away by any decay, he says.

 

According to Krauss, the smaller the energy gap between the false

vacuum and zero, the earlier the switching point between the two

rates. And - surprise, surprise - we live in a universe where the

vacuum energy is just above zero, so we could be well past the crucial

switching point.

 

At first glance, this seems like good news for us because it would

mean our universe is on track to survive forever. However, things may

not be as good as they seem, Krauss says. At the quantum level,

whenever we observe or measure something, we reset its clock and stop

it decaying - something known as the quantum Zeno effect. Our

measurement of the light from supernovae in 1998, which provided

evidence of dark energy, may have reset the false vacuum's decay clock

to zero - back to a point when the likelihood of its surviving was

falling exponentially over time. " In short, we may have snatched away

the possibility of long-term survival for our universe and made it

more likely it will decay, " says Krauss.

 

Krauss's claim is controversial. Max Tegmark of the Massachusetts

Institute of Technology maintains that the quantum Zeno effect does

not require humans to make observations of light. " Galaxies have

'observed' the dark energy long before we evolved, " he says, as they

were affected by it and were encoding information about it. " When we

humans in turn observe the light from these galaxies, it changes

nothing except our own knowledge. "

 

hahahahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!

 

..b b.b.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...