Consciousness and its content, questions and reflections.

[Guest guest]

Is the separation of Consciousness and

 

its content a fact? Or It is one Experience?

 

If I think that it could be separated

 

Could this be theoritical?

 

If it is one experience,

 

then it could be relative, conditioned or limited

 

by " me " .

 

What is this " me " that conditions consciousness?

 

If this one experience -consciousness and the content-

 

is freed from this " me " !

 

Could the resulting experience be

 

absolute, unconditioned and

 

unlimited consciousness?

 

v h

[Guest guest]

Suppose we call consciousness <<content>> and we call awareness

that which creates <<consciousness>>?

 

Now, I Am consciousness Being aware.<<of itself>> & what it

sees/feels/thinks/experiences as <<not-self>>.

 

A.

 

 

 

 

Nisargadatta , " Virgil " <v.halbred wrote:

>

> Is the separation of Consciousness and

>

> its content a fact? Or It is one Experience?

>

> If I think that it could be separated

>

> Could this be theoritical?

>

> If it is one experience,

>

> then it could be relative, conditioned or limited

>

> by " me " .

>

> What is this " me " that conditions consciousness?

>

> If this one experience -consciousness and the content-

>

> is freed from this " me " !

>

> Could the resulting experience be

>

> absolute, unconditioned and

>

> unlimited consciousness?

>

> v h

>

[Guest guest]

the knowing of which will occur or not..dianaanabebe57 <kailashana wrote: Suppose we call consciousness <<content>> and we call awarenessthat which creates <<consciousness>>?Now, I Am consciousness Being aware.<<of itself>> & what itsees/feels/thinks/experiences as <<not-self>>.A.Nisargadatta , "Virgil" <v.halbred wrote:>> Is the

separation of Consciousness and > > its content a fact? Or It is one Experience?> > If I think that it could be separated> > Could this be theoritical?> > If it is one experience,> > then it could be relative, conditioned or limited> > by "me".> > What is this "me" that conditions consciousness?> > If this one experience -consciousness and the content-> > is freed from this "me"!> > Could the resulting experience be > > absolute, unconditioned and > > unlimited consciousness?> > v h>

[Guest guest]

Hello everyone, just wanted to thank everyone for their post, you guys rock. I AM reading and searching and trying to learn to live or not live.I have to admit there is this question that keeps coming up, duality of the ego causes suffering and all that stuff. I keep seeing god playing chest and knowing every move before hand, when duality stops,the game has to be over, no more chest. MY question is that, is the goal to stop the game? When I read Ramana Maharshi. when he echoed Shankara he would say THE world is illusory----Brahman alone is real, Brahman is the world. Maybe god is playing the game and we are the instruments and thought calls the game ego.

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " gary tison " <juliusw007

wrote:

>

> Hello everyone, just wanted to thank everyone for their post, you

guys rock. I AM reading and searching and trying to learn to live or

not live.I have to admit there is this question that keeps coming up,

duality of the ego causes suffering and all that stuff. I keep seeing

god playing chest and knowing every move before hand, when duality

stops,the game has to be over, no more chest. MY question is that, is

the goal to stop the game? When I read Ramana Maharshi. when he echoed

Shankara he would say THE world is illusory----Brahman alone is real,

Brahman is the world.

 

Maybe god is playing the game and we are the instruments and thought

calls the game ego.

 

 

" god " is playing the game....as long there is an entity playing with

Him......

 

and....as long there is an entity playing a game or doing whatever nice

things ....there is also " god " playing a game

 

nobody/nothing is seperated from " god "

 

.....

 

nobody/nothing....except " your " imaginary being (ego)....is playing

games

 

.....

 

" god " is all there Is....within the imaginary world of a non dual ego

 

.....

 

 

" ego " is all there Is....within the imaginary world of a dual ego

 

such perception cause conflicts without end.....tend to destruction

constantly......because it is based on complete ignorance/blindness

 

some people get mad.....and when they read : " i am the world " ...in a

nice book.......they get persuaded that they should drive

everybody " mad " too.....without being aware of what they Are and are

Doing

 

.....

 

 

Marc

 

 

Ps: for a dual ego..... " god " keeps being imaginary....

 

for the non dual ego.... " god " is present....here & now....as all there Is

 

 

.....

 

so better to " see " " god " within everybody......

 

and be happy.....with whatever appearences......

 

then....there there is game at wish