Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

world peace? not!

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Nisargadatta , " joe.irrelevant "

<joe.irrelevant wrote:

>

> Was there ever a world without troubles? Your being as a person depends

> on violence to others. Your very body is a battlefield, full of the

> dead and dying. Existence implies violence. There is little of non-

> violence in nature. Do you realize that, as long as you have a self to

> defend, you must be violent?

>

 

If not oneself, then one's family, religion, country, sex, etc.

To now this is the beginning of the dismantling of fear which is the

ultimate cause of violence.

 

The underlying ever-present balance of opposites and the right

understanding of boundaries exists only in a fleeting frame of

reference called " I " .

 

It becomes a choice of how we act, enact, react, and reenact in the

world we create with our boundaries.

 

It's not easy unless we do so with awareness and loving-kindness/

compassion.

 

Anna

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , " anabebe57 " <kailashana

wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " joe.irrelevant "

> <joe.irrelevant@> wrote:

> >

> > Was there ever a world without troubles? Your being as a person

depends

> > on violence to others. Your very body is a battlefield, full of

the

> > dead and dying. Existence implies violence. There is little of

non-

> > violence in nature. Do you realize that, as long as you have a

self to

> > defend, you must be violent?

> >

>

> If not oneself, then one's family, religion, country, sex, etc.

> To now this is the beginning of the dismantling of fear which is the

> ultimate cause of violence.

>

> The underlying ever-present balance of opposites and the right

> understanding of boundaries exists only in a fleeting frame of

> reference called " I " .

>

> It becomes a choice of how we act, enact, react, and reenact in the

> world we create with our boundaries.

>

> It's not easy unless we do so with awareness and loving-kindness/

> compassion.

>

> Anna

>

When I copied this quote from Nis, I failed to include his name as

the author at the end, my apologies to Nis.

I agree, world peace would be very easy if awareness is realized as

self but impossible if it is not.

Joe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " joe.irrelevant "

<joe.irrelevant wrote:

>

> Was there ever a world without troubles? Your being as a person

depends

> on violence to others. Your very body is a battlefield, full of the

> dead and dying. Existence implies violence. There is little of non-

> violence in nature. Do you realize that, as long as you have a self to

> defend, you must be violent?

>

 

" You must be vilolent " ?

 

-As long there is attachment, most certainly...yes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " Johan " <yohansky wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " joe.irrelevant "

> <joe.irrelevant@> wrote:

> >

> > Was there ever a world without troubles? Your being as a person

> depends

> > on violence to others. Your very body is a battlefield, full of the

> > dead and dying. Existence implies violence. There is little of non-

> > violence in nature. Do you realize that, as long as you have a self

to

> > defend, you must be violent?

> >

>

> " You must be vilolent " ?

>

> -As long there is attachment, most certainly...yes.

>

I am. I killed hundreds of ants today

 

ah yes. . . the wonder of the world's evil is witnessed only with

detachment

Joe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " Johan " <yohansky wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " joe.irrelevant "

> <joe.irrelevant@> wrote:

> >

> > Was there ever a world without troubles? Your being as a person

> depends

> > on violence to others. Your very body is a battlefield, full of the

> > dead and dying. Existence implies violence. There is little of non-

> > violence in nature. Do you realize that, as long as you have a

self to

> > defend, you must be violent?

> >

>

> " You must be vilolent " ?

>

> -As long there is attachment, most certainly...yes.

>

 

Non-attachment is a lie. There is no such thing as non-attachment.

There is a process of letting go things that no longer serve us,

however as quickly as we notice we have let go, we also do not notice

how this is just a new variation of an old theme. Soon we will have

to let that attachment go.

 

And so it goes... Life.

 

~Anna

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " anabebe57 " <kailashana

wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " Johan " <yohansky@> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " joe.irrelevant "

> > <joe.irrelevant@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Was there ever a world without troubles? Your being as a person

> > depends

> > > on violence to others. Your very body is a battlefield, full of

the

> > > dead and dying. Existence implies violence. There is little of

non-

> > > violence in nature. Do you realize that, as long as you have a

> self to

> > > defend, you must be violent?

> > >

> >

> > " You must be vilolent " ?

> >

> > -As long there is attachment, most certainly...yes.

> >

>

> Non-attachment is a lie. There is no such thing as non-attachment.

> There is a process of letting go things that no longer serve us,

> however as quickly as we notice we have let go, we also do not

notice

> how this is just a new variation of an old theme. Soon we will have

> to let that attachment go.

>

> And so it goes... Life.

>

> ~Anna

>

attachment is the lie.

but you are almost correct about one thing

sooner or later we must detach from all things

either now or at death

Joe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " anabebe57 " <kailashana

wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " Johan " <yohansky@> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " joe.irrelevant "

> > <joe.irrelevant@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Was there ever a world without troubles? Your being as a person

> > depends

> > > on violence to others. Your very body is a battlefield, full of

the

> > > dead and dying. Existence implies violence. There is little of

non-

> > > violence in nature. Do you realize that, as long as you have a

> self to

> > > defend, you must be violent?

> > >

> >

> > " You must be vilolent " ?

> >

> > -As long there is attachment, most certainly...yes.

> >

>

> Non-attachment is a lie. There is no such thing as non-attachment.

> There is a process of letting go things that no longer serve us,

> however as quickly as we notice we have let go, we also do not

notice

> how this is just a new variation of an old theme. Soon we will have

> to let that attachment go.

>

> And so it goes... Life.

>

> ~Anna

>

Detachment a lie?!! the ego lives and breathes

 

You cannot be conscious of what does not change. All consciousness is

consciousness of change. But the very perception of change - does it

not necessitate a changeless background?

Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj

 

" Don't criticize what you can't understand. "

Joe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...