Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Re : two states

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , sujal <sujal_u wrote:

>

> Dear Jose,

>

> 'I AM' definetely means the true self and not ego.

> But to think on 'I AM', we need the support of mind.

> So we need to drop the word 'I AM' but not our true

> self. It is like a pole volt. You take the support of

> the pole (long stick 3-4 Mtrs long) to cross the cross

> bar (which is the mind) and then drop the pole and

> reach the other end. (divine bliss).

>

> Why there is the need to think on 'I AM'? To remove

> all the other thoughts. Basically ours is a demanding

> mind and mind is nothing but continous flow of

> thoughts according to Ramana Maharshi. To realise our

> true SELF, we need to remove all the other thoughts.

> How can we remove other thoughts? First we should be

> able to imagine what is our true nature. So by

> thinking on our true nature, i.e. i am conciousness, i

> am awareness, i am not the ego but the state where the

> ego does not exists. i am peace, divine bliss. I am

> beyond senses, beyond mind, etc. By thinking in such a

> way, (which Sri Nisargadattaji Maharaj has pointed

> out) we can develop all thoughts which are of similar

> kind ( nature) and when our mind is filled with these

> thougths then there is no space for worldly thoughts.

> our mind is full of the thoughts which are related to

> our SELF. In this way one pointedness is achieved.

> Total surrenderance of the EGO to the SELF is the real

> devotion according to Ramana Maharshi.When we are able

> to do so we find the source of ego, where the ego does

> not exists, but only the SELF exists. Everything

> dissolves and only you exists i.e. pure awareness.

>

> This is the reason why Sri Nisargadattaji has told us

> to think on 'I AM'. this is to reach one state i.e.

> mind full of thoughts related to our SELF.

> Then he says go beyond it. It does not mean that there

> is something beyond our SELF. It means that DROP this

> thought about 'I AM' (because the desire of knowing

> our true nature is also a desire and distruction of

> desires is nothing but liberation says Sri Adi

> Sankaracharya) and then the mind is perfectly calm we

> can go beyond the mind and realise our true self. If

> you keep on thinking about 'I AM' still it is not

> enough because to think means to involve the mind and

> till you are within the mind you cannot go beyond the

> mind. Now, to go beyond the mind or thoughts, we have

> to be aware of this thoughts and try to find their

> origin. The origin of thought is EGO, which is the

> cause of duality, and the origin of EGO is the SELF.

> If you are meditating then you can understand what do

> i mean.

>

> As far as Buddhism is concerned, i cannot comment on

> Buddhism and its principle of Shunyata - i.e. Soul

> means nothing or emptyness or zero state.

>

> I have read Sri Ramana Maharshi's " 40 verses on truth "

> and in that it is said that there is no state in which

> you can deny your existance. So Who says (observes)

> that the soul is the zero state is the SELF and not

> the ZERO state. The knowner of zero state is the SELF.

>

> I hope this clears your doubt.

>

> AUM

>

> Sujal

 

 

nice words.....interesting....

 

maybe there are people who are kind of too much attached to this " I

Am " ....and so to the fiction of an ego......and so loosing inner

attention

 

there are people who take themself....means, their limited

ego.....as " all there is " .....as the one and only subject.....

 

.....and cause therefore constantly conflicts.....mainly with

themself, means conflicts with their true self

(also through the appearing contact to other similar ego's)......

 

 

Marc

 

>

> --- jose le roy <joseleroyfr wrote:

>

> > Hello,

> > thank's for your answer but it seems to me that we

> > can make some confusions about what we call " I AM " .

> > one can listen here I AM = ego (the individual

> > person with a name and a body). So if I am

> > going beyond the I AM, I will discover the pure

> > consciousness. For exemple some buddhist compare

> > atman to the ego and non-atman means only non-ego,

> > not non-awareness.

> > But for other people (maybe for Niz), the I AM will

> > mean the pure consciousness wich is without limit,

> > without time, universal, and in which the world

> > happens now. This pure consciousness is the source

> > of the world. So in this case going beyong the pure

> > consciousness is going also beyong all self because

> > self = consciousness. Self means being conscious

> > that I AM conscious.

> > So what do you mean by I AM?

> > thanks josé

> >

> >

> >

> > ----- Message d'origine ----

> > De : sujal_u <sujal_u

> > À : Nisargadatta

> > Envoyé le : Lundi, 7 Avril 2008, 15h24mn 45s

> > Objet : Re: two states

> >

> >

> > Dear Jose,

> >

> > The method tought by Sri Nisargadattaji involves the

> > use of mind. The

> > enquiry about 'I am' or to find out 'who Am I' by

> > Sri Ramana Maharshi

> > or chanting of 'AUM' is all the same.

> >

> > All these require you to sit and meditate. This

> > process involves

> > mental efforts. The reason for suggesting this kind

> > of enquiry (about

> > 'I am' or 'who am i') is that with the help of this

> > al other thoughts

> > are dissloved. The only thought that remains is the

> > 'I am' or 'who am

> > i' or the chanting of 'AUM'. But still, it is not

> > the final state

> > because, in this state, duality exists i.e. 1. the

> > one who is

> > chanting or making the enquiry and 2. and the one

> > who observes the

> > chanting.

> >

> > Now Sri Nisargadattaji askes us to go beyond the 'i

> > am'. Who to go

> > beyond 'i am'?. By trying to know from where the

> > chanting or the

> > enquiry has originated. i.e. the source. In ramana

> > maharshi's words,

> > the fire burns the corpse (which implies the

> > desires) and then it

> > also dies out. After you find the source from where

> > this enquiry has

> > originated, then everything dissolves and only the

> > source, i.e. you

> > or 'SELF' remains this is known as

> >

> > 'Nirvikapl Samadhi'

> >

> > Vikalp=changes

> > NirVikalp= the one which does not changes

> > Samadhi = state of awareness about our true nature

> >

> > Hence first we should try to enquire or find 'i am '

> > or 'who am i'

> > and then go beyond it.

> >

> > A person who regularly meditating can understand

> > this.

> >

> > Ramesh Balsaker is from Yoga. In Yoga, the

> > philosophy, we have to

> > tune with the body both gross and subtle. So it has

> > its limitations

> > and you need to go beyond kundalini. finally every

> > thought has to be

> > discarded. which people fail to do so as they have

> > tuned with the

> > body. So these people cannot go beyond or find

> > diffucult or go beyond

> > 'i amj'

> >

> > Hope this clears out

> >

> > Sincerely

> >

> > Sujal Upadhyay

> >

> > Nisargadatta, jose le roy

> > <joseleroyfr@ ...>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear members,

> > > I am just joined you and I have a question.

> > > It seems to me that Nisargaddat talked about two

> > states: the first

> > is the discovering of the " I am " , of the

> > consciousness which is

> > formless, without limit, divine.

> > > But he asked us to go further, beyond the " I am " ,

> > beyong the

> > consciousness.

> > > Among the spiritual teachers today, it seems to me

> > that they often

> > make confusions between this two states maybe even

> > Balsekar.

> > > And it's difficult to find in the past teachers

> > who are able to

> > make this difference.

> > > Do someone agree with me or am I reading

> > Nisargadatta in the wrong

> > way?

> > > thanks

> > > josé (from Paris, france)

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________

> > _________ _

> >

> > > Envoyez avec Mail. Une boite mail plus

> > intelligente http://

> > mail..fr

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

____________________

_______

> >

> > Envoyez avec Mail. Une boite mail plus

> > intelligente http://mail..fr

>

>

>

>

____________________

______________

> You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of

Blockbuster Total Access, No Cost.

> http://tc.deals./tc/blockbuster/text5.com

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...