what else!? bleeding and bleeding and bleeding Anna

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " anabebe57 " <kailashana wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " <pedsie6@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > >

> > > and he's not to blame..we are.

> > >

> > > :-) bbb

> > >

> >

> > P: I had to chuckle at that one, bob.

> > And, you are, of course, right. What

> > can we do to amend our ways? Is there

> > a course in reading comprehension, or

> > in saintly patience we can take?

> >

>

>

>

>

> It seems everyone is just too eager to tell someone else of their

> *shortcomings*.....

>

> I wonder...

>

> Lots of smoke and mirrors.....

>

> Of course, while we're busy telling what's *wrong* with

> another person, we NEVER have to look at ourselves.

>

> Verbal and emotional *abuse* is still verbal and emotional

> abuse... no matter how *enlightened* we think we are.

>

> What's spiritual in these groups? Who's teaching whom?

>

> And may I inquire as to what?

>

>

> Happy Thanksgiving... I am thankful I'm pretty much done

> with it all. This is all a sham. And it has nothing to do

> with Rumi.

>

> ~A

 

In forensic science if they find 4 liters of your blood on the crime

scene you are officially declared dead, even if they don't find your body.

Bleeding and bleeding for ages on these lists, exposing yourself to

the exact situation that will call for the exact treatment you

denounce; people who are authentically hurt learn very fast, change

attitude or withdraw in a blink to their safe garden.

You are not hurt more than anyone else, just putting a show.

What has Grandiose Anna brought to you?

more happiness? any sense of peace?

sure don thin so..

[Guest guest]

 

 

In a message dated 11/28/2008 8:46:12 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, pedsie6 writes:

 

-> > Eric:In forensic science if they find 4 liters of your blood on thecrime> scene you are officially declared dead, even if they don't find yourbody.> Bleeding and bleeding for ages on these lists, exposing yourself to> the exact situation that will call for the exact treatment you> denounce; people who are authentically hurt learn very fast, change> attitude or withdraw in a blink to their safe garden.> You are not hurt more than anyone else, just putting a show.> What has Grandiose Anna brought to you?> more happiness? any sense of peace?> sure don thin so..P: I see great similarity between annaand phil, both refuse to admit anyresponsibility for the rejectionthey encounter at these lists, andso, they perpetuate the rejectionthey complain about. People who arefar from stupid can get caught ina loop of stupid behavior becauseto admit they are not playing this great role of teachers of light and love wouldcrush them as flat as a tortilla.Of course, they have no everyday egos, theyhave super inflationary egos.What do you think?>

 

 

****Is it that you don't believe anything I say, Pete? Is that why you keep repeating this nonsense, or is it that you don't hear me? I've neither denied responsibility nor complained about rejection. People who are far from stupid can get caught in a loop of stupid behavior. Have you noticed this about Pete?

 

Life should be easier. So should your homepage. Try the NEW AOL.com.

[Guest guest]

 

 

In a message dated 11/28/2008 10:21:22 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, ericparoissien writes:

 

Nisargadatta , "cerosoul" <pedsie6 wrote:...> P: I see great similarity between anna> and phil, both refuse to admit any> responsibility for the rejection> they encounter at these lists, and> so, they perpetuate the rejection> they complain about. People who are> far from stupid can get caught in> a loop of stupid behavior because> to admit they are not playing this great > role of teachers of light and love would> crush them as flat as a tortilla.> > Of course, they have no everyday egos, they> have super inflationary egos.> > What do you think?I haven't read much of Phil and it would have been particularlyinteresting to follow his problems with Jerry Katz who has greatpractical sense in dealing with "cases" without introducing an elementof neurotic lingering relationship.The first step of idiocy is the inability to avoid crisis or inabilityto diffuse their pressure energy, the cleverest person being the dumbwho knows he is dumb and plays dumb to avoid a crisis.THEN if the situations of crisis has not been avoided redeemingqualities play on the diptych panels of:- short term negotiation- long term reconsidering of attitudeAnd observing both Anna and bbb on these they failed lamentably on alltests.

 

****I've made no attempt to avoid "crisis" because I saw no crisis and still don't. I had no attachment to the NDS list and have none to this list. I think the dynamics are interesting and informative, but I have no desire to submerse myself in them long term. That would be rather massochistic.

 

I see both Anna and Booboo as drama queens, and so I suspect they have no interest in avoiding crisis but rather feed off it.

Life should be easier. So should your homepage. Try the NEW AOL.com.

[Guest guest]

 

 

In a message dated 11/28/2008 11:32:28 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, kailashana writes:

 

Nisargadatta , "roberibus111" <Roberibus111wrote:>> Nisargadatta , souldreamone@ wrote:> >> > > > > > > > In a message dated 11/28/2008 10:21:22 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, > > ericparoissien@ writes:> > > > Nisargadatta , "cerosoul" <pedsie6@> wrote:> > > > ...> > > > > P: I see great similarity between anna> > > and phil, both refuse to admit any> > > responsibility for the rejection> > > they encounter at these lists, and> > > so, they perpetuate the rejection> > > they complain about. People who are> > > far from stupid can get caught in> > > a loop of stupid behavior because> > > to admit they are not playing this great > > > role of teachers of light and love would> > > crush them as flat as a tortilla.> > > > > > Of course, they have no everyday egos, they> > > have super inflationary egos.> > > > > > What do you think?> > > > I haven't read much of Phil and it would have been particularly> > interesting to follow his problems with Jerry Katz who has great> > practical sense in dealing with "cases" without introducing anelement> > of neurotic lingering relationship.> > > > The first step of idiocy is the inability to avoid crisis orinability> > to diffuse their pressure energy, the cleverest person being the dumb> > who knows he is dumb and plays dumb to avoid a crisis.> > > > THEN if the situations of crisis has not been avoided redeeming> > qualities play on the diptych panels of:> > - short term negotiation> > - long term reconsidering of attitude> > And observing both Anna and bbb on these they failed lamentablyon all> > tests.> > > > > > > > > > > > ****I've made no attempt to avoid "crisis" because I saw no crisis> and still > > don't. I had no attachment to the NDS list and have none to this> list. I > > think the dynamics are interesting and informative, but I have no> desire to > > submerse myself in them long term. That would be rather massochistic.> > > > I see both Anna and Booboo as drama queens, and so I suspect they> have no > > interest in avoiding crisis but rather feed off it.> > > > LOL!> > if that ain't the kettle calling the pot black!> > drama queen?> > honey that's you all over.> > haaaaaaahaaahahahaha!> > .b b.b.>My darling Phil..... how sad, you've stopped *dancing*...~A

Then be happy that you are sad. Life should be easier. So should your homepage. Try the NEW AOL.com.

[Guest guest]

-

>

> Eric:In forensic science if they find 4 liters of your blood on the

crime

> scene you are officially declared dead, even if they don't find your

body.

> Bleeding and bleeding for ages on these lists, exposing yourself to

> the exact situation that will call for the exact treatment you

> denounce; people who are authentically hurt learn very fast, change

> attitude or withdraw in a blink to their safe garden.

> You are not hurt more than anyone else, just putting a show.

> What has Grandiose Anna brought to you?

> more happiness? any sense of peace?

> sure don thin so..

 

P: I see great similarity between anna

and phil, both refuse to admit any

responsibility for the rejection

they encounter at these lists, and

so, they perpetuate the rejection

they complain about. People who are

far from stupid can get caught in

a loop of stupid behavior because

to admit they are not playing this great

role of teachers of light and love would

crush them as flat as a tortilla.

 

Of course, they have no everyday egos, they

have super inflationary egos.

 

What do you think?

>

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " <pedsie6 wrote:

>

> -

> >

> > Eric:In forensic science if they find 4 liters of your blood on the

> crime

> > scene you are officially declared dead, even if they don't find your

> body.

> > Bleeding and bleeding for ages on these lists, exposing yourself to

> > the exact situation that will call for the exact treatment you

> > denounce; people who are authentically hurt learn very fast, change

> > attitude or withdraw in a blink to their safe garden.

> > You are not hurt more than anyone else, just putting a show.

> > What has Grandiose Anna brought to you?

> > more happiness? any sense of peace?

> > sure don thin so..

>

> P: I see great similarity between anna

> and phil, both refuse to admit any

> responsibility for the rejection

> they encounter at these lists, and

> so, they perpetuate the rejection

> they complain about. People who are

> far from stupid can get caught in

> a loop of stupid behavior because

> to admit they are not playing this great

> role of teachers of light and love would

> crush them as flat as a tortilla.

>

> Of course, they have no everyday egos, they

> have super inflationary egos.

>

> What do you think?

 

 

i don't think.

 

i don't care.

 

but from the perspective of my own inflated feeling..

 

of pride in my superiority to others..

 

i emphatically agree.

 

i also find that funny as all get out.

 

when you get far out enough..

 

you start going in.

 

both motions are merely killing time.

 

enveloping totally and remaining un-contained is the weeping welkin.

 

where ego is heard a discouraging word..

 

and the skies are not cloudy all day.

 

..b b.b.

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " <pedsie6 wrote:

 

....

 

> P: I see great similarity between anna

> and phil, both refuse to admit any

> responsibility for the rejection

> they encounter at these lists, and

> so, they perpetuate the rejection

> they complain about. People who are

> far from stupid can get caught in

> a loop of stupid behavior because

> to admit they are not playing this great

> role of teachers of light and love would

> crush them as flat as a tortilla.

>

> Of course, they have no everyday egos, they

> have super inflationary egos.

>

> What do you think?

 

I haven't read much of Phil and it would have been particularly

interesting to follow his problems with Jerry Katz who has great

practical sense in dealing with " cases " without introducing an element

of neurotic lingering relationship.

 

The first step of idiocy is the inability to avoid crisis or inability

to diffuse their pressure energy, the cleverest person being the dumb

who knows he is dumb and plays dumb to avoid a crisis.

 

THEN if the situations of crisis has not been avoided redeeming

qualities play on the diptych panels of:

- short term negotiation

- long term reconsidering of attitude

And observing both Anna and bbb on these they failed lamentably on all

tests.

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " Eric Paroissien "

<ericparoissien wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " <pedsie6@> wrote:

>

> ...

>

> > P: I see great similarity between anna

> > and phil, both refuse to admit any

> > responsibility for the rejection

> > they encounter at these lists, and

> > so, they perpetuate the rejection

> > they complain about. People who are

> > far from stupid can get caught in

> > a loop of stupid behavior because

> > to admit they are not playing this great

> > role of teachers of light and love would

> > crush them as flat as a tortilla.

> >

> > Of course, they have no everyday egos, they

> > have super inflationary egos.

> >

> > What do you think?

>

> I haven't read much of Phil and it would have been particularly

> interesting to follow his problems with Jerry Katz who has great

> practical sense in dealing with " cases " without introducing an element

> of neurotic lingering relationship.

>

> The first step of idiocy is the inability to avoid crisis or inability

> to diffuse their pressure energy, the cleverest person being the dumb

> who knows he is dumb and plays dumb to avoid a crisis.

>

> THEN if the situations of crisis has not been avoided redeeming

> qualities play on the diptych panels of:

> - short term negotiation

> - long term reconsidering of attitude

> And observing both Anna and bbb on these they failed lamentably on all

> tests.

 

 

 

ROFLMAO!

 

dippy test.

 

dippier tester.

 

failed your test..get a life froggy.

 

:-)

 

..b b.b.

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , souldreamone wrote:

>

>

>

>

> In a message dated 11/28/2008 10:21:22 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,

> ericparoissien writes:

>

> Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " <pedsie6@> wrote:

>

> ...

>

> > P: I see great similarity between anna

> > and phil, both refuse to admit any

> > responsibility for the rejection

> > they encounter at these lists, and

> > so, they perpetuate the rejection

> > they complain about. People who are

> > far from stupid can get caught in

> > a loop of stupid behavior because

> > to admit they are not playing this great

> > role of teachers of light and love would

> > crush them as flat as a tortilla.

> >

> > Of course, they have no everyday egos, they

> > have super inflationary egos.

> >

> > What do you think?

>

> I haven't read much of Phil and it would have been particularly

> interesting to follow his problems with Jerry Katz who has great

> practical sense in dealing with " cases " without introducing an element

> of neurotic lingering relationship.

>

> The first step of idiocy is the inability to avoid crisis or inability

> to diffuse their pressure energy, the cleverest person being the dumb

> who knows he is dumb and plays dumb to avoid a crisis.

>

> THEN if the situations of crisis has not been avoided redeeming

> qualities play on the diptych panels of:

> - short term negotiation

> - long term reconsidering of attitude

> And observing both Anna and bbb on these they failed lamentably on all

> tests.

>

>

>

>

>

> ****I've made no attempt to avoid " crisis " because I saw no crisis

and still

> don't. I had no attachment to the NDS list and have none to this

list. I

> think the dynamics are interesting and informative, but I have no

desire to

> submerse myself in them long term. That would be rather massochistic.

>

> I see both Anna and Booboo as drama queens, and so I suspect they

have no

> interest in avoiding crisis but rather feed off it.

 

 

 

LOL!

 

if that ain't the kettle calling the pot black!

 

drama queen?

 

honey that's you all over.

 

haaaaaaahaaahahahaha!

 

..b b.b.

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111

wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , souldreamone@ wrote:

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > In a message dated 11/28/2008 10:21:22 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,

> > ericparoissien@ writes:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " <pedsie6@> wrote:

> >

> > ...

> >

> > > P: I see great similarity between anna

> > > and phil, both refuse to admit any

> > > responsibility for the rejection

> > > they encounter at these lists, and

> > > so, they perpetuate the rejection

> > > they complain about. People who are

> > > far from stupid can get caught in

> > > a loop of stupid behavior because

> > > to admit they are not playing this great

> > > role of teachers of light and love would

> > > crush them as flat as a tortilla.

> > >

> > > Of course, they have no everyday egos, they

> > > have super inflationary egos.

> > >

> > > What do you think?

> >

> > I haven't read much of Phil and it would have been particularly

> > interesting to follow his problems with Jerry Katz who has great

> > practical sense in dealing with " cases " without introducing an

element

> > of neurotic lingering relationship.

> >

> > The first step of idiocy is the inability to avoid crisis or

inability

> > to diffuse their pressure energy, the cleverest person being the dumb

> > who knows he is dumb and plays dumb to avoid a crisis.

> >

> > THEN if the situations of crisis has not been avoided redeeming

> > qualities play on the diptych panels of:

> > - short term negotiation

> > - long term reconsidering of attitude

> > And observing both Anna and bbb on these they failed lamentably

on all

> > tests.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > ****I've made no attempt to avoid " crisis " because I saw no crisis

> and still

> > don't. I had no attachment to the NDS list and have none to this

> list. I

> > think the dynamics are interesting and informative, but I have no

> desire to

> > submerse myself in them long term. That would be rather massochistic.

> >

> > I see both Anna and Booboo as drama queens, and so I suspect they

> have no

> > interest in avoiding crisis but rather feed off it.

>

>

>

> LOL!

>

> if that ain't the kettle calling the pot black!

>

> drama queen?

>

> honey that's you all over.

>

> haaaaaaahaaahahahaha!

>

> .b b.b.

>

 

 

My darling Phil..... how sad, you've stopped *dancing*...

 

~A

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " anabebe57 " <kailashana wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , souldreamone@ wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > In a message dated 11/28/2008 10:21:22 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,

> > > ericparoissien@ writes:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " <pedsie6@> wrote:

> > >

> > > ...

> > >

> > > > P: I see great similarity between anna

> > > > and phil, both refuse to admit any

> > > > responsibility for the rejection

> > > > they encounter at these lists, and

> > > > so, they perpetuate the rejection

> > > > they complain about. People who are

> > > > far from stupid can get caught in

> > > > a loop of stupid behavior because

> > > > to admit they are not playing this great

> > > > role of teachers of light and love would

> > > > crush them as flat as a tortilla.

> > > >

> > > > Of course, they have no everyday egos, they

> > > > have super inflationary egos.

> > > >

> > > > What do you think?

> > >

> > > I haven't read much of Phil and it would have been particularly

> > > interesting to follow his problems with Jerry Katz who has great

> > > practical sense in dealing with " cases " without introducing an

> element

> > > of neurotic lingering relationship.

> > >

> > > The first step of idiocy is the inability to avoid crisis or

> inability

> > > to diffuse their pressure energy, the cleverest person being

the dumb

> > > who knows he is dumb and plays dumb to avoid a crisis.

> > >

> > > THEN if the situations of crisis has not been avoided redeeming

> > > qualities play on the diptych panels of:

> > > - short term negotiation

> > > - long term reconsidering of attitude

> > > And observing both Anna and bbb on these they failed lamentably

> on all

> > > tests.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > ****I've made no attempt to avoid " crisis " because I saw no crisis

> > and still

> > > don't. I had no attachment to the NDS list and have none to this

> > list. I

> > > think the dynamics are interesting and informative, but I have no

> > desire to

> > > submerse myself in them long term. That would be rather

massochistic.

> > >

> > > I see both Anna and Booboo as drama queens, and so I suspect they

> > have no

> > > interest in avoiding crisis but rather feed off it.

> >

> >

> >

> > LOL!

> >

> > if that ain't the kettle calling the pot black!

> >

> > drama queen?

> >

> > honey that's you all over.

> >

> > haaaaaaahaaahahahaha!

> >

> > .b b.b.

> >

>

>

> My darling Phil..... how sad, you've stopped *dancing*...

>

> ~A

 

 

quick now anna..

 

two steps stage back left..

 

our Queen of the drama approaches!

 

oh phil!

 

(swoon the audience)

 

all ribbons and curls.

 

:-)

 

..b b.b.

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " Eric Paroissien "

<ericparoissien wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " <pedsie6@> wrote:

>

> ...

>

> > P: I see great similarity between anna

> > and phil, both refuse to admit any

> > responsibility for the rejection

> > they encounter at these lists, and

> > so, they perpetuate the rejection

> > they complain about. People who are

> > far from stupid can get caught in

> > a loop of stupid behavior because

> > to admit they are not playing this great

> > role of teachers of light and love would

> > crush them as flat as a tortilla.

> >

> > Of course, they have no everyday egos, they

> > have super inflationary egos.

> >

> > What do you think?

>

> I haven't read much of Phil and it would have been particularly

> interesting to follow his problems with Jerry Katz who has great

> practical sense in dealing with " cases " without introducing an element

> of neurotic lingering relationship.

>

> The first step of idiocy is the inability to avoid crisis or inability

> to diffuse their pressure energy, the cleverest person being the dumb

> who knows he is dumb and plays dumb to avoid a crisis.

>

> THEN if the situations of crisis has not been avoided redeeming

> qualities play on the diptych panels of:

> - short term negotiation

> - long term reconsidering of attitude

> And observing both Anna and bbb on these they failed lamentably on all

> tests.

>

 

 

Love you my Frenchie, but please don't *fence me in* into your

opinions of me... I am incredibly more than that.

 

And you're capable of much more than these *opinions* you *serve*.

 

~A

[Guest guest]

 

 

In a message dated 11/28/2008 11:07:21 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, kailashana writes:

 

Nisargadatta , souldreamone wrote:>> > > > In a message dated 11/28/2008 11:32:28 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, > kailashana writes:> > Nisargadatta , "roberibus111" <Roberibus111@>> wrote:> >> > Nisargadatta , souldreamone@ wrote:> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > In a message dated 11/28/2008 10:21:22 A.M. Pacific StandardTime, > > > ericparoissien@ writes:> > > > > > Nisargadatta , "cerosoul" <pedsie6@> wrote:> > > > > > ...> > > > > > > P: I see great similarity between anna> > > > and phil, both refuse to admit any> > > > responsibility for the rejection> > > > they encounter at these lists, and> > > > so, they perpetuate the rejection> > > > they complain about. People who are> > > > far from stupid can get caught in> > > > a loop of stupid behavior because> > > > to admit they are not playing this great > > > > role of teachers of light and love would> > > > crush them as flat as a tortilla.> > > > > > > > Of course, they have no everyday egos, they> > > > have super inflationary egos.> > > > > > > > What do you think?> > > > > > I haven't read much of Phil and it would have been particularly> > > interesting to follow his problems with Jerry Katz who has great> > > practical sense in dealing with "cases" without introducing an> element> > > of neurotic lingering relationship.> > > > > > The first step of idiocy is the inability to avoid crisis or> inability> > > to diffuse their pressure energy, the cleverest person being the dumb> > > who knows he is dumb and plays dumb to avoid a crisis.> > > > > > THEN if the situations of crisis has not been avoided redeeming> > > qualities play on the diptych panels of:> > > - short term negotiation> > > - long term reconsidering of attitude> > > And observing both Anna and bbb on these they failed lamentably> on all> > > tests.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ****I've made no attempt to avoid "crisis" because I saw no crisis> > and still > > > don't. I had no attachment to the NDS list and have none to this> > list. I > > > think the dynamics are interesting and informative, but I have no> > desire to > > > submerse myself in them long term. That would be rather massochistic.> > > > > > I see both Anna and Booboo as drama queens, and so I suspect they> > have no > > > interest in avoiding crisis but rather feed off it.> > > > > > > > LOL!> > > > if that ain't the kettle calling the pot black!> > > > drama queen?> > > > honey that's you all over.> > > > haaaaaaahaaahahahaha!> > > > .b b.b.> >> > > My darling Phil..... how sad, you've stopped *dancing*...> > ~A> > > > > Then be happy that you are sad. Lol. Ain't that just like a man and a would-be *spiritual teacher*,telling a woman how to feel.You're so adorable when you're being ignorant. ;-)~A

 

 

Well, you're not so much, really.

If you think your comments are in any way different from the male interaction here that you elevate yourself above, think again. Ending your posts with "love to all" means nothing. It's a sham, and it has nothing to do with Rumi.

 

Life should be easier. So should your homepage. Try the NEW AOL.com.

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , souldreamone wrote:

>

>

>

>

> In a message dated 11/28/2008 11:32:28 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,

> kailashana writes:

>

> Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , souldreamone@ wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > In a message dated 11/28/2008 10:21:22 A.M. Pacific Standard

Time,

> > > ericparoissien@ writes:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " <pedsie6@> wrote:

> > >

> > > ...

> > >

> > > > P: I see great similarity between anna

> > > > and phil, both refuse to admit any

> > > > responsibility for the rejection

> > > > they encounter at these lists, and

> > > > so, they perpetuate the rejection

> > > > they complain about. People who are

> > > > far from stupid can get caught in

> > > > a loop of stupid behavior because

> > > > to admit they are not playing this great

> > > > role of teachers of light and love would

> > > > crush them as flat as a tortilla.

> > > >

> > > > Of course, they have no everyday egos, they

> > > > have super inflationary egos.

> > > >

> > > > What do you think?

> > >

> > > I haven't read much of Phil and it would have been particularly

> > > interesting to follow his problems with Jerry Katz who has great

> > > practical sense in dealing with " cases " without introducing an

> element

> > > of neurotic lingering relationship.

> > >

> > > The first step of idiocy is the inability to avoid crisis or

> inability

> > > to diffuse their pressure energy, the cleverest person being

the dumb

> > > who knows he is dumb and plays dumb to avoid a crisis.

> > >

> > > THEN if the situations of crisis has not been avoided redeeming

> > > qualities play on the diptych panels of:

> > > - short term negotiation

> > > - long term reconsidering of attitude

> > > And observing both Anna and bbb on these they failed lamentably

> on all

> > > tests.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > ****I've made no attempt to avoid " crisis " because I saw no crisis

> > and still

> > > don't. I had no attachment to the NDS list and have none to this

> > list. I

> > > think the dynamics are interesting and informative, but I have no

> > desire to

> > > submerse myself in them long term. That would be rather

massochistic.

> > >

> > > I see both Anna and Booboo as drama queens, and so I suspect they

> > have no

> > > interest in avoiding crisis but rather feed off it.

> >

> >

> >

> > LOL!

> >

> > if that ain't the kettle calling the pot black!

> >

> > drama queen?

> >

> > honey that's you all over.

> >

> > haaaaaaahaaahahahaha!

> >

> > .b b.b.

> >

>

>

> My darling Phil..... how sad, you've stopped *dancing*...

>

> ~A

>

>

>

>

> Then be happy that you are sad.

 

 

Lol. Ain't that just like a man and a would-be *spiritual teacher*,

telling a woman how to feel.

 

You're so adorable when you're being ignorant. ;-)

 

~A

 

 

>

>

>

>

> **************Life should be easier. So should your homepage. Try

the NEW

> AOL.com.

>

(http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp & icid=aolcom40vanity & ncid=emlcntaolcom00000002)

>

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , souldreamone wrote:

>

>

>

>

> In a message dated 11/28/2008 11:07:21 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,

> kailashana writes:

>

> Nisargadatta , souldreamone@ wrote:

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > In a message dated 11/28/2008 11:32:28 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,

> > kailashana@ writes:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , souldreamone@ wrote:

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > In a message dated 11/28/2008 10:21:22 A.M. Pacific Standard

> Time,

> > > > ericparoissien@ writes:

> > > >

> > > > Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " <pedsie6@>

wrote:

> > > >

> > > > ...

> > > >

> > > > > P: I see great similarity between anna

> > > > > and phil, both refuse to admit any

> > > > > responsibility for the rejection

> > > > > they encounter at these lists, and

> > > > > so, they perpetuate the rejection

> > > > > they complain about. People who are

> > > > > far from stupid can get caught in

> > > > > a loop of stupid behavior because

> > > > > to admit they are not playing this great

> > > > > role of teachers of light and love would

> > > > > crush them as flat as a tortilla.

> > > > >

> > > > > Of course, they have no everyday egos, they

> > > > > have super inflationary egos.

> > > > >

> > > > > What do you think?

> > > >

> > > > I haven't read much of Phil and it would have been particularly

> > > > interesting to follow his problems with Jerry Katz who has

great

> > > > practical sense in dealing with " cases " without introducing an

> > element

> > > > of neurotic lingering relationship.

> > > >

> > > > The first step of idiocy is the inability to avoid crisis or

> > inability

> > > > to diffuse their pressure energy, the cleverest person being

> the dumb

> > > > who knows he is dumb and plays dumb to avoid a crisis.

> > > >

> > > > THEN if the situations of crisis has not been avoided redeeming

> > > > qualities play on the diptych panels of:

> > > > - short term negotiation

> > > > - long term reconsidering of attitude

> > > > And observing both Anna and bbb on these they failed lamentably

> > on all

> > > > tests.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > ****I've made no attempt to avoid " crisis " because I saw no

crisis

> > > and still

> > > > don't. I had no attachment to the NDS list and have none to

this

> > > list. I

> > > > think the dynamics are interesting and informative, but I

have no

> > > desire to

> > > > submerse myself in them long term. That would be rather

> massochistic.

> > > >

> > > > I see both Anna and Booboo as drama queens, and so I

suspect they

> > > have no

> > > > interest in avoiding crisis but rather feed off it.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > LOL!

> > >

> > > if that ain't the kettle calling the pot black!

> > >

> > > drama queen?

> > >

> > > honey that's you all over.

> > >

> > > haaaaaaahaaahahahaha!

> > >

> > > .b b.b.

> > >

> >

> >

> > My darling Phil..... how sad, you've stopped *dancing*...

> >

> > ~A

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Then be happy that you are sad.

>

>

> Lol. Ain't that just like a man and a would-be *spiritual teacher*,

> telling a woman how to feel.

>

> You're so adorable when you're being ignorant. ;-)

>

> ~A

>

>

>

>

>

> Well, you're not so much, really.

> If you think your comments are in any way different from the male

> interaction here that you elevate yourself above, think again.

Ending your posts with

> " love to all " means nothing. It's a sham, and it has nothing to do

with Rumi.

 

 

 

well that's better than your posts..

 

that have to do with yourself and ONLY yourself...

 

and have nothing to do with ANYTHING else.

 

you're a sick puppy.

 

go lie down on your wet sham you naughty boy.

 

:-)

 

..b b.b.

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , souldreamone wrote:

>

>

>

>

> In a message dated 11/28/2008 11:07:21 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,

> kailashana writes:

>

> Nisargadatta , souldreamone@ wrote:

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > In a message dated 11/28/2008 11:32:28 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,

> > kailashana@ writes:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , souldreamone@ wrote:

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > In a message dated 11/28/2008 10:21:22 A.M. Pacific Standard

> Time,

> > > > ericparoissien@ writes:

> > > >

> > > > Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " <pedsie6@>

wrote:

> > > >

> > > > ...

> > > >

> > > > > P: I see great similarity between anna

> > > > > and phil, both refuse to admit any

> > > > > responsibility for the rejection

> > > > > they encounter at these lists, and

> > > > > so, they perpetuate the rejection

> > > > > they complain about. People who are

> > > > > far from stupid can get caught in

> > > > > a loop of stupid behavior because

> > > > > to admit they are not playing this great

> > > > > role of teachers of light and love would

> > > > > crush them as flat as a tortilla.

> > > > >

> > > > > Of course, they have no everyday egos, they

> > > > > have super inflationary egos.

> > > > >

> > > > > What do you think?

> > > >

> > > > I haven't read much of Phil and it would have been particularly

> > > > interesting to follow his problems with Jerry Katz who has

great

> > > > practical sense in dealing with " cases " without introducing an

> > element

> > > > of neurotic lingering relationship.

> > > >

> > > > The first step of idiocy is the inability to avoid crisis or

> > inability

> > > > to diffuse their pressure energy, the cleverest person being

> the dumb

> > > > who knows he is dumb and plays dumb to avoid a crisis.

> > > >

> > > > THEN if the situations of crisis has not been avoided redeeming

> > > > qualities play on the diptych panels of:

> > > > - short term negotiation

> > > > - long term reconsidering of attitude

> > > > And observing both Anna and bbb on these they failed lamentably

> > on all

> > > > tests.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > ****I've made no attempt to avoid " crisis " because I saw no

crisis

> > > and still

> > > > don't. I had no attachment to the NDS list and have none to

this

> > > list. I

> > > > think the dynamics are interesting and informative, but I

have no

> > > desire to

> > > > submerse myself in them long term. That would be rather

> massochistic.

> > > >

> > > > I see both Anna and Booboo as drama queens, and so I

suspect they

> > > have no

> > > > interest in avoiding crisis but rather feed off it.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > LOL!

> > >

> > > if that ain't the kettle calling the pot black!

> > >

> > > drama queen?

> > >

> > > honey that's you all over.

> > >

> > > haaaaaaahaaahahahaha!

> > >

> > > .b b.b.

> > >

> >

> >

> > My darling Phil..... how sad, you've stopped *dancing*...

> >

> > ~A

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Then be happy that you are sad.

>

>

> Lol. Ain't that just like a man and a would-be *spiritual teacher*,

> telling a woman how to feel.

>

> You're so adorable when you're being ignorant. ;-)

>

> ~A

>

>

>

>

>

> Well, you're not so much, really.

> If you think your comments are in any way different from the male

> interaction here that you elevate yourself above, think again.

Ending your posts with

> " love to all " means nothing. It's a sham, and it has nothing to do

with Rumi.

 

 

 

 

There ya go again..... talking about me... interpreting what i say and

do, instead of what you think and feel.....

 

I used to use love ALL the time ..... when I felt LOVE ALL THE

TIME....in the heyday of my feeling of Oneness and K ascension; I

feel this intermittently, much less often as I seem to be mired in

*personalities* once again, hence I sign, " Love to All " ,

selectively.... when the *mood* asserts itself.

 

And right now I love all youse guys.

 

Smile.

 

~A

 

 

>

>

>

>

>

> **************Life should be easier. So should your homepage. Try

the NEW

> AOL.com.

>

(http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp & icid=aolcom40vanity & ncid=emlcntaolcom00000002)

>

[Guest guest]

 

 

In a message dated 11/29/2008 4:02:13 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, kailashana writes:

 

Nisargadatta , souldreamone wrote:>> > > > In a message dated 11/28/2008 11:07:21 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, > kailashana writes:> > Nisargadatta , souldreamone@ wrote:> >> > > > > > > > In a message dated 11/28/2008 11:32:28 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, > > kailashana@ writes:> > > > Nisargadatta , "roberibus111" <Roberibus111@>> > wrote:> > >> > > Nisargadatta , souldreamone@ wrote:> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In a message dated 11/28/2008 10:21:22 A.M. Pacific Standard> Time, > > > > ericparoissien@ writes:> > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , "cerosoul" <pedsie6@> wrote:> > > > > > > > ...> > > > > > > > > P: I see great similarity between anna> > > > > and phil, both refuse to admit any> > > > > responsibility for the rejection> > > > > they encounter at these lists, and> > > > > so, they perpetuate the rejection> > > > > they complain about. People who are> > > > > far from stupid can get caught in> > > > > a loop of stupid behavior because> > > > > to admit they are not playing this great > > > > > role of teachers of light and love would> > > > > crush them as flat as a tortilla.> > > > > > > > > > Of course, they have no everyday egos, they> > > > > have super inflationary egos.> > > > > > > > > > What do you think?> > > > > > > > I haven't read much of Phil and it would have been particularly> > > > interesting to follow his problems with Jerry Katz who hasgreat> > > > practical sense in dealing with "cases" without introducing an> > element> > > > of neurotic lingering relationship.> > > > > > > > The first step of idiocy is the inability to avoid crisis or> > inability> > > > to diffuse their pressure energy, the cleverest person being > the dumb> > > > who knows he is dumb and plays dumb to avoid a crisis.> > > > > > > > THEN if the situations of crisis has not been avoided redeeming> > > > qualities play on the diptych panels of:> > > > - short term negotiation> > > > - long term reconsidering of attitude> > > > And observing both Anna and bbb on these they failed lamentably> > on all> > > > tests.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ****I've made no attempt to avoid "crisis" because I saw nocrisis> > > and still > > > > don't. I had no attachment to the NDS list and have none tothis> > > list. I > > > > think the dynamics are interesting and informative, but Ihave no> > > desire to > > > > submerse myself in them long term. That would be rather > massochistic.> > > > > > > > I see both Anna and Booboo as drama queens, and so Isuspect they> > > have no > > > > interest in avoiding crisis but rather feed off it.> > > > > > > > > > > > LOL!> > > > > > if that ain't the kettle calling the pot black!> > > > > > drama queen?> > > > > > honey that's you all over.> > > > > > haaaaaaahaaahahahaha!> > > > > > .b b.b.> > >> > > > > > My darling Phil..... how sad, you've stopped *dancing*...> > > > ~A> > > > > > > > > > Then be happy that you are sad. > > > Lol. Ain't that just like a man and a would-be *spiritual teacher*,> telling a woman how to feel.> > You're so adorable when you're being ignorant. ;-)> > ~A> > > > > > Well, you're not so much, really.> If you think your comments are in any way different from the male > interaction here that you elevate yourself above, think again.Ending your posts with > "love to all" means nothing. It's a sham, and it has nothing to dowith Rumi.There ya go again..... talking about me... interpreting what i say anddo, instead of what you think and feel.....I used to use love ALL the time ..... when I felt LOVE ALL THETIME....in the heyday of my feeling of Oneness and K ascension; Ifeel this intermittently, much less often as I seem to be mired in*personalities* once again, hence I sign, "Love to All",selectively.... when the *mood* asserts itself.And right now I love all youse guys. Smile.~A

 

 

***That's why I call it a sham. Real love doesn't come and go according to mood, and neither does genuine Oneness realization. If we aren't where we are, where are we?

Life should be easier. So should your homepage. Try the NEW AOL.com.

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 29/11/2008 11:26:32 AM Pacific Daylight Time, Roberibus111 writes:

> ***That's why I call it a sham. Real love doesn't come and goaccording to > mood, and neither does genuine Oneness realization. If we aren'twhere we > are, where are we?what do you mean "we"?maybe..no..absolutely...you are lost.don't try and include those who are not.

 

 

****Someday, maybe, you'll wake up and realize you're still sound asleep having a dream of being awake.Life should be easier. So should your homepage. Try the NEW AOL.com.

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 29/11/2008 12:55:26 PM Pacific Daylight Time, Roberibus111 writes:

> ****Someday, maybe, you'll wake up and realize you're still soundasleep > having a dream of being awake.oh relax phil.and quit posting old zen butterfly stories that aren't your own.you're dreaming bud.and you are wrong.i am not enlightened..no one is or ever has been..but through some enlightenment speaks.i can't help that you don't like that.that's the way it is... and the way it shall remain.don't be jealous phil.some folks like you just don't have the stuff.that's natural too..b b.b.

 

****What you mean is that I'm ill informed and incorrect in my suppositions?Life should be easier. So should your homepage. Try the NEW AOL.com.

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , souldreamone wrote:

>

>

>

>

> In a message dated 11/29/2008 4:02:13 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,

> kailashana writes:

>

> Nisargadatta , souldreamone@ wrote:

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > In a message dated 11/28/2008 11:07:21 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,

> > kailashana@ writes:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , souldreamone@ wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > In a message dated 11/28/2008 11:32:28 A.M. Pacific Standard

Time,

> > > kailashana@ writes:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 "

<Roberibus111@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Nisargadatta , souldreamone@ wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > In a message dated 11/28/2008 10:21:22 A.M. Pacific Standard

> > Time,

> > > > > ericparoissien@ writes:

> > > > >

> > > > > Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " <pedsie6@>

> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > ...

> > > > >

> > > > > > P: I see great similarity between anna

> > > > > > and phil, both refuse to admit any

> > > > > > responsibility for the rejection

> > > > > > they encounter at these lists, and

> > > > > > so, they perpetuate the rejection

> > > > > > they complain about. People who are

> > > > > > far from stupid can get caught in

> > > > > > a loop of stupid behavior because

> > > > > > to admit they are not playing this great

> > > > > > role of teachers of light and love would

> > > > > > crush them as flat as a tortilla.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Of course, they have no everyday egos, they

> > > > > > have super inflationary egos.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > What do you think?

> > > > >

> > > > > I haven't read much of Phil and it would have been

particularly

> > > > > interesting to follow his problems with Jerry Katz who has

> great

> > > > > practical sense in dealing with " cases " without

introducing an

> > > element

> > > > > of neurotic lingering relationship.

> > > > >

> > > > > The first step of idiocy is the inability to avoid crisis or

> > > inability

> > > > > to diffuse their pressure energy, the cleverest person

being

> > the dumb

> > > > > who knows he is dumb and plays dumb to avoid a crisis.

> > > > >

> > > > > THEN if the situations of crisis has not been avoided

redeeming

> > > > > qualities play on the diptych panels of:

> > > > > - short term negotiation

> > > > > - long term reconsidering of attitude

> > > > > And observing both Anna and bbb on these they failed

lamentably

> > > on all

> > > > > tests.

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > ****I've made no attempt to avoid " crisis " because I saw no

> crisis

> > > > and still

> > > > > don't. I had no attachment to the NDS list and have none to

> this

> > > > list. I

> > > > > think the dynamics are interesting and informative, but I

> have no

> > > > desire to

> > > > > submerse myself in them long term. That would be rather

> > massochistic.

> > > > >

> > > > > I see both Anna and Booboo as drama queens, and so I

> suspect they

> > > > have no

> > > > > interest in avoiding crisis but rather feed off it.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > LOL!

> > > >

> > > > if that ain't the kettle calling the pot black!

> > > >

> > > > drama queen?

> > > >

> > > > honey that's you all over.

> > > >

> > > > haaaaaaahaaahahahaha!

> > > >

> > > > .b b.b.

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > > My darling Phil..... how sad, you've stopped *dancing*...

> > >

> > > ~A

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Then be happy that you are sad.

> >

> >

> > Lol. Ain't that just like a man and a would-be *spiritual teacher*,

> > telling a woman how to feel.

> >

> > You're so adorable when you're being ignorant. ;-)

> >

> > ~A

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Well, you're not so much, really.

> > If you think your comments are in any way different from the male

> > interaction here that you elevate yourself above, think again.

> Ending your posts with

> > " love to all " means nothing. It's a sham, and it has nothing to do

> with Rumi.

>

>

>

>

> There ya go again..... talking about me... interpreting what i say and

> do, instead of what you think and feel.....

>

> I used to use love ALL the time ..... when I felt LOVE ALL THE

> TIME....in the heyday of my feeling of Oneness and K ascension; I

> feel this intermittently, much less often as I seem to be mired in

> *personalities* once again, hence I sign, " Love to All " ,

> selectively.... when the *mood* asserts itself.

>

> And right now I love all youse guys.

>

> Smile.

>

> ~A

>

>

>

>

>

> ***That's why I call it a sham. Real love doesn't come and go

according to

> mood, and neither does genuine Oneness realization. If we aren't

where we

> are, where are we?

 

 

 

 

 

 

what do you mean " we " ?

 

maybe..no..absolutely...you are lost.

 

don't try and include those who are not.

 

what are you afraid of?

 

being alone.

 

that's the case brother no matter what's going down.

 

wherever you go there you are.

 

..b b.b.

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111

wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , souldreamone@ wrote:

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > In a message dated 11/29/2008 4:02:13 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,

> > kailashana@ writes:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , souldreamone@ wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > In a message dated 11/28/2008 11:07:21 P.M. Pacific Standard

Time,

> > > kailashana@ writes:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , souldreamone@ wrote:

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > In a message dated 11/28/2008 11:32:28 A.M. Pacific Standard

> Time,

> > > > kailashana@ writes:

> > > >

> > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 "

> <Roberibus111@>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Nisargadatta , souldreamone@ wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > In a message dated 11/28/2008 10:21:22 A.M. Pacific

Standard

> > > Time,

> > > > > > ericparoissien@ writes:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Nisargadatta , " cerosoul "

<pedsie6@>

> > wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > ...

> > > > > >

> > > > > > > P: I see great similarity between anna

> > > > > > > and phil, both refuse to admit any

> > > > > > > responsibility for the rejection

> > > > > > > they encounter at these lists, and

> > > > > > > so, they perpetuate the rejection

> > > > > > > they complain about. People who are

> > > > > > > far from stupid can get caught in

> > > > > > > a loop of stupid behavior because

> > > > > > > to admit they are not playing this great

> > > > > > > role of teachers of light and love would

> > > > > > > crush them as flat as a tortilla.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Of course, they have no everyday egos, they

> > > > > > > have super inflationary egos.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > What do you think?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I haven't read much of Phil and it would have been

> particularly

> > > > > > interesting to follow his problems with Jerry Katz who

has

> > great

> > > > > > practical sense in dealing with " cases " without

> introducing an

> > > > element

> > > > > > of neurotic lingering relationship.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > The first step of idiocy is the inability to avoid

crisis or

> > > > inability

> > > > > > to diffuse their pressure energy, the cleverest person

> being

> > > the dumb

> > > > > > who knows he is dumb and plays dumb to avoid a crisis.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > THEN if the situations of crisis has not been avoided

> redeeming

> > > > > > qualities play on the diptych panels of:

> > > > > > - short term negotiation

> > > > > > - long term reconsidering of attitude

> > > > > > And observing both Anna and bbb on these they failed

> lamentably

> > > > on all

> > > > > > tests.

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > ****I've made no attempt to avoid " crisis " because I

saw no

> > crisis

> > > > > and still

> > > > > > don't. I had no attachment to the NDS list and have

none to

> > this

> > > > > list. I

> > > > > > think the dynamics are interesting and informative, but I

> > have no

> > > > > desire to

> > > > > > submerse myself in them long term. That would be rather

> > > massochistic.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I see both Anna and Booboo as drama queens, and so I

> > suspect they

> > > > > have no

> > > > > > interest in avoiding crisis but rather feed off it.

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > LOL!

> > > > >

> > > > > if that ain't the kettle calling the pot black!

> > > > >

> > > > > drama queen?

> > > > >

> > > > > honey that's you all over.

> > > > >

> > > > > haaaaaaahaaahahahaha!

> > > > >

> > > > > .b b.b.

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > My darling Phil..... how sad, you've stopped *dancing*...

> > > >

> > > > ~A

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Then be happy that you are sad.

> > >

> > >

> > > Lol. Ain't that just like a man and a would-be *spiritual

teacher*,

> > > telling a woman how to feel.

> > >

> > > You're so adorable when you're being ignorant. ;-)

> > >

> > > ~A

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Well, you're not so much, really.

> > > If you think your comments are in any way different from the male

> > > interaction here that you elevate yourself above, think again.

> > Ending your posts with

> > > " love to all " means nothing. It's a sham, and it has nothing to do

> > with Rumi.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > There ya go again..... talking about me... interpreting what i

say and

> > do, instead of what you think and feel.....

> >

> > I used to use love ALL the time ..... when I felt LOVE ALL THE

> > TIME....in the heyday of my feeling of Oneness and K ascension; I

> > feel this intermittently, much less often as I seem to be mired in

> > *personalities* once again, hence I sign, " Love to All " ,

> > selectively.... when the *mood* asserts itself.

> >

> > And right now I love all youse guys.

> >

> > Smile.

> >

> > ~A

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > ***That's why I call it a sham. Real love doesn't come and go

> according to

> > mood, and neither does genuine Oneness realization. If we aren't

> where we

> > are, where are we?

what do you mean " we " ?

>

> maybe..no..absolutely...you are lost.

>

> don't try and include those who are not.

>

> what are you afraid of?

>

> being alone.

>

> that's the case brother no matter what's going down.

>

> wherever you go there you are.

>

> .b b.b.

 

 

and wherever you are..there you go.

 

..b b.b.

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 29/11/2008 4:07:40 PM Pacific Daylight Time, kailashana writes:

> > > My darling Phil..... how sad, you've stopped *dancing*...> > > > > > ~A> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Then be happy that you are sad. > > > > > > Lol. Ain't that just like a man and a would-be *spiritual teacher*,> > telling a woman how to feel.> > > > You're so adorable when you're being ignorant. ;-)> > > > ~A> > > > > > > > > > > > Well, you're not so much, really.> > If you think your comments are in any way different from the male > > interaction here that you elevate yourself above, think again.> Ending your posts with > > "love to all" means nothing. It's a sham, and it has nothing to do> with Rumi.> > > > > There ya go again..... talking about me... interpreting what i say and> do, instead of what you think and feel.....> > I used to use love ALL the time ..... when I felt LOVE ALL THE> TIME....in the heyday of my feeling of Oneness and K ascension; I> feel this intermittently, much less often as I seem to be mired in> *personalities* once again, hence I sign, "Love to All",> selectively.... when the *mood* asserts itself.> > And right now I love all youse guys. > > Smile.> > ~A> > > > > > ***That's why I call it a sham. Real love doesn't come and goaccording to > mood, and neither does genuine Oneness realization. If we aren'twhere we > are, where are we?"Real Love" allows *you* to be *you* and *me* to be *me*, write thesewords to one another.... Speaking *your* truth, speaking *my* truth.All the rest are interpretations of what *real Love* should be.And here we are, there we go.~A

 

****That's also an interpretation. Saying nobody can know this or that is a silly ego trick to make everybody wrong but you, and when it goes more like 'The only thing anybody can know about it is this...', then it's a trick to get the last word. How can anybody say anything when you've already declared the only thing that can be said? Where does that leave me room to "speak my truth"? Where is the love that you just defined? How do you know what can and can't be known?

 

I'm sure all this looks like Phil arguing and whining and crying and complaining and trying to be right and blaming everyone because that's the nature of the stories we write. There's the possibility of noticing our own stories and that's what I'm doing, just noticing what's true. I'm noticing it for myself, but there's no reason you can't play along.

 

If anybody is interested in playing along, it's a simple matter to look at the posts from Pete, Booboo, and Anna and see how the stories are written and why the stories are written. Life should be easier. So should your homepage. Try the NEW AOL.com.

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , souldreamone wrote:

>

>

> In a message dated 29/11/2008 11:26:32 AM Pacific Daylight Time,

> Roberibus111 writes:

>

> > ***That's why I call it a sham. Real love doesn't come and go

> according to

> > mood, and neither does genuine Oneness realization. If we aren't

> where we

> > are, where are we?

what do you mean " we " ?

>

> maybe..no..absolutely...you are lost.

>

> don't try and include those who are not.

>

>

>

>

> ****Someday, maybe, you'll wake up and realize you're still sound

asleep

> having a dream of being awake.

 

 

 

oh relax phil.

 

and quit posting old zen butterfly stories that aren't your own.

 

you're dreaming bud.

 

and you are wrong.

 

i am not enlightened..no one is or ever has been..

 

but through some enlightenment speaks.

 

i can't help that you don't like that.

 

that's the way it is... and the way it shall remain.

 

don't be jealous phil.

 

some folks like you just don't have the stuff.

 

that's natural too.

 

..b b.b.

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 29/11/2008 5:00:03 PM Pacific Daylight Time, tyga writes:

souldreamone wrote:>>> > ***That's why I call it a sham. Real love doesn't come and go> according to> > mood, and neither does genuine Oneness realization. If we aren't> where we> > are, where are we?>>> "Real Love" allows *you* to be *you* and *me* to be *me*, write these> words to one another.... Speaking *your* truth, speaking *my* truth.>> All the rest are interpretations of what *real Love* should be.>> And here we are, there we go.>> ~A>> ****That's also an interpretation. Saying nobody can know this or that > is a silly ego trick to make everybody wrong but you, and when it goes > more like 'The only thing anybody can know about it is this...', then > it's a trick to get the last word. How can anybody say anything when > you've already declared the only thing that can be said? Where does > that leave me room to "speak my truth"? Where is the love that you > just defined? How do you know what can and can't be known?> > I'm sure all this looks like Phil arguing and whining and crying and > complaining and trying to be right and blaming everyone because that's > the nature of the stories we write. There's the possibility of > noticing our own stories and that's what I'm doing, just noticing > what's true. I'm noticing it for myself, but there's no reason you > can't play along.> > If anybody is interested in playing along, it's a simple matter to > look at the posts from Pete, Booboo, and Anna and see how the stories > are written and why the stories are written. >>>> ------In my opinion, real love is unconditional.Real love consists of all emotions. The emotional level of ultimate choices where all emotions are realised as conscious choice, true expressions of unconditional creativity. Fear then, is the bargain basement of choices, the lowest levels of creativity, unconscious, primal and instinctual, or blind creativity. Hate would be an expression of fear as blind creativity.Unconditional love is the ultimate expression of conscious creativity, where everything is allowable, no-thing is prevented, in my opinion.tyga

 

****Yeah, and no mind identified person is capable of unconditional love.

Life should be easier. So should your homepage. Try the NEW AOL.com.

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 29/11/2008 6:52:22 PM Pacific Daylight Time, tyga writes:

souldreamone wrote:>>> In my opinion, real love is unconditional.>> Real love consists of all emotions. The emotional level of ultimate> choices where all emotions are realised as conscious choice, true> expressions of unconditional creativity. Fear then, is the bargain> basement of choices, the lowest levels of creativity, unconscious,> primal and instinctual, or blind creativity. Hate would be an> expression> of fear as blind creativity.>> Unconditional love is the ultimate expression of conscious> creativity,> where everything is allowable, no-thing is prevented, in my opinion.>>> tyga>> ****Yeah, and no mind identified person is capable of unconditional love.> >>>> ------A mind identified person IS unconditional love.tyga

 

***A mind identified person is an illusion.Life should be easier. So should your homepage. Try the NEW AOL.com.