what else!? bleeding and bleeding and bleeding Anna

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , souldreamone wrote:

>

>

> In a message dated 29/11/2008 12:55:26 PM Pacific Daylight Time,

> Roberibus111 writes:

>

> > ****Someday, maybe, you'll wake up and realize you're still sound

> asleep

> > having a dream of being awake.

>

>

>

> oh relax phil.

>

> and quit posting old zen butterfly stories that aren't your own.

>

> you're dreaming bud.

>

> and you are wrong.

>

> i am not enlightened..no one is or ever has been..

>

> but through some enlightenment speaks.

>

> i can't help that you don't like that.

>

> that's the way it is... and the way it shall remain.

>

> don't be jealous phil.

>

> some folks like you just don't have the stuff.

>

> that's natural too.

>

> .b b.b.

>

>

>

> ****What you mean is that I'm ill informed and incorrect in my

suppositions?

 

 

whereas that is true..

 

that's not what i'm saying here.

 

once again you are wrong.

 

..b b.b.

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , souldreamone wrote:

>

>

>

>

> In a message dated 11/29/2008 4:02:13 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,

> kailashana writes:

>

> Nisargadatta , souldreamone@ wrote:

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > In a message dated 11/28/2008 11:07:21 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,

> > kailashana@ writes:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , souldreamone@ wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > In a message dated 11/28/2008 11:32:28 A.M. Pacific Standard

Time,

> > > kailashana@ writes:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 "

<Roberibus111@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Nisargadatta , souldreamone@ wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > In a message dated 11/28/2008 10:21:22 A.M. Pacific Standard

> > Time,

> > > > > ericparoissien@ writes:

> > > > >

> > > > > Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " <pedsie6@>

> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > ...

> > > > >

> > > > > > P: I see great similarity between anna

> > > > > > and phil, both refuse to admit any

> > > > > > responsibility for the rejection

> > > > > > they encounter at these lists, and

> > > > > > so, they perpetuate the rejection

> > > > > > they complain about. People who are

> > > > > > far from stupid can get caught in

> > > > > > a loop of stupid behavior because

> > > > > > to admit they are not playing this great

> > > > > > role of teachers of light and love would

> > > > > > crush them as flat as a tortilla.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Of course, they have no everyday egos, they

> > > > > > have super inflationary egos.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > What do you think?

> > > > >

> > > > > I haven't read much of Phil and it would have been

particularly

> > > > > interesting to follow his problems with Jerry Katz who has

> great

> > > > > practical sense in dealing with " cases " without

introducing an

> > > element

> > > > > of neurotic lingering relationship.

> > > > >

> > > > > The first step of idiocy is the inability to avoid crisis or

> > > inability

> > > > > to diffuse their pressure energy, the cleverest person

being

> > the dumb

> > > > > who knows he is dumb and plays dumb to avoid a crisis.

> > > > >

> > > > > THEN if the situations of crisis has not been avoided

redeeming

> > > > > qualities play on the diptych panels of:

> > > > > - short term negotiation

> > > > > - long term reconsidering of attitude

> > > > > And observing both Anna and bbb on these they failed

lamentably

> > > on all

> > > > > tests.

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > ****I've made no attempt to avoid " crisis " because I saw no

> crisis

> > > > and still

> > > > > don't. I had no attachment to the NDS list and have none to

> this

> > > > list. I

> > > > > think the dynamics are interesting and informative, but I

> have no

> > > > desire to

> > > > > submerse myself in them long term. That would be rather

> > massochistic.

> > > > >

> > > > > I see both Anna and Booboo as drama queens, and so I

> suspect they

> > > > have no

> > > > > interest in avoiding crisis but rather feed off it.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > LOL!

> > > >

> > > > if that ain't the kettle calling the pot black!

> > > >

> > > > drama queen?

> > > >

> > > > honey that's you all over.

> > > >

> > > > haaaaaaahaaahahahaha!

> > > >

> > > > .b b.b.

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > > My darling Phil..... how sad, you've stopped *dancing*...

> > >

> > > ~A

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Then be happy that you are sad.

> >

> >

> > Lol. Ain't that just like a man and a would-be *spiritual teacher*,

> > telling a woman how to feel.

> >

> > You're so adorable when you're being ignorant. ;-)

> >

> > ~A

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Well, you're not so much, really.

> > If you think your comments are in any way different from the male

> > interaction here that you elevate yourself above, think again.

> Ending your posts with

> > " love to all " means nothing. It's a sham, and it has nothing to do

> with Rumi.

>

>

>

>

> There ya go again..... talking about me... interpreting what i say and

> do, instead of what you think and feel.....

>

> I used to use love ALL the time ..... when I felt LOVE ALL THE

> TIME....in the heyday of my feeling of Oneness and K ascension; I

> feel this intermittently, much less often as I seem to be mired in

> *personalities* once again, hence I sign, " Love to All " ,

> selectively.... when the *mood* asserts itself.

>

> And right now I love all youse guys.

>

> Smile.

>

> ~A

>

>

>

>

>

> ***That's why I call it a sham. Real love doesn't come and go

according to

> mood, and neither does genuine Oneness realization. If we aren't

where we

> are, where are we?

 

 

" Real Love " allows *you* to be *you* and *me* to be *me*, write these

words to one another.... Speaking *your* truth, speaking *my* truth.

 

All the rest are interpretations of what *real Love* should be.

 

And here we are, there we go.

 

~A

 

>

>

>

>

> **************Life should be easier. So should your homepage. Try

the NEW

> AOL.com.

>

(http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp & icid=aolcom40vanity & ncid=emlcntaolcom00000002)

>

[Guest guest]

souldreamone wrote:

>

>

> > ***That's why I call it a sham. Real love doesn't come and go

> according to

> > mood, and neither does genuine Oneness realization. If we aren't

> where we

> > are, where are we?

>

>

> " Real Love " allows *you* to be *you* and *me* to be *me*, write these

> words to one another.... Speaking *your* truth, speaking *my* truth.

>

> All the rest are interpretations of what *real Love* should be.

>

> And here we are, there we go.

>

> ~A

>

> ****That's also an interpretation. Saying nobody can know this or that

> is a silly ego trick to make everybody wrong but you, and when it goes

> more like 'The only thing anybody can know about it is this...', then

> it's a trick to get the last word. How can anybody say anything when

> you've already declared the only thing that can be said? Where does

> that leave me room to " speak my truth " ? Where is the love that you

> just defined? How do you know what can and can't be known?

>

> I'm sure all this looks like Phil arguing and whining and crying and

> complaining and trying to be right and blaming everyone because that's

> the nature of the stories we write. There's the possibility of

> noticing our own stories and that's what I'm doing, just noticing

> what's true. I'm noticing it for myself, but there's no reason you

> can't play along.

>

> If anybody is interested in playing along, it's a simple matter to

> look at the posts from Pete, Booboo, and Anna and see how the stories

> are written and why the stories are written.

>

>

>

> ------

In my opinion, real love is unconditional.

 

Real love consists of all emotions. The emotional level of ultimate

choices where all emotions are realised as conscious choice, true

expressions of unconditional creativity. Fear then, is the bargain

basement of choices, the lowest levels of creativity, unconscious,

primal and instinctual, or blind creativity. Hate would be an expression

of fear as blind creativity.

 

Unconditional love is the ultimate expression of conscious creativity,

where everything is allowable, no-thing is prevented, in my opinion.

 

 

tyga

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , souldreamone wrote:

>

>

> In a message dated 29/11/2008 4:07:40 PM Pacific Daylight Time,

> kailashana writes:

>

> > > > My darling Phil..... how sad, you've stopped *dancing*...

> > > >

> > > > ~A

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Then be happy that you are sad.

> > >

> > >

> > > Lol. Ain't that just like a man and a would-be *spiritual

teacher*,

> > > telling a woman how to feel.

> > >

> > > You're so adorable when you're being ignorant. ;-)

> > >

> > > ~A

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Well, you're not so much, really.

> > > If you think your comments are in any way different from the

male

> > > interaction here that you elevate yourself above, think again.

> > Ending your posts with

> > > " love to all " means nothing. It's a sham, and it has nothing

to do

> > with Rumi.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > There ya go again..... talking about me... interpreting what i

say and

> > do, instead of what you think and feel.....

> >

> > I used to use love ALL the time ..... when I felt LOVE ALL THE

> > TIME....in the heyday of my feeling of Oneness and K ascension; I

> > feel this intermittently, much less often as I seem to be mired in

> > *personalities* once again, hence I sign, " Love to All " ,

> > selectively.... when the *mood* asserts itself.

> >

> > And right now I love all youse guys.

> >

> > Smile.

> >

> > ~A

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > ***That's why I call it a sham. Real love doesn't come and go

> according to

> > mood, and neither does genuine Oneness realization. If we aren't

> where we

> > are, where are we?

>

>

> " Real Love " allows *you* to be *you* and *me* to be *me*, write these

> words to one another.... Speaking *your* truth, speaking *my* truth.

>

> All the rest are interpretations of what *real Love* should be.

>

> And here we are, there we go.

>

> ~A

>

>

>

> ****That's also an interpretation. Saying nobody can know this or

that is a

> silly ego trick to make everybody wrong but you, and when it goes

more like

> 'The only thing anybody can know about it is this...', then it's a

trick to get

> the last word. How can anybody say anything when you've already

declared the

> only thing that can be said? Where does that leave me room to

" speak my

> truth " ? Where is the love that you just defined? How do you know

what can and

> can't be known?

>

> I'm sure all this looks like Phil arguing and whining and crying and

> complaining and trying to be right and blaming everyone

 

 

 

right on..you know exactly what it is as well as what it looks like.

 

 

 

 

>because that's the nature of

> the stories we write.

>There's the possibility of noticing our own stories

> and that's what I'm doing, just noticing what's true. I'm noticing

it for

> myself, but there's no reason you can't play along.

>

> If anybody is interested in playing along, it's a simple matter to

look at

> the posts from Pete, Booboo, and Anna and see how the stories are

written and

> why the stories are written.

 

 

 

aw phil..

 

you can't get us out of your small-though-it-is mind.

 

that's cute.

 

Booboo?

 

hahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaa! that's great!

 

like two boos that scare our little fella.

 

you have a gift for giving yourself away kid.

 

that's what's so fun..

 

watching you shoot yourself in the ass..

 

as well as getting a clean hit on the foot in your mouth.

 

you're the best entertainment.

 

thanks so much philsie.

 

:-)

 

..b b.b.

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , tyga <tyga wrote:

>

> souldreamone wrote:

> >

> >

> > > ***That's why I call it a sham. Real love doesn't come and go

> > according to

> > > mood, and neither does genuine Oneness realization. If we

aren't

> > where we

> > > are, where are we?

> >

> >

> > " Real Love " allows *you* to be *you* and *me* to be *me*,

write these

> > words to one another.... Speaking *your* truth, speaking *my*

truth.

> >

> > All the rest are interpretations of what *real Love* should be.

> >

> > And here we are, there we go.

> >

> > ~A

> >

> > ****That's also an interpretation. Saying nobody can know this or

that

> > is a silly ego trick to make everybody wrong but you, and when it

goes

> > more like 'The only thing anybody can know about it is this...', then

> > it's a trick to get the last word. How can anybody say anything when

> > you've already declared the only thing that can be said? Where does

> > that leave me room to " speak my truth " ? Where is the love that you

> > just defined? How do you know what can and can't be known?

> >

> > I'm sure all this looks like Phil arguing and whining and crying and

> > complaining and trying to be right and blaming everyone because

that's

> > the nature of the stories we write. There's the possibility of

> > noticing our own stories and that's what I'm doing, just noticing

> > what's true. I'm noticing it for myself, but there's no reason you

> > can't play along.

> >

> > If anybody is interested in playing along, it's a simple matter to

> > look at the posts from Pete, Booboo, and Anna and see how the stories

> > are written and why the stories are written.

> >

> >

> >

> >

------

> In my opinion, real love is unconditional.

>

> Real love consists of all emotions. The emotional level of ultimate

> choices where all emotions are realised as conscious choice, true

> expressions of unconditional creativity. Fear then, is the bargain

> basement of choices, the lowest levels of creativity, unconscious,

> primal and instinctual, or blind creativity. Hate would be an

expression

> of fear as blind creativity.

>

> Unconditional love is the ultimate expression of conscious creativity,

> where everything is allowable, no-thing is prevented, in my opinion.

>

>

> tyga

>

 

 

Your opinion is my opinion Tyga, we resonate in Unconditional

Love...

 

~A

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " anabebe57 " <kailashana wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , tyga <tyga@> wrote:

> >

> > souldreamone@ wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > > > ***That's why I call it a sham. Real love doesn't come and go

> > > according to

> > > > mood, and neither does genuine Oneness realization. If we

> aren't

> > > where we

> > > > are, where are we?

> > >

> > >

> > > " Real Love " allows *you* to be *you* and *me* to be *me*,

> write these

> > > words to one another.... Speaking *your* truth, speaking *my*

> truth.

> > >

> > > All the rest are interpretations of what *real Love* should be.

> > >

> > > And here we are, there we go.

> > >

> > > ~A

> > >

> > > ****That's also an interpretation. Saying nobody can know this or

> that

> > > is a silly ego trick to make everybody wrong but you, and when it

> goes

> > > more like 'The only thing anybody can know about it is this...',

then

> > > it's a trick to get the last word. How can anybody say anything

when

> > > you've already declared the only thing that can be said? Where does

> > > that leave me room to " speak my truth " ? Where is the love that you

> > > just defined? How do you know what can and can't be known?

> > >

> > > I'm sure all this looks like Phil arguing and whining and crying

and

> > > complaining and trying to be right and blaming everyone because

> that's

> > > the nature of the stories we write. There's the possibility of

> > > noticing our own stories and that's what I'm doing, just noticing

> > > what's true. I'm noticing it for myself, but there's no reason you

> > > can't play along.

> > >

> > > If anybody is interested in playing along, it's a simple matter to

> > > look at the posts from Pete, Booboo, and Anna and see how the

stories

> > > are written and why the stories are written.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> ------

> > In my opinion, real love is unconditional.

> >

> > Real love consists of all emotions. The emotional level of ultimate

> > choices where all emotions are realised as conscious choice, true

> > expressions of unconditional creativity. Fear then, is the bargain

> > basement of choices, the lowest levels of creativity, unconscious,

> > primal and instinctual, or blind creativity. Hate would be an

> expression

> > of fear as blind creativity.

> >

> > Unconditional love is the ultimate expression of conscious

creativity,

> > where everything is allowable, no-thing is prevented, in my opinion.

> >

> >

> > tyga

> >

>

>

> Your opinion is my opinion Tyga, we resonate in Unconditional

> Love...

>

> ~A

 

 

unconditional:

 

not contingent....

 

not determined or influenced by someone or something else.

 

that which resonates between two people is NOT an unconditional act.

 

if anything or anyone resonates with anything or anyone else...

 

it MUST be a most conditional activity.

 

not that it matters but it does too.

 

..b b.b.

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111

wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " anabebe57 " <kailashana@> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , tyga <tyga@> wrote:

> > >

> > > souldreamone@ wrote:

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > > ***That's why I call it a sham. Real love doesn't come

and go

> > > > according to

> > > > > mood, and neither does genuine Oneness realization. If we

> > aren't

> > > > where we

> > > > > are, where are we?

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > " Real Love " allows *you* to be *you* and *me* to be *me*,

> > write these

> > > > words to one another.... Speaking *your* truth, speaking *my*

> > truth.

> > > >

> > > > All the rest are interpretations of what *real Love*

should be.

> > > >

> > > > And here we are, there we go.

> > > >

> > > > ~A

> > > >

> > > > ****That's also an interpretation. Saying nobody can know this or

> > that

> > > > is a silly ego trick to make everybody wrong but you, and when it

> > goes

> > > > more like 'The only thing anybody can know about it is this...',

> then

> > > > it's a trick to get the last word. How can anybody say anything

> when

> > > > you've already declared the only thing that can be said? Where

does

> > > > that leave me room to " speak my truth " ? Where is the love that

you

> > > > just defined? How do you know what can and can't be known?

> > > >

> > > > I'm sure all this looks like Phil arguing and whining and crying

> and

> > > > complaining and trying to be right and blaming everyone because

> > that's

> > > > the nature of the stories we write. There's the possibility of

> > > > noticing our own stories and that's what I'm doing, just noticing

> > > > what's true. I'm noticing it for myself, but there's no reason

you

> > > > can't play along.

> > > >

> > > > If anybody is interested in playing along, it's a simple

matter to

> > > > look at the posts from Pete, Booboo, and Anna and see how the

> stories

> > > > are written and why the stories are written.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> >

------

> > > In my opinion, real love is unconditional.

> > >

> > > Real love consists of all emotions. The emotional level of ultimate

> > > choices where all emotions are realised as conscious choice, true

> > > expressions of unconditional creativity. Fear then, is the bargain

> > > basement of choices, the lowest levels of creativity, unconscious,

> > > primal and instinctual, or blind creativity. Hate would be an

> > expression

> > > of fear as blind creativity.

> > >

> > > Unconditional love is the ultimate expression of conscious

> creativity,

> > > where everything is allowable, no-thing is prevented, in my opinion.

> > >

> > >

> > > tyga

> > >

> >

> >

> > Your opinion is my opinion Tyga, we resonate in Unconditional

> > Love...

> >

> > ~A

>

>

> unconditional:

>

> not contingent....

>

> not determined or influenced by someone or something else.

>

> that which resonates between two people is NOT an unconditional act.

>

> if anything or anyone resonates with anything or anyone else...

>

> it MUST be a most conditional activity.

>

> not that it matters but it does too.

>

> .b b.b.

>

 

 

Silly bbb,

 

I Am, You are... Together Unconditional Love Is....

 

 

~A

[Guest guest]

souldreamone wrote:

>

>

> In my opinion, real love is unconditional.

>

> Real love consists of all emotions. The emotional level of ultimate

> choices where all emotions are realised as conscious choice, true

> expressions of unconditional creativity. Fear then, is the bargain

> basement of choices, the lowest levels of creativity, unconscious,

> primal and instinctual, or blind creativity. Hate would be an

> expression

> of fear as blind creativity.

>

> Unconditional love is the ultimate expression of conscious

> creativity,

> where everything is allowable, no-thing is prevented, in my opinion.

>

>

> tyga

>

> ****Yeah, and no mind identified person is capable of unconditional love.

>

>

>

>

> ------

A mind identified person IS unconditional love.

 

tyga

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " anabebe57 " <kailashana wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " anabebe57 " <kailashana@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , tyga <tyga@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > souldreamone@ wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > > ***That's why I call it a sham. Real love doesn't come

> and go

> > > > > according to

> > > > > > mood, and neither does genuine Oneness realization.

If we

> > > aren't

> > > > > where we

> > > > > > are, where are we?

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > " Real Love " allows *you* to be *you* and *me* to be *me*,

> > > write these

> > > > > words to one another.... Speaking *your* truth,

speaking *my*

> > > truth.

> > > > >

> > > > > All the rest are interpretations of what *real Love*

> should be.

> > > > >

> > > > > And here we are, there we go.

> > > > >

> > > > > ~A

> > > > >

> > > > > ****That's also an interpretation. Saying nobody can know

this or

> > > that

> > > > > is a silly ego trick to make everybody wrong but you, and

when it

> > > goes

> > > > > more like 'The only thing anybody can know about it is this...',

> > then

> > > > > it's a trick to get the last word. How can anybody say anything

> > when

> > > > > you've already declared the only thing that can be said? Where

> does

> > > > > that leave me room to " speak my truth " ? Where is the love that

> you

> > > > > just defined? How do you know what can and can't be known?

> > > > >

> > > > > I'm sure all this looks like Phil arguing and whining and crying

> > and

> > > > > complaining and trying to be right and blaming everyone because

> > > that's

> > > > > the nature of the stories we write. There's the possibility of

> > > > > noticing our own stories and that's what I'm doing, just

noticing

> > > > > what's true. I'm noticing it for myself, but there's no reason

> you

> > > > > can't play along.

> > > > >

> > > > > If anybody is interested in playing along, it's a simple

> matter to

> > > > > look at the posts from Pete, Booboo, and Anna and see how the

> > stories

> > > > > are written and why the stories are written.

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > >

> ------

> > > > In my opinion, real love is unconditional.

> > > >

> > > > Real love consists of all emotions. The emotional level of

ultimate

> > > > choices where all emotions are realised as conscious choice, true

> > > > expressions of unconditional creativity. Fear then, is the

bargain

> > > > basement of choices, the lowest levels of creativity,

unconscious,

> > > > primal and instinctual, or blind creativity. Hate would be an

> > > expression

> > > > of fear as blind creativity.

> > > >

> > > > Unconditional love is the ultimate expression of conscious

> > creativity,

> > > > where everything is allowable, no-thing is prevented, in my

opinion.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > tyga

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Your opinion is my opinion Tyga, we resonate in Unconditional

> > > Love...

> > >

> > > ~A

> >

> >

> > unconditional:

> >

> > not contingent....

> >

> > not determined or influenced by someone or something else.

> >

> > that which resonates between two people is NOT an unconditional act.

> >

> > if anything or anyone resonates with anything or anyone else...

> >

> > it MUST be a most conditional activity.

> >

> > not that it matters but it does too.

> >

> > .b b.b.

> >

>

>

> Silly bbb,

>

> I Am, You are... Together Unconditional Love Is....

>

>

> ~A

 

 

 

 

actually, Agape requires nothing nor anyone.

 

..b b.b.

[Guest guest]

roberibus111 wrote:

>>

>>> In my opinion, real love is unconditional.

>>>

>>> Real love consists of all emotions. The emotional level of ultimate

>>> choices where all emotions are realised as conscious choice, true

>>> expressions of unconditional creativity. Fear then, is the bargain

>>> basement of choices, the lowest levels of creativity, unconscious,

>>> primal and instinctual, or blind creativity. Hate would be an

>>>

>> expression

>>

>>> of fear as blind creativity.

>>>

>>> Unconditional love is the ultimate expression of conscious

>>>

> creativity,

>

>>> where everything is allowable, no-thing is prevented, in my opinion.

>>>

>>>

>>> tyga

>>>

>>>

>> Your opinion is my opinion Tyga, we resonate in Unconditional

>> Love...

>>

>> ~A

>>

>

>

> unconditional:

>

> not contingent....

>

> not determined or influenced by someone or something else.

>

> that which resonates between two people is NOT an unconditional act.

>

> if anything or anyone resonates with anything or anyone else...

>

> it MUST be a most conditional activity.

>

> not that it matters but it does too.

>

> .b b.b.

>

>

>

>

>

> ---

>

> **

>

Yes, you are correct.

 

The act of resonating though, is only possible because of the

unconditional nature of love. In an infinite universe, all things are

possible.

 

tyga

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , tyga <tyga wrote:

>

> souldreamone wrote:

> >

> >

> > In my opinion, real love is unconditional.

> >

> > Real love consists of all emotions. The emotional level of

ultimate

> > choices where all emotions are realised as conscious choice, true

> > expressions of unconditional creativity. Fear then, is the bargain

> > basement of choices, the lowest levels of creativity, unconscious,

> > primal and instinctual, or blind creativity. Hate would be an

> > expression

> > of fear as blind creativity.

> >

> > Unconditional love is the ultimate expression of conscious

> > creativity,

> > where everything is allowable, no-thing is prevented, in my

opinion.

> >

> >

> > tyga

> >

> > ****Yeah, and no mind identified person is capable of

unconditional love.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

------

> A mind identified person IS unconditional love.

>

> tyga

 

 

 

 

out of your mind love is the best.

 

it's incomparable.

 

..b b.b.

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , tyga <tyga wrote:

>

> roberibus111 wrote:

> >>

> >>> In my opinion, real love is unconditional.

> >>>

> >>> Real love consists of all emotions. The emotional level of ultimate

> >>> choices where all emotions are realised as conscious choice, true

> >>> expressions of unconditional creativity. Fear then, is the bargain

> >>> basement of choices, the lowest levels of creativity, unconscious,

> >>> primal and instinctual, or blind creativity. Hate would be an

> >>>

> >> expression

> >>

> >>> of fear as blind creativity.

> >>>

> >>> Unconditional love is the ultimate expression of conscious

> >>>

> > creativity,

> >

> >>> where everything is allowable, no-thing is prevented, in my opinion.

> >>>

> >>>

> >>> tyga

> >>>

> >>>

> >> Your opinion is my opinion Tyga, we resonate in Unconditional

> >> Love...

> >>

> >> ~A

> >>

> >

> >

> > unconditional:

> >

> > not contingent....

> >

> > not determined or influenced by someone or something else.

> >

> > that which resonates between two people is NOT an unconditional act.

> >

> > if anything or anyone resonates with anything or anyone else...

> >

> > it MUST be a most conditional activity.

> >

> > not that it matters but it does too.

> >

> > .b b.b.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > ---

> >

> > **

> >

> Yes, you are correct.

>

> The act of resonating though, is only possible because of the

> unconditional nature of love. In an infinite universe, all things are

> possible.

>

> tyga

 

 

 

possible yes.

 

some more probable than others.

 

actually as 'things'..they are not at all either

 

..b b.b.