Guest guest Posted February 25, 2009 Report Share Posted February 25, 2009 " The neurobiological approach to an " attractor state " helps us along nicely as we strive to disclose furhte the unconscious origin of the human creature's inclination to " people " the world with spirits,and in particular with a supernatural Parent God. Repeated states of activation at the critical early period of development shape the structure of the neural circuits which then form the functional basis for the enduring states of mind within the individual. Accordingly, what transpires between the offspring and caregiver during the early period comes gradually to serve as not merely one neurobiological " state " among many others but the central, enduring " attractor state " of our ongoing lives. The basic biological situation gives rise to the implicit, unconscious level of perceptual, emotional " scheme " from which emanate our deepest emotional longings and perceptual inclinations. How could it be otherwise? For many critical months and years our physical and mental survival depends entirely on the caregiver; thus the affective intensity of this " critical " early stage is colossal; we attach ourselves to our provider with utterly spontaneous, unabated ardor; nothing is held back; our needs for nourishment and care, for love, are " activated " continuously, over and over again, thousands upon thousands of times, to become rooted synaptically in our brains; our emotional " values " are established in an indelible, permanent manner that seeks fulfillment forever after along lines that affectively recall the initial, primal interaction. In short, we internalize into our developing minds early on the instinct-driven, affective " pattern " that will govern our behavior as we relinquish the immediate familial unit and move into the wider world of culture, including of course the culture's religious dimension. The " truth " of the religious narrative with the Loving-Parent God at the center is confirmed implicitly, unconsciously through a primed, fully readied " attractor state " that resides at the fountain of our interpersonally sculpted, impersonally wired brains. We are not simply attracted to the religious narrative to which we are eventually exposed; the system is completely dynamic: it is we who also attract the narrative to ourselves, yanking it in, absorbing it, mapping it onto the model, the scheme, upon which we've been relying all along. The attractor state within us is as eager for confirmation of its core perception as those who offer the narrative to us are eager for our acceptance of it and our entry into the flock. It is not only religion, needless to say, but a wide variety of human participations that are linked firmly to the basic biological situation: our ongoing personal relationships at both the individual and group level (spouce, family) our national loyalty and identification with " motherland " and " fatherland " including the " leader " of " chief " ; our absorption in music, art, poetry, literature; and of course our inclination to make gods out of other institutions such as science or philosophy. However, because the spiritual and supernatural domain of religion is imponderable, invisible, entirely unsupported by what we term emperical criteria, because for billions of people everywhere mental and emotional stablitiy depends significantly on religious ties, and finally because religion must compete with other emergent systems and brain states that come into play as an individual develops over time, religion's humble, worldly task is to reinforce, to strengthen, to deepen the participant's original, brain based convictions through steady, even continuous exposure to ritual and to the word from early childhood onward. The neurons that fired together are wired together to create a primal attractor state during the early period must be regularly activated in the proper devotional context to ensure the continuation of the supernatural attachment that emerged on the initial exposure to the official, sacred narrative. To put it another way, the worldly task of institutional religion is to provide the flock with the inspiration to continue its mapping of the primal, core experience of attachment to the parental figure onto the orthodox version of the substitute Parent-God. Unless this happens, the flock and earthy shepherds are apt to disappear. Accordingly. to employ a few examples in illustration, when we hear the gospel choir on television singing. " Jesus came and found me / and put his arms around me. " we detect the primal attractor state of union, with the biological caregiver humming along quietly beneath the mapped-on surface expression of the core fantasy. M.D. Faber " The Psychological Roots of Religious Belief " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.