Guest guest Posted February 27, 2009 Report Share Posted February 27, 2009 Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > <dennis_travis33@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " loewe2009@ " <loewe2009@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " loewe2009@ " <loewe2009@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > > <dennis_travis33@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " charlieaugust10 " > > > > > <charlieaugust10@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > > > > > <dennis_travis33@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , Mahesh Kamat > > <mv.kamat@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the sky is not affected by the sun, moon, earth, other > > planets, > > > > > > > comets, stars, clouds, lightening, wind, fire, black > > hole etc. > > > > > > > everything exists within it & its presence is in > > > > > everything. within it > > > > > > > everything that exists is in action, it is in state of > > inaction. > > > > > it is > > > > > > > unaware of the great sun, beautiful moon, miraculous planet > > > > > earth. it > > > > > > > holds everything togather with intense love. everything > > that > > > > > exists is > > > > > > > born in its formless attire, grows in its, disintegrates in > > > > > it. To > > > > > > > become one with it & remain forever. > > > > > > > > - mahesh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to get one with oneself is of no choice, anyway. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > get Real, mahesh! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wow. Wow. Wow. > > > > > > I mean, wow. I just read this entire thread and...wow. > > > > > > A real arena of mud slinging. > > > > > > (And please somebody do not tell me there is no mud and no > > > > > slinging, or that I am the > > > > > > mud and the slinging, or any more thoroughly tired and > > recycled > > > > > advaita garbage. > > > > > > Is there any simple human affection on this site? Any?) > > > > > > By the way, I was raised Catholic. > > > > > > I've never read Lacan. > > > > > > I thought the original message, though a bit lecturesome, > > raised > > > > > some interesting issues: > > > > > > namely, the cliquishness and egotism and exclusive jargon of > > most > > > > > groups, be they > > > > > > Catholic or Hindu or even if they (quite aggressively) > > profess to > > > > > be beyond it all. > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Lacan was catholic. Didn't practice the religion, as far as I > > know. I recommend the > > > reading > > > > of Zizek instead of Lacan's original opus, for those interested > > in Lacan. It can take > > > several > > > > years to find out what Lacan is talking about and there's much > > unnecessary blah, blah, > > > > blah without importance. Lacan appears to have been a big > > a..hole! > > > > > > > > Nonduality is a great tool....but just a tool. When used, take > > care of it as if it was your > > > own > > > > tool. Keep it clean. Give it to another, who needs it. > > > > > > > > Ricardo > > > > > > > > > " No-body can be beyond all.....! " > > > > > > BTW, what's 'all'?.....might be very easy to say it is 'one " . Maybe > > too easy. But, why should > > > 'all' be 'one'? Does it matter? > > > > > > Who cares? > > > > > > Ricardo > > > > > > > > > ego is " all " of " one " imaginary " one " > > > > it doesn't matter about the size of ego....about the size of an > > imaginary world.... > > > > what is the size of a thought then?... > > > > .... > > > > nobody cares > > > > .... > > > > Nobody & Nothing can be behond " all " this " one " fiction of ego.... > > > > there can't be anything behond any fictions.... > > > > > > Marc > > > is that a belief that you don't have faith... > > or a lack of belief that you do have faith? > > do you have faith that you don't believe.. > > or do you not have faith that you do believe? > > are you faithful to any or all of that? > > do you believe that you are not faithful to all or any of that? > > do you have faith that you can have faith in belief..or not.. > > or not not neither nor? > > is there a you that can " do " all or none of the above? > > is the above the below?. > > mainly and namely: > > .b b.b. > > > p.s. > > don't whatever the hell you do believe me. > > got nothing to believe in. i doubt that you'll believe me. i don't believe that you will not doubt me. i have faith in the belief that you may not doubt me. i can't have faith in the belief that i doubt that you won't.. believe me and not doubt me that is. how-some-ever.. nah.. forget it. who can believe they have enough faith to doubt they doubt belief only the true believer..in doubting. but i doubt that too Red Ryder's: ..b b.b. (don't shoot the messenger) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.