Guest guest Posted March 2, 2009 Report Share Posted March 2, 2009 Nisargadatta , " loewe2009 " <loewe2009 wrote: > > > According to Lacan, and in contrast to Freud, the super-ego's demand, its implacable > demand, is: Enjoy! Enjoy everything. Enjoy shit! To see this, to accept it, to understand and > tolerate this gives you the freedom to just not try to enjoy every moment or to do as you > were enjoying it. A sense of culpability can emerge when the subject can't comply with > the super-ego's demand. The super-cop (ego) knows no mercy and will punish inexorably > the subject, when not enjoying. It also regurgitates constantly unpleasant situations and > tells you to enjoy it, and asks: Oh, why can't you enjoy this? People, then, develop all > possible sorts and types of coping-strategies. > > Merging in daily life routine, work, responsibilities and duties not always is accompained > by pleasurable feelings. Dealing every day with many different persons, with their > problems, pain and suffering can't lead to a constant feeling of spiritual bliss, peace and > understanding. But, it is possible to cope with it, to fight and accept that you not always > will win. People you meet in daily life are not always nice. They sometimes hurt > themselves and others. There is so much suffering around us. Nobody, except the super- > ego, tells me to enjoy it. Why should I find everything pleasurable? Why should I try to > transform, to rationalize things into pleasurable moments or try to avoid constantly these > situations? > > Yours, > Ricardo > > P: Well, I agree with you there, in that the brain has a mechanism of quality control, which inspects all sensations and experiences regarding enjoyability, and rejects any that doesn't come bearing pleasure as its admission fee. I don't call that mechanism a super-ego because a super-ego is no thing other than a psychological straw man. Nevertheless, this demand for pleasant sensations and experiences is the most constant sort of dukkha as discontent. Awareness of this demand in all its forms is a huge leap to attain equanimity. Unpleasantness has its role in life and must be accommodated. A young child can't feel unpleasantness or pain without a strong rejection. As she/h grows old the ability to tolerate the unpleasant grows. It's a sign of maturity to accept such. That doesn't mean that the brain cannot be trained to defuse most of the unpleasantness of life, specially those concerning social situations in which our expectations and demands on others play a role. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.