Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Not Two

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

The subject and the object is the same.

 

It already is false to say they ARE same and inseparable because that would

imply two different things glued together appearing as one.

 

No, subject and object IS the same. They are not two.

 

The perceiver IS the pereived means there is no separate perceiver which is

perceiving appearances like objects or sensations. The perceiver IS the

sensations.

 

To say there is no perceiver and also nothing perceived is just, when verbally

taken, intellectual rubbish. Something like Read's Digest Advaita :)

 

Consciousness is its content. It IS the same. There is no such as a thing as a

mirror called consicousness in which contents as objects are appearing. This

mirror thingy is an ancient myth repeated in teachings and books by mindless

spiritual parrots til today.

 

Werner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " Werner Woehr " <wwoehr wrote:

>

> The subject and the object is the same.

>

> It already is false to say they ARE same and inseparable because that would

imply two different things glued together appearing as one.

>

> No, subject and object IS the same. They are not two.

>

> The perceiver IS the pereived means there is no separate perceiver which is

perceiving appearances like objects or sensations. The perceiver IS the

sensations.

>

> To say there is no perceiver and also nothing perceived is just, when verbally

taken, intellectual rubbish. Something like Read's Digest Advaita :)

>

> Consciousness is its content. It IS the same. There is no such as a thing as a

mirror called consicousness in which contents as objects are appearing. This

mirror thingy is an ancient myth repeated in teachings and books by mindless

spiritual parrots til today.

>

> Werner

>

 

 

then you could try to fight this " mindless spiritual parrots " ....

 

out of your mind....

 

:)

 

Marc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " Werner Woehr " <wwoehr wrote:

>

> The subject and the object is the same.

>

> It already is false to say they ARE same and inseparable because that would

imply two different things glued together appearing as one.

>

> No, subject and object IS the same. They are not two.

>

> The perceiver IS the pereived means there is no separate perceiver which is

perceiving appearances like objects or sensations. The perceiver IS the

sensations.

>

> To say there is no perceiver and also nothing perceived is just, when verbally

taken, intellectual rubbish. Something like Read's Digest Advaita :)

>

> Consciousness is its content. It IS the same. There is no such as a thing as a

mirror called consicousness in which contents as objects are appearing. This

mirror thingy is an ancient myth repeated in teachings and books by mindless

spiritual parrots til today.

>

> Werner

 

 

how true.

 

there is no subject in what you say above.

 

and there was no object in saying it.

 

Brilliant wernie!

 

never saw a more talented parrot.

 

..b b.b.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " Werner Woehr " <wwoehr@> wrote:

> >

> > The subject and the object is the same.

> >

> > It already is false to say they ARE same and inseparable because that would

imply two different things glued together appearing as one.

> >

> > No, subject and object IS the same. They are not two.

> >

> > The perceiver IS the pereived means there is no separate perceiver which is

perceiving appearances like objects or sensations. The perceiver IS the

sensations.

> >

> > To say there is no perceiver and also nothing perceived is just, when

verbally taken, intellectual rubbish. Something like Read's Digest Advaita :)

> >

> > Consciousness is its content. It IS the same. There is no such as a thing as

a mirror called consicousness in which contents as objects are appearing. This

mirror thingy is an ancient myth repeated in teachings and books by mindless

spiritual parrots til today.

> >

> > Werner

>

>

> how true.

>

> there is no subject in what you say above.

>

> and there was no object in saying it.

>

> Brilliant wernie!

>

> never saw a more talented parrot.

>

> .b b.b.

>

 

 

Werner = parrot?

 

whose parrot then?

 

lol

 

Marc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...