Guest guest Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 Dan: Bubbles burst and blow away in the wind. The human experience. > > > > Anna: Much love to you both, Atagrasin and Dan... I'm pleased your bubbles of being have not burst into thin air and we still meet in the hear and now. Atagrasin: Hi Anna,thanks for your lovely welcoming.Nice to meet you again. I´m finishing " Ten poems " by Roger Housden.Your perseverance [by you example] paid off. Atagrasin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > if one of you claim there are two of you so enlightened.. > > > > > > > > > > > > you are befogged. > > > > > > > > > > > > it matters little which one. > > > > > > > > > > > > both are deluded. > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As Henny Youngman once said: > > > > > > > > > > Take my 'lude ... please. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Love to you and All - > > > > > > > > > > De-luded, De-livered, and De-lightful Dan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > henny youngman is dead. > > > > > > > > so are quaaludes. > > > > > > > > ,b b,b, > > > > > > > > > and so are you. > > > > > > how would 'you " know? > > > > .b b.b. > > the dead bury their dead. > > here, use this shovel. to be fair i will respond intelligently.. even to unintelligent treatment like that. you are unsuccessful in attempting this theft of " my " life. you make " me " giggle. " the robbed that smiles.. steals something from the thief. " -William Shakespeare oh awaken my child! ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " atagrasin " <k1c2@> wrote: > > > > > In the book " I AM THAT " Nisargadatta Maharaj is quoted as saying " It took me > > > only three years to realize my true nature. " His supposed " dharma > > > heir " ,Sailor Bob and co,apparently, are claming that you don´t need time to > > > realize your " true nature " . Any comments? > > > > > > Atagrasin > > > > > Geo: I would say each insight into the true nature of existence is a flash, > > always new.... > > The organism may take time to change, but that should not be your concern. > > Go as deep as you can > > on each flash...alwasys deep. Who am I? > > -geo- > > > > Atagrasin:If we accepts Maharaj´s own testimony about his realization in three years as final and complete [ " full stop " as Sailor Bob says]then, where we are going to put your argument about a " progresive " > > " flash by flash " way? Maybe this was what happens in those three years, but who really knows? > > > > We first need to know, to what Maharaj was referring, with his statement about " realizing in three years my true nature " ,and there seems to be, that nobody here [in his own group]knows the answer.But what we really know is that language produce the appearance of choice and control.Then if our expectation are met,we claim responsability for an " achievement " , be this spiritual or not, missing the point that our theorical constructions [including ,future realizations and a " me " that had realize something,in time]are only structures of interpretations and representations. > > > > In other words,imaginations and abstractions in reference to nothing outside of themselves.In this sense Dan and Toomboru are echoing ,the middle way Buddhism when it says that, there is not a " true nature " if by " true nature " we mean an autonomous substance,entity,or something with inherent existence. > > > > Atagrasin > > What do I know first-hand? > > What do I know directly, " so " - now. > > What doesn't take time, isn't constructed by me or anyone else. > > Nisargardatta constructed a statement. > > You constructed a reaction. > > Words were offered and read. > > All involving time and construction. > > What was never constructed - say anything about it, yea or nay, and you are involved in constructing. > > How are you going to say it? > > How to tell about it? > > How to tell when there isn't anyone to report it to? > > This has nothing to do with anything Nisargadatta ever said, nor with anything he experienced, or any particular hero of yours who you think is nondual. > > I know directly. > > I post here because I'm human and communicate. > > I know directly and know the human being for what it is. > > Bubbles burst and blow away in the wind. > > The human experience. oh! are you a......gawwwwd??!! hahahahaaaaaaaaaa! that's funny stuff danny. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 Nisargadatta , " anabebe57 " <kailashana wrote: > Much love to you both, Atagrasin and Dan... > > I'm pleased your bubbles of being have not burst into thin air > and we still meet in the hear and now. > > > ~A Mine has. I am the thin air. The meeting is illusory. And I enjoy it. Nice not meeting you here! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 Nisargadatta , " atagrasin " <k1c2 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " atagrasin " <k1c2@> wrote: > > > > > Nisargardatta constructed a statement. > > > > > > You constructed a reaction. > > > > Dan apparently contructed a reaction to an apparent reaction. > > > > > > Words were offered and read. > > > > > > All involving time and construction. > > > > > > What was never constructed - say anything about it, yea or nay, and you are involved in constructing. > > > > > Atagrasin: Welcome to the construction, fellow laborer. I'm being constructed here, now, for your viewing pleasure. These fingers appeared to type a note, just for you. You appeared, just to read it. All effortless, no? Not even a second of labor involved. Marvelous! > > > How are you going to say it? > > > > > > How to tell about it? > > > > > > How to tell when there isn't anyone to report it to? > > > Atagrasin: There is no anyone to report it or to not report it. [worth the clarifying] So nothing was ever said. > > > This has nothing to do with anything Nisargadatta ever said, nor with anything he experienced, or any particular hero of yours who you think is nondual. > > Atagrasin; Asking a question in the Nisargadatta group, about a statement made by Nisargadatta himself, give you the impression that Nisargadatta is my hero? You seem to be the " master builder " . Not really. I was just kidding. > > > I know directly. > > > > > I post here because I'm human and communicate. > > Atagrasin: Do you know directly that you are a human being? Sure. And I'm happy to be one. At your service. Just for you. To type this response. How long am I human? I don't think your watch is able to record it. >.Or this is only an inference colored by imagination and asociated with sensations? You don´t post here, " because " ........The posting seems to happens , ipso facto, and we cannot track any particular cause for this happening. You can say what you want about it. It's not like it " really " matters. You haven't defined it. Neither have I. However we explain it is just a matter of convenience. Nothing's explained, doesn't need to be. > Are you concious of being a human 24 hours a day? For example, in deep sleep are you concious of being a human?.You are claiming to be a human, then Im refering to clock hours.If not,are your a human only part time? If so,then what you are in the breaks? Human being is only a role,an interpretation not what I really am.[spirituality 101] Human being is a construct. Nanosecond to nanosecond. Inter-correlatedly inter-constructed with every other construct at every apparent level co-inter-determined nanosecond to nanosecond. And of course, the nanoseconds also are constructed in the same way. > > > I know directly and know the human being for what it is. > > > > > > Bubbles burst and blow away in the wind. > > > > > > The human experience. > > Atagrasin: Now you have changed the cartoons.But,are you not the " wind " too? Interdependent arrising, interdependent extinction,both and neither Indeedy yes. And no " you " necessary to " be that. " Bingo! Smiles. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > to be fair i will respond intelligently.. > > even to unintelligent treatment like that. > > you are unsuccessful in attempting this theft of " my " life. > > you make " me " giggle. > > " the robbed that smiles.. > > steals something from the thief. " > > -William Shakespeare > > oh awaken my child! > > .b b.b. silly! > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > oh! > > are you a......gawwwwd??!! > > hahahahaaaaaaaaaa! > > that's funny stuff danny. > > .b b.b. glad we're finally in agreement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > to be fair i will respond intelligently.. > > > > even to unintelligent treatment like that. > > > > you are unsuccessful in attempting this theft of " my " life. > > > > you make " me " giggle. > > > > " the robbed that smiles.. > > > > steals something from the thief. " > > > > -William Shakespeare > > > > oh awaken my child! > > > > .b b.b. > > silly! therein lies a glimmer of light. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > oh! > > > > are you a......gawwwwd??!! > > > > hahahahaaaaaaaaaa! > > > > that's funny stuff danny. > > > > .b b.b. > > glad we're finally in agreement. you're assuming again. you're once again incorrect in your assumption. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > oh! > > > > > > are you a......gawwwwd??!! > > > > > > hahahahaaaaaaaaaa! > > > > > > that's funny stuff danny. > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > glad we're finally in agreement. > > > you're assuming again. > > you're once again incorrect in your assumption. From here, you fellers are both " projecting " ;-). After all, nothing else is possible/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > oh! > > > > > > are you a......gawwwwd??!! > > > > > > hahahahaaaaaaaaaa! > > > > > > that's funny stuff danny. > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > glad we're finally in agreement. > > > you're assuming again. > > you're once again incorrect in your assumption. > > .b b.b. i assume nothing. you're silly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > oh! > > > > > > > > are you a......gawwwwd??!! > > > > > > > > hahahahaaaaaaaaaa! > > > > > > > > that's funny stuff danny. > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > glad we're finally in agreement. > > > > > > you're assuming again. > > > > you're once again incorrect in your assumption. > > From here, you fellers are both " projecting " ;-). After all, nothing else is possible/ the impossible that is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > oh! > > > > > > > > > > are you a......gawwwwd??!! > > > > > > > > > > hahahahaaaaaaaaaa! > > > > > > > > > > that's funny stuff danny. > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > glad we're finally in agreement. > > > > > > > > > you're assuming again. > > > > > > you're once again incorrect in your assumption. > > > > From here, you fellers are both " projecting " ;-). After all, nothing else is possible/ > > the impossible that is. What? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 Pattern? What's a pattern? Something like a melody, perhaps? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > oh! > > > > > > > > are you a......gawwwwd??!! > > > > > > > > hahahahaaaaaaaaaa! > > > > > > > > that's funny stuff danny. > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > glad we're finally in agreement. > > > > > > you're assuming again. > > > > you're once again incorrect in your assumption. > > > > .b b.b. > > i assume nothing. > > you're silly. i assume nothing. you're stupid. neither of us has to assume stuuf that evident. but you did assume that agreement stuff. and you're still wrong. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > oh! > > > > > > > > > > are you a......gawwwwd??!! > > > > > > > > > > hahahahaaaaaaaaaa! > > > > > > > > > > that's funny stuff danny. > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > glad we're finally in agreement. > > > > > > > > > you're assuming again. > > > > > > you're once again incorrect in your assumption. > > > > From here, you fellers are both " projecting " ;-). After all, nothing else is possible/ > > the impossible that is. it's not possible for anything to be impossible. how could an impossible thing even be talked about? if it's said to be impossible.. that's an impossible statement of fact. liar! ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 Nisargadatta , Ricardo Almon <ricardo.almon wrote: > > Pattern? What's a pattern? > > > > Something like a melody, perhaps? > An overlapping memory that is used as a reference point in the perceptual chaos out of which the sense of self emerges. toombaru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > > > > > From here, you fellers are both " projecting " ;-). After all, nothing else is possible/ > > > > the impossible that is. > > What? The impossible is possible. Each moment arises as is, and conversing occurs. Nothing is actually projected. There isn't a projector existing apart from a screen to make a projection. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > From here, you fellers are both " projecting " ;-). After all, nothing else is possible/ > > > > > > the impossible that is. > > > > What? > > The impossible is possible. > > Each moment arises as is, and conversing occurs. > > Nothing is actually projected. > > There isn't a projector existing apart from a screen to make a projection. oh for christ sakes there's none of that stuff. quit droning on about old metaphors. it's quite boring. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > > oh for christ sakes there's none of that stuff. > > quit droning on about old metaphors. > > it's quite boring. > > .b b.b. i'm not responsible for your feelings of boredom, bob. it's funny that tim felt bored by something i said and then left the list. wow. i didn't realize i had such power! you're not going to leave the list because you got bored by a post. you're different than tim in that way. ha! love to you and all -- boring dan (lmao) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > oh for christ sakes there's none of that stuff. > > > > quit droning on about old metaphors. > > > > it's quite boring. > > > > .b b.b. > > i'm not responsible for your feelings of boredom, bob. you aren't responsible for anything. you have no power this or any other way. what you do doesn't affect me. but it's boring all the same. > > it's funny that tim felt bored by something i said and then left the list. > > wow. > > i didn't realize i had such power! you don't. read the above. i'm not leaving the list. you are easily thrilled. this is understandable. > you're not going to leave the list because you got bored by a post. > > you're different than tim in that way. > > ha! i am not.. that is.. it is not possible that i can be different.. or the same as anyone " else " you seem to be lost in the discussions here. this will pass. > love to you and all -- > > boring dan (lmao) yes. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 > > Pattern? What's a pattern? > > > > Something like a melody, perhaps? > An overlapping memory that is used as a reference point in the perceptual chaos out of which the sense of self emerges. toombaru That is the patterning issuing from a self centered man, yes. There are several fields of patterning. For a man that transcended the organic-based-center, there is another field of patterns. It is a more " fixed " one. It is the patterns of the human world. Trees, winds, stars, bodies...all are empty patterns in this human world. The later will completely dissolve only with the ending of the body. And thenfinally there is the patterning issuing/seen from the ground: all manifested or non-manifested unlimited possibilities. All empty of being. -geo- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.