Guest guest Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > roberibus111 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Friday, May 22, 2009 7:32 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Re: no pattern P.S. P.S2 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Conceptual thought speculates that beyond its purview there is a realm > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it cannot touch. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you see where this is going? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am not sure... but is there anything wrong with thought " knowing " that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is limited? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I feel sometimes that that is all it can do. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -geo- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there's nothing wrong with anything. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > how could anything be wrong..or right? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it's what it is. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If conceptual thought speculates that beyond its purview there is a realm > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that it cannot touch > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > nontheless projects such realm....then it is back to duality. It is not > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " wrong " or " right " ...just > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > back to the narrowness of conceptualy trying to understand what IS. Result: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > conflict. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -geo- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i don't know what i'm talking about. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ......but you know you're talking? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i don't know anything. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ...but you know that? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you seem to know what i do or do not know.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i do not. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > no ifs ands or buts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are you listening? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You think we think? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who the hell are you asking? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who's the you that asks? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't think! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You have the where-with-all to offer advise to another? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > do you really believe that? > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You tell me no to think and drink warm milk. > > > > > > > > > > Have I ask you to do anything? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > do you actually find this ego stuff important? > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you still think that I and my ego are separate? > > > Do you still think that you can think about your ego? > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > ok.. > > > > once again.. > > > > i don't think. > > > > i don't know what i'm saying. > > > > the i that goes by toombaru is no different. > > > > your no Socrates toomie. > > > > well you are.. > > > > as i am.. > > > > but those methods you attempt to employ.. > > > > you don't even run a close 10,000th with old Soc. > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > You still think that a method is being employed? > > > > toombaru there is no doubt. stop trying to bullshit a bullshitter you old bullshitter. do you still think you can hide? you're as phony as i am. but you have to much pride to admit it. but that's another situation. i'll help you on that too. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > roberibus111 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Friday, May 22, 2009 7:32 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Re: no pattern P.S. P.S2 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Conceptual thought speculates that beyond its purview there is a realm > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it cannot touch. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you see where this is going? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am not sure... but is there anything wrong with thought " knowing " that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is limited? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I feel sometimes that that is all it can do. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -geo- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there's nothing wrong with anything. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > how could anything be wrong..or right? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it's what it is. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If conceptual thought speculates that beyond its purview there is a realm > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that it cannot touch > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > nontheless projects such realm....then it is back to duality. It is not > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " wrong " or " right " ...just > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > back to the narrowness of conceptualy trying to understand what IS. Result: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > conflict. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -geo- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i don't know what i'm talking about. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ......but you know you're talking? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i don't know anything. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ...but you know that? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you seem to know what i do or do not know.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i do not. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > no ifs ands or buts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are you listening? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You think we think? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who the hell are you asking? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who's the you that asks? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't think! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You have the where-with-all to offer advise to another? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > do you really believe that? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You tell me no to think and drink warm milk. > > > > > > > > > > > > Have I ask you to do anything? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > do you actually find this ego stuff important? > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you still think that I and my ego are separate? > > > > Do you still think that you can think about your ego? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > ok.. > > > > > > once again.. > > > > > > i don't think. > > > > > > i don't know what i'm saying. > > > > > > the i that goes by toombaru is no different. > > > > > > your no Socrates toomie. > > > > > > well you are.. > > > > > > as i am.. > > > > > > but those methods you attempt to employ.. > > > > > > you don't even run a close 10,000th with old Soc. > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and: > > > > of course... you have no choice... > > > > of course.... you don't think... > > > > of course.... you are fiction... > > > > of course.... the apparent world is a dream.. > > > > of course ALL that shit. > > > > you know what i mean.. > > > > even if i don't. > > > > but i won't assume. > > > > don't take any of this as advise. > > > > i understand now how fragile your sense of self is. > > > > sorry. > > > > .b b.b. > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > You think that you have a valid picture of me in your mind? > > You think that you have something substantial that you can influence? toombaru of course of course.. you have these assumptions that you hold dear... and hold onto for dear life. you are influenced greatly by their overwhelming power.. to convince you that you know something.. that you are clever. well.. i won't spoil your dream. you're big stuff and cannot be influenced. you aren't even a process. you are...a gawwwwwd! LOL! ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > roberibus111 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Friday, May 22, 2009 7:32 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Re: no pattern P.S. P.S2 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Conceptual thought speculates that beyond its purview there is a realm > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it cannot touch. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you see where this is going? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am not sure... but is there anything wrong with thought " knowing " that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is limited? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I feel sometimes that that is all it can do. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -geo- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there's nothing wrong with anything. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > how could anything be wrong..or right? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it's what it is. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If conceptual thought speculates that beyond its purview there is a realm > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that it cannot touch > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > nontheless projects such realm....then it is back to duality. It is not > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " wrong " or " right " ...just > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > back to the narrowness of conceptualy trying to understand what IS. Result: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > conflict. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -geo- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i don't know what i'm talking about. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ......but you know you're talking? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i don't know anything. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ...but you know that? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you seem to know what i do or do not know.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i do not. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > no ifs ands or buts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are you listening? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You think we think? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who the hell are you asking? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who's the you that asks? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't think! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You have the where-with-all to offer advise to another? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > do you really believe that? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You tell me no to think and drink warm milk. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Have I ask you to do anything? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > do you actually find this ego stuff important? > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you still think that I and my ego are separate? > > > > > Do you still think that you can think about your ego? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > ok.. > > > > > > > > once again.. > > > > > > > > i don't think. > > > > > > > > i don't know what i'm saying. > > > > > > > > the i that goes by toombaru is no different. > > > > > > > > your no Socrates toomie. > > > > > > > > well you are.. > > > > > > > > as i am.. > > > > > > > > but those methods you attempt to employ.. > > > > > > > > you don't even run a close 10,000th with old Soc. > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and: > > > > > > of course... you have no choice... > > > > > > of course.... you don't think... > > > > > > of course.... you are fiction... > > > > > > of course.... the apparent world is a dream.. > > > > > > of course ALL that shit. > > > > > > you know what i mean.. > > > > > > even if i don't. > > > > > > but i won't assume. > > > > > > don't take any of this as advise. > > > > > > i understand now how fragile your sense of self is. > > > > > > sorry. > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > do i assume that you require an apology? > > > > i don't assume.. > > > > there is a thought that does.. > > > > but it's not 'mine " . > > > > it's crazy daddyo. > > > > .b b.b. > Do you think that you can offend me? > > > > > toombaru i don't care. do you ever talk straight? or do you now take it upon yourself to be: the Official Inquisitor. :-) ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > roberibus111 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Friday, May 22, 2009 7:32 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Re: no pattern P.S. P.S2 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Conceptual thought speculates that beyond its purview there is a realm > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it cannot touch. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you see where this is going? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am not sure... but is there anything wrong with thought " knowing " that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is limited? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I feel sometimes that that is all it can do. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -geo- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there's nothing wrong with anything. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > how could anything be wrong..or right? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it's what it is. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If conceptual thought speculates that beyond its purview there is a realm > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that it cannot touch > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > nontheless projects such realm....then it is back to duality. It is not > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " wrong " or " right " ...just > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > back to the narrowness of conceptualy trying to understand what IS. Result: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > conflict. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -geo- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i don't know what i'm talking about. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ......but you know you're talking? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i don't know anything. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ...but you know that? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you seem to know what i do or do not know.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i do not. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > no ifs ands or buts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are you listening? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You think we think? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who the hell are you asking? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who's the you that asks? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't think! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You have the where-with-all to offer advise to another? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > do you really believe that? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You tell me no to think and drink warm milk. > > > > > > > > > > > > Have I ask you to do anything? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > do you actually find this ego stuff important? > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you still think that I and my ego are separate? > > > > Do you still think that you can think about your ego? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > ok.. > > > > > > once again.. > > > > > > i don't think. > > > > > > i don't know what i'm saying. > > > > > > the i that goes by toombaru is no different. > > > > > > your no Socrates toomie. > > > > > > well you are.. > > > > > > as i am.. > > > > > > but those methods you attempt to employ.. > > > > > > you don't even run a close 10,000th with old Soc. > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > You still think that a method is being employed? > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > there is no doubt. > > stop trying to bullshit a bullshitter you old bullshitter. > > do you still think you can hide? > > you're as phony as i am. > > but you have to much pride to admit it. > > but that's another situation. > > i'll help you on that too. > > .b b.b. > Ok. I need all the help I can get. Now.............how about that money thing? We have to go to Las Vegas again.....and the way things are going my wife will have to cut back severely on her gambling. If she wins big .......we will pay you back. toombaru toombaru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > > > > > ok.. > > > > once again.. > > > > i don't think. > > > > i don't know what i'm saying. > > > > the i that goes by toombaru is no different. > > > > your no Socrates toomie. > > > > well you are.. > > > > as i am.. > > > > but those methods you attempt to employ.. > > > > you don't even run a close 10,000th with old Soc. > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > Socrates is dead. > > It's just me and you babe. > > > > toombaru we're dead too. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > ok.. > > > > > > once again.. > > > > > > i don't think. > > > > > > i don't know what i'm saying. > > > > > > the i that goes by toombaru is no different. > > > > > > your no Socrates toomie. > > > > > > well you are.. > > > > > > as i am.. > > > > > > but those methods you attempt to employ.. > > > > > > you don't even run a close 10,000th with old Soc. > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Socrates is dead. > > > > It's just me and you babe. > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > we're dead too. > > .b b.b. > You mean........we were alive? :-0 toombaru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ok.. > > > > > > > > once again.. > > > > > > > > i don't think. > > > > > > > > i don't know what i'm saying. > > > > > > > > the i that goes by toombaru is no different. > > > > > > > > your no Socrates toomie. > > > > > > > > well you are.. > > > > > > > > as i am.. > > > > > > > > but those methods you attempt to employ.. > > > > > > > > you don't even run a close 10,000th with old Soc. > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Socrates is dead. > > > > > > It's just me and you babe. > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > we're dead too. > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > You mean........we were alive? > > > :-0 > > > > toombaru what does that even mean? ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > roberibus111 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Friday, May 22, 2009 7:32 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Re: no pattern P.S. P.S2 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Conceptual thought speculates that beyond its purview there is a realm > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it cannot touch. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you see where this is going? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am not sure... but is there anything wrong with thought " knowing " that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is limited? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I feel sometimes that that is all it can do. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -geo- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there's nothing wrong with anything. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > how could anything be wrong..or right? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it's what it is. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If conceptual thought speculates that beyond its purview there is a realm > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that it cannot touch > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > nontheless projects such realm....then it is back to duality. It is not > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " wrong " or " right " ...just > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > back to the narrowness of conceptualy trying to understand what IS. Result: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > conflict. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -geo- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i don't know what i'm talking about. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ......but you know you're talking? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i don't know anything. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ...but you know that? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you seem to know what i do or do not know.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i do not. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > no ifs ands or buts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are you listening? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You think we think? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who the hell are you asking? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who's the you that asks? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't think! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You have the where-with-all to offer advise to another? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > do you really believe that? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You tell me no to think and drink warm milk. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Have I ask you to do anything? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > do you actually find this ego stuff important? > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you still think that I and my ego are separate? > > > > > Do you still think that you can think about your ego? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > ok.. > > > > > > > > once again.. > > > > > > > > i don't think. > > > > > > > > i don't know what i'm saying. > > > > > > > > the i that goes by toombaru is no different. > > > > > > > > your no Socrates toomie. > > > > > > > > well you are.. > > > > > > > > as i am.. > > > > > > > > but those methods you attempt to employ.. > > > > > > > > you don't even run a close 10,000th with old Soc. > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You still think that a method is being employed? > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > there is no doubt. > > > > stop trying to bullshit a bullshitter you old bullshitter. > > > > do you still think you can hide? > > > > you're as phony as i am. > > > > but you have to much pride to admit it. > > > > but that's another situation. > > > > i'll help you on that too. > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > Ok. > > I need all the help I can get. > > Now.............how about that money thing? > > We have to go to Las Vegas again.....and the way things are going my wife will have to cut back severely on her gambling. > > If she wins big .......we will pay you back. toombaru toombaru vegas! well maybe we can work something out here. i hear that the odds are better at the vegas casinos.. then they are betting that obama is fixing everything up over there. what do you think? even though you don't. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ok.. > > > > > > > > > > once again.. > > > > > > > > > > i don't think. > > > > > > > > > > i don't know what i'm saying. > > > > > > > > > > the i that goes by toombaru is no different. > > > > > > > > > > your no Socrates toomie. > > > > > > > > > > well you are.. > > > > > > > > > > as i am.. > > > > > > > > > > but those methods you attempt to employ.. > > > > > > > > > > you don't even run a close 10,000th with old Soc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Socrates is dead. > > > > > > > > It's just me and you babe. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > we're dead too. > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > You mean........we were alive? > > > > > > :-0 > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > what does that even mean? > > .b b.b. > Well.....if we're dead.......we must have died. If we died......we must have been alive at one time. Do you remember what that was like?. toombaru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 As long as there is an I "employed" it are stuck in the conceptual dream.toombaru I can use an I, without having some inner real I. Language -geo- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > As long as there is an I " employed " it are stuck in the conceptual dream. > > toombaru > > I can use an I, without having some inner real I. Language > -geo- > You can try. toombaru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ok.. > > > > > > > > > > > > once again.. > > > > > > > > > > > > i don't think. > > > > > > > > > > > > i don't know what i'm saying. > > > > > > > > > > > > the i that goes by toombaru is no different. > > > > > > > > > > > > your no Socrates toomie. > > > > > > > > > > > > well you are.. > > > > > > > > > > > > as i am.. > > > > > > > > > > > > but those methods you attempt to employ.. > > > > > > > > > > > > you don't even run a close 10,000th with old Soc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Socrates is dead. > > > > > > > > > > It's just me and you babe. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > we're dead too. > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You mean........we were alive? > > > > > > > > > :-0 > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > what does that even mean? > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > Well.....if we're dead.......we must have died. > > If we died......we must have been alive at one time. > > Do you remember what that was like?. > > > > toombaru i can't remember what i had for breakfast. i don't know if there is such a thing. i don't think about it. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 Socrates is dead. It's just me and you babe. toombaru You AND he?? -geo- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > As long as there is an I " employed " it are stuck in the conceptual dream. > > > > toombaru > > > > I can use an I, without having some inner real I. Language > > -geo- > > > > > You can try. > > > > toombaru actually he can't. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ok.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > once again.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i don't think. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i don't know what i'm saying. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the i that goes by toombaru is no different. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > your no Socrates toomie. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > well you are.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as i am.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but those methods you attempt to employ.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you don't even run a close 10,000th with old Soc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Socrates is dead. > > > > > > > > > > > > It's just me and you babe. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we're dead too. > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You mean........we were alive? > > > > > > > > > > > > :-0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > what does that even mean? > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > Well.....if we're dead.......we must have died. > > > > If we died......we must have been alive at one time. > > > > Do you remember what that was like?. > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > i can't remember what i had for breakfast. > > i don't know if there is such a thing. > > i don't think about it. > > .b b.b. > Neither me also. toombaru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > As long as there is an I " employed " it are stuck in the conceptual dream. > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > I can use an I, without having some inner real I. Language > > > -geo- > > > > > > > > > You can try. > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > actually he can't. > > .b b.b. > Can he try to try? :-0 toombaru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 - roberibus111 Nisargadatta Friday, May 22, 2009 1:55 PM Re: no pattern P.S. P.S2 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ok.. > > > > > > > > > > > > once again.. > > > > > > > > > > > > i don't think. > > > > > > > > > > > > i don't know what i'm saying. > > > > > > > > > > > > the i that goes by toombaru is no different. > > > > > > > > > > > > your no Socrates toomie. > > > > > > > > > > > > well you are.. > > > > > > > > > > > > as i am.. > > > > > > > > > > > > but those methods you attempt to employ.. > > > > > > > > > > > > you don't even run a close 10,000th with old Soc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Socrates is dead. > > > > > > > > > > It's just me and you babe. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > we're dead too. > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You mean........we were alive? > > > > > > > > > :-0 > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > what does that even mean? > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > Well.....if we're dead.......we must have died. > > If we died......we must have been alive at one time. > > Do you remember what that was like?. > > > > toombaru i can't remember what i had for breakfast. i don't know if there is such a thing. i don't think about it. ..b b.b. Some stuff do that with you. Sometimes they mix rubish with it Better check it out.. -geo- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 - roberibus111 Nisargadatta Friday, May 22, 2009 1:57 PM Re: no pattern P.S. P.S2 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > As long as there is an I " employed " it are stuck in the conceptual > > dream. > > > > toombaru > > > > I can use an I, without having some inner real I. Language > > -geo- > > > > > You can try. > > > > toombaru actually he can't. ..b b.b. Lets see ... I -geo- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > As long as there is an I " employed " it are stuck in the conceptual dream. > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > I can use an I, without having some inner real I. Language > > > > -geo- > > > > > > > > > > > > > You can try. > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > actually he can't. > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > Can he try to try? > > > :-0 > > > > > toombaru he can think that he can try to try.. but actually.. he can't. there is the trying to try for sure.. but there isn't anyone trying to try. and what's going on..or down..or whatever.. depends on the perception taken... and exists only relevant to those perspectives. and it tries to convince each and every one apparent... that their story is the important one.. especially the part where " my story " is being compassionate.. or benevolent...or loving...or wise. it knows the score! what a dumbass huh? ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 - toombaru2006 Nisargadatta Friday, May 22, 2009 2:04 PM Re: no pattern P.S. P.S2 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > Socrates is dead. > > It's just me and you babe. > > toombaru > > You AND he?? > -geo- > It's jus me babe.......It's jus me yur lookin for........babe. toombaru AAAARRRGGGGHHHHH...... " toombaru " sounds like a male. -geo- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > roberibus111 > Nisargadatta > Friday, May 22, 2009 1:55 PM > Re: no pattern P.S. P.S2 > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ok.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > once again.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i don't think. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i don't know what i'm saying. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the i that goes by toombaru is no different. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > your no Socrates toomie. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > well you are.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as i am.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but those methods you attempt to employ.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you don't even run a close 10,000th with old Soc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Socrates is dead. > > > > > > > > > > > > It's just me and you babe. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we're dead too. > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You mean........we were alive? > > > > > > > > > > > > :-0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > what does that even mean? > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > Well.....if we're dead.......we must have died. > > > > If we died......we must have been alive at one time. > > > > Do you remember what that was like?. > > > > > > > > toombaru > > i can't remember what i had for breakfast. > > i don't know if there is such a thing. > > i don't think about it. > > .b b.b. > > Some stuff do that with you. Sometimes they mix rubish with it > Better check it out.. > -geo- it's all rubbish! everything and everyone is being flushed down as we speak. nothing is " for keeps " . it a bullshit deal. we're doomed before we become. and we aren't going anywhere that isn't here. what the fuck! ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > As long as there is an I " employed " it are stuck in the conceptual dream. > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > I can use an I, without having some inner real I. Language > > > > > -geo- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You can try. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > actually he can't. > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can he try to try? > > > > > > :-0 > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > he can think that he can try to try.. > > but actually.. > > he can't. > > there is the trying to try for sure.. > > but there isn't anyone trying to try. > > and what's going on..or down..or whatever.. > > depends on the perception taken... > > and exists only relevant to those perspectives. > > and it tries to convince each and every one apparent... > > that their story is the important one.. > > especially the part where " my story " is being compassionate.. > > or benevolent...or loving...or wise. > > it knows the score! > > what a dumbass huh? > > .b b.b. > Dumb in the same way my dishwasher is dumb. toombaru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > toombaru2006 > Nisargadatta > Friday, May 22, 2009 2:04 PM > Re: no pattern P.S. P.S2 > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > Socrates is dead. > > > > It's just me and you babe. > > > > toombaru > > > > You AND he?? > > -geo- > > > > It's jus me babe.......It's jus me yur lookin for........babe. > > toombaru > > AAAARRRGGGGHHHHH...... > " toombaru " sounds like a male. > -geo- > Yeah......well........I just peed on the computer. What do ya think of that? toombaru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > - > > roberibus111 > > Nisargadatta > > Friday, May 22, 2009 1:55 PM > > Re: no pattern P.S. P.S2 > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ok.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > once again.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i don't think. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i don't know what i'm saying. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the i that goes by toombaru is no different. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > your no Socrates toomie. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > well you are.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as i am.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but those methods you attempt to employ.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you don't even run a close 10,000th with old Soc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Socrates is dead. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's just me and you babe. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we're dead too. > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You mean........we were alive? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > :-0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > what does that even mean? > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well.....if we're dead.......we must have died. > > > > > > If we died......we must have been alive at one time. > > > > > > Do you remember what that was like?. > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > i can't remember what i had for breakfast. > > > > i don't know if there is such a thing. > > > > i don't think about it. > > > > .b b.b. > > > > Some stuff do that with you. Sometimes they mix rubish with it > > Better check it out.. > > -geo- > > > it's all rubbish! > > everything and everyone is being flushed down as we speak. > > nothing is " for keeps " . > > it a bullshit deal. > > we're doomed before we become. > > and we aren't going anywhere that isn't here. > > what the fuck! > > .b b.b. > Black smoke is coming out of my computer! :-0 toombaru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > As long as there is an I " employed " it are stuck in the conceptual dream. > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > I can use an I, without having some inner real I. Language > > > > > > -geo- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You can try. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > actually he can't. > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can he try to try? > > > > > > > > > :-0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > he can think that he can try to try.. > > > > but actually.. > > > > he can't. > > > > there is the trying to try for sure.. > > > > but there isn't anyone trying to try. > > > > and what's going on..or down..or whatever.. > > > > depends on the perception taken... > > > > and exists only relevant to those perspectives. > > > > and it tries to convince each and every one apparent... > > > > that their story is the important one.. > > > > especially the part where " my story " is being compassionate.. > > > > or benevolent...or loving...or wise. > > > > it knows the score! > > > > what a dumbass huh? > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > Dumb in the same way my dishwasher is dumb. > > > > > > toombaru actually dumber. it doesn't quit when it broken or damaged. it just keeps on righteously keeping on. spinning incoherently... incoherent even to it's self. on the other hand (even though there isn't).. the dishwasher doesn't even say uh-uh.. it just stand silent and doesn't " try " to do anything. it doesn't care what's right or wrong.. or good or bad... or logical or reasonable. it's damaged it stops. not as stupid as human consciousness. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.