Guest guest Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 This is most hopeless group I came across.Under heading of Shri Nisargadatta useless discussions on DVAITA ( Diversity ) going on.I condemn this.I request moderator to ban such nonsense.-- Split-mind must be in abeyance, and 'we' must be absent for Awareness to be present. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 Nisargadatta , Nitin Musale <nsmusale wrote: > > This is most hopeless group I came across.Under heading of Shri Nisargadatta > useless discussions on DVAITA ( Diversity ) going on.I condemn this.I > request moderator to ban such nonsense. > > -- > Split-mind must be in abeyance, and 'we' must be absent for Awareness to be > present. > This is not a saint worship site. As for the dvaita (diverse) users, even if they tried i don't think they'd be very good at saint worshipping. This is not an Advaita theology school seminar level class either. Even if they tried they'd forget to say Shri each time and fail miserably. This is not a very subtle new age " look at my pretty Advaitan pearls " type of intellectual group either. I can't really say we are beyond all that and i can't claim this is a site for those who are cured of the religion disease. One thing that i know is that i started this group for the love of Maharaj's words. Since it's a group and i hardly ever post, the rest is up to the users. I don't have the interest to shape anyone's model of reality. In other words it's what you make of it. If you don't like it then blame yourself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 Nisargadatta , Nitin Musale <nsmusale wrote: > > This is most hopeless group I came across.Under heading of Shri Nisargadatta > useless discussions on DVAITA ( Diversity ) going on.I condemn this.I > request moderator to ban such nonsense. > > -- > Split-mind must be in abeyance, and 'we' must be absent for Awareness to be > present. > The conceptual self....the I am....evolved simply because it helps the physical organism survive and reproduce. It is a phantom that functions to search out those things that can fulfill its insatiable desire for happiness and to avoid those events that could harm itself or its gene pool. It is a survival program...an overlay. If it is hope you seek.......go to your local church, synagogue or mosque. They will fill your soul so full you can hardly function. You will get a glassy-eyed grin and want to share the warmth. But don't go to Nisargadatta if you seek anything. With him.......you will only find your own emptiness. toombaru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 Bijak of Kabir How will you cross, Nath how will you cross, so full of crookedness? Look how he meditates, serves and prays, Look: the white plumage, the crane's sly ways. Mood of a snake, look: utterly lewd, utterly quarrelsome, utterly shrewd. Look: a hawk's face, and the thoughts of a cat. Schools of philosophy like a cloak furled. Look: the witch vanity gulps down the world. - mahesh toombaru2006 <lastrainNisargadatta Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2009 9:51:25 PM Re: Activities On Group Nisargadatta, Nitin Musale <nsmusale@.. .> wrote:>> This is most hopeless group I came across.Under heading of Shri Nisargadatta> useless discussions on DVAITA ( Diversity ) going on.I condemn this.I> request moderator to ban such nonsense.> > -- > Split-mind must be in abeyance, and 'we' must be absent for Awareness to be> present.>The conceptual self....the I am....evolved simply because it helps the physical organism survive and reproduce.It is a phantom that functions to search out those things that can fulfill its insatiable desire for happiness and to avoid those events that could harm itself or its gene pool.It is a survival program...an overlay.If it is hope you seek.......go to your local church, synagogue or mosque.They will fill your soul so full you can hardly function.You will get a glassy-eyed grin and want to share the warmth.But don't go to Nisargadatta if you seek anything.With him.......you will only find your own emptiness.toombaru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Hur " <hurg wrote: > > Nisargadatta , Nitin Musale <nsmusale@> wrote: > > > > This is most hopeless group I came across.Under heading of Shri Nisargadatta > > useless discussions on DVAITA ( Diversity ) going on.I condemn this.I > > request moderator to ban such nonsense. > > > > -- > > Split-mind must be in abeyance, and 'we' must be absent for Awareness to be > > present. > > > > This is not a saint worship site. As for the dvaita (diverse) users, even if they tried i don't think they'd be very good at saint worshipping. This is not an Advaita theology school seminar level class either. Even if they tried they'd forget to say Shri each time and fail miserably. This is not a very subtle new age " look at my pretty Advaitan pearls " type of intellectual group either. I can't really say we are beyond all that and i can't claim this is a site for those who are cured of the religion disease. One thing that i know is that i started this group for the love of Maharaj's words. Since it's a group and i hardly ever post, the rest is up to the users. I don't have the interest to shape anyone's model of reality. In other words it's what you make of it. If you don't like it then blame yourself. > Hur, are you married or otherwise spoken for? ;-) Love and bows. ~A Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 Nisargadatta , Nitin Musale <nsmusale wrote: > > This is most hopeless group I came across.Under heading of Shri Nisargadatta > useless discussions on DVAITA ( Diversity ) going on.I condemn this.I > request moderator to ban such nonsense. > > -- > Split-mind must be in abeyance, and 'we' must be absent for Awareness to be > present. You just split yourself from something you call a " split mind. " Splitting on splitting. You are worried about diversity and dvaita being discussed. You don't see that duality is the nondual. More splits. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 18, 2009 Report Share Posted May 18, 2009 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > You are worried about diversity and dvaita being discussed. > > You don't see that duality is the nondual. If duality is the nondual, then " black " is " white " , " red " is " orange " and " seashore " is " desert " . One word is not another word. Words are defined differently. > More splits. Thought you said splits don't split anything? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 18, 2009 Report Share Posted May 18, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > You are worried about diversity and dvaita being discussed. > > > > You don't see that duality is the nondual. > > If duality is the nondual, then " black " is " white " , " red " is " orange " and " seashore " is " desert " . > > One word is not another word. Words are defined differently. Words are defined by other words in a circular manner. > > More splits. > > Thought you said splits don't split anything? They don't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 18, 2009 Report Share Posted May 18, 2009 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > You are worried about diversity and dvaita being discussed. > > > > > > You don't see that duality is the nondual. > > > > If duality is the nondual, then " black " is " white " , " red " is " orange " and " seashore " is " desert " . > > > > One word is not another word. Words are defined differently. > > Words are defined by other words in a circular manner. Obviously. That doesn't give us license to dismiss stuff by saying " words are meaningless " though. Words are all we have in this format. In my view -- either take words 'seriously' enough to address points on their own merit, or don't post. But if you want to dismiss some postings instead, I can't stop ya of course. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.