Particles of Sensation and the Experience of Now - / Dan

[Guest guest]

Bill -

You are talking about the intersection of time (past, present, future)

with the timeless (now, now, now).

We can only make such talk by using metaphor.

The actuality of the no-time moment is nonmetaphorical.

Nothing can stand in for it.

No image, not even nothing.Good point

One who knows isn't put off by the lack of description available.One who knows lives outside of descriptions. Hence " one who knows "

does not expect or even really care about a description.

" It is all clear now, " said the blind man.

Somf (Smile on my face.)

Flux dissolves here, too.

Flux depends on time, depends on memory, depends on a being who is aware of the flux.

Flux is the last to go.This is where I got excited by your response.At some point I realized that for a very long time experiencehad had a quality of " flow " ... and that was no longer the case.

In so looking back it was obvious that " flow " entailed a (minimal) sense of duration, that time was in a sense involved,albeit strictly " locally " . So the clear conclusion was that " flow "

and absolute presence do not coincide. I don't believe I'vementioned this to anyone before.In looking at that it seemed experience as " an energyflow " is  a being present relatively to " ordinary consciousness " ,

since " flow " consciousness is only of immediate sensations.So it seemed to constitute a stage in an inexorable progressiontowards absolute presence.[Actually, there are still rare, usually brief periods of

" energy flow " ... and when those occur it seems to be a kindof " dropping to a lower energy shell " as it were. Mechanismsare in place to dissolve those so when they occur they don'tlast very long.]

 

With flux gone, going is gone.

With coming and going gone ...

We party!I'm assuming your notion of flux is verysimilar to my notion of " energy flow " ...and yes, energy flow seems to have a

sense of " seeking resolution " ....Apparently the " flows " happen in relationto an implicit and normally unconscious " perceptual frame " . Dissolution of theflow is in dissolution of the perceptual

frame. Speaking of which, all senses of incompletewholeness are apparently traceable to some perceptual frame, which is alwaysarbitrary and lacking in complete opennessand flexibility. Dissolution of perceptual frames is always

appropriate, though I mean here by perceptualframe a kind of " orientation " in consciousnesswhich has a " kinesthetic " character.

 

The party at the point of the laser.

The party at the end of the world.

The party at the event horizon.I wonder if you've seen my piece:The Living Moment as a Singularity.It is all about the Event Horizon.

I'll post it.

-- Dan

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , Bill Rishel <illusyn wrote:

 

> I'm assuming your notion of flux is very

> similar to my notion of " energy flow " ...

 

Yes.

 

Flux, yin/yang, negative/positive, awareness on/awareness off, energy flow.

 

The idea that there is something that is always on is a stultification of a

conceptuality.

 

Yin meets yang - always - nowing.

 

Negative meets positive - always - now.

 

The -ing of now-ing goes ...

 

Nothing is static, nothing moves ...

 

Even " nothing " dissolves here ...

 

On the positive: glorious splendor

 

On the negative: not even nothing

 

> and yes, energy flow seems to have a

> sense of " seeking resolution " ....

> Apparently the " flows " happen in relation

> to an implicit and normally unconscious

> " perceptual frame " . Dissolution of the

> flow is in dissolution of the perceptual

> frame.

>

> Speaking of which, all senses of incomplete

> wholeness are apparently traceable to

> some perceptual frame, which is always

> arbitrary and lacking in complete openness

> and flexibility.

 

Totally agree with this.

 

 

> Dissolution of perceptual frames is always

> appropriate, though I mean here by perceptual

> frame a kind of " orientation " in consciousness

> which has a " kinesthetic " character.

 

Even the most basic sensory orientation - yes.

 

Movement in space.

 

> The party at the point of the laser.

>

> The party at the end of the world.

>

> The party at the event horizon.

>

> I wonder if you've seen my piece:

> *The Living Moment as a Singularity*.

> It is all about the Event Horizon.

> I'll post it.

 

Cool!

 

 

-- Dan

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , Bill Rishel <illusyn@> wrote:

>

> > I'm assuming your notion of flux is very

> > similar to my notion of " energy flow " ...

>

> Yes.

>

> Flux, yin/yang, negative/positive, awareness on/awareness off,

> energy flow.

 

You fellers are all chock full of notions. Isn't there anyone around here who's

just living normally? :-o.

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , Bill Rishel <illusyn@> wrote:

> >

> > > I'm assuming your notion of flux is very

> > > similar to my notion of " energy flow " ...

> >

> > Yes.

> >

> > Flux, yin/yang, negative/positive, awareness on/awareness off,

> > energy flow.

>

> You fellers are all chock full of notions. Isn't there anyone around here

who's just living normally? :-o.

 

P: I am living a completely normal life,

and will continue to do so, when released

from this Niz mental hospital.

>

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , Bill Rishel <illusyn@> wrote:

> >

> > > I'm assuming your notion of flux is very

> > > similar to my notion of " energy flow " ...

> >

> > Yes.

> >

> > Flux, yin/yang, negative/positive, awareness on/awareness off,

> > energy flow.

>

> You fellers are all chock full of notions. Isn't there anyone around here

who's just living normally? :-o.

 

 

i do.

 

yet it is not i who live..

 

it is that which doesn't say anything which lives through me.

 

that's my normal.

 

..b b.b.

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " <pedsie6 wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , Bill Rishel <illusyn@> wrote:

> > >

> > > > I'm assuming your notion of flux is very

> > > > similar to my notion of " energy flow " ...

> > >

> > > Yes.

> > >

> > > Flux, yin/yang, negative/positive, awareness on/awareness off,

> > > energy flow.

> >

> > You fellers are all chock full of notions. Isn't there anyone around here

who's just living normally? :-o.

>

> P: I am living a completely normal life,

> and will continue to do so, when released

> from this Niz mental hospital.

 

You can check out any time you like... and unlike the Hotel California, you can

leave too.

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , Bill Rishel <illusyn@> wrote:

> > >

> > > > I'm assuming your notion of flux is very

> > > > similar to my notion of " energy flow " ...

> > >

> > > Yes.

> > >

> > > Flux, yin/yang, negative/positive, awareness on/awareness off,

> > > energy flow.

> >

> > You fellers are all chock full of notions. Isn't there anyone around here

who's just living normally? :-o.

>

>

> i do.

>

> yet it is not i who live..

 

It's not I who live, yet living isn't without me, either. " No me " does not

suggest its opposite, " absence of me " . The mind works in opposites, reality

does not.

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Nisargadatta , Bill Rishel <illusyn@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > > I'm assuming your notion of flux is very

> > > > > similar to my notion of " energy flow " ...

> > > >

> > > > Yes.

> > > >

> > > > Flux, yin/yang, negative/positive, awareness on/awareness off,

> > > > energy flow.

> > >

> > > You fellers are all chock full of notions. Isn't there anyone around here

who's just living normally? :-o.

> >

> >

> > i do.

> >

> > yet it is not i who live..

>

> It's not I who live, yet living isn't without me, either. " No me " does not

suggest its opposite, " absence of me " . The mind works in opposites, reality

does not.

 

 

i don't know what you're talking about.

 

neither do you.

 

what mind?

 

..b b.b.

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Nisargadatta , Bill Rishel <illusyn@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > > I'm assuming your notion of flux is very

> > > > > > similar to my notion of " energy flow " ...

> > > > >

> > > > > Yes.

> > > > >

> > > > > Flux, yin/yang, negative/positive, awareness on/awareness off,

> > > > > energy flow.

> > > >

> > > > You fellers are all chock full of notions. Isn't there anyone around

here who's just living normally? :-o.

> > >

> > >

> > > i do.

> > >

> > > yet it is not i who live..

> >

> > It's not I who live, yet living isn't without me, either. " No me " does not

suggest its opposite, " absence of me " . The mind works in opposites, reality

does not.

>

>

> i don't know what you're talking about.

>

> neither do you.

 

You have no clue what I know and what I don't.

 

> what mind?

 

Figure it out. Whatever figures it out is the mind ;-).

[Guest guest]

> >

> > > I'm assuming your notion of flux is very

> > > similar to my notion of " energy flow " ...

> >

> > Yes.

> >

> > Flux, yin/yang, negative/positive, awareness on/awareness off,

> > energy flow.

>

> You fellers are all chock full of notions. Isn't there anyone around here

> who's just living normally? :-o.

 

i do.

 

yet it is not i who live..

 

it is that which doesn't say anything which lives through me.

 

that's my normal.

 

..b b.b.

 

Nothing normal here. I keep wondering how this thing could ever happen, or

not happen - as you whish....

How can the most impossible .....be

 

- ( o )

 

- ( )

 

-

 

-geo-

[Guest guest]

-

geo

Nisargadatta

Tuesday, May 19, 2009 7:39 PM

Re: Re: Particles of Sensation and the Experience of

Now - / Dan

 

 

 

 

 

> >

> > > I'm assuming your notion of flux is very

> > > similar to my notion of " energy flow " ...

> >

> > Yes.

> >

> > Flux, yin/yang, negative/positive, awareness on/awareness off,

> > energy flow.

>

> You fellers are all chock full of notions. Isn't there anyone around here

> who's just living normally? :-o.

 

i do.

 

yet it is not i who live..

 

it is that which doesn't say anything which lives through me.

 

that's my normal.

 

..b b.b.

 

Nothing normal here. I keep wondering how this thing could ever happen, or

not happen - as you whish....

How can the most impossible .....be

 

Someone looking from outside though, would say I am a pretty normal guy

living

a normal life. My wife does, my doughter does, my friends do... but there is

nothing

here that could be classified according to a norm.

 

- ( o )

 

- ( )

 

-

 

-geo-

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Nisargadatta , Bill Rishel <illusyn@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > > I'm assuming your notion of flux is very

> > > > > > > similar to my notion of " energy flow " ...

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Yes.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Flux, yin/yang, negative/positive, awareness on/awareness off,

> > > > > > energy flow.

> > > > >

> > > > > You fellers are all chock full of notions. Isn't there anyone around

here who's just living normally? :-o.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > i do.

> > > >

> > > > yet it is not i who live..

> > >

> > > It's not I who live, yet living isn't without me, either. " No me " does

not suggest its opposite, " absence of me " . The mind works in opposites, reality

does not.

> >

> >

> > i don't know what you're talking about.

> >

> > neither do you.

>

> You have no clue what I know and what I don't.

>

> > what mind?

>

> Figure it out. Whatever figures it out is the mind ;-).

 

 

i don't know what you're talking about.

 

neither do you.

 

it doesn't matter.

 

pay " it " no mind.

 

..b b.b.

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote:

>

> > >

> > > > I'm assuming your notion of flux is very

> > > > similar to my notion of " energy flow " ...

> > >

> > > Yes.

> > >

> > > Flux, yin/yang, negative/positive, awareness on/awareness off,

> > > energy flow.

> >

> > You fellers are all chock full of notions. Isn't there anyone around here

> > who's just living normally? :-o.

>

> i do.

>

> yet it is not i who live..

>

> it is that which doesn't say anything which lives through me.

>

> that's my normal.

>

> .b b.b.

>

> Nothing normal here. I keep wondering how this thing could ever happen, or

> not happen - as you whish....

> How can the most impossible .....be

>

> - ( o )

>

> - ( )

>

> -

>

> -geo-

 

 

how can it not?

 

..b b.b.

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote:

>

>

> -

> geo

> Nisargadatta

> Tuesday, May 19, 2009 7:39 PM

> Re: Re: Particles of Sensation and the Experience of

> Now - / Dan

>

>

>

>

>

> > >

> > > > I'm assuming your notion of flux is very

> > > > similar to my notion of " energy flow " ...

> > >

> > > Yes.

> > >

> > > Flux, yin/yang, negative/positive, awareness on/awareness off,

> > > energy flow.

> >

> > You fellers are all chock full of notions. Isn't there anyone around here

> > who's just living normally? :-o.

>

> i do.

>

> yet it is not i who live..

>

> it is that which doesn't say anything which lives through me.

>

> that's my normal.

>

> .b b.b.

>

> Nothing normal here. I keep wondering how this thing could ever happen, or

> not happen - as you whish....

> How can the most impossible .....be

>

> Someone looking from outside though, would say I am a pretty normal guy

> living

> a normal life. My wife does, my doughter does, my friends do... but there is

> nothing

> here that could be classified according to a norm.

>

> - ( o )

>

> - ( )

>

> -

>

> -geo-

 

 

that's normal.

 

..b b.b.

[Guest guest]

-

roberibus111

Nisargadatta

Tuesday, May 19, 2009 8:20 PM

Re: Particles of Sensation and the Experience of

Now - / Dan

 

 

 

 

 

Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote:

>

>

> -

> geo

> Nisargadatta

> Tuesday, May 19, 2009 7:39 PM

> Re: Re: Particles of Sensation and the Experience

> of

> Now - / Dan

>

>

>

>

>

> > >

> > > > I'm assuming your notion of flux is very

> > > > similar to my notion of " energy flow " ...

> > >

> > > Yes.

> > >

> > > Flux, yin/yang, negative/positive, awareness on/awareness off,

> > > energy flow.

> >

> > You fellers are all chock full of notions. Isn't there anyone around

> > here

> > who's just living normally? :-o.

>

> i do.

>

> yet it is not i who live..

>

> it is that which doesn't say anything which lives through me.

>

> that's my normal.

>

> .b b.b.

>

> Nothing normal here. I keep wondering how this thing could ever happen, or

> not happen - as you whish....

> How can the most impossible .....be

>

> Someone looking from outside though, would say I am a pretty normal guy

> living

> a normal life. My wife does, my doughter does, my friends do... but there

> is

> nothing

> here that could be classified according to a norm.

>

> - ( o )

>

> - ( )

>

> -

>

> -geo-

 

that's normal.

 

..b b.b.

 

which norm?

-geo-

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , Bill Rishel <illusyn@> wrote:

> >

> > > I'm assuming your notion of flux is very

> > > similar to my notion of " energy flow " ...

> >

> > Yes.

> >

> > Flux, yin/yang, negative/positive, awareness on/awareness off,

> > energy flow.

>

> You fellers are all chock full of notions. Isn't there anyone around here

who's just living normally? :-o.

 

Sure, but they've never posted.

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote:

>

>

> -

> roberibus111

> Nisargadatta

> Tuesday, May 19, 2009 8:20 PM

> Re: Particles of Sensation and the Experience of

> Now - / Dan

>

>

>

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > -

> > geo

> > Nisargadatta

> > Tuesday, May 19, 2009 7:39 PM

> > Re: Re: Particles of Sensation and the Experience

> > of

> > Now - / Dan

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > > >

> > > > > I'm assuming your notion of flux is very

> > > > > similar to my notion of " energy flow " ...

> > > >

> > > > Yes.

> > > >

> > > > Flux, yin/yang, negative/positive, awareness on/awareness off,

> > > > energy flow.

> > >

> > > You fellers are all chock full of notions. Isn't there anyone around

> > > here

> > > who's just living normally? :-o.

> >

> > i do.

> >

> > yet it is not i who live..

> >

> > it is that which doesn't say anything which lives through me.

> >

> > that's my normal.

> >

> > .b b.b.

> >

> > Nothing normal here. I keep wondering how this thing could ever happen, or

> > not happen - as you whish....

> > How can the most impossible .....be

> >

> > Someone looking from outside though, would say I am a pretty normal guy

> > living

> > a normal life. My wife does, my doughter does, my friends do... but there

> > is

> > nothing

> > here that could be classified according to a norm.

> >

> > - ( o )

> >

> > - ( )

> >

> > -

> >

> > -geo-

>

> that's normal.

>

> .b b.b.

>

> which norm?

> -geo-

 

 

not the one on Cheers.

 

..b b.b.

[Guest guest]

-

roberibus111

Nisargadatta

Tuesday, May 19, 2009 8:19 PM

Re: Particles of Sensation and the Experience of

Now - / Dan

 

 

 

 

 

Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote:

>

> > >

> > > > I'm assuming your notion of flux is very

> > > > similar to my notion of " energy flow " ...

> > >

> > > Yes.

> > >

> > > Flux, yin/yang, negative/positive, awareness on/awareness off,

> > > energy flow.

> >

> > You fellers are all chock full of notions. Isn't there anyone around

> > here

> > who's just living normally? :-o.

>

> i do.

>

> yet it is not i who live..

>

> it is that which doesn't say anything which lives through me.

>

> that's my normal.

>

> .b b.b.

>

> Nothing normal here. I keep wondering how this thing could ever happen, or

> not happen - as you whish....

> How can the most impossible .....be

>

> - ( o )

>

> - ( )

>

> -

>

> -geo-

 

how can it not?

 

..b b.b.

 

It must...even so...it is as far as it can be from in any norm - here.

-geo-

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote:

>

>

> -

> roberibus111

> Nisargadatta

> Tuesday, May 19, 2009 8:19 PM

> Re: Particles of Sensation and the Experience of

> Now - / Dan

>

>

>

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> >

> > > >

> > > > > I'm assuming your notion of flux is very

> > > > > similar to my notion of " energy flow " ...

> > > >

> > > > Yes.

> > > >

> > > > Flux, yin/yang, negative/positive, awareness on/awareness off,

> > > > energy flow.

> > >

> > > You fellers are all chock full of notions. Isn't there anyone around

> > > here

> > > who's just living normally? :-o.

> >

> > i do.

> >

> > yet it is not i who live..

> >

> > it is that which doesn't say anything which lives through me.

> >

> > that's my normal.

> >

> > .b b.b.

> >

> > Nothing normal here. I keep wondering how this thing could ever happen, or

> > not happen - as you whish....

> > How can the most impossible .....be

> >

> > - ( o )

> >

> > - ( )

> >

> > -

> >

> > -geo-

>

> how can it not?

>

> .b b.b.

>

> It must...even so...it is as far as it can be from in any norm - here.

> -geo-

 

 

what is?

 

..b b.b.

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote:

>

> > >

> > > > I'm assuming your notion of flux is very

> > > > similar to my notion of " energy flow " ...

> > >

> > > Yes.

> > >

> > > Flux, yin/yang, negative/positive, awareness on/awareness off,

> > > energy flow.

> >

> > You fellers are all chock full of notions. Isn't there anyone around here

> > who's just living normally? :-o.

>

> i do.

>

> yet it is not i who live..

>

> it is that which doesn't say anything which lives through me.

>

> that's my normal.

>

> .b b.b.

>

> Nothing normal here. I keep wondering how this thing could ever happen, or

> not happen - as you whish....

> How can the most impossible .....be

>

> - ( o )

>

> - ( )

>

> -

>

> -geo-

 

It is wildly improbable.

 

Everything and anything.

 

And here it is.

 

Poof!

 

The only way it could be.

 

The way it is.

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote:

>

> It is wildly improbable.

>

> Everything and anything.

>

> And here it is.

>

> Poof!

>

> The only way it could be.

>

> The way it is.

 

Indeed so. Most of " it " is a mental creation, thus a product of imagination.

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , Bill Rishel <illusyn@> wrote:

> > >

> > > > I'm assuming your notion of flux is very

> > > > similar to my notion of " energy flow " ...

> > >

> > > Yes.

> > >

> > > Flux, yin/yang, negative/positive, awareness on/awareness off,

> > > energy flow.

> >

> > You fellers are all chock full of notions. Isn't there anyone around here

who's just living normally? :-o.

>

> Sure, but they've never posted.

 

Sure they have.

[Guest guest]

-

roberibus111

Nisargadatta

Tuesday, May 19, 2009 8:55 PM

Re: Particles of Sensation and the Experience of

Now - / Dan

 

 

 

 

 

Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote:

>

>

> -

> roberibus111

> Nisargadatta

> Tuesday, May 19, 2009 8:19 PM

> Re: Particles of Sensation and the Experience of

> Now - / Dan

>

>

>

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> >

> > > >

> > > > > I'm assuming your notion of flux is very

> > > > > similar to my notion of " energy flow " ...

> > > >

> > > > Yes.

> > > >

> > > > Flux, yin/yang, negative/positive, awareness on/awareness off,

> > > > energy flow.

> > >

> > > You fellers are all chock full of notions. Isn't there anyone around

> > > here

> > > who's just living normally? :-o.

> >

> > i do.

> >

> > yet it is not i who live..

> >

> > it is that which doesn't say anything which lives through me.

> >

> > that's my normal.

> >

> > .b b.b.

> >

> > Nothing normal here. I keep wondering how this thing could ever happen,

> > or

> > not happen - as you whish....

> > How can the most impossible .....be

> >

> > - ( o )

> >

> > - ( )

> >

> > -

> >

> > -geo-

>

> how can it not?

>

> .b b.b.

>

> It must...even so...it is as far as it can be from in any norm - here.

> -geo-

 

what is?

 

..b b.b.

 

existence .... and its consequences

LOL LOL LOL

-geo-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean.

Virus Database (VPS): 090513-0, 13/05/2009

Tested on: 19/5/2009 22:30:43

avast! - copyright © 1988-2009 ALWIL Software.

[Guest guest]

-

Tim G.

Nisargadatta

Tuesday, May 19, 2009 9:09 PM

Re: Particles of Sensation and the Experience of

Now - / Dan

 

 

 

 

 

Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote:

>

> It is wildly improbable.

>

> Everything and anything.

>

> And here it is.

>

> Poof!

>

> The only way it could be.

>

> The way it is.

 

Indeed so. Most of " it " is a mental creation, thus a product of imagination.

 

geo> Ah... but mental creations, and products of imagination are part of the

wonder.

Iqually wildly part of the impossible yet present. Why dixcriminate against:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean.

Virus Database (VPS): 090513-0, 13/05/2009

Tested on: 19/5/2009 22:30:43

avast! - copyright © 1988-2009 ALWIL Software.

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote:

>

>

> -

> roberibus111

> Nisargadatta

> Tuesday, May 19, 2009 8:55 PM

> Re: Particles of Sensation and the Experience of

> Now - / Dan

>

>

>

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > -

> > roberibus111

> > Nisargadatta

> > Tuesday, May 19, 2009 8:19 PM

> > Re: Particles of Sensation and the Experience of

> > Now - / Dan

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> > >

> > > > >

> > > > > > I'm assuming your notion of flux is very

> > > > > > similar to my notion of " energy flow " ...

> > > > >

> > > > > Yes.

> > > > >

> > > > > Flux, yin/yang, negative/positive, awareness on/awareness off,

> > > > > energy flow.

> > > >

> > > > You fellers are all chock full of notions. Isn't there anyone around

> > > > here

> > > > who's just living normally? :-o.

> > >

> > > i do.

> > >

> > > yet it is not i who live..

> > >

> > > it is that which doesn't say anything which lives through me.

> > >

> > > that's my normal.

> > >

> > > .b b.b.

> > >

> > > Nothing normal here. I keep wondering how this thing could ever happen,

> > > or

> > > not happen - as you whish....

> > > How can the most impossible .....be

> > >

> > > - ( o )

> > >

> > > - ( )

> > >

> > > -

> > >

> > > -geo-

> >

> > how can it not?

> >

> > .b b.b.

> >

> > It must...even so...it is as far as it can be from in any norm - here.

> > -geo-

>

> what is?

>

> .b b.b.

>

> existence .... and its consequences

> LOL LOL LOL

> -geo-

>

 

 

 

you're sure of that?

 

..b b.b.