Guest guest Posted May 27, 2009 Report Share Posted May 27, 2009 In a message dated 5/27/2009 10:36:59 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, lastrain writes: > > this is true.> > > > but..> > > > one who says they are not interesting..isn't.> > > > .b b.b.> >> > > :-)> > > > > toombaru>It just dawned on me.........you and I are song birds trying to sing the crow dialect.They're just just can't hear the melody.It's kinda sad.......in a way.:-(toombaru ****A good example of how we can create our own sadness out of pure mental fantasy, while at the same time using even this to reinforce the ego fantasy. We found the real 'Hotel California' and the 'Seinfeld' diner. What will you find? Explore WhereItsAt.com. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2009 Report Share Posted May 27, 2009 In a message dated 5/27/2009 11:00:01 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, inandor writes: Nisargadatta , "geo" <inandor wrote:>>> > What is truth again....and what is it relative too........I forgot.> >> > What is true in nature?> >> > toombaru> >> > Everything is true to its own nature.> > -geo-> >>> You could say that is true.......it anything had a true nature.>> toombaru>> Any and everything has a nature for it is capable of being > nature-fied...or> pointed...or referred to.> -geo->What is the true nature of an egg?toombaruEgg? That is more difficult.... its meatiness....its waterness...hmmmm...its egginess!!-geo- ****The true nature of this whole conversation is silliness. Hehe. We found the real 'Hotel California' and the 'Seinfeld' diner. What will you find? Explore WhereItsAt.com. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2009 Report Share Posted May 27, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > You mean " your " story. " My " story never began. I'm not aware of any time but now. > > > > > > > > Perhaps the following Niz quote will help illustrate what I'm " trying to " say. > > > > > > > > M: Everything begins with you. What else is beginningless? > > > > > > > > Q: I began at birth. > > > > > > > > M: That is what you are told. Is it so? Did you see yourself beginning? > > > > > > > > Q: I began just now. All else is memory. > > > > > > > > M: Quite right. The beginningless begins forever. > > > > > > And no, I don't " treasure " memory :-p. It's perfectly acceptable as 'what is', should it arise, but I'm not a fan of drama surrounding my own memory, whether that drama be positive or negative. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You do not exist outside of your memory. > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > Speak for yourself, and allow me to do the same. When he says " you " it's the you of his imagining. When you say " he " it's the he of your imagining. When you say " I " it's the " I " of imagining. When he says " I " it's the " I " of imagining. So, an imagined I insists on imagined you not preventing it from speaking. All of what I'm saying is imagined. These words form storied contexts. -- D. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2009 Report Share Posted May 27, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You have a self? > > > > > > > > > > > > And it can speak for itself? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I have a self. So do you. It can speak for itself. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Where do you keep it? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > I keep it in the dictionary. > > > > > > > > > > > Can you tell it what to do? > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > Nope, because I've foisted all my power off onto others. > > I, Toomie, am dependent on you, the writer. I probably can't tear myself away from the computer. > > That's because I'm attached to " you " , general-case. You're speaking for him, immediately after telling him not to speak for you. A contradictory development in the story line. Smiling, Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2009 Report Share Posted May 27, 2009 Nisargadatta , souldreamone wrote: > > > > > In a message dated 5/27/2009 12:53:20 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, > fewtch writes: > > Nisargadatta , souldreamone@ wrote: > > > > > > ***Thankfully, I've deleted all Booboo's posts since i know from > > experience they're utterly useless, but I did get the giggles a while > ago reading > > Toomy's posts......I think I'm over that now. ~ > > Lots & lots of drama :-p. I'm about done reading Toomie's posts again... > until I'm not, I s'pose ;-). I'm always 'forgetting' I decided to do this > and that, and decisions aren't serious here in the first place. Why should > they be? Life is all in fun :-). > > > ****Yeah, I thought I'd see what Dan had to say, and you and i don't have > a place to chat anymore, but the rest of the group basically just recycles > the same nonsense over and over. P: Hi Phil, I told you when you left last Dec, that you'll be back. You always do. You and Tim the enlightened sensitive flakes. See your last post below: In a message dated 12/2/2008 7:10:43 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, > Roberibus111 writes: > > > ***Ego is an illusion, a set of thoughts, a false belief, > > > > > > who is it that has the illusion..set of thoughts...false belief.. > > it's ego dummy! > > > > *** Ego never becomes more than a belief happening to nobody. As such, it's > not meaningful to ask who has these self referential thoughts. Ego does not > have thoughts since it IS the thoughts. > > Okay, I can see it was a mistake coming back here, and i admit there's a > part of me that's fascinated by the depths of ugliness you're willing to go to. > Pete would no doubt say it's a wise plan of the enlightened beings here to > remove Phil's conditioning but really you're all deeply asleep and playing > childish games for your own amusement. By all means carry on with your carrying > on........... P: Are you quitting, yet again? You'll be back. You always do. Keep warm, eat well. Love, Pete Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2009 Report Share Posted May 27, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , souldreamone@ wrote: > > > > ****I would venture to say there's not one person on this list who doesn't > > understand the concept that our Essence is actually eternal, without > > beginning. > > Nonsense. Toomie demonstrates a complete lack of understanding, and there are probably at least several hundred rs, a subset of which post at any given time. > > > Is that the point you've been trying to make? > > No. > > > That's the point that > > Nizzy is making. > > I'll go ahead and state that I don't believe you're awake, and that you're clueless what Nizzy is getting at. It appears that you're constructing a drama, based on words read over the internet, in which the image of another person does not have the quality of understanding added to it. That is the drama I've constructed about your construction from the words you provided. The " I " and " you " involved also being constructions. -- D. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2009 Report Share Posted May 27, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > " I am unborn " (and " the story never began " , which I intended as a restatement) is a wordless understanding. It's not a point I can communicate at all, ever. You didn't " see it " , and so let's move on. Yes, wordless awareness, not of or depending on words, concepts, bodies, minds, feelings, memories. Including " wordless awareness. " Confusion easily ensues once words are offered, giving the " as if " impression that important information is being imparted that should be taken in, digested, and used in some way. An age-old confusion. The confusion dissolves, but not because a word was taken in and digested. Nor because of anything related to memory, nor any residue or outcome from the past. -- D. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2009 Report Share Posted May 27, 2009 Nisargadatta , souldreamone wrote: > > ****My grandmother was never 'here', and neither are you or me. This is > what you refuse to get. Year after year you go on insisting that you exist as > swirling neumonic debris or memory or some such nonsense. No you don't. > None of that has any existence. The two of you are using the word " you " differently. It's a matter of semantics and context. Such a dialogue can't produce a coherent mutually shared context. Which is typical of so many dialogues. And that is fine. Truth isn't a product of a mutually shared context, nor is truth a mutually shared context. -- D. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2009 Report Share Posted May 27, 2009 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , souldreamone@ wrote: > > > > > ****My grandmother was never 'here', and neither are you or me. This is > > what you refuse to get. Year after year you go on insisting that you exist as > > swirling neumonic debris or memory or some such nonsense. No you don't. > > None of that has any existence. > > The two of you are using the word " you " differently. > > It's a matter of semantics and context. > > Such a dialogue can't produce a coherent mutually shared context. > > Which is typical of so many dialogues. > > And that is fine. > > Truth isn't a product of a mutually shared context, nor is truth a mutually shared context. > > > -- D. ok swami.. what IS truth? or do you only spout about what it isn't? ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2009 Report Share Posted May 27, 2009 Nisargadatta , souldreamone wrote: > > > > > In a message dated 5/27/2009 12:35:17 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, > fewtch writes: > > Nisargadatta , souldreamone@ wrote: > > > > ****ZZZZZzzzzzzzzz..........Aw, yer just getting frustrated > > because you > > couldn't keep track of what YOU were talking about. > > Preceded with " Aw " or not, you've got no clue whatsoever as to my > motivations or thoughts, other than what you see right here on the screen. > > Not even that, as they may have changed in the 10 or so minutes between > messages on this list. I don't hold things in mind, trying to maintain > continuity -- which is the exact reason most folks are addicted to mailing > lists. It maintains " me " . > > " I am unborn " (and " the story never began " , which I intended as a > restatement) is a wordless understanding. It's not a point I can communicate at > all, ever. You didn't " see it " , and so let's move on. > > > ****Right, I couldn't possibly see such a deep and subtle point. Hehe. Now > yer making me giggle too. ~ Me laughing now. Laughter is good. -- D. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2009 Report Share Posted May 27, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , souldreamone@ wrote: > > > > ****Right, I couldn't possibly see such a deep and subtle point. > > Hehe. Now > > yer making me giggle too. ~ > > Is " I am Unborn " clear? Now? If so, great :-). Doesn't have to be clear again in the future, and didn't ever have to be in the past. " I am " has dropped away. Bye-bye. Unborn. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2009 Report Share Posted May 27, 2009 Nisargadatta , souldreamone wrote: > > > > > In a message dated 5/27/2009 12:53:20 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, > fewtch writes: > > Nisargadatta , souldreamone@ wrote: > > > > > > ***Thankfully, I've deleted all Booboo's posts since i know from > > experience they're utterly useless, but I did get the giggles a while > ago reading > > Toomy's posts......I think I'm over that now. ~ > > Lots & lots of drama :-p. I'm about done reading Toomie's posts again... > until I'm not, I s'pose ;-). I'm always 'forgetting' I decided to do this > and that, and decisions aren't serious here in the first place. Why should > they be? Life is all in fun :-). > > > ****Yeah, I thought I'd see what Dan had to say, and you and i don't have > a place to chat anymore, but the rest of the group basically just recycles > the same nonsense over and over. Every word of every sentence is a recycling. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2009 Report Share Posted May 27, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , souldreamone@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > In a message dated 5/27/2009 12:53:20 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, > > fewtch@ writes: > > > > Nisargadatta , souldreamone@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > ***Thankfully, I've deleted all Booboo's posts since i know from > > > experience they're utterly useless, but I did get the giggles a while > > ago reading > > > Toomy's posts......I think I'm over that now. ~ > > > > Lots & lots of drama :-p. I'm about done reading Toomie's posts again... > > until I'm not, I s'pose ;-). I'm always 'forgetting' I decided to do this > > and that, and decisions aren't serious here in the first place. Why should > > they be? Life is all in fun :-). > > > > > > ****Yeah, I thought I'd see what Dan had to say, and you and i don't have > > a place to chat anymore, but the rest of the group basically just recycles > > the same nonsense over and over. > > If/when Dan takes off, I'm out of here. Nothing else worthwhile here but you two, and one isn't enough to keep my interest. I'm not interesting. -- D. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2009 Report Share Posted May 27, 2009 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , souldreamone@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > In a message dated 5/27/2009 12:35:17 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, > > fewtch@ writes: > > > > Nisargadatta , souldreamone@ wrote: > > > > > > ****ZZZZZzzzzzzzzz..........Aw, yer just getting frustrated > > > because you > > > couldn't keep track of what YOU were talking about. > > > > Preceded with " Aw " or not, you've got no clue whatsoever as to my > > motivations or thoughts, other than what you see right here on the screen. > > > > Not even that, as they may have changed in the 10 or so minutes between > > messages on this list. I don't hold things in mind, trying to maintain > > continuity -- which is the exact reason most folks are addicted to mailing > > lists. It maintains " me " . > > > > " I am unborn " (and " the story never began " , which I intended as a > > restatement) is a wordless understanding. It's not a point I can communicate at > > all, ever. You didn't " see it " , and so let's move on. > > > > > > ****Right, I couldn't possibly see such a deep and subtle point. Hehe. Now > > yer making me giggle too. ~ > > Me laughing now. > > Laughter is good. > > -- D. actually laughter is laughter. what is " good " ? ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2009 Report Share Posted May 27, 2009 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , souldreamone@ wrote: > > > > > > ****Right, I couldn't possibly see such a deep and subtle point. > > > Hehe. Now > > > yer making me giggle too. ~ > > > > Is " I am Unborn " clear? Now? If so, great :-). Doesn't have to be clear again in the future, and didn't ever have to be in the past. > > > " I am " has dropped away. > > Bye-bye. > > Unborn. id say a pretty mouthy inborn. and phony to boot. LOL! ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2009 Report Share Posted May 27, 2009 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , souldreamone@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In a message dated 5/27/2009 12:53:20 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, > > > fewtch@ writes: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , souldreamone@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > ***Thankfully, I've deleted all Booboo's posts since i know from > > > > experience they're utterly useless, but I did get the giggles a while > > > ago reading > > > > Toomy's posts......I think I'm over that now. ~ > > > > > > Lots & lots of drama :-p. I'm about done reading Toomie's posts again... > > > until I'm not, I s'pose ;-). I'm always 'forgetting' I decided to do this > > > and that, and decisions aren't serious here in the first place. Why should > > > they be? Life is all in fun :-). > > > > > > > > > ****Yeah, I thought I'd see what Dan had to say, and you and i don't have > > > a place to chat anymore, but the rest of the group basically just recycles > > > the same nonsense over and over. > > > > If/when Dan takes off, I'm out of here. Nothing else worthwhile here but you two, and one isn't enough to keep my interest. > > I'm not interesting. > > -- D. ah.. you've found it... truth! ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2009 Report Share Posted May 27, 2009 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , souldreamone@ wrote: > > > > > ****My grandmother was never 'here', and neither are you or me. This is > > what you refuse to get. Year after year you go on insisting that you exist as > > swirling neumonic debris or memory or some such nonsense. No you don't. > > None of that has any existence. > > The two of you are using the word " you " differently. You think? :-0 > > It's a matter of semantics and context. > > Such a dialogue can't produce a coherent mutually shared context. No dialog can. > > Which is typical of so many dialogues. > > And that is fine. > > Truth isn't a product of a mutually shared context, nor is truth a mutually shared context. > > > -- D. > What is truth again....and what is it relative too........I forgot. What is true in nature? toombaru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2009 Report Share Posted May 27, 2009 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , souldreamone@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > In a message dated 5/27/2009 12:35:17 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, > > fewtch@ writes: > > > > Nisargadatta , souldreamone@ wrote: > > > > > > ****ZZZZZzzzzzzzzz..........Aw, yer just getting frustrated > > > because you > > > couldn't keep track of what YOU were talking about. > > > > Preceded with " Aw " or not, you've got no clue whatsoever as to my > > motivations or thoughts, other than what you see right here on the screen. > > > > Not even that, as they may have changed in the 10 or so minutes between > > messages on this list. I don't hold things in mind, trying to maintain > > continuity -- which is the exact reason most folks are addicted to mailing > > lists. It maintains " me " . > > > > " I am unborn " (and " the story never began " , which I intended as a > > restatement) is a wordless understanding. It's not a point I can communicate at > > all, ever. You didn't " see it " , and so let's move on. > > > > > > ****Right, I couldn't possibly see such a deep and subtle point. Hehe. Now > > yer making me giggle too. ~ > > Me laughing now. > > Laughter is good. > > -- D. > For whom? toombaru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2009 Report Share Posted May 27, 2009 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , souldreamone@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In a message dated 5/27/2009 12:53:20 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, > > > fewtch@ writes: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , souldreamone@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > ***Thankfully, I've deleted all Booboo's posts since i know from > > > > experience they're utterly useless, but I did get the giggles a while > > > ago reading > > > > Toomy's posts......I think I'm over that now. ~ > > > > > > Lots & lots of drama :-p. I'm about done reading Toomie's posts again... > > > until I'm not, I s'pose ;-). I'm always 'forgetting' I decided to do this > > > and that, and decisions aren't serious here in the first place. Why should > > > they be? Life is all in fun :-). > > > > > > > > > ****Yeah, I thought I'd see what Dan had to say, and you and i don't have > > > a place to chat anymore, but the rest of the group basically just recycles > > > the same nonsense over and over. > > > > If/when Dan takes off, I'm out of here. Nothing else worthwhile here but you two, and one isn't enough to keep my interest. > > I'm not interesting. > > -- D. > One who says that they are not interested.............is. toombaru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2009 Report Share Posted May 27, 2009 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , souldreamone@ wrote: > > > > > > ****Right, I couldn't possibly see such a deep and subtle point. > > > Hehe. Now > > > yer making me giggle too. ~ > > > > Is " I am Unborn " clear? Now? If so, great :-). Doesn't have to be clear again in the future, and didn't ever have to be in the past. > > > " I am " has dropped away. > > Bye-bye. > > Unborn. > If one says his I am has dropped away...........it hasn't. toombaru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2009 Report Share Posted May 27, 2009 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , souldreamone@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In a message dated 5/27/2009 12:35:17 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, > > > fewtch@ writes: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , souldreamone@ wrote: > > > > > > > > ****ZZZZZzzzzzzzzz..........Aw, yer just getting frustrated > > > > because you > > > > couldn't keep track of what YOU were talking about. > > > > > > Preceded with " Aw " or not, you've got no clue whatsoever as to my > > > motivations or thoughts, other than what you see right here on the screen. > > > > > > Not even that, as they may have changed in the 10 or so minutes between > > > messages on this list. I don't hold things in mind, trying to maintain > > > continuity -- which is the exact reason most folks are addicted to mailing > > > lists. It maintains " me " . > > > > > > " I am unborn " (and " the story never began " , which I intended as a > > > restatement) is a wordless understanding. It's not a point I can communicate at > > > all, ever. You didn't " see it " , and so let's move on. > > > > > > > > > ****Right, I couldn't possibly see such a deep and subtle point. Hehe. Now > > > yer making me giggle too. ~ > > > > Me laughing now. > > > > Laughter is good. > > > > -- D. > > > > > > For whom? > > > > > toombaru i think he'll say for whomever it's not bad. he believes he's saying something perspicacious when he does that. :-) ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2009 Report Share Posted May 27, 2009 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , souldreamone@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In a message dated 5/27/2009 12:53:20 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, > > > > fewtch@ writes: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , souldreamone@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ***Thankfully, I've deleted all Booboo's posts since i know from > > > > > experience they're utterly useless, but I did get the giggles a while > > > > ago reading > > > > > Toomy's posts......I think I'm over that now. ~ > > > > > > > > Lots & lots of drama :-p. I'm about done reading Toomie's posts again... > > > > until I'm not, I s'pose ;-). I'm always 'forgetting' I decided to do this > > > > and that, and decisions aren't serious here in the first place. Why should > > > > they be? Life is all in fun :-). > > > > > > > > > > > > ****Yeah, I thought I'd see what Dan had to say, and you and i don't have > > > > a place to chat anymore, but the rest of the group basically just recycles > > > > the same nonsense over and over. > > > > > > If/when Dan takes off, I'm out of here. Nothing else worthwhile here but you two, and one isn't enough to keep my interest. > > > > I'm not interesting. > > > > -- D. > > > > > > One who says that they are not interested.............is. > > > > > > toombaru this is true. but.. one who says they are not interesting..isn't. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2009 Report Share Posted May 27, 2009 What is truth again....and what is it relative too........I forgot. What is true in nature? toombaru Everything is true to its own nature. -geo- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2009 Report Share Posted May 27, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > > What is truth again....and what is it relative too........I forgot. > > What is true in nature? > > toombaru > > Everything is true to its own nature. > -geo- what's an " everything " ? ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2009 Report Share Posted May 27, 2009 Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , souldreamone@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In a message dated 5/27/2009 12:53:20 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, > > > > > fewtch@ writes: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , souldreamone@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ***Thankfully, I've deleted all Booboo's posts since i know from > > > > > > experience they're utterly useless, but I did get the giggles a while > > > > > ago reading > > > > > > Toomy's posts......I think I'm over that now. ~ > > > > > > > > > > Lots & lots of drama :-p. I'm about done reading Toomie's posts again... > > > > > until I'm not, I s'pose ;-). I'm always 'forgetting' I decided to do this > > > > > and that, and decisions aren't serious here in the first place. Why should > > > > > they be? Life is all in fun :-). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ****Yeah, I thought I'd see what Dan had to say, and you and i don't have > > > > > a place to chat anymore, but the rest of the group basically just recycles > > > > > the same nonsense over and over. > > > > > > > > If/when Dan takes off, I'm out of here. Nothing else worthwhile here but you two, and one isn't enough to keep my interest. > > > > > > I'm not interesting. > > > > > > -- D. > > > > > > > > > > > One who says that they are not interested.............is. > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > this is true. > > but.. > > one who says they are not interesting..isn't. > > .b b.b. > :-) toombaru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.