Guest guest Posted June 5, 2009 Report Share Posted June 5, 2009 Speaking for myself, the words " speaking for myself " just arose from that which isn't a self. Believing there's a separate perceiver who " understands " the words, is duality and falsehood. It's an endless loop... if there's a separate perceiver, who/what is it perceiving that separate perceiver? Obviously, that view of things is 'broken'. These words just appear, from nowhere. Nobody is writing them, or reading them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.