Guest guest Posted June 5, 2009 Report Share Posted June 5, 2009 omkaradatta , " omkara " <fewtch wrote: In advaita, we talk of " the Self " , but this is only an indicator. In truth, any " self " or " Self " is merely postulated. No perceiver ever perceived itself 'directly'. But it's easy to see why such a notion arises... because the perceiver is the perceived. If the perceiver perceives a false perceiver, then the perceiver is the perceived. Temporarily, and falsely. But in truth, there is no perceiver. Such a thing is a postulate, as is " The Self " . The Buddhist concept of the Void is equally nonsense. No void has ever been out in front of anyone, to be seen. --- End forwarded message --- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 5, 2009 Report Share Posted June 5, 2009 - omkara nisargadatta Friday, June 05, 2009 5:16 AM Fwd: Notion of the Self omkaradatta , " omkara " <fewtch wrote: In advaita, we talk of " the Self " , but this is only an indicator. In truth, any " self " or " Self " is merely postulated. No perceiver ever perceived itself 'directly'. But it's easy to see why such a notion arises... because the perceiver is the perceived. If the perceiver perceives a false perceiver, then the perceiver is the perceived. Temporarily, and falsely. But in truth, there is no perceiver. Such a thing is a postulate, as is " The Self " . The Buddhist concept of the Void is equally nonsense. No void has ever been out in front of anyone, to be seen. --- End forwarded message --- ====== " In advaita, we talk of ..... " The guy who wrote that is a lunatic. He thinks he belongs to a tribe. -geo- avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 090526-0, 26/05/2009 Tested on: 5/6/2009 07:10:02 avast! - copyright © 1988-2009 ALWIL Software. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 5, 2009 Report Share Posted June 5, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > omkara > nisargadatta > Friday, June 05, 2009 5:16 AM > Fwd: Notion of the Self > > > > > > omkaradatta , " omkara " <fewtch@> wrote: > > In advaita, we talk of " the Self " , but this is only an indicator. > > In truth, any " self " or " Self " is merely postulated. > > No perceiver ever perceived itself 'directly'. But it's easy to see why such > a notion arises... because the perceiver is the perceived. > > If the perceiver perceives a false perceiver, then the perceiver is the > perceived. Temporarily, and falsely. > > But in truth, there is no perceiver. Such a thing is a postulate, as is " The > Self " . The Buddhist concept of the Void is equally nonsense. No void has > ever been out in front of anyone, to be seen. > > --- End forwarded message --- > ====== > " In advaita, we talk of ..... " > The guy who wrote that is a lunatic. He thinks he belongs to a tribe. > -geo- are you not in the tribe? if you're " alone " ..outside a 'tribe " .. who the fuck is that " other " guy you're saying is a lunatic? you've been blinded by the full Luna. quit howling. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 5, 2009 Report Share Posted June 5, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > omkara > nisargadatta > Friday, June 05, 2009 5:16 AM > Fwd: Notion of the Self > > > > > > omkaradatta , " omkara " <fewtch@> wrote: > > In advaita, we talk of " the Self " , but this is only an indicator. > > In truth, any " self " or " Self " is merely postulated. > > No perceiver ever perceived itself 'directly'. But it's easy to see why such > a notion arises... because the perceiver is the perceived. > > If the perceiver perceives a false perceiver, then the perceiver is the > perceived. Temporarily, and falsely. > > But in truth, there is no perceiver. Such a thing is a postulate, as is " The > Self " . The Buddhist concept of the Void is equally nonsense. No void has > ever been out in front of anyone, to be seen. > > --- End forwarded message --- > ====== > " In advaita, we talk of ..... " > The guy who wrote that is a lunatic. He thinks he belongs to a > tribe. > -geo- He does. The tribe of " here " . All of it here, none of it elsewhere. What, ya think there's somebody out there? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 5, 2009 Report Share Posted June 5, 2009 - roberibus111 Nisargadatta Friday, June 05, 2009 7:36 AM Re: Fwd: Notion of the Self Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > omkara > nisargadatta > Friday, June 05, 2009 5:16 AM > Fwd: Notion of the Self > > > > > > omkaradatta , " omkara " <fewtch@> wrote: > > In advaita, we talk of " the Self " , but this is only an indicator. > > In truth, any " self " or " Self " is merely postulated. > > No perceiver ever perceived itself 'directly'. But it's easy to see why > such > a notion arises... because the perceiver is the perceived. > > If the perceiver perceives a false perceiver, then the perceiver is the > perceived. Temporarily, and falsely. > > But in truth, there is no perceiver. Such a thing is a postulate, as is > " The > Self " . The Buddhist concept of the Void is equally nonsense. No void has > ever been out in front of anyone, to be seen. > > --- End forwarded message --- > ====== > " In advaita, we talk of ..... " > The guy who wrote that is a lunatic. He thinks he belongs to a tribe. > -geo- are you not in the tribe? if you're " alone " ..outside a 'tribe " .. who the fuck is that " other " guy you're saying is a lunatic? you've been blinded by the full Luna. quit howling. ..b b.b. okokokok..ok....i'll talk to the walls. -geo- avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 090526-0, 26/05/2009 Tested on: 5/6/2009 07:42:40 avast! - copyright © 1988-2009 ALWIL Software. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 5, 2009 Report Share Posted June 5, 2009 - Tim G. Nisargadatta Friday, June 05, 2009 7:39 AM Re: Fwd: Notion of the Self Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > omkara > nisargadatta > Friday, June 05, 2009 5:16 AM > Fwd: Notion of the Self > > > > > > omkaradatta , " omkara " <fewtch@> wrote: > > In advaita, we talk of " the Self " , but this is only an indicator. > > In truth, any " self " or " Self " is merely postulated. > > No perceiver ever perceived itself 'directly'. But it's easy to see why > such > a notion arises... because the perceiver is the perceived. > > If the perceiver perceives a false perceiver, then the perceiver is the > perceived. Temporarily, and falsely. > > But in truth, there is no perceiver. Such a thing is a postulate, as is > " The > Self " . The Buddhist concept of the Void is equally nonsense. No void has > ever been out in front of anyone, to be seen. > > --- End forwarded message --- > ====== > " In advaita, we talk of ..... " > The guy who wrote that is a lunatic. He thinks he belongs to a > tribe. > -geo- He does. The tribe of " here " . All of it here, none of it elsewhere. What, ya think there's somebody out there? geo> No. I know there is none ou there. Out there is without people. In the desert its full of sand, on a boat is full of water, in a baloon is full of air....now....if you are in a spececraft, then yes. Then there is nothing out there. avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 090526-0, 26/05/2009 Tested on: 5/6/2009 07:45:42 avast! - copyright © 1988-2009 ALWIL Software. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 5, 2009 Report Share Posted June 5, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > Tim G. > Nisargadatta > Friday, June 05, 2009 7:39 AM > Re: Fwd: Notion of the Self > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > - > > omkara > > nisargadatta > > Friday, June 05, 2009 5:16 AM > > Fwd: Notion of the Self > > > > > > > > > > > > omkaradatta , " omkara " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > In advaita, we talk of " the Self " , but this is only an indicator. > > > > In truth, any " self " or " Self " is merely postulated. > > > > No perceiver ever perceived itself 'directly'. But it's easy to see why > > such > > a notion arises... because the perceiver is the perceived. > > > > If the perceiver perceives a false perceiver, then the perceiver is the > > perceived. Temporarily, and falsely. > > > > But in truth, there is no perceiver. Such a thing is a postulate, as is > > " The > > Self " . The Buddhist concept of the Void is equally nonsense. No void has > > ever been out in front of anyone, to be seen. > > > > --- End forwarded message --- > > ====== > > " In advaita, we talk of ..... " > > The guy who wrote that is a lunatic. He thinks he belongs to a > > tribe. > > -geo- > > He does. The tribe of " here " . All of it here, none of it elsewhere. > > What, ya think there's somebody out there? > > geo> No. I know there is none ou there. Out there is without people. > In the desert its full of sand, on a boat is full of water, in a baloon is > full of air....now....if you are in a spececraft, then yes. > Then there is nothing out there. if that boat is full of water.. it's out there but it's beneath the deep blue. that's why you can't see it. my boat was full of fish. i soon won't be able to see them either. i'll be full. they'll be beneath the belly button. ha cha cha cha! ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.