Guest guest Posted June 9, 2009 Report Share Posted June 9, 2009 - dan330033 Nisargadatta Tuesday, June 09, 2009 12:44 PM Re: it's not there or over there either. Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > Tim G. > Nisargadatta > Monday, June 08, 2009 4:54 PM > Re: it's not there or over there either. > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > geo> There is no me experiencing the world. The world is not a > > description > > nor a translation of another world. > > The human world IS as it is. > > The human world is not. > > geo> The human world is a patterning of the one that is. you and your patternings ... geo> Only one and the empty patterns. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 9, 2009 Report Share Posted June 9, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > geo> I dont understand what you mean...or maybe there is nothing to > understand anyway... There's not even nothing to understand ;-). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 9, 2009 Report Share Posted June 9, 2009 - Tim G. Nisargadatta Tuesday, June 09, 2009 1:31 PM Re: it's not there or over there either. Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > geo> I dont understand what you mean...or maybe there is nothing to > understand anyway... There's not even nothing to understand ;-). even? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 9, 2009 Report Share Posted June 9, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > Tim G. > Nisargadatta > Tuesday, June 09, 2009 1:31 PM > Re: it's not there or over there either. > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > geo> I dont understand what you mean...or maybe there is nothing to > > understand anyway... > > There's not even nothing to understand ;-). > > even? There's not odd-nothing to understand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 9, 2009 Report Share Posted June 9, 2009 - Tim G. Nisargadatta Tuesday, June 09, 2009 1:43 PM Re: it's not there or over there either. Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > Tim G. > Nisargadatta > Tuesday, June 09, 2009 1:31 PM > Re: it's not there or over there either. > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > geo> I dont understand what you mean...or maybe there is nothing to > > understand anyway... > > There's not even nothing to understand ;-). > > even? There's not odd-nothing to understand. Yea... is just memory stuff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 9, 2009 Report Share Posted June 9, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > Tim G. > Nisargadatta > Tuesday, June 09, 2009 1:43 PM > Re: it's not there or over there either. > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > - > > Tim G. > > Nisargadatta > > Tuesday, June 09, 2009 1:31 PM > > Re: it's not there or over there either. > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > geo> I dont understand what you mean...or maybe there is nothing to > > > understand anyway... > > > > There's not even nothing to understand ;-). > > > > even? > > There's not odd-nothing to understand. > > Yea... is just memory stuff There's nothing separate from 'thoughts arising' to understand anything. The desire to understand something is just another thought arising. These thoughts just come up. How can there be a separate thinker? The reason there's no need for understanding is that there's nobody to understand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 10, 2009 Report Share Posted June 10, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > dan330033 > Nisargadatta > Tuesday, June 09, 2009 12:43 PM > Re: it's not there or over there either. > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > - > > dan330033 > > Nisargadatta > > Monday, June 08, 2009 4:22 PM > > Re: it's not there or over there either. > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > - > > > Tim G. > > > Nisargadatta > > > Sunday, June 07, 2009 8:35 PM > > > Re: it's not there or over there either. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > geo> I understand, but then your statement " .... everything's an > > > > interpretation. " is not a fact....or is it? > > > > I dont know > > > > > > Even to say " everything's an interpretation " is an interpretation. > > > > > > Dan will talk about 'what was never interpreted' and such. > > > > > > There may be such a 'thing' (that isn't a 'thing'), but it isn't subject > > > to > > > interpretation. It's just absence of all interpretation. > > > > > > geo> The only way you can get away with this is if you say that > > > interpretation is the same as consciousness or the same as the world. > > > Any implication of something being interpreted to a subject receiver of > > > some > > > interpretation is conceptual. > > > > once you understand that the world you experience is a description > > > > a translation > > > > you know > > > > without anything being known > > > > geo> There is no me experiencing the world. The world is not a description > > nor a translation of another world. > > The human world IS as it is. > > it's nice for you to know that so definitely > > geo> I dont understand what you mean...or maybe there is nothing to > understand anyway... maybe? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 10, 2009 Report Share Posted June 10, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > dan330033 > Nisargadatta > Tuesday, June 09, 2009 12:44 PM > Re: it's not there or over there either. > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > - > > Tim G. > > Nisargadatta > > Monday, June 08, 2009 4:54 PM > > Re: it's not there or over there either. > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > geo> There is no me experiencing the world. The world is not a > > > description > > > nor a translation of another world. > > > The human world IS as it is. > > > > The human world is not. > > > > geo> The human world is a patterning of the one that is. > > you and your patternings ... > > geo> Only one and the empty patterns. the one is what is patterned the patterns are one as one can't separate from one ... what patterns? what one? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 10, 2009 Report Share Posted June 10, 2009 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > - > > dan330033 > > Nisargadatta > > Tuesday, June 09, 2009 12:44 PM > > Re: it's not there or over there either. > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > - > > > Tim G. > > > Nisargadatta > > > Monday, June 08, 2009 4:54 PM > > > Re: it's not there or over there either. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > geo> There is no me experiencing the world. The world is not a > > > > description > > > > nor a translation of another world. > > > > The human world IS as it is. > > > > > > The human world is not. > > > > > > geo> The human world is a patterning of the one that is. > > > > you and your patternings ... > > > > geo> Only one and the empty patterns. > > the one is what is patterned > > the patterns are one > > as one can't separate from one ... > > what patterns? > > what one? the inseparable one what is patterned as the patterned one. that's the patterns. that's the one. you just said so for christ's sakes. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 10, 2009 Report Share Posted June 10, 2009 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > - > > dan330033 > > Nisargadatta > > Tuesday, June 09, 2009 12:43 PM > > Re: it's not there or over there either. > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > - > > > dan330033 > > > Nisargadatta > > > Monday, June 08, 2009 4:22 PM > > > Re: it's not there or over there either. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > Tim G. > > > > Nisargadatta > > > > Sunday, June 07, 2009 8:35 PM > > > > Re: it's not there or over there either. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > geo> I understand, but then your statement " .... everything's an > > > > > interpretation. " is not a fact....or is it? > > > > > I dont know > > > > > > > > Even to say " everything's an interpretation " is an interpretation. > > > > > > > > Dan will talk about 'what was never interpreted' and such. > > > > > > > > There may be such a 'thing' (that isn't a 'thing'), but it isn't subject > > > > to > > > > interpretation. It's just absence of all interpretation. > > > > > > > > geo> The only way you can get away with this is if you say that > > > > interpretation is the same as consciousness or the same as the world. > > > > Any implication of something being interpreted to a subject receiver of > > > > some > > > > interpretation is conceptual. > > > > > > once you understand that the world you experience is a description > > > > > > a translation > > > > > > you know > > > > > > without anything being known > > > > > > geo> There is no me experiencing the world. The world is not a description > > > nor a translation of another world. > > > The human world IS as it is. > > > > it's nice for you to know that so definitely > > > > geo> I dont understand what you mean...or maybe there is nothing to > > understand anyway... > > maybe? absolutely maybe. possibly maybe maybe. did you maybe not understand what maybe means? could be. shouldn't be. are you ok..maybe? ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 10, 2009 Report Share Posted June 10, 2009 - dan330033 Nisargadatta Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:49 AM Re: it's not there or over there either. Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > dan330033 > Nisargadatta > Tuesday, June 09, 2009 12:43 PM > Re: it's not there or over there either. > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > - > > dan330033 > > Nisargadatta > > Monday, June 08, 2009 4:22 PM > > Re: it's not there or over there either. > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > - > > > Tim G. > > > Nisargadatta > > > Sunday, June 07, 2009 8:35 PM > > > Re: it's not there or over there either. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > geo> I understand, but then your statement " .... everything's an > > > > interpretation. " is not a fact....or is it? > > > > I dont know > > > > > > Even to say " everything's an interpretation " is an interpretation. > > > > > > Dan will talk about 'what was never interpreted' and such. > > > > > > There may be such a 'thing' (that isn't a 'thing'), but it isn't > > > subject > > > to > > > interpretation. It's just absence of all interpretation. > > > > > > geo> The only way you can get away with this is if you say that > > > interpretation is the same as consciousness or the same as the world. > > > Any implication of something being interpreted to a subject receiver > > > of > > > some > > > interpretation is conceptual. > > > > once you understand that the world you experience is a description > > > > a translation > > > > you know > > > > without anything being known > > > > geo> There is no me experiencing the world. The world is not a > > description > > nor a translation of another world. > > The human world IS as it is. > > it's nice for you to know that so definitely > > geo> I dont understand what you mean...or maybe there is nothing to > understand anyway... maybe? Yes, maybe. I am referring to your stupid mechanical additions under each post, not the nature of what IS. Dan....go rest a litlle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 10, 2009 Report Share Posted June 10, 2009 - dan330033 Nisargadatta Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:53 AM Re: it's not there or over there either. Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > dan330033 > Nisargadatta > Tuesday, June 09, 2009 12:44 PM > Re: it's not there or over there either. > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > - > > Tim G. > > Nisargadatta > > Monday, June 08, 2009 4:54 PM > > Re: it's not there or over there either. > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > geo> There is no me experiencing the world. The world is not a > > > description > > > nor a translation of another world. > > > The human world IS as it is. > > > > The human world is not. > > > > geo> The human world is a patterning of the one that is. > > you and your patternings ... > > geo> Only one and the empty patterns. the one is what is patterned the patterns are one as one can't separate from one ... what patterns? what one? -d- That is why I said EMPTY. You are making just quick stupid useless out of the pocket remarks. What one? What patterns? The same very f - cking ones you yourself mention. Waht is the purpose?? -geo- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 10, 2009 Report Share Posted June 10, 2009 - roberibus111 Nisargadatta Wednesday, June 10, 2009 6:00 AM Re: it's not there or over there either. Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > - > > dan330033 > > Nisargadatta > > Tuesday, June 09, 2009 12:44 PM > > Re: it's not there or over there either. > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > - > > > Tim G. > > > Nisargadatta > > > Monday, June 08, 2009 4:54 PM > > > Re: it's not there or over there either. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > geo> There is no me experiencing the world. The world is not a > > > > description > > > > nor a translation of another world. > > > > The human world IS as it is. > > > > > > The human world is not. > > > > > > geo> The human world is a patterning of the one that is. > > > > you and your patternings ... > > > > geo> Only one and the empty patterns. > > the one is what is patterned > > the patterns are one > > as one can't separate from one ... > > what patterns? > > what one? the inseparable one what is patterned as the patterned one. that's the patterns. that's the one. you just said so for christ's sakes. ..b b.b. Yes. Now he is into these repetitious additions of the same... " The need for speed " . -geo- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 10, 2009 Report Share Posted June 10, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > dan330033 > Nisargadatta > Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:49 AM > Re: it's not there or over there either. > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > - > > dan330033 > > Nisargadatta > > Tuesday, June 09, 2009 12:43 PM > > Re: it's not there or over there either. > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > - > > > dan330033 > > > Nisargadatta > > > Monday, June 08, 2009 4:22 PM > > > Re: it's not there or over there either. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > Tim G. > > > > Nisargadatta > > > > Sunday, June 07, 2009 8:35 PM > > > > Re: it's not there or over there either. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > geo> I understand, but then your statement " .... everything's an > > > > > interpretation. " is not a fact....or is it? > > > > > I dont know > > > > > > > > Even to say " everything's an interpretation " is an interpretation. > > > > > > > > Dan will talk about 'what was never interpreted' and such. > > > > > > > > There may be such a 'thing' (that isn't a 'thing'), but it isn't > > > > subject > > > > to > > > > interpretation. It's just absence of all interpretation. > > > > > > > > geo> The only way you can get away with this is if you say that > > > > interpretation is the same as consciousness or the same as the world. > > > > Any implication of something being interpreted to a subject receiver > > > > of > > > > some > > > > interpretation is conceptual. > > > > > > once you understand that the world you experience is a description > > > > > > a translation > > > > > > you know > > > > > > without anything being known > > > > > > geo> There is no me experiencing the world. The world is not a > > > description > > > nor a translation of another world. > > > The human world IS as it is. > > > > it's nice for you to know that so definitely > > > > geo> I dont understand what you mean...or maybe there is nothing to > > understand anyway... > > maybe? > > Yes, maybe. I am referring to your stupid mechanical additions under each > post, not the nature of what IS. > Dan....go rest a litlle. stupid? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 10, 2009 Report Share Posted June 10, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > dan330033 > Nisargadatta > Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:53 AM > Re: it's not there or over there either. > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > - > > dan330033 > > Nisargadatta > > Tuesday, June 09, 2009 12:44 PM > > Re: it's not there or over there either. > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > - > > > Tim G. > > > Nisargadatta > > > Monday, June 08, 2009 4:54 PM > > > Re: it's not there or over there either. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > geo> There is no me experiencing the world. The world is not a > > > > description > > > > nor a translation of another world. > > > > The human world IS as it is. > > > > > > The human world is not. > > > > > > geo> The human world is a patterning of the one that is. > > > > you and your patternings ... > > > > geo> Only one and the empty patterns. > > the one is what is patterned > > the patterns are one > > as one can't separate from one ... > > what patterns? > > what one? > -d- > > That is why I said EMPTY. You are making just quick stupid useless out of > the pocket remarks. > What one? What patterns? The same very f - cking ones you yourself mention. > Waht is the purpose?? > -geo- you? stupid? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 10, 2009 Report Share Posted June 10, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > roberibus111 > Nisargadatta > Wednesday, June 10, 2009 6:00 AM > Re: it's not there or over there either. > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > - > > > dan330033 > > > Nisargadatta > > > Tuesday, June 09, 2009 12:44 PM > > > Re: it's not there or over there either. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > Tim G. > > > > Nisargadatta > > > > Monday, June 08, 2009 4:54 PM > > > > Re: it's not there or over there either. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > geo> There is no me experiencing the world. The world is not a > > > > > description > > > > > nor a translation of another world. > > > > > The human world IS as it is. > > > > > > > > The human world is not. > > > > > > > > geo> The human world is a patterning of the one that is. > > > > > > you and your patternings ... > > > > > > geo> Only one and the empty patterns. > > > > the one is what is patterned > > > > the patterns are one > > > > as one can't separate from one ... > > > > what patterns? > > > > what one? > > the inseparable one what is patterned as the patterned one. > > that's the patterns. > > that's the one. > > you just said so for christ's sakes. > > .b b.b. > > Yes. Now he is into these repetitious additions of the same... " The need for > speed " . > -geo- lots of focus on " someone else " the gossipy mind rest in/as awareness here no mind no someone else doing things Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 10, 2009 Report Share Posted June 10, 2009 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > lots of focus on " someone else " > > the gossipy mind 'Tis the nature of " spiritual " lists... nothing could be more " worldly " in that regard. All resistance, all the time. > rest in/as awareness here > > no mind > > no someone else doing things Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 10, 2009 Report Share Posted June 10, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > Yes, maybe. I am referring to your stupid mechanical additions under each > > > post, not the nature of what IS. > > > Dan....go rest a litlle. > > > > stupid? > > Projection is always stupid. indeed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 10, 2009 Report Share Posted June 10, 2009 - dan330033 Nisargadatta Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:37 PM Re: it's not there or over there either. Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > dan330033 > Nisargadatta > Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:53 AM > Re: it's not there or over there either. > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > - > > dan330033 > > Nisargadatta > > Tuesday, June 09, 2009 12:44 PM > > Re: it's not there or over there either. > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > - > > > Tim G. > > > Nisargadatta > > > Monday, June 08, 2009 4:54 PM > > > Re: it's not there or over there either. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > geo> There is no me experiencing the world. The world is not a > > > > description > > > > nor a translation of another world. > > > > The human world IS as it is. > > > > > > The human world is not. > > > > > > geo> The human world is a patterning of the one that is. > > > > you and your patternings ... > > > > geo> Only one and the empty patterns. > > the one is what is patterned > > the patterns are one > > as one can't separate from one ... > > what patterns? > > what one? > -d- > > That is why I said EMPTY. You are making just quick stupid useless out of > the pocket remarks. > What one? What patterns? The same very f - cking ones you yourself > mention. > Waht is the purpose?? > -geo- you? stupid? geo> Sorry... avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 090526-0, 26/05/2009 Tested on: 10/6/2009 14:42:25 avast! - copyright © 1988-2009 ALWIL Software. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 10, 2009 Report Share Posted June 10, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > Tim G. > Nisargadatta > Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:39 PM > Re: it's not there or over there either. > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > Yes, maybe. I am referring to your stupid mechanical additions under > > > each > > > post, not the nature of what IS. > > > Dan....go rest a litlle. > > > > stupid? > > Projection is always stupid. > > It is. Any and everything that happens, happens 'here'. It's worth keeping in mind before calling someone else stupid. What was happening in their thoughts when a message was posted, there's no clue. What's happening in our own is obvious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 10, 2009 Report Share Posted June 10, 2009 > lots of focus on " someone else " > > the gossipy mind 'Tis the nature of " spiritual " lists... nothing could be more " worldly " in that regard. All resistance, all the time. All the time? Time? avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 090526-0, 26/05/2009 Tested on: 10/6/2009 14:46:29 avast! - copyright © 1988-2009 ALWIL Software. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 10, 2009 Report Share Posted June 10, 2009 - Tim G. Nisargadatta Wednesday, June 10, 2009 3:00 PM Re: it's not there or over there either. Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > Tim G. > Nisargadatta > Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:39 PM > Re: it's not there or over there either. > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > Yes, maybe. I am referring to your stupid mechanical additions under > > > each > > > post, not the nature of what IS. > > > Dan....go rest a litlle. > > > > stupid? > > Projection is always stupid. > > It is. Any and everything that happens, happens 'here'. It's worth keeping in mind before calling someone else stupid. What was happening in their thoughts when a message was posted, there's no clue. What's happening in our own is obvious. geo> The issue is not the stupid - dan is anyway :>) - but being idientified with memory. avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 090526-0, 26/05/2009 Tested on: 10/6/2009 15:07:02 avast! - copyright © 1988-2009 ALWIL Software. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 10, 2009 Report Share Posted June 10, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > Any and everything that happens, happens 'here'. It's worth keeping in mind > before calling someone else stupid. What was happening in their thoughts > when a message was posted, there's no clue. What's happening in our own is > obvious. > > geo> The issue is not the stupid - dan is anyway :>) - but being > idientified with memory. The issue is whatever " the issue " seems to be at the moment, if any... so if being identified with memory is the issue, that's the issue. There's also the issue of identifying 'others' with our own memory pattern. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 10, 2009 Report Share Posted June 10, 2009 - Tim G. Nisargadatta Wednesday, June 10, 2009 3:10 PM Re: it's not there or over there either. Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > Any and everything that happens, happens 'here'. It's worth keeping in > mind > before calling someone else stupid. What was happening in their thoughts > when a message was posted, there's no clue. What's happening in our own is > obvious. > > geo> The issue is not the stupid - dan is anyway :>) - but being > idientified with memory. The issue is whatever " the issue " seems to be at the moment, if any... so if being identified with memory is the issue, that's the issue. There's also the issue of identifying 'others' with our own memory pattern. geo> Either there is a " contraction " away from what is, or not. It is yes or no. avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 090526-0, 26/05/2009 Tested on: 10/6/2009 15:24:02 avast! - copyright © 1988-2009 ALWIL Software. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 10, 2009 Report Share Posted June 10, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > The issue is whatever " the issue " seems to be at the moment, if any... so if > being identified with memory is the issue, that's the issue. There's also > the issue of identifying 'others' with our own memory pattern. > > geo> Either there is a " contraction " away from what is, or not. It is yes or > no. There is no ongoing, continuous contraction. There's no ongoing, continuous nothin'. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.