Guest guest Posted June 15, 2009 Report Share Posted June 15, 2009 " The seeker is he who is in search of himself. Give up all questions except one: 'Who am I?' " Now. When we refer to " you " or " other " , who are we really referring to, if the seeker is in search of *himself* ? How much more obvious can it get? Any reference to " you " or " other " refers to ME. ME ME ME ME ME. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 15, 2009 Report Share Posted June 15, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > " The seeker is he who is in search of himself. > > Give up all questions except one: 'Who am I?' " > > > Now. When we refer to " you " or " other " , who are we really referring to, if the seeker is in search of *himself* ? > > How much more obvious can it get? > > Any reference to " you " or " other " refers to ME. ME ME ME ME ME. for me all is me. no me no nothing. no nothing no me. it's easy to see. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 15, 2009 Report Share Posted June 15, 2009 - Tim G. Nisargadatta Sunday, June 14, 2009 10:32 PM From the group's front page... " The seeker is he who is in search of himself. Give up all questions except one: 'Who am I?' " Now. When we refer to " you " or " other " , who are we really referring to, if the seeker is in search of *himself* ? How much more obvious can it get? Any reference to " you " or " other " refers to ME. ME ME ME ME ME. geo> What is the relation of these ME ME ME to the " answer " to the question 'Who am I?' " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 15, 2009 Report Share Posted June 15, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > Tim G. > Nisargadatta > Sunday, June 14, 2009 10:32 PM > From the group's front page... > > > > > > " The seeker is he who is in search of himself. > > Give up all questions except one: 'Who am I?' " > > Now. When we refer to " you " or " other " , who are we really referring to, if > the seeker is in search of *himself* ? > > How much more obvious can it get? > > Any reference to " you " or " other " refers to ME. ME ME ME ME ME. > > geo> What is the relation of these ME ME ME to the " answer " to the question > 'Who am I?' " where else but " me " can the question " who am 'i' " arise? that question and all things pure and profane are of " me " . it can be no other way. the bottom can fall out. no more: " who am i? " that now falls below ridiculous. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 15, 2009 Report Share Posted June 15, 2009 - roberibus111 Nisargadatta Monday, June 15, 2009 10:20 AM Re: From the group's front page... Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > Tim G. > Nisargadatta > Sunday, June 14, 2009 10:32 PM > From the group's front page... > > > > > > " The seeker is he who is in search of himself. > > Give up all questions except one: 'Who am I?' " > > Now. When we refer to " you " or " other " , who are we really referring to, if > the seeker is in search of *himself* ? > > How much more obvious can it get? > > Any reference to " you " or " other " refers to ME. ME ME ME ME ME. > > geo> What is the relation of these ME ME ME to the " answer " to the > question > 'Who am I?' " where else but " me " can the question " who am 'i' " arise? that question and all things pure and profane are of " me " . it can be no other way. the bottom can fall out. no more: " who am i? " that now falls below ridiculous. ..b b.b. That is what I was questioning. The question may lead to an an-answerable answer. -geo- avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 090526-0, 26/05/2009 Tested on: 15/6/2009 11:35:37 avast! - copyright © 1988-2009 ALWIL Software. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 15, 2009 Report Share Posted June 15, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > roberibus111 > Nisargadatta > Monday, June 15, 2009 10:20 AM > Re: From the group's front page... > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > - > > Tim G. > > Nisargadatta > > Sunday, June 14, 2009 10:32 PM > > From the group's front page... > > > > > > > > > > > > " The seeker is he who is in search of himself. > > > > Give up all questions except one: 'Who am I?' " > > > > Now. When we refer to " you " or " other " , who are we really referring to, if > > the seeker is in search of *himself* ? > > > > How much more obvious can it get? > > > > Any reference to " you " or " other " refers to ME. ME ME ME ME ME. > > > > geo> What is the relation of these ME ME ME to the " answer " to the > > question > > 'Who am I?' " > > where else but " me " can the question " who am 'i' " arise? > > that question and all things pure and profane are of " me " . > > it can be no other way. > > the bottom can fall out. > > no more: " who am i? " > > that now falls below ridiculous. > > .b b.b. > > That is what I was questioning. > The question may lead to an an-answerable answer. > -geo- that was it. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.