Guest guest Posted June 20, 2009 Report Share Posted June 20, 2009 if you don't think " this can't be happening " .. it isn't. if you do think " this can't be happening " .. it is. the statement wouldn't arise unless it was happening. if you think this just happens.. that's not happening. if there is a thinker at all there is error. the error is the thinker. and the error erroneously thinks it knows itself. what dipstick lipschitz huh? ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 20, 2009 Report Share Posted June 20, 2009 - roberibus111 Nisargadatta Saturday, June 20, 2009 7:50 AM you don't say! if you don't think " this can't be happening " .. it isn't. if you do think " this can't be happening " .. it is. the statement wouldn't arise unless it was happening. if you think this just happens.. that's not happening. if there is a thinker at all there is error. the error is the thinker. and the error erroneously thinks it knows itself. what dipstick lipschitz huh? ..b b.b. This it tipicaly what happens most often here...and there....Any assertion brings with it the opposite ...duuuuhhhhh.....geo is so clever. -geo- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.