Guest guest Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 > One good thing about an imaginary God is that you can never be separate from Him. > > > toombaru We need God because we need explanations. If you have an explanation for your life, you have a God. Science is the religion of manufacturing endless new gods. Religions adore old explanations. Can an explanation be the ultimate one? And that is what Truth is, an explanation enthroned as ultimate, but just for a while. Pete > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " <pedsie6 wrote: > > > One good thing about an imaginary God is that you can never be separate from Him. > > > > > > toombaru > > We need God because we need explanations. > If you have an explanation for your life, you > have a God. Science is the religion of manufacturing > endless new gods. Religions adore old explanations. > > Can an explanation be the ultimate one? > And that is what Truth is, an explanation enthroned > as ultimate, but just for a while. > > Pete > > Jesus... ya made it the whole message without talking about the brain... LOL ;-). I mean, why talk about " nonduality' when you can talk biology? (chuckling)... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " <pedsie6@> wrote: > > > > > One good thing about an imaginary God is that you can never be separate from Him. > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > We need God because we need explanations. > > If you have an explanation for your life, you > > have a God. Science is the religion of manufacturing > > endless new gods. Religions adore old explanations. > > > > Can an explanation be the ultimate one? > > And that is what Truth is, an explanation enthroned > > as ultimate, but just for a while. > > > > Pete > > > > > Jesus... ya made it the whole message without talking about the > brain... LOL ;-). I mean, why talk about " nonduality' when you can > talk biology? (chuckling)... P.S. from here, " Truth " is clear seeing of the utter futility of all explanations. And that is 'ultimate', because there is nothing beyond " no explanation for anything is necessary " . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " <pedsie6 wrote: > > > One good thing about an imaginary God is that you can never be separate from Him. > > > > > > toombaru > > We need God because we need explanations. > If you have an explanation for your life, you > have a God. Science is the religion of manufacturing > endless new gods. Religions adore old explanations. > > Can an explanation be the ultimate one? > And that is what Truth is, an explanation enthroned > as ultimate, but just for a while. > > Pete I stand face to face with no-explanation, and nothing in between. - D - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " <pedsie6@> wrote: > > > > > One good thing about an imaginary God is that you can never be separate from Him. > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > We need God because we need explanations. > > If you have an explanation for your life, you > > have a God. Science is the religion of manufacturing > > endless new gods. Religions adore old explanations. > > > > Can an explanation be the ultimate one? > > And that is what Truth is, an explanation enthroned > > as ultimate, but just for a while. > > > > Pete > > I stand face to face with no-explanation, and nothing in between. > > - D - Wow, we got that in common between us! (grasping at air with hand -- opening hand) Whoops... nothing between us at all :-). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " <pedsie6@> wrote: > > > > > > > One good thing about an imaginary God is that you can never be separate from Him. > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > We need God because we need explanations. > > > If you have an explanation for your life, you > > > have a God. Science is the religion of manufacturing > > > endless new gods. Religions adore old explanations. > > > > > > Can an explanation be the ultimate one? > > > And that is what Truth is, an explanation enthroned > > > as ultimate, but just for a while. > > > > > > Pete > > > > I stand face to face with no-explanation, and nothing in between. > > > > - D - > > Wow, we got that in common between us! > > (grasping at air with hand -- opening hand) > > Whoops... nothing between us at all :-). How do you explain that? - D - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " <pedsie6@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > One good thing about an imaginary God is that you can never be separate from Him. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > We need God because we need explanations. > > > > If you have an explanation for your life, you > > > > have a God. Science is the religion of manufacturing > > > > endless new gods. Religions adore old explanations. > > > > > > > > Can an explanation be the ultimate one? > > > > And that is what Truth is, an explanation enthroned > > > > as ultimate, but just for a while. > > > > > > > > Pete > > > > > > I stand face to face with no-explanation, and nothing in between. > > > > > > - D - > > > > Wow, we got that in common between us! > > > > (grasping at air with hand -- opening hand) > > > > Whoops... nothing between us at all :-). > > How do you explain that? > > - D - No need or desire to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 - dan330033 Nisargadatta Monday, June 22, 2009 3:04 PM Re: An Imaginary God Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " <pedsie6@> wrote: > > > > > > > One good thing about an imaginary God is that you can never be > > > > separate from Him. > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > We need God because we need explanations. > > > If you have an explanation for your life, you > > > have a God. Science is the religion of manufacturing > > > endless new gods. Religions adore old explanations. > > > > > > Can an explanation be the ultimate one? > > > And that is what Truth is, an explanation enthroned > > > as ultimate, but just for a while. > > > > > > Pete > > > > I stand face to face with no-explanation, and nothing in between. > > > > - D - > > Wow, we got that in common between us! > > (grasping at air with hand -- opening hand) > > Whoops... nothing between us at all :-). How do you explain that? - D - How strange....an explanation for truth. What for? Can that be serious? :>)) -ego- avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 090526-0, 26/05/2009 Tested on: 22/6/2009 15:11:35 avast! - copyright © 1988-2009 ALWIL Software. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " <pedsie6@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > One good thing about an imaginary God is that you can never be separate from Him. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > We need God because we need explanations. > > > > > If you have an explanation for your life, you > > > > > have a God. Science is the religion of manufacturing > > > > > endless new gods. Religions adore old explanations. > > > > > > > > > > Can an explanation be the ultimate one? > > > > > And that is what Truth is, an explanation enthroned > > > > > as ultimate, but just for a while. > > > > > > > > > > Pete > > > > > > > > I stand face to face with no-explanation, and nothing in between. > > > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > Wow, we got that in common between us! > > > > > > (grasping at air with hand -- opening hand) > > > > > > Whoops... nothing between us at all :-). > > > > How do you explain that? > > > > - D - > > No need or desire to. Okay, well then I better explain it. I stand face-to-face with no-explanation, and nothing in between, because it was foretold by the elders many moons ago. - D - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 - "geo" <inandor<Nisargadatta >Monday, June 22, 2009 3:25 PMRe: Re: it's not there or over there either.>> - > dan330033> Nisargadatta > Monday, June 22, 2009 3:07 PM> Re: it's not there or over there either.>>>>>> Nisargadatta , "geo" <inandor wrote:>>>> > > > > > geo> "Now" is just a concept of the timebound mind. Chasing the>> > > > > > now>> > > > > > is>> > > > > > more>> > > > > > like a joke.>> > > > >>> > > > > This applies equally to all concepts, not only 'now'. If it seems >> > > > > to>> > > > > apply>> > > > > especially to 'now', then something is being avoided.>> > > > >>> > > > > All involuntary concepts, yes. The conception of a new mechanism >> > > > > may>> > > > > not>> > > > > be>> > > > > avoidance.>> > > > > -geo->> > > >>> > > > I dunno what you're talking about, and doubt you do either.>> > > >>> > > > But, enjoy ;-).>> > >>> > > LOL>> > >>> > > To imagine the way to the super-market, to design a new car, does not>> > > imply>> > > in a separate entity.>> > > -ego->> >>> > nothing implies a separate entity>> >>> > Actualy nothing. The implication is fragmentation, a "as if".>> > -ego->>>> If I understand without separation of any entity anywhere, then (now) >> there>> is no "as if" - anywhere at any time.>>>> It's all or nothing.>>>> Or all and nothing, if you prefer.>>>> - D ->>>> Without fragmentation, without the entity, there is no need to state a>> "now".>> -ego->> Without fragmentation, without the entity, there is no need to state that > there is no need to state a "now.">> - d ->> If I understand without separation of any entity anywhere, then there is > no need to state that there is no "as if" either.You know what? Stating or not stating hs nothing to do with needing or not.> -ego->>>>>>>>> >>>>>> avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean.> Virus Database (VPS): 090526-0, 26/05/2009> Tested on: 22/6/2009 15:13:36> avast! - copyright © 1988-2009 ALWIL Software. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > - > > dan330033 > > Nisargadatta > > Monday, June 22, 2009 3:04 PM > > Re: An Imaginary God > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " <pedsie6@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > One good thing about an imaginary God is that you can never be > > > > > > separate from Him. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > We need God because we need explanations. > > > > > If you have an explanation for your life, you > > > > > have a God. Science is the religion of manufacturing > > > > > endless new gods. Religions adore old explanations. > > > > > > > > > > Can an explanation be the ultimate one? > > > > > And that is what Truth is, an explanation enthroned > > > > > as ultimate, but just for a while. > > > > > > > > > > Pete > > > > > > > > I stand face to face with no-explanation, and nothing in between. > > > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > Wow, we got that in common between us! > > > > > > (grasping at air with hand -- opening hand) > > > > > > Whoops... nothing between us at all :-). > > > > How do you explain that? > > > > - D - > > > > How strange....an explanation for truth. What for? Can that be serious? :>)) > > -ego- > > Seems a strange question here, too. Dunno whether he really wants to know, or is this some 'test' of some kind? :-p. Yes, of course it's a test. A test for whether or not the truly obvious can be laughed about, or whether it's taken seriously. You will receive tickets for your next destination based on how you responded. Please meet with the ticketing agent in Truth or Consequences, Nevada. -- D -- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > > No need or desire to. > > Okay, well then I better explain it. > > I stand face-to-face with no-explanation, and nothing in between, > because it was foretold by the elders many moons ago. > > - D - Well, ask 'em to stop mooning ya as a way to tell time... butt-cracks make for poor clocks :-p. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > > Seems a strange question here, too. Dunno whether he really wants to know, or is this some 'test' of some kind? :-p. > > Yes, of course it's a test. > > A test for whether or not the truly obvious can be laughed about, or > whether it's taken seriously. The truly obvious is neither serious nor funny, just obvious :-p. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > Seems a strange question here, too. Dunno whether he really wants to know, or is this some 'test' of some kind? :-p. > > > > Yes, of course it's a test. > > > > A test for whether or not the truly obvious can be laughed about, or > whether it's taken seriously. > > The truly obvious is neither serious nor funny, just obvious :-p. P.S. I find humor to nearly always come across poorly in a text-only format, particularly without emoticons or indicators like <chuckling>. YMMV :-p. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > " geo " <inandor > <Nisargadatta > > Monday, June 22, 2009 3:25 PM > Re: Re: it's not there or over there either. > > > > > > - > > dan330033 > > Nisargadatta > > Monday, June 22, 2009 3:07 PM > > Re: it's not there or over there either. > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > >> > >> > > > > > geo> " Now " is just a concept of the timebound mind. Chasing the > >> > > > > > now > >> > > > > > is > >> > > > > > more > >> > > > > > like a joke. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > This applies equally to all concepts, not only 'now'. If it seems > >> > > > > to > >> > > > > apply > >> > > > > especially to 'now', then something is being avoided. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > All involuntary concepts, yes. The conception of a new mechanism > >> > > > > may > >> > > > > not > >> > > > > be > >> > > > > avoidance. > >> > > > > -geo- > >> > > > > >> > > > I dunno what you're talking about, and doubt you do either. > >> > > > > >> > > > But, enjoy ;-). > >> > > > >> > > LOL > >> > > > >> > > To imagine the way to the super-market, to design a new car, does not > >> > > imply > >> > > in a separate entity. > >> > > -ego- > >> > > >> > nothing implies a separate entity > >> > > >> > Actualy nothing. The implication is fragmentation, a " as if " . > >> > -ego- > >> > >> If I understand without separation of any entity anywhere, then (now) > >> there > >> is no " as if " - anywhere at any time. > >> > >> It's all or nothing. > >> > >> Or all and nothing, if you prefer. > >> > >> - D - > >> > >> Without fragmentation, without the entity, there is no need to state a > >> " now " . > >> -ego- > > > > Without fragmentation, without the entity, there is no need to state that > > there is no need to state a " now. " > > > > - d - > > > > If I understand without separation of any entity anywhere, then there is > > no need to state that there is no " as if " either. > > You know what? Stating or not stating hs nothing to do with needing or not. > > -ego- That's because what is has no needs, until a being is separated out and considered as something that has needs. The human mind quickly jumps to that kind of perception. And there is the " I " being projected - all kinds of beings are seen, with motives, such as ( " I " ) the need to eat, ( " I " ) the need for pleasure, ( " I " )the need to avoid pain, ( " I " ) the need to survive. Without any entity anywhere, there is no need for survival. Check it out: what is has absolutely nothing needed, and no threats. Certainly the organism is defined by its needs. Hence, the organism is a thought-constructed, limited definition. The organism is an explanation. I am defined as organism, as having a center and perimeter, so behaviors can be explained and predicted. It's circular: I need to explain and predict so I can survive. And I survive by explaining and predicting. That's the entity: an ongoing self-justifying, self-validating cycle of explanation, enclosed by its " purpose. " And here's what is: no explanation, no purpose. - D - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > No need or desire to. > > > > Okay, well then I better explain it. > > > > I stand face-to-face with no-explanation, and nothing in between, > > because it was foretold by the elders many moons ago. > > > > - D - > > Well, ask 'em to stop mooning ya as a way to tell time... butt-cracks make for poor clocks :-p. They're correct twice a day, at 12:30 AM and 12:30 PM. - d - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > No need or desire to. > > > > > > Okay, well then I better explain it. > > > > > > I stand face-to-face with no-explanation, and nothing in between, > > > because it was foretold by the elders many moons ago. > > > > > > - D - > > > > Well, ask 'em to stop mooning ya as a way to tell time... butt-cracks make for poor clocks :-p. > > They're correct twice a day, at 12:30 AM and 12:30 PM. > > - d - LOL... OK, maybe humor doesn't always come across poorly ;-). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > Seems a strange question here, too. Dunno whether he really wants to know, or is this some 'test' of some kind? :-p. > > > > > > Yes, of course it's a test. > > > > > > A test for whether or not the truly obvious can be laughed about, or > whether it's taken seriously. > > > > The truly obvious is neither serious nor funny, just obvious :-p. > > P.S. I find humor to nearly always come across poorly in a text-only format, particularly without emoticons or indicators like <chuckling>. YMMV :-p. That's why it's a test. Now, don't get testy with me. - d - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 - dan330033 Nisargadatta Monday, June 22, 2009 3:35 PM Re: An Imaginary God Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > dan330033 > Nisargadatta > Monday, June 22, 2009 3:04 PM > Re: An Imaginary God > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " <pedsie6@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > One good thing about an imaginary God is that you can never be > > > > > separate from Him. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > We need God because we need explanations. > > > > If you have an explanation for your life, you > > > > have a God. Science is the religion of manufacturing > > > > endless new gods. Religions adore old explanations. > > > > > > > > Can an explanation be the ultimate one? > > > > And that is what Truth is, an explanation enthroned > > > > as ultimate, but just for a while. > > > > > > > > Pete > > > > > > I stand face to face with no-explanation, and nothing in between. > > > > > > - D - > > > > Wow, we got that in common between us! > > > > (grasping at air with hand -- opening hand) > > > > Whoops... nothing between us at all :-). > > How do you explain that? > > - D - > > How strange....an explanation for truth. What for? Can that be serious? > :>)) > -ego- Yes, I'm very serious, mr. eggnog. We must set about to explain how it can be that there is no explanation for what is. I suggest that you research which entities are responsible. Tim can research all the archives of all the possible explanations and decide which ones really support that there is no choice involved. Pete can research the biological implications, including brain structures involved in making explanations. I plan to sit back and laugh and do absolutely nothing. Consider me the cheer-leading section. - D - I suggest the scientific aproach. Lets take all possible explanations from tims research results and compare them to the actual truth. The one that happens to be identical to truth according to your apreciation will be submited to werners aproval. -ego- avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 090526-0, 26/05/2009 Tested on: 22/6/2009 15:41:38 avast! - copyright © 1988-2009 ALWIL Software. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Seems a strange question here, too. Dunno whether he really wants to know, or is this some 'test' of some kind? :-p. > > > > > > > > Yes, of course it's a test. > > > > > > > > A test for whether or not the truly obvious can be laughed about, or > whether it's taken seriously. > > > > > > The truly obvious is neither serious nor funny, just obvious :-p. > > > > P.S. I find humor to nearly always come across poorly in a text-only format, particularly without emoticons or indicators like <chuckling>. YMMV :-p. > > That's why it's a test. > > Now, don't get testy with me. > > - d - Don't worry, no interest here in test tickles. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > dan330033 > Nisargadatta > Monday, June 22, 2009 3:35 PM > Re: An Imaginary God > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > - > > dan330033 > > Nisargadatta > > Monday, June 22, 2009 3:04 PM > > Re: An Imaginary God > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " <pedsie6@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > One good thing about an imaginary God is that you can never be > > > > > > separate from Him. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > We need God because we need explanations. > > > > > If you have an explanation for your life, you > > > > > have a God. Science is the religion of manufacturing > > > > > endless new gods. Religions adore old explanations. > > > > > > > > > > Can an explanation be the ultimate one? > > > > > And that is what Truth is, an explanation enthroned > > > > > as ultimate, but just for a while. > > > > > > > > > > Pete > > > > > > > > I stand face to face with no-explanation, and nothing in between. > > > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > Wow, we got that in common between us! > > > > > > (grasping at air with hand -- opening hand) > > > > > > Whoops... nothing between us at all :-). > > > > How do you explain that? > > > > - D - > > > > How strange....an explanation for truth. What for? Can that be serious? > > :>)) > > -ego- > > Yes, I'm very serious, mr. eggnog. > > We must set about to explain how it can be that there is no explanation for > what is. > > I suggest that you research which entities are responsible. > > Tim can research all the archives of all the possible explanations and > decide which ones really support that there is no choice involved. > > Pete can research the biological implications, including brain structures > involved in making explanations. > > I plan to sit back and laugh and do absolutely nothing. > > Consider me the cheer-leading section. > > - D - > > I suggest the scientific aproach. Lets take all possible explanations from > tims research results and compare them to the actual truth. The one that > happens to be identical to truth according to your apreciation will be > submited to werners aproval. > -ego- this is a good plan. identical to truth, i like that. i will be able to detect a perfect identity because the results will be invisible. and werner has his own test, which I've been assured is absolutely reliable, verifiable, and alcohol-free. - d - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 23, 2009 Report Share Posted June 23, 2009 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " <pedsie6@> wrote: > > > > > One good thing about an imaginary God is that you can never be separate from Him. > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > We need God because we need explanations. > > If you have an explanation for your life, you > > have a God. Science is the religion of manufacturing > > endless new gods. Religions adore old explanations. > > > > Can an explanation be the ultimate one? > > And that is what Truth is, an explanation enthroned > > as ultimate, but just for a while. > > > > Pete > > I stand face to face with no-explanation, and nothing in between. > > - D - dull and tiresome claptrap. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 23, 2009 Report Share Posted June 23, 2009 Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " <pedsie6@> wrote: > > > > > > > One good thing about an imaginary God is that you can never be separate from Him. > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > We need God because we need explanations. > > > If you have an explanation for your life, you > > > have a God. Science is the religion of manufacturing > > > endless new gods. Religions adore old explanations. > > > > > > Can an explanation be the ultimate one? > > > And that is what Truth is, an explanation enthroned > > > as ultimate, but just for a while. > > > > > > Pete > > > > I stand face to face with no-explanation, and nothing in between. > > > > - D - > > > dull and tiresome claptrap. > > .b b.b. you never tire of reading and responding. entertaining stuff. - d - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 23, 2009 Report Share Posted June 23, 2009 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " <pedsie6@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > One good thing about an imaginary God is that you can never be separate from Him. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > We need God because we need explanations. > > > > If you have an explanation for your life, you > > > > have a God. Science is the religion of manufacturing > > > > endless new gods. Religions adore old explanations. > > > > > > > > Can an explanation be the ultimate one? > > > > And that is what Truth is, an explanation enthroned > > > > as ultimate, but just for a while. > > > > > > > > Pete > > > > > > I stand face to face with no-explanation, and nothing in between. > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > dull and tiresome claptrap. > > > > .b b.b. > > you never tire of reading and responding. > > entertaining stuff. > > - d - danny.. better count up your posts for today..then mine. now daniel.. i think you're off the fucking wall with the above statement. you're talking about yourself numbskull. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.