Guest guest Posted June 24, 2009 Report Share Posted June 24, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > Tim G. > Nisargadatta > Wednesday, June 24, 2009 3:35 AM > Re: Question to bbb > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > - > > Tim G. > > Nisargadatta > > Wednesday, June 24, 2009 3:05 AM > > Re: Question to bbb > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > You see....there is something behind the names that you seem to > > > recognise as a knower of the depth of peace...or not > > > > The only thing behind the names is your own body, sitting directly behind > > them. > > -tim- > > > > Out of context. I was comenting something dan said. But yes, words can be > > seen as comming from beliefs or not. If " X " says: I believe in god, I know > > it is conceptual. The " X " in my world is saying something conceptual in my > > world. > > -geo- > > There is only your world. Others' worlds are in your world. > -tim- > > Yes tim! You dont have to repeat this. There is only this world. You are tim > of this one world. Everything touching my senses are me, you dont have to > keep repeating this as if it was unknwon here. Tim of my world may be > sleeping or tim of my world may be awake. > -geo- Yes. And however it appears, is choiceless. Whatever reactions appear to be involved, appear choicelessly. To whom it appears, is awareness. Regardless of the imagined situation. The awareness is never actually situated. As many worlds as people, as many meanings as people, as many peoples as meanings. Person changes one moment to moment. No actual continuity. Image appearing/disappearing. Seeemingly reappearing. But not really. - D - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 24, 2009 Report Share Posted June 24, 2009 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > - > > Tim G. > > Nisargadatta > > Wednesday, June 24, 2009 3:35 AM > > Re: Question to bbb > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > - > > > Tim G. > > > Nisargadatta > > > Wednesday, June 24, 2009 3:05 AM > > > Re: Question to bbb > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > You see....there is something behind the names that you seem to > > > > recognise as a knower of the depth of peace...or not > > > > > > The only thing behind the names is your own body, sitting directly behind > > > them. > > > -tim- > > > > > > Out of context. I was comenting something dan said. But yes, words can be > > > seen as comming from beliefs or not. If " X " says: I believe in god, I know > > > it is conceptual. The " X " in my world is saying something conceptual in my > > > world. > > > -geo- > > > > There is only your world. Others' worlds are in your world. > > -tim- > > > > Yes tim! You dont have to repeat this. There is only this world. You are tim > > of this one world. Everything touching my senses are me, you dont have to > > keep repeating this as if it was unknwon here. Tim of my world may be > > sleeping or tim of my world may be awake. > > -geo- > > Yes. > > And however it appears, is choiceless. > > Whatever reactions appear to be involved, appear choicelessly. > > To whom it appears, is awareness. > > Regardless of the imagined situation. > > The awareness is never actually situated. > > As many worlds as people, as many meanings as people, as many peoples as meanings. > > Person changes one moment to moment. > > No actual continuity. > > Image appearing/disappearing. > > Seeemingly reappearing. > > But not really. > > - D - what do you mean by " really " ? tell us swami what is and is not " real " .. really. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.