Guest guest Posted June 26, 2009 Report Share Posted June 26, 2009 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Aint this funny?!! All the time claiming nobady is, I am not, you are > > > > > > not...and then this sooooo interesting exchange. > > > > > > lol > > > > > > -egg- > > > > > > > > > > you are missing what i've been saying, apparently. > > > > > > > > He's hearing 'himself' speak. > > > > > > > > Not missing what you've been saying. Not hearing 'you' at all. > > > > > > > > One hears oneself. If there's resonation, oneself is heard through another. If not, nothing is 'heard'. > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > That's seen. > > > > > > The one posting, posts to the image of self maintained. > > > > > > Puts up that image through words. > > > > > > Interacts with and through that image. > > > > > > Unless it's not there, which is rare. > > > > P.S... I don't much care for the notion that " clarity is rare " ... it caters to the whole idea of " Great Enlightened Beings " , or just " he's got something I've don't " ... > > That's just it. > > That's the reason it's rare. > > People look for and to someone else who " has it. " I agree... that's the issue. One needs *someone* to be jealous of, or to worship and admire from afar... how the heck could one maintain a self, without an other? ;-). > Whatever " it " is: charisma, love, sex appeal, money, power, > status, wisdom, knowledge, eternal life > > There seems to be a deep assumption that " this here isn't complete > now, as is, undivided. " Well hey, how the heck else could one get nowhere, without having somewhere to get to? ;-). > There is an assumption of division, which means there is less here > and more there, apparently. Out there, where the other is who has > it. So I want to be near it, have more, etc. Hey, *every* " non-self " has to " make something of themselves " ;-). Areya kiddin'? > Whatever crusade one embarks on, the democracy of enlightenment, or > the myth of the master - it doesn't really matter -- the crusade > and its message will simply generate belief. Hey, if ya can't Be-truth, Be-LIE-f. > This simply is. > > Here. Naah... way too easy. How the heck could I get somewhere if there was nowhere to get to? ;-). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 26, 2009 Report Share Posted June 26, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > Naah... way too easy. How the heck could I get somewhere if there was nowhere to get to? ;-). Yes, it's way too easy as it is. It can't be worth much. Let's complicate it. I know, let's have a competition to see who will have the best label for it. Let's see who will conceptualize it the clearest, the most poetically, the deepest. Who really feels it? Let's see whose negations will be the best negations to really get rid of all the obscurations that aren't there. We can have a vote for who is really experiencing it as it is. This is great. There are so many ways to complicate this and make it really valuable. And then it will seem like someone is more there than someone else. And that one can sell tickets and stuff! This is great, now! Much better. Why didn't I think of this before? - D - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 26, 2009 Report Share Posted June 26, 2009 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > Naah... way too easy. How the heck could I get somewhere if there was nowhere to get to? ;-). > > Yes, it's way too easy as it is. > > It can't be worth much. > > Let's complicate it. > > I know, let's have a competition to see who will have the best label for it. > > Let's see who will conceptualize it the clearest, the most poetically, the deepest. > > Who really feels it? > > Let's see whose negations will be the best negations to really get rid of all the obscurations that aren't there. > > We can have a vote for who is really experiencing it as it is. > > This is great. > > There are so many ways to complicate this and make it really valuable. > > And then it will seem like someone is more there than someone else. > > And that one can sell tickets and stuff! > > This is great, now! Much better. > > Why didn't I think of this before? > > - D - Umm... because nothing ever happened? (hopeful glance) ;-). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 26, 2009 Report Share Posted June 26, 2009 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > Naah... way too easy. How the heck could I get somewhere if there was nowhere to get to? ;-). > > Yes, it's way too easy as it is. > > It can't be worth much. > > Let's complicate it. > > I know, let's have a competition to see who will have the best label for it. > > Let's see who will conceptualize it the clearest, the most poetically, the deepest. > > Who really feels it? > > Let's see whose negations will be the best negations to really get rid of all the obscurations that aren't there. > > We can have a vote for who is really experiencing it as it is. > > This is great. > > There are so many ways to complicate this and make it really valuable. > > And then it will seem like someone is more there than someone else. > > And that one can sell tickets and stuff! > > This is great, now! Much better. > > Why didn't I think of this before? > > - D - because you NEVER think. it's old and you didn't think of it. you merely plagiarized. we're used to it. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.